REWARD OFFERED: Showing cracks~Do mestic Violence Industrial Comlpex profiteers exploiting Fusion Centers and targeting individuals??

ROGS-the blog you are reading now-is offering a 1300$ reward, USD, for information and documentation that political DVIC enterprises like Pennsylvania VOICe, or womens “advocates”, psychologists, social workers, rape crisis centers, and other NGOs are storing, and sharing information about men who have been accused, but never convicted of crimes, and then, targeting these men with “hit lists”

Related Stories: the origins of pseudo-feminist gang stalking in militant lesbian culture, and women who advocate for non-trial based outcomes, backed by vigilanteism. And, a man who claimed he was stalked by women, crashes his auto into a newsroom.

And, we see in the case of Andy Ostrowski, who fits the profile of a “targeted individual” by every single metric of “what is organized gang stalking, and who are targeted individuals,” right down to threats of homelessness, incarceration, institutionaluzatiin and more, these cases are actually first amendment, and due bprocess of law cases where the state, and DVIC institutions insert themselves into every facet of a persons life, in a “full spectrum” assault”, rendering victims powerless, and like Eric Garner, or Jamal Khashoggis last words, “I cant breath,”these targeted individuals-and now, Ostrowski-are extra-judicially rendered dead AND alive.
FURTHER: I offer a $5000$ reward for any complete database from any of the many DVIC institutions, NGOs,womens centers, etc. that is used in targeting these men(an extremely few women are actual TIs, and most online gibberish written by women claiming to be TIs is actually part of the misinformation aspect of OGS), which includes the names, and other personally identifying information of men who are targeted by any of the many “empowering women” NGOs and institutions that are working with law enforcement, DVIC institutions, and “community policing,”aka “domestic spying,”and stalking in America.
How you get that database is not my concern, and I advise any and all to follow the law, as closely as Fusion Centers-to-PA VOICe-to-the- NSA-to-Israel-to-squad car outside Andy Ostrowskis yard did.
Then, I am offering a $1000 reward about information that one Karen Berg, of VOICe PA, is on record targeting men.
In her case, I seek personal-institution derived notes,Jo from her desktop, email logs, emails, or other verifiable data wherein she is on record targeting men like we see described in the story below, using and abusing her position in that organization, and her connections in family courts, and other pseudo-constitutional bodies, and, connections in law enforcement to wage personalized, individualized terror campaigns targeting men, and their children.
All, and any who wish to seek these rewards must use anonymous accounts, and post their data publicly to Pastebin, or other anonymized online media, in order to be eligible for the reward. I will not be liable if you fail to protect your anonymity in any way.
The rewards will be paid once the information is verified and the person who submits it is vetted for accuracy, and I will instruct the submitter further at that point.
This reward is also valid for any other substantial submission derived from womens NGOs that fits the above criterion.

Related Stories: Are Asian-Americans(Americas new “white ”) like Edward “” Hu of San Francisco, and Frank Tomota, and “Princess Megumi,” a former Los Angeles county coroner, who has direct access to LEIUs, and the internet backbone, of the Masonic capital of America, Arcadia, CA, tied to gang stalking? I now ask the poor, obviously -overloaded -with -manufactured-terrorism FBI to make that connection, and investigate, and /or prosecute them for abusing /misusing Fusion Center data, comon everyday NSA -DVIC wiretaps, and gang stalking people.
Then, have a look at Temple. City, CA, where we can see how SWAT teams exchange love notes with Taiwan -affiliated intel agents…..

Also, have a look at how the FBI operates in Asia (with their pants below their knees ), as I personally engage Red Army commanders, and name names, for “liberties sake,” and work for “democracy,”which has been foresaken in America, which is over -run by religious -sectarian nut jobs in the FBI /DHS, Et agency ass.
As we see in case after case after case of mass shooters, car crashers, incel guys with butter knives and car crashers, DVIC “high policing,” is the single biggest link that precedes these events, as many men are stalked and slandered sometimes for decades BY womens groups, and others in the FBI-CVE/DHS/ NGO-Fusion Center schema targets and harasses many until they go ballistic.
Here below is an extremely short list of “designer shooters,” created by hidden-occulted policing methods, all of whom encountered neocon gray area smear campaigns, DVIC slanderers, and hidden internet provocateurs, Fusion Center computer redirection and hacking, and more, as they were gang stalked, slandered and harrassed by the full spectrum monitoring, targeting, and stalking that takes place under the federally incentivized DVIC, and as recommended by Nikki Craft, a late 1980s feminist who was the first to advocate for organized gang stalking.
So,you, reader, have now met the gang stalkers of the Kommunity Kulture Klubs of America, that have replaced lynchings with gang stalkings that sometimes end in mass homucides and suicides; and their many gang stalkings that got out of control, causing deaths, homicides, and suicides as folliws below (not a complete list by any means):
Matt Riehl, an Asian American free speech advocate who was gang stalked and murdered because he practiced the first amendment, and caught gang stalking cops in illegal activity.
Seung-Hui Cho, the Virginia Tech
shooter, whose story, and the connection to campus mobbing was revealed by Dr. Kenneth Westhues, of the University of Waterloo ; a disabled student who was slandered, harassed, stalked, and mobbed by poet laureate Nikki Giovanni, an Eastern Star mason, and her mobs of crybullies, and complicit campus cops.
Ian Long, aka the Thousand Oaks shooter, and a US veteran who was gang stalked in California
The Hot Yoga shooter, Scott Bierele, who very likely researched, and discoveredn oe of his slanderers, who he then murdered. Note the ties to organized religions in these cases-this and the Thousand Oaks shooting both have ties to Lutherans, and also, yoga studios and practicing Freemasons (read my story about the son of a UN intelligence station chief in Africa, popping up behind me on Venice Beach, in California. Then, ask yourself “how bizarre is organized gang stalking?”)
The case of Cesar Sayoc, which is so bizarre, it looks like a cartoonish CIA plot, complete with cartoon bombs marked ACME.
And, poor Andy Ostrowski, of course. Hey, Andy, I offer you pro bono advice from a laypersons perspective, if you need it in your case.
Yeah-OGS is bizarre-and tied DISTINCTLY, with empirical evidence to crybullies, and womens institutionalized violence.
in the meantime, as you research all of that, take a break, and read Happyvalley citizen, who brought the Pennsylvania VOICe hit lists to light, and blinded a few cockroaches, like that cunt Karen Berg, who targets men with para-judicial violence, and tries to kidnap their kids:
Painting a target on Karen Berg, Pennsylvania VOICe, et al

A former employee of VOICe contacted Butler News regarding her termination, she says she first contacted the Butler Eagle, and that the Butler Eagle told her they are “ad partners” with VOICe, and could not run this story. In turn, this person then emailed Butler News.
At first to say the least I was a bit worried about tackling this story, a person I have had personal battles with reached out to me about corruption, as much as I dislike this person, (whom I have decided not to name) I have decided when the public donates to VOICe, the public should know the truth.
This person was a woman that worked for VOICe for years, one drunken night her husband assaulted her, the husband was charged with domestic violence. The husband was released O.R.
At the time the woman told her boss by the name of Linda what happened, Linda informed her that her position has been terminated, because they need strong women working there, and that this woman who was assaulted deserved it, and that she gave VOICe a bad name by being assaulted.
This woman tells Butler News she was shocked, did not know how she would support her family, begged and was tossed to the streets fired as her husband got drunk and assaulted her. She told Butler News that she followed all legal steps, called the police, had him arrested, and planned to file her own PFA as well as file for divorce, yet Linda said she must have deserved to be assaulted by her husband.
The woman who was fired contacted multiple attorneys, all told her the same that Pa is a “right to work” State. The person whom was fired was able to find a job rather fast, a better job at that.
She tells Butler News about some of the inner workings of VOICe, telling Butler News employees are instructed to “help the biggest losers so we look good” “help the people that can not help themselves so they look good”
To get even more disturbing on a personal level, this former employee of VOICe tells me that VOICe attorneys once called a meeting to figure out how to “incarcerate the owner of Butler News at all costs” Karen Berg telling members of the meeting that it would “make her career to put the Butler News guy behind bars”
The former employee of VOICe was instructed to only take cases when they make the media, and was told to do the very least possible when it was not a public case. Saying “media attention beings donations”
This former VOICe attorney was told to only take custody cases that made media attention, this way the media attention would bring in donations, when she asked Linda how she should choose the cases, she was told “see how much attention the Butler Eagle is giving them”
More troubling accusations come out, a meeting took place at VOICe between all attorneys, this meeting concerned Family Pathways and child custody, Linda who is the former executive told all staff members too “send everyone you can to supervised visits at Family Pathways” Linda tells the employees that this would make VOICe seem to want to protect more children by doing this, but the fact is there are allegations of Family Pathways paying VOICe via third party donations if they sent more children to Family Pathways.
The former VOICe employee says that at times she was given gift cards when she would send a father or mother to Family Pathways when it was not needed. The gift cards were to places like Walmart and were from “donors” sent in via mail.
She goes on to tell Butler News VOICe has a “hit list” a list of men that VOICe will pull favors for or do anything to incarcerate, or take their children off of them, even going on to say that at one point the owner of Butler News was placed number one on the hit list by attorney Karen Berg, including posting a mugshot of Castilyn on the door of the VOICe off with the wording “dangerous offender” written on the mugshot. Berg went on to tell employees that “maybe I can say this guy attacked me and shoot him in the head and do the world a favor” Berg went on on time to belittle a child, saying the child looks as “disgusting and retarded as his father”

Read through ROGS to note that I indict some of the same suspects that Sharyll Atkisson's lawsuit did: Hillary Clinton, Al Franken, lawsuit, Department of Justice Department of Justice, FISA, Fisc, Obstruction of due process, America's Political Police

Could federal watchdog tamper with Trump wiretap evidence? It may not be a first- The Hill

Could federal watchdog tamper with Trump wiretap evidence? It may not be a first
© Greg Nash

Everyone hopes the Department of Justice’s inspector general (IG) will fairly investigate surveillance activities conducted on U.S. citizens by the FBI and intel agencies. Just like we hope the IG’s office will reach fair conclusions in its probes of alleged FBI misconduct concerning the Hillary Clinton investigation, leaks to the media and conflicts of interest.

But, for me, there’s reason to be wary.

I turned to the IG’s office in 2013 after independent forensics proved my computers had been infiltrated by remote intruders using software proprietary to a federal intel agency. Instead of fair findings, I got a lot of mischief and stonewalling.

And wait until you hear what I recently learned.

By way of background, in 2013, I filed a complaint with the IG’s office asking it to investigate the government-based computer surveillance. CBS News — where I worked at the time — would not allow the IG to examine my CBS laptop, which had been infiltrated (as CBS publicly announced on Aug. 7, 2013). But I asked the IG to examine one of my personal home computers that was also compromised.

Some of my intel sources didn’t want me to hand over any computer. “You can’t trust the inspector general,” they told me.

But I figured there was little downside. We already had our irrefutable forensics findings from our examinations. If the IG probe was competent and honest, as I expected it might be, then it could turn up names of the government actors responsible. If not, no harm done.

I don’t blame the IG computer investigators for what ultimately went wrong. They got briefed up on Apple forensics for their inspection of my computer, visited my house on numerous occasions, communicated freely, shared findings along the way and seemed to earnestly do a thorough job.

But as the investigation neared a conclusion, things changed.

On their last visit to my house, they wanted to be sure to segregate the malicious activity they identified from any work I might have done on the computer. They told me someone operated the computer in advanced mode, something I don’t know how to do. They found that — like the CBS laptop — the intruders had repeatedly altered the computer’s internal system times and dates. And they discovered that — like the CBS laptop — key files had been destroyed. (We already knew these things and more from our own exams.) We went through pages of their notes together. I asked for copies.

“You can get those later,” the lead investigator assured me. “When the investigation is finished.”

If there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that you can’t count on getting something from the government tomorrow. I made contemporaneous notes of the visit and findings.

The weirdest part of the visit was that, for the first time, the IG investigators began insisting the intruders weren’t working remotely but were in my house, sitting at my computer, doing these things. They had dates and times. I told them that was impossible; nobody was sitting at my computer upstairs in my home for hours while my husband was home on those days, at those times. Besides, we already knew from our own forensics that the intruders had operated remotely. My forensics team said the IG experts were not fully competent on their Apple work and, for some reason, seemed to be misreading the remote intrusions as local intrusions. Still, if nothing else, the IG work provided additional confirmation of some of our more basic forensics. No harm done.

Not long after that, my communications with the IG’s office changed. They notified me that their investigation had been “narrowed,” from looking into an illegal intrusion to determining only if there had been a remote intrusion. Nobody would explain to me who narrowed the scope of the probe or why. You’d think they’d be interested in any intrusion, remote or otherwise. Why the distinction?

In the next few weeks, when I learned the IG had finished its investigation into my Apple computer, I asked for my copy of the report. The investigators told me they’d been ordered to send it to the office of IG general counsel Bill Blier for approval.

Over the coming weeks, I repeatedly asked for the findings but was told it was still in the IG general counsel’s office. I formally requested that the general counsel release a copy to me. No luck.

One investigator had told me I could always file a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain my report and notes. I did so; under the law, a response was due within about 30 days. It’s been years.

When the DOJ’s inspector general won’t follow the law, to where can a citizen turn?

Meantime, under pressure from Congress, the IG eventually released what my attorney refers to as a “wiped” summary — not the actual report or notes — with spin that implied there had been no intrusion. This was quickly presented, publicly, by then-Sen. Al Franken (D-Minn.), who had gotten a copy of the summary with lightning speed; and it was dutifully reported by some in an unquestioning press.

The IG’s obfuscation and stonewalling doesn’t adversely impact my lawsuit against the federal government for the computer intrusions. The case is progressing through court with evidence from multiple forensics exams.

As our lawsuit continues, so do our forensics. New computer investigative tools have become available, and grains of evidence have been solidified into forensic mountains. Our evidence involves multiple computers and government I.P. addresses discovered improperly residing in them.

That brings us to the news.

Not long ago, my forensics team asked if I used that Apple computer after the IG returned it. My team was conducting a new exam. “No,” I replied, “it hasn’t functioned since before I gave it to the IG. I just stored it when they returned it. Why?”

“Because — that’s not your hard drive inside the computer they gave back to you,” they told me. “… We know the serial number on the hard drive when you bought it. We recorded the same serial number on our earlier forensics exams. This is a different hard drive. Completely different serial number. Not even close.”

I would never have known if we hadn’t gone back in that computer for additional forensics.

In addition to somebody changing the scope of the IG investigation midstream, and the office withholding from me the notes and the report on my own complaint, somebody also switched out my hard drive before the IG returned it to me.

What does all this mean to the integrity of the DOJ’s inspector general?

You decide.

Sharyl Attkisson is an Emmy Award-winning investigative journalist, author of The New York Times bestsellers “The Smear” and “Stonewalled,” and host of Sinclair’s Sunday TV program “Full Measure.” Follow her on Twitter @SharylAttkisson.

Sharyl Attkisson: please ask Marcy Wheeler about the Tor Exception, and then "what is a "targeted individual."

More and more, we see reporters are targets of the “Fourteen Eyed Monster,” aka the NSA warrantless hacking, redirection, and targeting scheme.And, keep the CIA plausible deniability that I write aout all over ROGS here in mind as you read this case study of computer hacking, redirection, an monitoring of a targeted individual, CBS news reporter Sharyl Attkisson, and American citizen.
And-remember: one of the main threats of “gang stalkers” is that they will force a “target” to go broke suing them.

forensic work of my computer laptop system has revealed a second government Internet Protocol (IP) address used in the illegal cyber-attacks on my computer laptop system

While forensically, we must look at “organized gang stalking” as “counter-intelligence stalking,” which is what it is properly called in the intelligence agency, law enforcement and military circles where it originated, we also must look at the complaints of “targeted individuals much the way that Marcy Wheeler, aka emptywheel.com and others are starting to see the term: as something more than ‘ordinary complaints.
Because what these claims are is EXTRAORDINARY complaints-once we weed out the counter-intelligence psychobabble, disinformation, misinformation, and the massive fraud that most of the spy-state is.
And, we can begin to perform a biopsy on many cases that otherwise defied explanation up until recently, such as the “kill book” that some BLM agents brag about, as they literally stalk people to suicide, using hidden methods and tactics of counter-intelligence that never see the inside of a court room.
Or former New Yarwk Times reporter James Risen’s case of being stalked for 12 years because he did what journalists are supposed to do in a healthy democracy-he protected his source Jeffrey Sterling, who was railroaded by the CIA;for allegedly revealing a cartoonish CIA plot.

Related: Why Every Reporter Must Understand the Sharyl Attkisson Lawsuit

Or the well known cases of “frame jobs” such as how the Beatrice Six were literally bullied into Stockholme Syndrome and framed for a crime they didn’t commit. But like I say quite frequently-in a word where counter-intelligence stalking is designed to “slice the enemies throats with Occam’s Razor,” well, get out the ROGS BINGO card for the case of Sharyl Atkisson too, because many-if not all OGS is political stalking that began in the “building the haystack era of political policing via database abuse.
And-take note of the similarities across ALL of these cases, because “hacking the computers of TI’s” is one of the most common threats in the dialectic online.

Related Story: How 5-9-or-14 nations are spying on you at any given time, aka the UKUSA (rhymes with Yakuza). Or, “what is a state sponsored shell game, 101.”

shell game
ˈSHel ˌɡām/
noun

NORTH AMERICAN
  1. a game involving sleight of hand, in which three inverted cups or nutshells are moved about, and contestants must spot which is the one with a pea or other object underneath.
    • a deceptive and evasive action or ploy, especially a political one.
      plural noun: shell games
      “officials played a shell game by loading prisoners onto buses during population counts at the jail”

      or “What is NSA-14 Other Nations Spying” for the win.

     
    From SharylAttkisson.com:
    It “is not a mistake; it is not a random event; and it is not technically possible for these IP addresses to simply appear on her computer systems without activity by someone using them as part of the cyber-attack.” –David Scantling, cyber-security expert.
     

    I’m frequently asked about the status of my lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice over the secret, unlawful intrusions into my computers, exposed in 2013. As my federal case moves slowly through court system, there is a new development: ongoing forensic work of my computer laptop system has revealed a second government Internet Protocol (IP) address used in the illegal cyber-attacks on my computer laptop system.
    The IP addresses don’t belong there.
    In a new affidavit filed in federal court last week, cyber-security expert David Scantling states, “[T]he presence of these USPS addresses on [Attkisson’s] computer is not a mistake; it is not a random event; and it is not technically possible for these IP addresses to simply appear on her computer systems without activity by someone using them as part of the cyber-attack.”
    Scantling served as a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and as a Department of Defense (DoD) civilian employee. He’s familiar with “Advanced Persistent Threat” (“APT”) cyber-attacks. In fact, he developed and deployed similar APT cyber-attacks against foreign government, commercial, insurgent and terrorist targets. He also developed and deployed cyber-security countermeasures in the private sector to defend against such attacks.

    Interestingly, both government IP addresses found embedded deep in my computer system trace to the U.S. Postal Service (U.S.P.S.), which has been known to cooperate with intelligence agencies on various levels. The U.S.P.S. refused to cooperate with me, prior to my lawsuit, after my forensics expert recovered evidence of an IP address mysteriously residing in my computer. At the time, an agency official dismissed the forensics evidence as some sort of unexplainable mistake, and refused to help us learn how its IP addresses are maintained and accessed so we could identify the perpetrators.
    Tracing the evidence of the government-related intrusion to individual participants hasn’t been easy. The attackers attempted to erase their tracks once they were discovered. And neither the U.S.P.S. nor the Department of Justice (DOJ) are voluntarily cooperating. But experts familiar with the tools and tradecraft that are proprietary to government intelligence agencies have painstakingly recovered and pieced together compelling forensic proof as to attribution.
    “There can be no reasonable question that an [Advanced Persistent Threat]-style cyber-attack was carried on Attkisson’s computer systems and Internet connection,” stated Scantling in an affidavit filed last week. “Specifically, the APT methods deployed against [Attkisson’s] computers and Internet connection…were sophisticated and of the type only available to government-type activities and operations.”
    This latest information builds upon earlier forensic examinations already conducted by: a confidential government-linked source, an independent forensics specialist hired by CBS, and a forensics expert consulting on my lawsuit.

    The Counter-Narratives

    The facts at hand are at odds with widespread attempts to establish public counter-narratives, resulting in reckless reporting in the past that wrongly implied the Department of Justice Inspector General (IG) had rejected any notion of an intrusion into my computer(s). In fact, the IG never even reviewed the primary computer in question—a CBS laptop—because CBS News would not permit it. I had asked the IG to examine my personal computer, in which two independent forensics examiners had also identified evidence of intrusions. The IG investigators found and described to me significant suspicious anomalies in that system much like the CBS laptop, unearthing similar efforts by someone to erase data and evidence. However, when the IG computer experts finished their review, the findings went to higher ups and the resulting report was inexplicably withheld from me in its entirety.
    I was shut out.
    Many months later, under pressure from Congress, the IG eventually released a very different-sounding summary of its forensics report to the press. It recast or excluded much of what the investigators had told me they’d found. I attempted to obtain the full report and original notes, some of which I reviewed while the investigation was underway, describing the suspicious activity found on my personal computer. However, the IG has stonewalled my Freedom of Information (FOI) requests for these documents for several years. If the Department of Justice won’t comply with FOI law, then what recourse does a citizen have?
    Meantime, instead of helping us get at the facts, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has attempted to block the federal lawsuit at every turn. For example, their lawyers improperly ignored our first notice asking that the appropriate U.S. Postal Service employee(s) appear to give testimony for discovery. The DOJ lawyers didn’t even go through the appropriate legal processes to oppose discovery; they literally ignored the motion entirely. If the nation’s top law enforcement body doesn’t follow the rule of law, what recourse does a citizen have?
    If the Department of Justice wishes to establish that it had nothing to do with the forensically verified intrusions into my computers, it should help us get to the bottom of who did — instead of obstructing the effort. Above all, in the interest of justice, the Justice Department should want to identify who would have spied on a national journalist reporting on a number of international news stories impacting political officials. To me, there are few more chilling scenarios from the standpoint of constitutional press freedoms and protections in our society.
    Deep gratitude to the honest patriots who have been sources for my case because they believe the government attack on a member of the free press is so egregious. (As the case progresses, it’s better to be on the side of the law than exposed as someone who knew but kept silent. Government whistleblowers will receive legal protection.)
    Contact for Whistleblowers, and for more information: Attorney Tab Turner  501-791-2277
    Announcement of lawsuit
    Recent pleading in case denying DOJ motion to dismiss the lawsuit

    Sharyl Attkisson is a five-time Emmy award winning investigative correspondent and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting. She hosts the Sinclair weekly Sunday TV program: Full Measure, and is author of two New York Times bestsellers, including the new book: “The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think and How You Vote.”

     

    Share
    • 11
    • 11
      Shares

Forensic photography and actual gangs: the difference between gang stalkers and actual gang members

UPDATE: Since I chronicled the story below, the web has been scrubbed of the story mentioned herein, shortly thereafter.
That story was about how Canadian intelligence agencies selectively utilize internet and MSM, to create cross-talk (feedback loops ) to speak with mainland Chinese police investigators, while pursuing a suspect, and a gang of suspects.

There is no difference between actual gang stalkers and actual gang members. Zero- Cero. Zip. Zilch. Nada-except for the federal/state paycheck. And the “high policing” basis of criminal morality, of course.
Oh-that, and the fact that official corruption is better financed, far more brutal, operates with total impunity, and it’s illegality and mercenary scope far better hidden from the courts (as we see with the Section 702 and the FISA charade/masquerade ball), because it is easy to pick easy targets and then, drag them before a judge, and say “look! We got a badguy!” because this serves the social purpose of “security theater,” or, what has been referred to in the gang stalking dialectic as “street theater,” finalized by the three well known and often repeated phrases: gang stalking “ends in institutionalization, incarceration, or suicide.”

Related Google Fun: “Bush phone and gang stalking” returns  514,000 results “Obama phone and gang stalking” returns 641,000 results. “Trump phone and gang stalking” returns  750,000 results. Is organized gang stalking just a phenomenon, or is it the emergence of a social contagion? Emergent norm theory predicts that gang stalking is becoming a new normal-and that’s not good for democracy.

The Alcoholics Anonymous  variant is ” incarceration, institutionalization, or death,” and in the online dialogues of gang stalking, we can also find links between it and M. Scott Peck, a Catholic psychologist,and a debunked ponerologist. So, these strange and limited outcomes  of organized gang stalking ALSO and  without irony, derive from the Cult of Bill W., and AA’s across America.In a tenuous way, this links OGS directly to the FBI, and the curious rise of gang stalking complaints.
It cannot be missed that this is a direct dialectical link to specifically James Comey’s FBI, which ran from 2005 until his firing in 2017 because he had turned the agency into a political police that J.Edgar would only drem of, because they didnt have internet drag queen porn durng Hoover’s reign, which would have kept him very busy-possibly TOO BUSY to wage war on American’s.
And, this AA phrase is also linked directly to Mr. Comey’s chosen buddha, Reinhold Niehbur, who is said to have written the serenity prayer(although a few spurious crickets  in the head of Bill W.’s Protestant/Catholic universe dispute the origins-remember; ALL WORDS and SYMBOLS ARE SECTARIAN, and  POLITICAL in “WESTERN” JEWISH-cHRISTIANITY)
Sure- real gangs sometimes use cell phones and computers to stalk, harass, and harm people. But keep in mind that all of THOSE phones are monitored by any of 17 agencies here in the US and hundreds of others in the FiveEyes scheme AS CRIME HAPPENS. Then, the “goodguys” sweep in and grab all the cash from the “badguys”, after pre-emptivey pre-targeting real estate after pre-assessing and pre-apraising and predictively pre-empting crimes that could/might/would/will happen in or on or around a house, aka “real estate;”and that just after they have manipulated a rental property via a Fusion Center, or manipulated a landlord from long distance-Virginia to Minnesota for instance-and filled the property with drug dealers and sex offenders (Google “real estate” and “gang stalking,” or “John Lang Fresno” and “sex offender”).
Tell ya what: if John Forbes Nash didn’t sound nuts BEFORE he met those guys, he sure did AFTER he met those guys. I mean- no gang has anything on this new federal-state-local scheme. The goodguys lost and this is all that’s left of the shredded democracy we all once trusted to rely upon due process. It’s enough to make you wear shoes on your head.
Or:

chinese gangster 20 Photos from a Chinese gangsters lost cell phone (21 Photos)
This is a photograph of a Chinese gangster, in unfortunate circumstances. I ask you, the reader: why does he have a shoe on his head? Google “Chinese” and “sadness” or “mourning” and “shoe’s on head” But WHAT ABOUT THE WATER BOTTLE?

Moving on now: some have at times confused the terminology and blurred the line between “organized criminal gangs” and “organized gang stalkers,” which would be a false binary. As we see time and time again, the Hegelian dialectic has demanded that we choose an “us versus them” paradigm. It also makes us look stupid, corrupt, short sighted, and weak.
As I have noted, I am biologically and psychologically unable to think that way, whereas some 98% of American’s and others from cricket headed cultures think that way by default. I admit: it’s a personal flaw. A fault of my birth, also in unfortunate circumstances in a Catholic-Jewish cultureruled from hidden mechanisms and hidden activity from a sky god who sits “in the cloud.”

Related Stories: What is the FBI’s “bizarre” method of off-the-books harassment aka COINTELPRO 2.0? It’s called a “disruption” campaign. And according to byline.com, these are “How the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation is violating the liberty and privacy interests of Americans by using extra-judicial investigations designed to never lead to a formal criminal charge.”

But the problem with that type of thinking is that once “we” adopt it (whoever “we” are on that day/that election/that locality), “we” become gangs ourselves, and thus, there can be no actual morality, and no actual higher purpose. And for me at least, the war on terror has actually been a war on ideas, and the people who have them, because the predatory structure of highly institutionalized and RITUALIZED  illegality (the inter-connected tribal-religious-sectarian FISA/Section 702/Fusion Center/FBI-DHS-CIA ‘backdoor searches’/ political spying/ targeted police brutality/etc) affects some of us, provably more than others of us.
Here- look where their war on my ideas began. I was just a lil’ ol’ amateur journalist then. Imagine where the narrative would be if I hadn’t become a target of their hidden and brutal and constant attacks on my ability to write? I mean-this happened less than three years ago. Whoever the apophonetic “they” are of course, “on that day” in this bizarre inter-connected web of hidden and constant atrocities against liberty.
So as you might guess, I am the crazy guy on the internet, walking around in cyberspace with a pair of shoes on my head, and nothing but pocket litter in my worn out overhauls. And even that, “they” pick through it like a gold strike.
And, as I have documented repeatedly, in many ways, with the best saved for that one important day in the light, because it will take more than me to gain standing to sue this monstrosity of the Panopticon in a court room. And, there is much more than meets the blog- the rabbit hole goes much deeper than your eyes, there, reading this post. And that is what is colloquially called a “Constitutional crisis,” and a well considered challenge to its basis.
Wheeeeeew. I am glad others are on the case now. I’m very tired! I can’t keep the shoes on my head much longer. AND: my green hat falls off when I hang my head, remembering those oddly timed car accidents. But these, too, will have their day in court, again-because, it is in fact, all related.
And look! The ACLU, and the EFF, and the NACDL now has a manual for civil and criminal litigators to challenge government hacking! And generally, it is becoming more widely known that gang stalking” is actually “counter-surveillance stalking” by the “goodguys,” against “everyone else who ruffles their flying pig feathers. Now, if we can just get them onboard with these many entrapment and containment schemes that all agencies are practicing.
That will be THE game changer-when “we” get wider publicity for the fact that kids like the mass shooter in New Mexico are created from the information “sharing” GCHQ/FBI/CVE fraud that targets our son’s online gaming habits on pure speech grounds-or no grounds other than that they are easy targets, alone in “their mothers basements”; and then “privacy rapes” them, while stirring up gender wars via “Gamergate.” How Catholic/Jewish/Protestant is THAT?
Here- have a look at a Chinese gangsters cell phone from 2012, and see how many forensic clues YOU can pick out from his culture/location/situation/status/power.
How big IS this little guy? One western/American/British linguistic feature is to use diminutives like “little” when speaking about Asian men and women, whereas many Asian cultures and specifically Chinese culture uses the diminutive the opposite way- to state that a person has great status and great power)?
chinese gangster 6 Photos from a Chinese gangsters lost cell phone (21 Photos)
 
 

Gang stalking and ritual defamation

One of the single most common features of gang stalking complaints is that slander and defamation is being waged behind a persons back. This is also a main fetaure of what psychologiss call “delusional complaints,” of the type suffered by “schizophrenics.” and others who are “mentally ill.” Indeed, religion is often a main feature of schizophrenic delusions as well.

Related Stories: The Case of the “Slenderman” and schizophrenia; then, the odd circumstances where un-empathetic societies that bomb babies and rape our data seek to label others as having a lack of empathy, aka “psycho’s and anti-socials.”

But in politics, certain elements of our western culture suffer the loathsome an literally communicable disease of “neuro-memetic fasciitis of the mind,” too, by spreading memetic slander and defamation by targeting individuals. And, we see this most commonly in politics, academia, and other institutions.

Related Story Update: Bari Weiss, a pseudo-journalist who wrote the defamational smear referenced below has now quit the New York Times, trying to stave off her inevitable firing, and ironically alleging “bullying” and other dubious claims. It takes one to know one, I suppose. See also this post about liar and fraud Sabrina Rubin Erdelywho notoriously concocted the UVA #fakerape story

Few circumstances in modern psychology, sociology, or policing allow us insight into the nefarious practice of gas lighting and official source anomie than the case of ritual defamation, which is widely used in policing, and especially in DVIC gray area policing aka “community policing.”It is this gray area collusion where many civil conspiracies are hatched these days, and I will provide an example below of such a case, and that case, where actual gang stalking takes place.
So, keep in mind that most OGS is the direct actions of local “mobs” of insiders ranging from union members to police and fire, to academics and other institutional forces working together to control an individual, or to craft, or contain a narrative. This is called “framing” in public relations circles, but also is a feature of “bad jacketing” as well. And, the preferred tool of slander these days originates in database abuses, which then frequently becomes the defamation campaign waged in the thin disguise of “police investigatory privilege” via the massive NSA-Israel–FiveEyes data theft that we see today.
So-bad jacketing and ritual defamation is a practice of religious cults and sects who work in institutions and policing, much as we saw with Andy Ostrowski in The Kids for Cash state of Pennsylvania who was targeted by Republican’s, judges, and Scientologists as well ( a virtual trifecta of OGS) because he advocated for judicial reforms, children’s rights to not be bought and sold for state incentive dollars, and more. So, OGS is political in many/most cases.
Asking “Who stole progressivism” is like asking “who stole feminism.” The answer is: the usual suspects at the Anti Defamation League and its related octopus of NGOs.
This was most evident in the last election cycle, when some noticed that the progressive party had been hijacked by an especially vicious form of hate that can only be described as psychopathic-and that, encouraged by people who “are in  the business of hate.” This is how sick our society has become-that hate is actually a business model for psychopaths and DVIC profiteers. And-it proved how hollow their ethos is.
Here is a bit about ritual defamation as practiced by NGO’s and other political elements in western societies as a form of leverage and compromise operation on a grand scale. And keep in mind that these elements used data bases, and then, as we see with many of the new fakerape’s being rolled out every day in the press, actual rapes are being conflated with mere slanderous allegations of impropriety, with the same effect as if they were actual rapes.
This is what ritual defamation IS, and regardless of any opinion for or against the “necessity” of airing all that dirty laundry, we see without a doubt that the same slanderers are involved time and time again-that those who are “in the business of hate” have left their ideological and linguistic, and tactical fingerprints all over the dialogue. This is what the Whisper Campaign IS, which not in-coincidentally, was also a main feature of the Palestinian Exodus of 1948.
So- what IS ritual defamation, and why does it matter? Well, for starters, it is very Jewish. From Yakov Hirsch, citing Laird Wilcox:

It’s important to recognize and identify the patterns of a ritual defamation. Like all propaganda and disinformation campaigns it is accomplished primarily through the manipulation of words and symbols. It is not used to persuade, but to punish. Although it may have cognitive elements, its thrust is primarily emotional. Ritual Defamation is used to hurt, to intimidate, to destroy, and to persecute, and to avoid the dialogue, debate and discussion upon which a free society depends. On those grounds it must be opposed no matter who tries to justify its use

Then, Hirsch goes on to explain how extremely Jewish the smear campaign is in cultural practice and politics, as he cites one after another Jewish whsiperer in the defamation of BDS supporter Linda Sarsour, and Senator Keith Ellison, (D) MN. Also note how the term anti-semite-like fakerape’s-have deflated meaning in such a dialectic.
Then, notice that these smears routinely appear in the New Yarwk Times, just like the original piece about OGS that inspired ROGS blog. The reader will note that my goal is to reduce and eradicate database abuse, to expose political psychiatry/psychology in action, and, to protect future victims, and also provide help for others who are actual TI’s from all folds of this dialectic. But also, to call the blackmailing cockroaches out of their hidey holes.
For me, I encountered people who used the tactics of Gavin de Becker, who is also a Department of Homeland Security contractor. So, for me, there is little doubt that this is one function of this agency, and it’s IA styled black cash hidden domestic operations. Unlike each and every other blog about OGS, here, I provide evidence of these operations, and links to the wider dialectic
Here is ritual defamation in practice, and it is important to note that it is not a delusional complaint:

The reason for this discrepancy over Sarsour is explained by understanding why she is being defamed.

What Linda Sarsour did or didn’t do is irrelevant; the goal is to make her Palestinian perspective taboo. We see more evidence that Bari Weiss has that frame of mind from her description of Congressman Keith Ellison in her same “hate” article. How does Weiss refer to Congressman Keith Ellison?

“Recall that only a few months ago, Keith Ellison, a man with a long history of defending and working with anti-Semites, was almost made leader of the Democratic National Committee.”

To be clear, Bari Weiss is calling Keith Ellison an “anti-Semite.” Non-anti-Semites don’t “defend” and “work with” anti-Semites. But the question that arises is that we know Keith Ellison is not an anti-Semite. Listen to the Jews who know him best….That Ellison is not an anti-Semite earns him no protection from ritual defamers like Weiss.

….It is noteworthy that Weiss’s conscience is clear, that NYT readers will leave her “hate” column believing Keith Ellison hates Jews. Anti-Semitism is a stain Ellison will never remove. Think of the real world “hate” Weiss intended for Ellison. But Keith Ellison being a “Muslim peacenik,” as JJ Goldberg called him, offered him no protection from Weiss. Because from Weiss’s right-wing Jewish perspective, Keith Ellison has a “forbidden attitude, opinion or belief” that must be made taboo.

We clearly see that ritual defamation is both a feature of politics AND a main complaint of those who are gang stalked. And with little to no doubt, we see that organized gang stalking is in fact and practice, a very Jewish tactic-but also a mob tactic- of social engineering and control. In the example above, we see it toxifying progressive politics, and revealing Jewish racism, but also, we see that all roads lead to Israel, no matter whose side you are on. It’s a win/win for that lobby.
Now, let’s look at community policing for signs and symbols where social interactions can be forensically analysed to see if they are affected by OGS; to see what kinds of politics are involved. But also, to see what kind of “electronics” and databases are used to target individuals.
Here is a case where Bijan Ebrahimi, a crippled immigrant, was pedofied by local police and community stalkers who likely were on his internet connection. “They” eventually murdered him, and set him on fire after a seven year long stalking, and some 80 calls to police, where he was “framed” as an unstable liar, and a pedophile. Welcome to the new religious theocracy! And, the “scapegoat” of Catholic and Jewish rituals, and kabbalists.
Here below is a comment from 2004, when both the internet, and organized gang staking as an occut practice, and gang stalking as a political and social engineering tactic took hold across America. Note the specific name of a specific council member who was named in the blog, the use of coded symbols, the mention of ‘mob’ activity’, as well as elements from police and firefighters being implicated as stalkers. Then, notice that license plates are being tracked (click the link to the full article).
This license plate tracking is not insignificant, because as we saw in the case of the Electronic Peeping Toms of Minnesota and the police stalking of Minnesota reporters, journalists, and lawyers around 2011 (just after the DHS ramped up sectarianism and selective enforcement of law and surveillance) TODAY, we see Automated License Plate Reader’s (ALPR’s) in use across the country. Imagine the impact on or political climate? Then, add the NSA full capture database that has been collected since then…..
From LA Indy Media in 2004:

How to otherwise explain the kids all driving around with the decals?
Well, we make them nervous. And they should be….if they are breaking the law.
Maybe this is why GEORGE NAKXXX, YAKUZA BACKED STATE ASS-EMBLYMAN, gets so much support from some firemen’s cells – uh, we mean unions.

I have preserved this conversation here as well, because frequently, webwashing takes place just AFTER I write about or document online evidence of OGS. But like the example of Who’sA Rat which I provided here, from that same era, we see that OGS is very real, and that attempts are made to control the public’s insight into this nefarious practice. And, so, here we see state paid and union backed actors actively subverting the law-or in the least playing hide and seek on state dollars.
Lastly, here is more about RD from Aletho News:

Ritual Defamation: A Contemporary Academic Example

By Daniel McGowan | Dissident Voice | September 22, 2017

The term ritual defamation was coined by Laird Wilcox to describe the destruction of the reputation of a person by unfair, wrongful, or malicious speech or publication. The defamation is in retaliation for opinions expressed by the victim, with the intention of silencing that person’s influence, and making an example of him so as to discourage similar “insensitivity” to subjects currently ruled as taboo. It is aggressive, organized and skillfully applied, often by a representative of a special interest group, such as, ironically, the Anti-Defamation League.
Ritual defamation is not called “ritual” because it follows any prescribed religious or mystical doctrine, nor is it embraced in any particular document or scripture. Rather, it is ritualistic because it follows a predictable, stereotyped pattern which embraces a number of elements, as in a ritual.
Laird Wilcox enumerated eight basic elements of a ritual defamation:
First, the victim must have violated a particular taboo, usually by expressing or identifying with a forbidden attitude, opinion or belief.
Second, the defamers condemn the character of the victim, never offering more than a perfunctory challenge to the particular attitudes, opinions or beliefs the victim expressed or implied. Character assassination is its primary tool.
Third, the defamers avoid engaging in any kind of debate over the truthfulness or reasonableness of what has been expressed. Their goal is not discussion but rather condemnation, censorship and repression.

Now, when  factor in these facts above, and add to them the “delusional complaint” of schizophrenic paranoid anxieties about whisper campaigns, we see a new picture emerge, and it indicts this practice, and the official source gas-lighting that gies along with it.
I ask the reader to look back upon my thesis and do their own homework now. But also, to note how easily Big Pharma psychologists and prison profiteers work within the OGS Big Data abuse schemes-they are the perfect mockingbirds. Because crisi public relations firms do more than just create messages: they monitor them too, and that, sometimes in real time as the monitor individuals.
Related Story: The Association of Threat Assessment Professional(ATAP ) calls OGS the “colluding parallel investigation. ” ATAP is also on record linking the police and private contractor, multi -agency blur of “community policing ”to gang stalking. But also, to agencies that are affiliated with Fusion Centers, and who literally practice what is called psychological operations.

Gang stalking and news services, reporters, and journalists.

You can scour the web and find endless fake stories about gang staking, and useless amounts of total DVIC/MIC/PIC pap smeared everywhere, with the net effect of wasting sh!tloads of time.
Or, you can read ROGS, where I point you in the right directions, and hope that the world will be a better place once we can hunt down and sue, or lock up a few of these total cunts (have you ever noticed how SJW/AIPAC/military trolls, fake feminists and the big bullies who protect these scum HATE that word? And, most are are just control freaks, gender lesbians, or psychopaths? And, frequently, they can’t keep a man around too long-and if they do, the guy is a real piece of work, usually fresh out of his mothers basement.
Related Story: Where did the core theosophy of Social Justice Warriors come from-and who uses it the most? Ask the crybullies!
So-here is one of my favorite links to news persons and others who gang stalk-and it cannot be missed that Vester Lee Flanagan, a gay man, went ballistic when ‘certain elements’ of the news business waged a whisper campaign against him; or that the curious case of the stalking of news personalities BY LAW ENFORCEMENT in a heavily AIPAC state was, like a thing in the run-up to the 2012 election cycle-or that award winning journalist from Newsweek, Robert Parry noted in 1993 that CIA “disruption” tactics were being used in the US against activists and journalists.
The fingerprints of crisis PR factories, military grade “narrative control” and the DVIC are ALL OVER the place in cases where alternative narratives challenge the DVIC/MIC, from the earliest days of mass shooter events and the creatin fo patsies in state crime.
The most famous of these is undoubtedly Lee Harvey Oswald who was partially vindicated by the most recent, but still incomplete Kennedy papers release. Oswald notoriously appeared on radio and television many times BEFORE he was framed as the lone gunman, as covered in many sources, including the PBS Frontline documentary “WHo Was Lee Harvey Oswald?”

Related Story: Vester Flanagan/aka Bryce William’s mother tried to kill his father, and threatened to kill him and her other children, and was likely a dangerous sociopath-a product of the DVIC’s encouragement and incentivization of  women who abuse children. Many mass shooters are the products of narcissistic female sociopaths, as we saw with Christopher Dorner, and the Columbine shooter, Adam Lanza, and many others.

So, in keeping with my theme of “controlled media,” and “whisper campaigns,” and attacks on journalists here below in parentheses is a snippet from a web forum where we see an alleged Infragard member named ( I will incentivize any whistle blower for names of these people who ‘work in darkness’ to add to my list), and someone describing workplace harassment.
Now-in the case below, from a gang stalker blog online, we see several elements of my many thesis (and I will leave it to the reader to infer ‘what kind of people are gang stalkers’). Especially note that it is a journalism related workplace mobbing.
And, like many of these cases, the woman implicated as a stalker has several alias’ in real life-the state where this person s named breeds a certain sociopathy much as shepherds breed their sheep (there’s a joke in there about DVIC guidance systems)
And- I will also note that there are political implications, and that as I have said- gang stalking goes both ways. The named party is a Republican, but the alleged victim who planted this smear could easily be doing just that-planting a smear, so there may be nor real ‘actual victim’, but just a planted smear.
I have obscured part of the name, and highlighted the relevant materials:

I was set up quite elaborately at a workplace to apply for a job at what was characterized to me as a family oriented workplace that was highly rated.
I found out the first day that they had gone through at least seven people trying to fill the position. And every single one of these people were deemed “crazy.”
Many of these people were at this job one or just a few days. They must have been much more in touch with what they were seeing and feeling than I was. But I did have this feeling of fear and foreboding.
One of the “women” in my unit I was told was with Infraguard. She tried goading me into one fight after another. When the O.J. verdict came down we were at work and I was talking to another woman and the spy just made a beeline for me and wanted my opinion. I didn’t bite, but it became clear she was out to get me one way or another.
After awhile, nothing was working so she got most of the other people involved in “pushing my buttons.” I was crying every day due to the personal nature of the goading.
I overheard my manager say “I didn’t say she was a threat, I said ‘what if we said she was a threat’?”
That’s when I gathered a minimum amount of belongings and got out of there.
I actually heard, as if it were the voice of God or something…”Get out of there, they are trying to KILL YOU!”
I left and never went back. They have since merged with a major news service.
The funny thing is that I was also told that this Infraguard’s job was to know everything there was to know about everybody on our floor.
And when I moved into my new neighborhood I was cued in that this woman from Jamaica was “in charge of everything in the complex.”
I had no idea we lived in a controlled society. I bought all the propaganda hook, line and sinker. It has been quite a shock!
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Anonymous Anonymous said…
The Infraguard’s name for the above story was Tammy Hinxst and she lives in South Saint Paul, Minnesota. A truly slimy character!
Thursday, April 19, 2012

So, as we see time and again, it is ok to hate or defile, or otherwise denigrate Republican women, with the most vile slanders and anonymous lies. And, it is OK to stalk them online, and more. This, to me, indicates who it is that are likely gang stalkers, and just like we see with who it is that is trying to silence people online, and otherwise control dialectical space, we can infer trends, and emergent norms in action.
Then, notice that “I get mail” and one letter I recently received here at my semi-anonymous blog bears interesting indicators of how the internet really works-and how extensive these long term conspiracies are, as the writer made sure they noted that they are from an area with “twin cities.” I mention this, for he record.
 

Speech Crimes, journalism, and Targeted Individuals: my connection to Sammy "the Bull" Gravano, who got out of prison Monday.

Webs of associations, connections, presidents and naming names- even some torture. All of that is in a single quote from “Six Degrees of Separation: by John Guare, voicing his observation from the mouth of his character Ouisa Kitteridge:

I read somewhere that everybody on this planet is separated by only six other people. Six degrees of separation between us and everyone else on this planet. The President of the United States, a gondolier in Venice, just fill in the names. I find it extremely comforting that we’re so close. I also find it like Chinese water torture, that we’re so close because you have to find the right six people to make the right connection…
-Ouisa Kitteridge in “Six Degrees of Separation”

In my formative years, I watched the movie”Six Degrees of Separation” starring Will Smith, and based on the book by  Guare, and have found that, in these privacy and due process raping times, our “associations” are under attack; that the NSA, DHS, FBI, Fusion Centers, and local police have literally stolen our choices of primary “rights of assembly; and association,” by data-warehousing our entire webs of relationships in the huge data bases that I chronicle here at ROGS. And they have done it for over two decades. This is what is meant by “soft force eugenics” in the online gang stalking community, and it works like this.
So, what is a “disruption” campaign and how does it affect targeted individuals?
Six Degrees of Separation had, for me, a personal connection, though our “six degrees” is no longer six: it is TWO DEGREES of separation, as the Five Eyes Nations and the NSA-FiveEyes-Israel data theft pipeline have stolen all of our information, and use it to monitor, manipulate, and “disrupt” our relationships, as we are now all connected by a single mouse click at the NSA, or GCHQ, or any of the hundreds and thousands of other “good guys monitoring human relationships” centers across the west. As Edward Snowden said- this is not merely about spying: ‘this is about intellectual property theft,’ and then guilt by association-or vindication by it.
Six Degrees also notably highlights the late era feminism of white females attempting to ’empathize’ with black men, which they simply cannot, being as they are on one hand, the un-empathetic Bernaysian mouthpieces of organized globalism, and on the other, the mistresses of the police state itself, which Guare note’s thus in an exchange between the protagonist Paul, and the white Ouisa:

Ouisa Kittredge: There is so much you don’t know. You are so smart and so stupid.
Paul: I’ll be treated with care if you take me to the police. If they don’t know you’re special, they kill you.
Ouisa Kittredge: Oh, I don’t think they kill you.
Paul: Mrs. Louisa Kittredge, I am black.
Ouisa Kittredge: I will deliver you to them with kindness and affection.

 

I have never been awed by status or power, nor intimidated by it, which for some, poses a problem. And, those “some, I have described elsewhere on this blog as “cowards,” and especially as RATS, nibbling away at the bottom most planks of Constitutional Democracy, and nibbling away at the bottom of the bottomless DVIC slop-trough. And as such, I have come to realize how the Pharisee’s and the scumbags alike all HATE words. And, mine, specifically and especially.
But fame and power interested me slightly in my formative years, for several reasons, not least of which is that when I was  kid, I spent a lot of time on Hollywood Blvd, in Hollywood, CA, where Smith used to hang out as well, during his pre- “Fresh Prince of Bel Aire” days.
Generally, he caused quite a stir when he would roll up to Tommy’s, in his late model Benz ( I actually cannot remember what his car was, but I recall that he preferred late model Benzies or something similar) or otherwise show up at a club venue with a gorgeous ingenue strapped to his arm. Those who hung out, or lived on The Blvd-those ranged from teen runaways, to hookers and dope dealers, or punk rockers who squatted on abandoned properties up on Mount Olympus- would stir like bees, and in minutes, everyone knew that Smith was around.
He was an “up and coming star” then, and everyone wanted to touch fame, and hope it rubbed off. Except me. I was saving up to pay my way through college when I met a “mind controlled”system child named “Piper.
I personally was never star struck in any way, and have the unique ability to see people as people, regardless of stature. And I always somehow had a focus on the fact that fame is illusory, and that it can get in the way of other things that are more important. And in Hollywood, in that era, a lot was plainly “not right,” but also, not necessarily wrong either; that things were as they have been for millenia; and even moreso, that I was called to write, which is a tenuous fate for anyone facing “the way tings really are.”
Many years later, as a budding journalist, I tried to “make a difference,” by writing stories that defied “narrative” and that defied those who abuse power, and sought the gritty “facts” instead-and was soundly abused because of it by those that I write about herein and more, all of whom had their own designs on what I could or should do, what I could or should write.
SO when the researcher asks the question “who are targeted individuals?” Who gets gang stalked?” and so on, a simple answer would be that those who defy the lockup on narrative are primary targets, because narrative is the guiding force of corruption; and corruption is profitable; and the truth? Well….you can’t handle the truth.

vlcsnap-2017-12-07-22h26m08s502 (2)
I smell a rat!

But the truth is, in a society where Jewish-christians and then, al of their many sects and cults have a lockup on narrative, and where the mouth-piece of choice is the white female and her “others,” who literally CREATE boogiemen like evil Golem’s-those of us who see it another way are plainly dangerous to their old myths and lies, and cover-ups of atrocity after atrocity with their pseudo-morality, called “religion,” which many of our societies most astute have observed is a form of mental illness-but because so many suffer from it, it is the “norm” not the exception.
And so, the irony of me scrabbling around at the feet of Hollywood then was less than ironic, because I couldn’t give a rat’s ass about fame, or power; but “they” did, all of them. Sherman, the script writer, living in his cat-shit littered apartment, and cranking out pulpy manuscripts and cat-pawed screenplays;  Henry Rollins playing here or there, the Sick Green Hearts and their heroin addiction (as I recall they were usually too sick to get out of bed and play), and Bukowski’s bungalow blocks away-none of it meant “doodley squat” to me, then or now, as I simply couldn’t write an “ending” to any story I ever attempted- there are just too many new beginnings that the end is plainly outgunned.
Anyways- years later, as a budding college journalist ( I studied journalism because the paragraphs were moronically simple, and most American’s are adept at moronically simple), who worked in a little college news office, at a college  that, it turns out, was and still is one of the FBI’s “Somali/immigrant informant recruiting” centers, I once interviewed Lynne Stewart, who passed away in March of this year, 2017.
Stewart was labeled “the Terrorists Lawyer,” by the Bush Administration, because she had the odd trait of being able to represent clients according to the law-every ugly and precious bit of it, and to protect her clients, and to protect due process, and civil liberty zealously, with vigor, and regardless of their politics, or the political climate in which she practiced law. And in a social climate where practicing law and defending clients is demonized by the police, and their racist enablers, even lawyers ‘get no respect.’ especially those who stand for the CONSTITUTION.
But American cops no longer stand for the constitution, and have nearly al never even read it, because they themselves are little more than the paid armies of AIPAC and its enablers.
Cops who hate America give policing a bad name. Here is a “police opinion” of Lynne Stewart, from Michelle Malkin, who has likely chowed down a few sloppy cops dogs in her time. So many in fact that it is surprising that she can even speak freely:

Sicko Terrorist Lynne Stewart: Still Hating Cops

Well, sue, Stewart represented radical leftists, gangster’s and mass murderers, and non-Jewish Nazi’s alike; she represented “the Blind Sheik,” Omar Abdel Rahman, who was an actual terrorist, as opposed to these manufactured terrorists that we see being created today-and Rahman also died this year in Supermax prison, almost as a signal that we are at the end of an era-and no one seems to know it.
But what she was DEFENDING was due process and the Constitution, which is distinctly different than “defending terrorists.” And who could forget that King George thought the founding fathers were themselves terrorists?!
And, of course, she represented FBI star witness against organized crime, Sammy “the Bull” Gravano, who gets out of prison today. Gravano was an actual RAT who brought down the Gambino crime family, and John Gotti (at least- the parts of this crime family that are NOT on the FBI payroll, or otherwise working with and for the government.)
Like cancer, rats chew away at self-sustaining organisms, and then, let larger diseases in. Don’t get me wrong- mobsters are plainly dangerous, and plainly scary and all that, and Gravano made “hard choices” but this new thing- this ‘thing of theirs’? This government with no due process ever, and constant slander and spying and the destruction of due process in “gray area” that will NEVER see a day in court (and which they work hard to keep OUT of courts? It’s terrifying in every way.
Related Story: The ACLU asks: If the government spied on YOU, and worked behind the scenes to “disrupt” your life, opportunities, and social connections- how would you know?

vlcsnap-2017-12-07-23h03m15s193 (2)
Frances-it’s a whole nation FULL of rats!

Some might note in my thesis here, that our current corroded democracy was initiated by secret courts and secret laws, and secret practices in the “gray area” of policing and prosecutor conduct and misconduct. Gravano’s case was one of those that set this trend.
And, too, a cowardly trend was set in journalism as well, by the “nation’s opinion  leader” The New York Times. Here is the schmear that the New Yarwk Times put out about Ms. Stewart as an obituary– and I have highlighted the keywords and phrases that indicate a smear-in fact, the entire first paragraph is classic intelligence agency slander:

Lynne F. Stewart, a radical-leftist lawyer who gained wide notice for representing violent, self-described revolutionaries and who spent four years in prison herself, convicted of aiding terrorism, died on Tuesday at her home in Brooklyn. She was 77.

Her son, Geoffrey Stewart, said the cause was complications of cancer and a series of strokes.

Ms. Stewart, who had been treated for breast cancer before entering prison, was granted a “compassionate release” in January 2014 after the cancer had spread and was deemed terminal. Doctors at the time gave her 18 months to live.

A former librarian and teacher, she had taken up the law in the cause of social justice after seeing the squalor in the area around the public school in Harlem where she taught. She built a reputation for representing the poor and the reviled, usually for modest, court-paid fees.

Believing that the American political and capitalist system needed “radical surgery,” as Ms. Stewart put it, she sympathized with clients who sought to fight that system, even with violence, although she did not always endorse their tactics, she said.

One such client was Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the blind Egyptian cleric who was found guilty in 1995 of leading a plot to blow up New York City landmarks, including the United Nations, after some of his followers had driven a powerful bomb into a garage beneath the World Trade Center in 1993, killing six people. Ms. Stewart would visit him in prison, where he was serving a life sentence in solitary confinement. Her death came less than three weeks after his: He died in prison on Feb. 18.

So, when I met her, and covered her story in a little college newspaper that had been ransacked several times (most likely by the college administrator) Stewart was touring the nation under federal indictment, working with the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, and others; and I was being followed around and photographed by cowardly “mystery people” who ranged from tall Ethiopian men in suits, to flat chested blonde women and butch haircuts, or stocky meat-packer shouldered black women with bad weaves- and all of them with bad shoes (usually black, but sometimes “Eddie Bauer brown”).
And I was “crazy” because my relationships were undermined-James became an FBI informant; Laura became a librarian-much like Lynne Stewart herself had been a librarian-and another story I covered about a “terrorist” who was a librarian- librarians are highly targeted individuals, apparently. Let me know if you start seeing patterns, because…
My phone’s were constantly re-routed and redirected-even when I was in foreign lands. There was the “clicking” at the switch-fairly routine surveillance; but, too, the morons who repeated select words and phrases back to me over time. And much more going on as you might imagine; and much of that terrifying and heinous in ways that only deviants at the state level could think up, and disgusting; abhorrent to due process of law.
Many years after the time I interviewed her, my storage locker was broken into. My family mementos box was tossed like a salad, and my papers were scattered between boxes. So my “news clippings” were mixed with “family history” and my book and leaflet collections- the contents of several boxes of distinctly different materials literally became “word salad.”
And, my reporters notebooks had pages torn out of them, and these pages were put int different boxes or otherwise scattered about. Here are the notes these people came to take-and never a single warrant issued to me, or left anywhere. And this happened some five years AFTER I had interviewed and AFTER she was convicted of ‘material support for terrorism” because she did what?
She spoke with a cnvicts family on the phone. Yup. She got ten years for that.
Are you seeing any patterns yet especially patterns about how long they drag these “disruption campaigns” out- and how petty and trifling the ‘offenses’ are? Surely, America is under attack from SOMEONE SOMEWHERE- but it isn’t terrorists, because last I checked, terrorists LOVE speech.
How about this pattern: shortly after I discovered this burglary of my storage locker- which I did not report to police for obvious reasons stated all over this blog- shortly afterwards, “mysterious” pele contacted me on a web forum that has since disappeared from the internet-and thee mystery people were yammering on about how “yeah, THEY can even do sneak and peek searches of your stuff,” and so on.
So, here is evidence of my personal disruption campaign- because I believe in due process of law, and the right-indeed, the IMPERATIVE NECESSITY of attorney’s to vigorously defend their clients:
lynne stewart notes 1
lynne stewart notes
Look at these notes above ad ask yourself what could POSSIBLY be worth anything to anyone? If your answer was that I was personally villified, terrorized, and sufficiently in horror that I virtually kept quiet for many years, you would be correct- because the outrageous state of affairs of gray area policing, and Kafaka-meets-Orwell-meets-Fabian in the DVIC policing scheme that this country and the west is in today are beyond imagination of the founders, and even beyond the imagination of LEFTISTS of Stewart’s ERA!
So, for those peeking in, and asking yourselves “what is a targeted individual” or “what happens in gang stalking,” know this: I refused to cooperate, capitulate, cop a plea, or otherwise subsume “my” rights to those who approached me in secret, in “darkness” or who used un-Constitutional and undue processes and methods to ensnare or enlist my “support,” or submission.
In other words, in totally corrupted societies, they never come “through the straight gate,” and choose cowardly,ensnaring, entrapping, or  blackmailing work-arounds instead. This is what gray area policing, aka Fabian Socialism is meeting the total corruption of institutional power; and all of that WITHOUT JUDICIAL OVERSIGHT, or with judicial complicity.
So there’s that factor, and becoming a rat, like Sammy the Bull. It only takes one rat gnawing away at the bottom of the big huge sloppy pig trough to set a trend. And, as we see with our total surveillance state, DVIC dollars are the Pied Piper that these have followed-and led us over the cliff of this new “thing of theirs”-totalitarianism.
 

Guest Post from 4rec3s: Gang stalking and artificial intelligence-a world of false positives and death

This essay is based on this post on the Boingboing article, “NSA and GCHQ’s crappy Big Data techniques may be killing thousands of innocents”, which reminded me of a video of a robotic drone-death art installation that really puts this killing into a particularly inhuman perspective.

Notice: This essay does not deal with ‘electronic mind control’, drugging, ‘creating alters’, V2K or paranormal. All these links are from mainstream sources and my purpose is to glue it together as a feasibility of how gangstalking could happen with existing, known technologies. Namely social psychology, HUMINT-based pattern prediction, ubiquitous surveillance and communications.


Gangster Computer God
Every day, increasingly, our reality is validating Francis Dee’s racist, paranoid, schizophrenic prophecy of the “Gangster Computer God Worldwide Secret Containment Policy” as less fiction and more fact (sans the mullatto-jew robot doctors). More fact because it’s become feasible (except for the cosmetic surgery).
Mass surveillance innovations[1][2][3][4][5]), purposeful efforts and accomplishments[6][7][8][9]; a drive towards total information awareness[10] and such compelling integration of technology leading to a Panopticon[11][12], creates a situation in which a system could be devised capable of data-mining and heuristic pattern-of-life analysis of all citizens[12]. Coupling such a system with astoundingly capable AI technology; an extreme willingness to help (and profit motive) by industry[14][15]; an hegelian (‘ends justify the means’) ethos quite contrary to that of Christianity, secular humanism and altruism generally[16][17][18][19][20]; and “machine learning algorithms”[21][22][23][322]; form the constants of an addition equation that yields the very real possibility and therefore threat of an worldwide, technocratic, AI-based Gangstalking system.
Requirements and Purpose
The only requirements are paranoia and an utter lack of trust of the Government towards the global everycitizen[24]. In other words, “to shut down a political enemy by gaslighting[25][26][27][28] them to the extent that they end up in jail or in a mental facility”. There may be other incentives however:

  • Random harassment ‘like a game’
  • Targetted harassment of non-threat ‘undesirables’
  • Spiritual warfare ‘to demoralize the population’
  • Human / Social experimentation
  • Data collection efforts (pushing people around to see where they go / with whom they talk in ‘crisis’ mode)
  • Psychopathologizing an individual through trauma-based mind control—to develop them as asset
  • Playing both the targetted individual and deputized stalker against each other. Why is the TI the only victim?

All Watched Over By Machines Of Loving Grace[29]
Consider the following scenario.
1) You have an AI program that is hooked up with mass surveillance and has decades of social psychology to understand how humans work (HUMANINT + psychology/sociology, ‘game theory’, ‘prisoner’s dilemma’, ‘milgram’s’)[30].
2) The AI program finds ways to manipulate people (stalkers) into ‘being at a certain place at a certain time’, ‘to look out for a certain individual’. Perhaps they’ve been getting fed emails from a “protected’ or ‘authoritative source’ (AI::outreach), someone from an intelligence agency for example, that has ‘deputized’ him/her, to help assist them in tracking down ‘an alleged (serial killer / pedophile / drug dealer / murderer / stalker)‘ in the community. This person then is notified to go to a certain place and ‘watch out for’ this disreputable / potential criminal.

Everyone wants to be a hero. All that is required is exploiting our vanity.

3) This AI program has a deep knowledge of everyone from mass surveillance[1][2][3][4][5]). Enough to ‘predict behavior’ and generate a deep, heuristic, ‘life pattern’ analysis[1][2]
4) The AI knows when you leave your home, when you take a shower, approx where you are located and headed using your cellphone’s gps/wifi and cell tower triangulation sent back to servers. Also, if the AI has access to NRO satellite data, they can actually see you, with a potential resolution of 50 cm2 to 1cm2 (drone)!!
5) Using the ‘pattern of life’ and seeing that you left your home, it can send email / sms / skype / facebook / twitter / foursquare / ‘other’ instant messages to various ‘deputized’ community citizens to ‘watch you’.
6) The targetted individual is now under humanint field surveillance by people who have been tricked, duped with disinformation into thinking they are doing good, protecting the community.


Con Game, Not Mind Kontrol
None of this requires mind control. All it requires is panopticon, vain authoritarians as ‘faux-insiders’, and a highly-available communication network with dynamic asset development and appropriation software.
If this is happening, it’s immoral and abusive and it’s also lacking in manners. Military-industrial aristocrats are supposed to have manners and respect. After all, their guarded culture demands those things. But their development of rights-destroying, ‘tough guy mafioso abuses’ reveal the ruling class as irresponsible, lacking a keen foresight into consequence they claim generally has guided their successes in life and which differentiate them from the masses.
Their lack of manners has created an uncouth robot that reduces everyone to numbered accounts in a microserfdom. This robot is going to mix up the salad fork with the dinner fork, which is a metaphor for ‘killing everyone’—it’s a matter of time before it’s discernments become so specific that everyone, poor and rich alike, need to be subject to ‘quantitative easing’. And that’s too is a metaphor, for this.

Copies of Nothing: police psychology and the replication of power through willful ignorance, and bullying.

It is nearly impossible to impute to the reader how disproportionate the telling of the story of “targeted individuals” of organized gang stalking is in terms of power versus those who are powerless; or that the issue of “TI’s” is in fact one of “first they came for the ________, and I said nothing, because I wasn’t a (member of the Beatrice Six). But the fact is that beyond interagency collaborationn to subvert the Constitution in the name of “goodguyism,” only the little guys and gals get targeted, while others get “flipped” or otherwise compromised.

Related Story: The Association of Threat Assessment Professionals (ATAP ) is on record calling modern “high policing ” by its proper name,which is the “parallel colluding investigation, ”and has linked this in their literature to “delusions ”. Now, I ask the reader to decide for themselves what OGS is, and take,a look at a retired United States Air Force OSI (USAFOSI) investigator who targeted me on Twitter, accusing me of being a serial murderer, goading me with violence, and, eventually being hacked, with “face orbs ” and a link to pogo-pins placed on my computer, as bizarre -acting people in hoodies ran around outside my apartment .
Organized-and Irgunized gang stalking is THAT weird. And, so was the depopulation /genocide /ethnic cleansing of Palestine, aka the Great Israelification

So let’s take a look at one of the many illegal database schemes that has been minimized or eradicated from our ability to view this illegality in the press, and where innocent people and Americans were targeted by an intelligence agency that was really a multi-agency Hydra of subversion on American-and international shores.
The DEA and the SOD database: They needed a code word to describe their voyeurism, and then, to discredit those they targeted with clandestine, illegal, iun-Constitutional HUMINT campaigns of coercion and terror.

Let’s first take a look at “police psychological profiles” that are generally stuck somewhere in the toilet, as most of the religiously/Freudian afflicted are, and then, add the opportunistic and voyeuristic and eugenic nature of feminist jurisprudence through the eyes of Kurt Vonnegut, who was popular with militarist feminists during the rise of the neocon “left” and the DVIC, where we discovered that women’s violence is well financed, and internationalist, because “hungry hungry hungry!“:
From “Breakfast of Champions,” where Vonnegut- a survivor of the fire-bombing of Dresden– critiques “white male power” but forgets to note “white female privilege,”which is perhaps more deadly, if Dresden, or Holodmor are any example .
wide open beavers.jpg
So, voyeurism (the NSA to local LEO data theft pipeline) and photography ( they frequently make threats that they have secret databases with TI’s pictures in them; and agencies are indeed using our televisions and our laptop camera’s to spy on us according to all major media) is a major them of these neo-fascists and their Hegelian counter parts, and the “TI” is their secret passion, as women’s deviance and violence takes different and creative forms.
If I showed you pictures of “TI’s” you might laugh, or mock them somehow, as many of them appear in mug shots, due to the disproportionate force and fury with which western societies prosecute the poor and the disenfranchised. Many of them, like the now-famous Timothy Trespas, are easily discredited because they “don’t look like “us”.”
Odd, how the bane of aging white feminists everywhere-“lookism” has become the exact tool with which these target and harass people in official source gas lighting, such as the case where the New York Times Mike McPhate conspired with Lorraine Sheridan to cover up this crime in last years article.
I have written about TI’s from a variety of standpoints, but one thing that can be said with certainty is that they are frequently “not” super models or muscle bound ‘heroic’ figures from ancient Greece, though there ARE exceptions. And, like anyone, they ave their faults and flaws.
What makes them different though, is that they are often stripped of the pretenses of power fairly early in life, and have frequently been labeled by those who value power. As such, as Glenn Greenwald has noted, they have “no place to hide,” when operations like the illegal and warrantless  NSA/DEA/CIA/FBI decides to turn their lives into a free for all. so beyond merely being involuntary HUMINT assets, they are also mocked for being so, and with the approval apparently, of “psychology,” despite NONE OF THIS being authorized or even acknowledged in a legal framework anywhere.
I recently spoke with a man who was engaged in a custody dispute with his wife, a former stripper who has an extensive network of admirers in policing, and he described how he was forced onto a stretcher in a bizarre “set up,” much as we saw in the DVIC deterioration of Andy Ostrowski, who once opposed PA Governor Tom Ridge.
The source was locked up on a 72 hour psychiatric hold, to try to create the appearance that he is mentally ill, which is bad enough (tested negative). But the story gets really sick when he describes how “there was even a photographer present taking closeup pictures of my face as they did this, pulling him from his home and placing him in that position, as his young daughter was spirited away by Child Services.”
And I spoke with a woman whose neighbors-wonderful progressives in a “progressive” city, framed her as the neighborhood crank as they waged loud parties next door. Her mugshot looks exactly like that. And then, after they got a fifty year restraining order on her (because she told the judge ‘why don’t you just make it ten, twenty or forty years’) they moved away! See how that works- let me know if you start seeing patterns-because seeing patterns can indicate delusional thinking.
So, the claim that communitarian policing is framing people is not unusual, nor is it unprecedented when individuals take a stand against this nefarious bullying. And this is no small claim, nor is it an uncommon one in the “frame jobs” that much of these make-work projects of our current government is involved in.
And the internet abounds with video’s of “authorities” in power citing vague “rules” or even more un-Constitutional “policies” that prohibit photographers from filming them-public servants-at work in public. So, without a doubt, photography-which is NOT a crime- has become a tool with which institutions collaborate to defame those it targets.
In the video below, some from the DEA gets their authoritarian asses handed to them by an individual who knows that “policies” and “rules” are not LAWS, and that-for now- citizens still have the right to film and photograph these cowards who work anonymously from behind the internet switches plotting the destruction of free speech rights, due process of law, and more; that these who invade our privacy with impunity, and from behind the veil of absolutist secrecy are themselves annoyed by cameras.
And,  the citizen knows that people who cite policies and rules are in fact cowards who hide behind authority, and mobsterism, and the psychopathology of institutions that are destroying Democracy with obstructionism in the gray area of law.
And especially, note the license plates, as these federal agents work in a state that has granted official “anonymity”to public “servants.” In order to understand “what is a police state” one must understand the “privileged immunity and institutional anonymity” of these operatives.
And this, below, is what breeds contempt for the public by these same. And it cannot be missed that the photographer is described as being 5’4″ tall, and is standing against men and women who top the scales at body mass and weight. Welcome to feminist jurisprudence and policing! It seems that the “little people” are an extreme threat:

MUST SEE VIDEO:

“Fascist DEA Scum bags attempting to Censor 1St Amendment freedom of Press”

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kxH9N5oXkgY&w=854&h=480]
 
But for the most part, many if not all TI’s are the product of inter-generational bullying by institutional forces ranging from neighbors and schoolmates to police to mental health professionals, and the hidden networks of “goodguys and gals” who somehow see nothing wrong with “piling on.”So in order to understand my version and interpretation of “TI’s” and OGS, it requires that I define “what is a coward,”as you and others who research organized gang stalking will note that claims that GS are cowards are quite frequent in the online dialectic of OGS, and in fact a staple comment.
So, it cannot be missed that this individual filming is a 5’4″ sprite, unarmed, and questioning the authority of those who are IN FACT AND IN PRACTICE a huge factor in OGS online dialogues. Nor can it be missed that each of these photographers is practicing their rights against thousands of pounds of human meat that makes it’s living from violence, and that they are all armed.
So, beyond institutional sociopathy, and psychopaths whose sickness finds a welcome home in institutions of power, I personally view TI’s as “not mentally ill” anymore than those who pursue them, and “pile on.” It is instructive to note two things about this “phenomenon” that will help put it in perspective

  1. many of those who are “targeted” are people whose civil rights and due process rights were violated in durations of time that defy imagination and are frequently derived from warrantless surveillance and the “War on Terror.”
  2. Nearly all of them that I have talked to report bullying, and “strange” internet encounters with hidden bad actors

Read together, these form a narrative drawn from the replication of status quo superstitions and outright mythological lies that form the narrative of police and state power psychological basis, but also, plain old bullying by any other name.
So, here below is a link farm to stories about how the DEA (which is inseparable in mission or tactical applications, and methodology from the CIA at this point) used a database to illegally, and un-Constitutionally profile, monitor, perform surveillance and harass American citizens.
And for those of us who walk “unarmed” in the world with the expectation that these “goodguys and their gunz and bomz” won’t shoot us for excercising our rights is in fact and in practice, true bravery, because we KNOW they are murderous, slanderous, malevolent crooks who love to “shine a light” on “we the people” but somehow, cringe when the light gets cast on them-or scurry away like cockroaches-the video above is prima facie proof of that.
Special Operations Division (SOD) database abuse and lawsuits to follow? Who would even know where to look for the proof? I have an idea- ask those crazy peepl in the TI community!
Testilying as security theater and “goodguyism gone wild!”: How DEA agents and all other LEO’s use illegally obtained data to create and then “dry clean or launder” a case, aka “parallel construction-as well as to follow peole around and do plainly bizarre sh!t to their internet connections, telephones, cars, homes, etc, etc….
http://bangordailynews.com/2013/08/05/politics/agents-ordered-to-cover-up-dea-program-used-to-investigate-americans-critics-say-methods-unconstitutional/
More on parallel case laundering, dry cleaning alleged crime, and illegal spying
http://www.businessinsider.com/dea-agents-cover-up-spying-program-2013-8?IR=T
Prosecutors and supervisors cover up the program that covers up illegal spying, of “cover up squared,” layers upon layers of subterfuge and criminality from “the good guys and gals”
http://www.rawstory.com/2013/08/secretive-drug-enforcement-agency-dea-unit-told-to-cover-up-massive-spy-program-used-to-investigate-americans/
The cover up of the cover up of the cover ups, layered in a discrediting narrative, aka “who are targeted individuals?” What happens to targeted individuals?”
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-dea-sod/exclusive-u-s-directs-agents-to-cover-up-program-used-to-investigate-americans-idUSBRE97409R20130805
Correction: This post states that the videographer said he is 5‘4″ tall, when in fact, he did not say that.
That quote came from another video like tens of thousands of these types of videos, where those who actually practice civil rights then, become targeted, stalked, and harrassed by intel agents and agencies.
The guy in the video above is around 5’8″, and unarmed. If you got nothin ta hide, the “good guys and gals ”, whats the harm of one lil ol photog?

Speaking of "what happens to gang stalking targets?" A story from 2014-16

Speaking of espionage- but really quietly of course, here in public, about mission creep and bleed-over into a dying Constitutional Democracy.

“There not using them that way- they’re using them here…”

Background: Consensual Surveillance is what the DHS, ICE, FBI and even state level agencies call their secret warrantless cellphone surveillance. They have been monitoring and manipulating the communications of Americans via Cessna airplanes using technology called Stingrays and Hailstorm here in America since before 2006.
My first encounter with this form of warrantless surveillance by air was in 2011 or so when a little yellow Cessna airplane followed me everywhere, for hours, across a mid-western city.  Then, I pulled my phones battery for the first time ever- and the plane disappeared.
————————————————————————
Low and Slow is the way to go when monitoring American’s speech : off-the-radar, “push-broom” hyper spectral imaging is more than picking up chatter.
The Beechcraft King Air turbo-prop is a beautiful bird. And it’s used to fly domestic surveillance missions in the U.S., and scoop up data about Americans
So- there’s this guy who worked on the electronic navigation and stability systems that are in MRAPs, the spectral imaging and photographic capabilities of FBI spy planes that currently monitor the phones of many Americans without a warrant or even probable cause; and the heavier military grade spectral and thermal imaging systems of CIA, DEA, and USAF surveillance aircraft. He particularly was fond of his work on the Beechcraft King Air line. How could those planes NOT be an engineers favorite- the name alone is so retro and air-crafty.
Related Story: EMARSS aircraft crashes over Iraq– what was it doing?
He said “These things can look down through the roof of your house, and draw a multi-tiered 3D heat map and watch you move through your house in real time.” He really thought highly of those Beechcraft Surveillance planes.

image

All images courtesy of Beechcraft online: http://beechcraft.txtav.com/en/king-air-c90gtx

B100
I met him at a Japanese restaurant in November of 2014, a tonkatsu ramen and saki place in a strip mall next to a hotel where he was a regular; at least, as much of a regular as a guy who moves around a lot,  working for military contractors and weapons manufacturers.
At the time, I was surprised that he was telling me, a virtual stranger, about domestic surveillance in the U.S. done TO Americans by intelligence agencies, BY the #goodguys at every level. I always thought the #badguys and the #otherguys did that stuff in their countries, to their peoples. Turns out some of those guys are training on those same planes as I write.
And, I would love to tell you more, but it might be illegal to do so, cuz, national security and stuff-you know: the Chinese or the North Koreans- maybe the Syrians or ISIS!! might get a leg up,catch us with our pants down, and tap all our phones, or follow us around with airplanes to get at all of our phone data and stuff.
Also, because we know that main stream journalists are so reputable and all, after President Obama authorized the dispensing of propaganda on the American public in 2011. A main stream media so reputable that they forgot to question the surveillance state as it was being built above my head. There are plainly too many military industrial surveillance state ‘official sources’ to wine and dine for stories- real inside scoops about cute puppies, or a stadium or something. Busy busy busy hungry hungry hungry officials: the #goodguys busy and hungry together.
image
Anyways, these MRAPs were designed for military use,in theaters of war, but somehow ended up parked next to your local donut shops all across America.
Related Story: Colorado SWAT team completely demolishes man’s home looking for a shoplifter who stole 15 dollars worth of stuff.
Well: once upon a time on a phone long since stolen, I was making a case in the public’s interest about how airplanes are being used domestically to spy on Americans phone calls, and possibly looking through our roofs. I used Gmail and kept notes and contact info there. And, that story literally got scooped out of my Gmail account, then somehow hit the newspapers- in Minnesota.
image
image
And this guy- I’ll call him Jack- was a mess. He was hammered- absolutely shitfaced; he was all tore up about missing his aged mother- how he wanted a ghostwriter to tell her story to the world.
“Let me tell you- there are good mothers and then there was her: my mother was the best mother ever- anyone could see it. She was like a saint…” and so he went on about his mother.
And he was weeping. Weeping about how his inventions were being mis-used. You see, he works for many of the weapons dealers and arms suppliers that build the bombs and the drones and the MRAPs there in front of your house. He is a military industrial complex engineer.
Here is a project he worked on:
https://www.beechcraft.com/special_missions/aerial_survey.aspx
And this doozy which he made note of:
https://www.beechcraft.com/special_missions/surveillance.aspx
His biggest problem seemed to be that he felt that he had no say in the fact that these tools were being used to target civilians.
“I never gave my consent…they never told me they would be used this way…” and so on. He was horrified when he found out that the multiple agencies were using his toys and tools to target practice on American citizens, here, in America. That the FBI et al were training their pilots and their resources using Americans for practice, without warrants.
There’s this point between men where boundaries become demilitarized- where we drop our guard, and empathize: where we try to comfort another man, which is always awkward. And, where one wonders if the weirdness might be a whole ‘nother level of weird.
Well, the guy stumbled towards me in his stupor, head hanging in his hands- and he was literally slobbering as he gasped one of those horrid sort of drunk guy gasps that precedes horrible crying,  and then sprang at me and was in my arms, where he found a slobbery nook on my shoulder to weep into.
Awkward indeed- blurring boundaries, blurring stories, one minute on about his mother the next, talking about how the technology he designed for  Beechcraft could “look through your ceiling and create a 3D image model” of you as you take a shit in the privacy of your own home. ( Update: here is a story that ran in Popular Science on April 6, 2016, shortly before I wrote this story herein, and shortly after I spoke with a confidential informant: http://www.popsci.com/fbi-planes-used-augmented-reality-to-watch-america)
I said ” Well, these are the kind of tools we need in a war.” He gasped a cry and said “There not using them that way- they’re using them here…” and more weeping.
I couldn’t help but feel my lifelong revulsion to men, and weeping men, but especially- weeping men slobbering snot on my shirt.
But, in some conversations, I guess I overlook my own biases and listen for the story that really matters. And he seemed nice enough, provided an interesting story full of details.
In this case, it was that one detail- that military grade photo-thermal imaging was being used on American citizens.
That seemed important.
Within a day, I bumped into anther guy in the hallway carrying a Stingray sized briefcase- one of those metal kind that you see in the movies. And, the next night, a long black Suburban with no license plates of any kind parked under my motel window. Within three months, the phone where I kept my research and notes about this incident disappeared from my car.
And- the story about how the FBI is using these technologies broke almost immediately after my ability to report it had been erased. This has been the nature of my journalism for over a decade and counting; and why I provide these stories to others now- because control of my personal narrative begins and ends with this strange idea of my personal ‘right to privacy- my right to be left alone.’
But also, it coexists along with the public’s right to know.