Case Study: Ahmaud Arbery committed no crime, but he WAS stalked by a gang, and then, murdered. Why?

Police get away with bad behavior because there is a huge gaping hole in due process: investigatory privileged tactics, methods, and investigative techniques, otherwise known as the law enforcement privilege.

It is in this huge gaping hole in the law where organized gangs of stalkers exist, because gang stalking IS high policing,also known as “political policing,” which is the defining term that decides if a nation is, or is not a “police state” by definition.

And what these gangs of stalkers do is mostly illegal, because most modern “law enforcement” is really law enfarcement-a complete mockery of civil rights and due process, utilized by those with power against those with no power.

It is the key feature of what I and others call “the Domestic Violence Industrial Compxle(DVIC), which depends upon the gray area of law, nepotistic connections, and hidden tactical assaults against other citizens, and an assault against due process rights, and the spirit of the law itself.

Investigative privilege is a gaping morass placed into a persons life, and flaunting its usurpation of that persons civil liberties, BY law enforcement and their gangs of associates.


The Law Enforcement Privilege, and High Policing in the case of Ahmaud Arbery

From the The Law Officer online: law enforcement privilege is not an absolute privilege. Rather, it is a qualified common law privilege, the purpose of which is to “prevent disclosure of law enforcement techniques and procedures, to preserve the confidentiality of sources, to protect witness and law enforcement personnel, to safeguard the privacy of individuals involved in an investigation, and otherwise to prevent interference with
an investigation.”

Even the Department of Homeland Security manual states as much, that they try to go as close to breaking the law without getting caught; and the US Air Forces Office of Special Investigations (AFOSI), alterately known as,“OSI Informers,”has stated this as well.

Georgia law spells out the crime of trespassing in various ways, with different categories and sub-categories of trespass. As Travis McMichael, his father, retired detective Gregory McMichael, and William Roddy formed an armed gang, and pursued the unarmed Ahmaud Arbery, certainly they were trying to concoct a legal basis for their (bad) behavior directed at Arbery.

As we see from the 911 calls, they were trying to frame Arbery as a burglar. But he obviously had nothing in his hands. No doubt, it crossed their (warped) minds that trespassing had occured, though like most cops and their kind, they are totally ignorant of the laws they claim to enforce.

And so, for those following the case of the statistically non-random, non-coincidental, targeted killing of Ahmaud Arbery, we try to put ourselves in the others shoes, and many questions arise.

Barnhill declared, “a local ‘rabble rouser’ has taken up this cause….

1-was it a random coincidence, where the good people just happened upon a guy getting a drink of water at a construction site? Well, no, it was nearly a one out of 17000 chance that Ahmaud Arbery would meet someone from his small town, who non-councidentally had worked for the local prodecutor, and tried to pin a rap on Arbery in the past.

2-Was Arbery burglarizing the neighborhood? We already know from the video that exists, and the clothes that he was wearing, that he was empty handed when he was murdered.

3- Was there a plague of burglaries in that nneighborhood, as Greg McMichael claimed? We know with certainty that there was not, and that the only theft in that area was reported by none other than Travis McMichael, who reported that one of his guns was stolen right out of his pickup truck.

4- Because so many targeted individuals have had run ins with dirty cops and local DAs, judges, and prosecutors who have tried to frame them in the past, was it possible that this was a local prosecutor with a “hate boner” for the handsome and talented young athlete? I cant answer that yet, but two local prosecutors have recused themselves, and one of those directly employed Greg McMichael, even after McMichael was insubordinate having refused to comply with mandatory use of force training for over ten years. So, this really is how bizarre and incestuous gang stalkers are, (quote courtesy of TheGriot):

“Judicial Circuit District Attorney George Barnhillrecused himself from the case due to a conflict of interest, in a letter sent to Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr.

He wrote that his son, a prosecutor in the Brunswick DA’s office, and McMichael, then an investigator in that same office, “both helped with the previous prosecution of (Ahmaud) Arbery.”

Barnhill claimed that he only became aware of this previous association “three or four weeks” earlier. He made no mention as to why he waited to come forward with this information but accused others of spreading lies about him and the McMichaels.

Barnhill declared, “a local ‘rabble rouser’ has taken up this cause and begun publishing wild and factually incorrect and legally wrong accusations on Facebook and other social media formats calling for marches and physical affronts be made against the McMichaels at their homes, and my son’s home in Brunswick, etc.”

5- Was the third man, William Bryan, the guy who filmed the homicide, just an innocent neighbor, there for safetyof his neighbors? Well, we do know that he blocked Arberys ability to escape his tormenters, aka his “gang of stalkers”. And, in the video he took, we can hear him cock his weapon as he all but ensured Arberys death.

Lots of questions….putting myself in the others shoes.

So what could Arbery possibly have done to break any law? What bogus charge could this lical gang try to pin on Arbery this time?

Well, in a stretch of law and imagination, a gang stalker could possibly say that Arbery was trespassing the night he was stalked and then murdered by Travis McMichael, his retired cop father Greg McMichael, and their other accomplices. That seems like the inly charge left to frame a guy with.

But the answer is no, Ahmaud Arbery committed no crime, including trespassing according to Georgia law. And thats exactly the problem that gang stalkers encounter in nearly every case, as they stalk, and harass, attempt to entrap and intimidate their victims in hidden, covert ways, far outside of due process of law, and exactly as we see in this case organized gang stalking. OGS works exactly as we see in this case.

Here, from Bixon Law, we see that nothing Ahmaud did comes even close to the legal definition of trespassing. We see in Georgias law many nuanced categories of trespass, all of them stipulating that motive, and intent are singularly important elements of the crime of trespass.

For example, a defense lawyer “must determine whether the elements of the crime of trespassing are present in a particular case. Was there specific intent to cause damage to property? Was there proper notice prohibiting entry into the premise? Was there consent from the lawful possessor/owner? Was there actual interference with the use of the property? Was the entry justified under the given circumstances? Was the damage caused a result of public or private necessity rather than malicious intentions?”

So, while police and their gangs of “investigative privileged” stalkers flaunt their ignorance of the law as they try to frame a case and pin a rap on some poor soul, defense attorneys “must determine whether the elements of the crime of trespassing are present in a particular case.

In the most strict reading og Georgias law, Arbery committed no crime. But gang stalkers dont care about that, because their intentis to frame the narrative as if the targeted individual did something that they can then twist into a legal noose with which to hang their target.

Here are the nearest legal analysis that they could have used to do that:

B. A person commits the offense of criminal trespass when he or she knowingly and maliciously interferes with the possession or use of the property of another person without consent of that person.

And:

C. A person commits the offense of criminal trespass when he or she knowingly and without authority enters upon the land or premises of another person or into any part of any vehicle, railroad car, aircraft, or watercraft of another person for an unlawful purpose.

So, clearly, and according to all known evidence, Arbery did none of that, because no one can assume his intent. Except an armed gang of stalkers, that is.

Online “personas ” and what to do about them: gang stalking by AI assisted robots and targeted individuals online

Online “personas ” and what to do about them: gang stalking by AI assisted robots and targeted individuals online: a gang stalking conundrum.

Gang stalking is automated, but also, assisted by living breathing humans, who are sometimes paid players, and other times, mere useless idiots who play along with the Mockingbird Effect.

Here, have a look at how I was cyberstalked on Mike Masnicks (fabulous ) blog, Techdirt.com:

The gang stalking started around 2013, when I tried to raise awareness of organized gang stalking. Out of necessity for dealing with a troll farm friendly commenting sytem at Techdirt, I used different “personas” to manage a conversation, but without any software, or automated programs to assist me:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20131210/07555625519/lawsuit-claims-accidental-google-search-led-to-years-government-investigation-harrassment.shtml

I responded to a comment from a guy name George Boneyard, which I referenced here.

I was defending/empathizing with a guy named Jeffrey Kantor who had been targeted by a Google based algorithym, and that had served him bullshit results, and possibly, those results spoonfed to him after some online gang stalking by Fusion Center operatives and military contractors/AI programs that manipulated his search results.

Back in those days, AI gang stalking was new to the “normies ” whereas I first experienced online “redirection” after I reported on the first Somali manufactured terrorist in the City College News, Mohammed Warsame, who was an FBI snitch.

Redirection is where people search Google, or other search engines for materials and get different results, depending upon who is targeting the searcher based upon an IP address, as we see in the case of ADL online cyberstalking here.

So, the Jewish, parochial journalist (Mike Masnick, of Techdirt.com, for example ) who searches for information about “why do Somalis get…. ” blankety blank, will get Google results for:

https://www.somalispot.com/threads/why-do-innocent-people-get-punished.76125/

https://www.somalinet.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=357328

And other such discussions, whereas myself, I got results sponsored by shitbags like the Anti Defamation League, and bbbb,,b other shit-persons. I also got Nazi logo laden websites (courtesy of the Bronfman klan and local Fusion Centers, working with Infragard shitbags like that colleges president) every time I searched forresults like, “human rights in Palestine” and so on.

And, besides the ibvious terroris recruitment pop -ups, and as in Arabuc tat I couldnt read, when I searched for information on Somalis, I got stuff like this instead :


Why do Somalis smell bad
?

And, occassionally, stuff like this:

https://www.mnopedia.org/somali-and-somali-american-experiences-minnesota

But always, reverting to this:

Etc.

If you guessed that not all searches online are equal, you would be correct. Because our filtered internet serves some of us, different results than others of us.

Now, take a look at how I predicted that:

1 the Redirect Method will be used by the Anti Defamation League to bully, target, and harass individuals

2 the Anti Defamation League (and Mike Masnicks in -house trolls ) bully commenters online.

Its a ROGS BINGO.

So, now when I go online, I practice persona management, and I recommend it to anyone who is being targeted in the Panopticon.

Read this article about how defense contractors use persona management to target us,

https://m.dailykos.com/stories/2011/02/16/945768/-UPDATED-The-HB-Gary-Email-That-Should-Concern-Us-All

and keep in mid tat its not just “the gubmint ” targeting you, but tese das, it could be racist groups like the Anti Defamation League and its octopus of NGOs, or even te Klan, and any of the militant feminist groups who work behind Sexual Violence Centers (also note the para-language involved in nearly all DVIC industries )

I will provide more context at a later date, with evidence.

Gang stalking and news services, reporters, and journalists.

You can scour the web and find endless fake stories about gang staking, and useless amounts of total DVIC/MIC/PIC pap smeared everywhere, with the net effect of wasting sh!tloads of time.
Or, you can read ROGS, where I point you in the right directions, and hope that the world will be a better place once we can hunt down and sue, or lock up a few of these total cunts (have you ever noticed how SJW/AIPAC/military trolls, fake feminists and the big bullies who protect these scum HATE that word? And, most are are just control freaks, gender lesbians, or psychopaths? And, frequently, they can’t keep a man around too long-and if they do, the guy is a real piece of work, usually fresh out of his mothers basement.
Related Story: Where did the core theosophy of Social Justice Warriors come from-and who uses it the most? Ask the crybullies!
So-here is one of my favorite links to news persons and others who gang stalk-and it cannot be missed that Vester Lee Flanagan, a gay man, went ballistic when ‘certain elements’ of the news business waged a whisper campaign against him; or that the curious case of the stalking of news personalities BY LAW ENFORCEMENT in a heavily AIPAC state was, like a thing in the run-up to the 2012 election cycle-or that award winning journalist from Newsweek, Robert Parry noted in 1993 that CIA “disruption” tactics were being used in the US against activists and journalists.
The fingerprints of crisis PR factories, military grade “narrative control” and the DVIC are ALL OVER the place in cases where alternative narratives challenge the DVIC/MIC, from the earliest days of mass shooter events and the creatin fo patsies in state crime.
The most famous of these is undoubtedly Lee Harvey Oswald who was partially vindicated by the most recent, but still incomplete Kennedy papers release. Oswald notoriously appeared on radio and television many times BEFORE he was framed as the lone gunman, as covered in many sources, including the PBS Frontline documentary “WHo Was Lee Harvey Oswald?”

Related Story: Vester Flanagan/aka Bryce William’s mother tried to kill his father, and threatened to kill him and her other children, and was likely a dangerous sociopath-a product of the DVIC’s encouragement and incentivization of  women who abuse children. Many mass shooters are the products of narcissistic female sociopaths, as we saw with Christopher Dorner, and the Columbine shooter, Adam Lanza, and many others.

So, in keeping with my theme of “controlled media,” and “whisper campaigns,” and attacks on journalists here below in parentheses is a snippet from a web forum where we see an alleged Infragard member named ( I will incentivize any whistle blower for names of these people who ‘work in darkness’ to add to my list), and someone describing workplace harassment.
Now-in the case below, from a gang stalker blog online, we see several elements of my many thesis (and I will leave it to the reader to infer ‘what kind of people are gang stalkers’). Especially note that it is a journalism related workplace mobbing.
And, like many of these cases, the woman implicated as a stalker has several alias’ in real life-the state where this person s named breeds a certain sociopathy much as shepherds breed their sheep (there’s a joke in there about DVIC guidance systems)
And- I will also note that there are political implications, and that as I have said- gang stalking goes both ways. The named party is a Republican, but the alleged victim who planted this smear could easily be doing just that-planting a smear, so there may be nor real ‘actual victim’, but just a planted smear.
I have obscured part of the name, and highlighted the relevant materials:

I was set up quite elaborately at a workplace to apply for a job at what was characterized to me as a family oriented workplace that was highly rated.
I found out the first day that they had gone through at least seven people trying to fill the position. And every single one of these people were deemed “crazy.”
Many of these people were at this job one or just a few days. They must have been much more in touch with what they were seeing and feeling than I was. But I did have this feeling of fear and foreboding.
One of the “women” in my unit I was told was with Infraguard. She tried goading me into one fight after another. When the O.J. verdict came down we were at work and I was talking to another woman and the spy just made a beeline for me and wanted my opinion. I didn’t bite, but it became clear she was out to get me one way or another.
After awhile, nothing was working so she got most of the other people involved in “pushing my buttons.” I was crying every day due to the personal nature of the goading.
I overheard my manager say “I didn’t say she was a threat, I said ‘what if we said she was a threat’?”
That’s when I gathered a minimum amount of belongings and got out of there.
I actually heard, as if it were the voice of God or something…”Get out of there, they are trying to KILL YOU!”
I left and never went back. They have since merged with a major news service.
The funny thing is that I was also told that this Infraguard’s job was to know everything there was to know about everybody on our floor.
And when I moved into my new neighborhood I was cued in that this woman from Jamaica was “in charge of everything in the complex.”
I had no idea we lived in a controlled society. I bought all the propaganda hook, line and sinker. It has been quite a shock!
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Anonymous Anonymous said…
The Infraguard’s name for the above story was Tammy Hinxst and she lives in South Saint Paul, Minnesota. A truly slimy character!
Thursday, April 19, 2012

So, as we see time and again, it is ok to hate or defile, or otherwise denigrate Republican women, with the most vile slanders and anonymous lies. And, it is OK to stalk them online, and more. This, to me, indicates who it is that are likely gang stalkers, and just like we see with who it is that is trying to silence people online, and otherwise control dialectical space, we can infer trends, and emergent norms in action.
Then, notice that “I get mail” and one letter I recently received here at my semi-anonymous blog bears interesting indicators of how the internet really works-and how extensive these long term conspiracies are, as the writer made sure they noted that they are from an area with “twin cities.” I mention this, for he record.