Manufacturing terrorism suspects, fake web pages, and informants using lots of rope in darkness: modern lynching online and CVE programs

Whether the target is a Muslim, a Mormon cattle rancher, a black activist, or a poor white kid like William Atchison who get stalked online and then offline by agents provocateurs, aka DHS/FBI/DIA/private contractor/NGO/foreign spy outfit unspecified, informants, a few patterns stand out in the data:
UNDERCOVER FBI AGENTS SWARM THE INTERNET SEEKING CONTACT WITH “TERRORISTS”who they then profile via behavioral analysts, psycholigical operations, and then endlessly monitor their speech online and off, in concert with HUNDREDS of agencies, and using NSA data.
The FBI’s online activities are so pervasive that the bureau sometimes finds itself investigating its own people.

Almost all targets of provocation are male.
All targets of provocations are ensnared online, and followed, monitored and more offline for using words~aka pure first amendment protected speech~sometimes for decades since the NSA dumped hay all over needles in a theretofore previously non-existent “haystack.”
All targets of provocateurs have long term contact with people working under the counter-terrorism rubtrik, or so calked community policing, who seek to INFLUENCE the speaker, from hidden or occulted positions online and off (for instance, social workers, college, or DV type “counselors” target and track individuals, usi.g multiple databases, and share information about their targets with police)
All targets of these hidden programs are manipulated in “directed conversations”which is well documented in the online TI community,and this unrecorded anywhere.
All targets are manipulated, and frequently their most base impulses to food, clothing and shelter~indeed, their base drives, what Freud called libido~are used as tools to manipulate them, and much more, as we saw with the Tsaernev family being targeted for a decade BEFORE the Boston bombing, as well as in the cases of the Seattle Somalis employment and travel being stifled by federal agents, hearsay, and policy (not law.)
In any study of what is colloquially called mind control, and stemming from Nazi/US/British styled torture, or the well documented MKULTRA and its companions Monarch, Bluebird, Phoenix, Gladio-all of these used base drives as ways to manipulate subjects and targets.
And, all base drives, stationed a man, or a woman in the middle to impede or encourage the target toward one or another behavioral goal. So, any study of targeted individuals must account for ling term state/federal ibstruction of base drives, and achievements.
Related Story: Niftygerbil, Niftychinchilla, and other Nifty names for Tor nodes, courtesy of the same geniuses who gave the world Monarch and Bluebird.
So, we see now, the entire organized gang stalking dialectic mirrors the ACTUAL complaints of targeted individuals. Refer to the ROGS BINGO card at the top of this blog for comparison.
So, OGS is far from a delusional complaint, and rather,indicative of manufactured terrorisms un Constitutional basis, and the occulted use of informants whose work in online terror/criminal/other incitement is undocumented by design-a totally unchecked use of actual psychological operations-agents provocateurs actions are not on the record, or in courtroom documents either.
So, in the very least, these online influence and psyops using unchecked, unregulated, hidden, occulted and obscured methods, repeated over time, do indeed form, as the good doctor Lorraine Sheridan has noted~a closed echo chamber, echo chamber, where words themselves are the primary targets, as are the individuals who use the words- they are literally under close monitoring every time a banned word hits Google/Wordpress/Twitter, etc.
Here from NBC News is a story about how the FBI uses informants online and on social media in occulted fashion to police pure speech, and then, to target individuals:
https://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/isis-terror/no-lol-matter-fbi-trolls-social-media-would-be-jihadis-n226841s
And here is a bit more about that from the Intercepts Cora Courier in 2017: ghttps://theintercept.com/2017/01/31/undercover-fbi-agents-swarm-the-internet-seeking-contact-with-terrorists/
“”According to the guie, an online counterterrorism investigation can target websites or online networks that the FBI believes terrorists are using “to encourage and recruit members” or to spread propaganda. Such probes may extend to the administrators or creators of those forums, as well as people engaged in “the development of communications security practices” or “acting as ‘virtual couriers’ for terrorist organizations by passing online messages among members or leadership.”
The guide classes as online investigations those that rely primarily on online informants or undercover employees, and those that involve surveilling internet facilities or foreign websites hosted on U.S. servers. The FBI often runs such operations jointly with other U.S. intelligence agencies or “international partners,” according to the document.
Since 2008, the Counterterrorism Division has coordinated these operations under a program called the Net Talon National Initiative. Net Talon uses informants, linguists, and FBI employees working undercover, posing as ordinary internet users, to zero in on terrorists’ use of the internet, according to the guide. The initiative was meant to centralize expertise on particular targets and platforms, to “address intelligence gaps,” and to create a clearinghouse of the intelligence the bureau has collected on terrorists’ use of the internet.
The FBI’s online activities are apparently pervasive and uncoordinated enough to lead to confusion. The document refers to “resources being wasted by investigating or collecting on FBI online identities,” including undercover employees, informants, or people who have already been investigated by other offices or agencies. An FBI official told the Intercept, “You would be in a forum, and you’re like, ‘This person’s way out there,’ and we’ve gone and opened up a case, and sometimes that was a local police department, or a friendly foreign service. There are still instances of that, and deconfliction is still necessary.”
Khurrum Wahid and Joshua Dratel, defense attorneys for Ahmed Omar Abu Ali, answer questions from the media after Abu Ali was sentenced on March 29, 2006, at a federal court in Alexandria, Va. Photo: Alex Wong/Getty Images
THE COUNTERTERRORISM POLICY GUIDE shows just how much flexibility informants and undercover agents have when operating online, even when they’re not working specific targets. The FBI insists that there is nothing to see here: In statements provided to The Intercept, the FBI said that “while there are obvious differences between online and offline environments,” FBI employees and informants working on the internet are subject to the same rules, and that bureau employees can only monitor people’s online activity as part of an authorized investigation.
The guide, however, suggests that the internet offers areas of ambiguity. Much comes down to the questions of what informants can do, as opposed to FBI employees, and whether the goal of an operation should be construed as seeking to obtain specific intelligence, simply watching public websites, or developing a profile for an undercover identity.
For instance, the guide states that an FBI employee can visit a message forum or blog only when the site is relevant to an investigation. An FBI employee, according to the guide, could be an undercover agent or an “online covert employee,” a term that presumably refers to FBI workers other than agents, like analysts. FBI employees can’t chat online with someone who isn’t already the subject of an investigation for the purposes of gathering intelligence on that person. They can, however, “engage in unlimited communication with associates” of a person under investigation, if the conversations are relevant to the investigation.
Informants and undercover FBI employees are also allowed to do a great deal online in the name of “building bona fides,” such as creating fake identities or making themselves appear to be normal commenters on online fora. The guide says that in order to establish credibility, FBI employees “may make postings and communicate with individuals who are neither the subjects nor the associates of subjects … there is no limitation with respect to the amount of communication [they] may initiate in this regard.”
And the FBI is allowed to open new investigations on people it identifies through “passive monitoring or active communication” on websites.
An FBI spokesperson clarified that in order for an undercover or covert employee to monitor a website or forum, the site must already be associated with an investigation, “either because the forum was known to be used by a subject [of an investigation], or because the subjects are there. I can’t be in the forum trying to bait you into conversation.”
However, the FBI acknowledges that when its employees participate in online fora, they interact with people who may be bystanders to whatever activity led the bureau there in the first place. And that is not accidental. “We want to know if the subject has other people who are joining in, which people are part of the activity, and who is just there,” a spokesperson explained.
In other words, FBI agents can post and chat online with people who have nothing to do with an investigation, so long as they aren’t collecting intelligence — but in the course of those online communications, they can decide to start investigating someone.
Michael German, a former FBI agent who is now with the Brennan Center for Justice at New York University Law School, said that agents have always had a little bit of wiggle room in this regard. They can have a certain number of in-person meetings with someone, or in some circumstances go to public meetings or public websites, without identifying themselves as part of the FBI. This helps agents avoid a bureaucratic mess when carrying out a simple “buy and bust” drug sting, for example, German said.
But the ability to conduct unlimited online conversations in the name of building bona fides gives agents “a pretty long rope,” German said.
Criminal defense attorney Khurrum Wahid, who has handled or been an adviser on many national security cases, notes that FBI employees or informants frequently pose as experts offering guidance to lost individuals.
“These uninformed young people go online and become almost smitten with people who show a level of knowledge, who often turn out to be informants or undercovers,” said Wahid.
Informants operate under looser rules than FBI personnel. They are allowed unlimited engagement with a target in the course of an “assessment,” a preliminary investigation that can be opened on a loose tip of suspicious behavior, in order to collect general intelligence on a subject, or to evaluate a potential new informant. Assessments were created as a category in 2008. German finds their allowance for the expansive use of informants problematic.
“What we’ve seen in sting operations is that there is this shady portion before the official operation begins which often involves the informant,” said German. “And then it’s passed off to an agent, and it looks like they are ready to commit a crime pretty quickly.”
Wahid noted that at least in online cases, there are generally logs of all the conversations between suspect and informant, whereas “when it’s a live informant, they can turn off the recorder and we never know what it was all about.”
The use of informants in counterterrorism sting operations has expanded since the 9/11 attacks, when the FBI adopted the mantra that its job is to stop terror attacks before they occur, not just investigate them afterward. The government argues that the anonymity the internet affords to suspects necessitates an aggressive approach, including stings. The FBI’s national security director told the New York Times this summer that “using undercover agents online allowed the FBI to ‘flesh out’ suspects by gaining their trust and persuading them to disclose their real identities.” In some cases, the FBI even created fake webpages in order to draw in suspects.
“Agencies are under a lot of pressure to find a needle in a haystack, something that has haunted us since the beginning of the war on terror,” said Karen Greenberg, director of the Center on National Security at Fordham Law School. “It’s true that the internet has changed everything about how we communicate, but are we just going to be trawling online forever? It turns the principles of criminal investigation on their head.””

The Chinese teachers and the MDMA drug: Minigh dimol/ waterinch, psychology, and drug experiments, SWAT, Cigarettes and Suffragettes, and gang stalking

The Chinese teachers and the MDMA drug: Minigh dimol/ waterinch, psychology, and drug experiments, and gang stalking, with commentary from a SWAT officer

minigh dimol: Evidence is quite conclusive, though no one seems to care or take notice. Organised psychological harassment, ongoing, equates to psychological violence, and all involved in such violence are guilty of criminal harassment, whether they see it that way or not.

Discussions about organized gang stalking have political undertones. Much like the ‘War on Drugs,’ the current moral panic’s and the ‘War on Terrorism’ reveal the stresses at the seams of our democracy, as some will do ANYTHING for DVIC dollars, while other’s resist such ‘blood money’ and the accompanying lies and half truths-what blood libel’s one must speak in order to get more of it.
And still other’s recognize the militarized bleed-over that has likely affected those who claim OGS spilled all over America like the guts of a 10,000 deer hung on America’s tree limb. What is called “mission creep,” and it’s effects on “we the people” as police and corporate interests, database abusers, and politicized organizations ranging from AIPAC to other NGO’s (many of which are also coincidentally embezzling or otherwise selectively mis-managing funds) to psychology work and the healing professions, with crisis PR manufacturers ready to create the appearance of an America under attack by anyone BUT them.
It is these hidden black operations that need to see the light of day, because OGS is certainly one indicator of a social disease, not necessarily mental health. And certainly, as we watch the failed “War on Terror” casting an ever widening net to now encompass “domestic violence” which is and always has been a one way narrative, the Ich Du is showing some bloat.
As noted by a retired SWAT Lieutenant, a highly decorated officer, and wounded warrior who saw service all across the globe as exactly the black operator that I criticize here,  here, here and elsewhere, ” Anyone above me is a politican-they’re not even real cops. They’re a different clss of people-they are making political decisions, not using common sense.
Maybe there are occasions where MRAP’s are actually needed. Watts, riots and that sort of thing. But these small towns-and their police are ill equipped to even operate those things, much less have a need for them. It’s ridiculous. “
In the case of Lucie, aka “Miranda” I presented a tenuous link from unethical human exprimentation that was financed by US drug industries in Guatemala in the 1940-50’s, to a homeless street person who had lost “millions” by her own account due to unethical and amoral punitive psychology. I make no claims of this being an entirely accurate assessment, but rather, as a sociological sketch of one person’s story derived from a well known era of government and corporate psychological harassment and abuse of discredited or easily discreditable victims, and that the homeless are notoriously targeted from many interests groups ranging from real estate developers and other’s who seek to profit in real estate, to those who pass them around in the ‘helping’ industries, rather than root out the social problem that “causes” them.  As such it is a derivative analogy of one person who for all practical purposes and who fits the categories of advanced sequalae described by OGS TI’s; and only that. But mental health is not the WHOLE story-not even close.
One man’s online testimony about OGS has the absolute ring of truth to it, not least of which is that he documents times and dates of “onset” and specific drug use; and those directly from the notes of psychologists and inpatient treatment, and he presents a case that OGS being neither an imaginary thing, a delusion, or necessarily psychosis, and also points the finger directly at a mis-diagnosis that becomes a lie repeated in the “echo chamber” of drug rehab’s and treatment centers and the various “on message” care providers.  Here is the hard link to one of his/her many websites that chronicle the use of the party drug MDMA, which is arguably the “new LSD”: https://weathernotes.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/pasychological-harhassment-methods-to-undermine-a-personss-life/ written November 19, 2006
While the CIA is widely discussed as having perpetrated drug experiments, little focus is on what might be a modern version of these experiments that takes place across international jurisdictions and across cultures and countries. But the American layperson is most prone to blame the CIA, FBI or other domestic agencies because that is what our propaganda system has on one hand encouraged, and on the other discouraged when it comes to OGS.
And it cannot be forgotten how Nancy Reagan’s War on Drugs affected the other side of the political aisle of morality policing-namely that Mothers Against Drunk Driving coincided with rape hysteria and bad guys (men, primarily, for some reason) are everywhere; the boogieman manufacturing and “Take Back the Night” rallies, which really just created women as cheerleaders for the modern DVIC, using the exact tactical and strategic marketing and the social shepherding to “manipulate the breeding stock with flattery and safety” formula that Edward Bernays used to sell cigarettes as “Torches of Freedom” to the same class of primarily European, middle class white females.
Related Reading: the easily manipulated American woman: Cigarettes and Suffragettes, and America’s most famous  Pimp of Propaganda
One must also remember that America’s GDP isn’t measured by actual productivity, but rather the appearance of it, because we produce very little, so “products” in America are drunk driving arrests, sex offender statistics, domestic violence creation, prison beds filled nearly at random and frequently in advance as “gangster babies” are targeted literally from birth and stalked in databases from day 1.
And that PR “placements” of these ideas have replaced an actual economy, and keeping everyone who benefits from these industries, down to local police and the affiliated DVIC industries, such as social workers, psychologists, and drug rehabs ‘on message”and saying the same thing at all times, to keep DVIC dollars flowing, aka “official source gas-lighting” and CVE collusion AGAINST the mental health of clients entrusted to them. This is in stark contrast to the 1960’s when actual products were manufactured here, and men were conscripted for the draft. The DVIC incentivizes false claims and one sided story telling via Martin Buber’s zionist framework of othering and “us versus them,” rather than creating insight into cause and effect related research; much less enlists the truth of those who are for all practical purposes the people who were spoken of when it was written “first they came for___________, and I said nothing, for I was not a __________.”
Then, as we saw in the election of 2016, foreign intelligence agencies ranging from Russia to Israel, corporate spying, and likely more, are operating on American soil, and in American politics, enjoying the impunity that a special class of citizen’s also enjoy here-the political class*; that it could be argued, America is under siege, or that those who sit at the gate employing the “gatekeepers mechanism” willingly allowing the subversion of our citizens.
Adding to this potential and actual proven abuse are other American intelligence agencies, or even private contractors such as the firms like Stratfor, or CIA funded fronts that hire surveillance role players to stalk American’s and others as target practice are also clearly spying ON American’s and more.
While many celebrities such as writer Ken Kesey, The Grateful Dead, Timothy Leary, and others participated in these experiments of the 1960’s and even acted as nearly positive public relations, and made few dollars talking about it. But it seems that the dialogue of drug experiments and the general public is somehow stuck in the 60’s, and today, in American Studies programs and Pop Culture, much of which is so fused with women’s studies programs and multi-culti classes that the Marxist blur of indoctrination, propaganda, and history is complete; and we see many teachers, and especially those who ‘work’ in the DVIC-all of whom were propagandized a certain and specfic way-  adulating this era as well.
But what are the modern version’s of “The ElectricKool Aid Acid Test,”and is psychology and psychiatry as much a part of this ‘junk science’ that produces ‘junk economy’ as it was then? Because listening to James Mitchell-one of the CIA’s torture psychiatrists justify his participation-his hands on water boarding of detainees- is just sickening, and illustrates EXACTLY how deep the OGS denialist collusion-with-psychology rabbit hole goes. I mean, these guys got 81 million to design scientifically sound, but ethically bankrupt torture, just so Dick Cheney could catch a woodie again. I mean-who cares if your name is forever cemented in infamy-81 million will buy lots of return trips to Tel Aviv, where Russian hookers are cheaper than blow up dolls (this last phrase was for the guys at the Fusion Center.)
One case stands out in the online community of OGS victims as one man’s quest to overcome what most of us would call intense and life-crippling stigma from a couple of ‘bad night’s on the town’ in his time as a language teacher in China, which was later diagnosed as a mental disorder accompanied by delusions. While some might say he is mentally ill, o otherwise infer this or that-it cannot be forgotten that secret LSD experiments created lifelong informants and HUMINT out of whole cloth as well:
The case of minigh dimol aka ‘waterinch’ is all over “the internet”and his claim that on  several occasion’s, which he can date and virtually timestamp, of the “rapid onset” of his OGS “symptoms,and delusions” which he had NEVER had before meeting specific, nameable people in a foreign country and doing MDHA.”http://minighjk.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/gang-stalking-and-the-demise-of-moral-consciouness/
Minigh dimol is extremely well spoken, and devotes a large part of their commentary to trying to explain the “psychosis” from a different viewpoint than labeling it mental illness. Most importantly-and this cannot be overlooked from a historical perspective, or from the stand point of sociology-it is noted that the way this person was introduced to MDMA is exactly how many were introduced to LSD at the height of the MKULTRA era:

“The terror stalking campaign involving the writer of this text is campaign that begins in the central region of Hunan Province China, a place called Shaoyang, were the target was a teacher. A torturous protracted nightly noise campaign disrupts his sleep for more than a year, and while he has on going discussions with the schools administration concerning the harassers, nothing is done.
After leaving his teaching postition at Shaoyang University, he relocates to the southern city of Guangzhou, the fourth largest city in Mainland China, for a year of language study, and though the torturous noise harassments seem a far away and in the past, his life is slowly visited by a series of mishaps, misfortunes, and an unexplained injury.
By the end of his year of study, supposed friends he had met in the second half of the year, have set a stage on which we see the target become entangled through set ups, thefts that include his laptop and other expensive items, all leading to the eventual onslaught of an intense gang stalking campaign, one that carefully causes him to feel that he under investigation for suspicions regarding the death of his parents, or is being set up to look as if he had murdered his parents, committed rape and other sorted and grotesque act.It is not until months later, after being in the US for a nearly five months, that he discovers that all he has experienced is part of a phenomena called terror stalking (also multistalking/gang stalking).
A simple search on the internet using the words ‘secret harassment’ enlightens him to the facts concerning the sick reality brought onto him by organized criminals who are bent on exercising a sadistic psychopathic practice, for reasons that are not understood by the victim. Learning from accounts of other victims, who in the initial stages of terror stalking, endure countless noise harassments, he is brought back in mind to Shaoyang University and his own encounter with such a form of harassment.
The unfortunate reality is that these exercises in the destruction of innocent peoples lives are happening to individuals in many countries of the world today, especially here in the United States and Canada.
The effects of terror stalking will undoubtedly cause the victim of this horrific crime to appear mentally unstable, for the tactics of psychological harassment, demoralization and dehumanization are so subtle and 100% tailored for the targeted individual, so that a target’s accounts of gang stalking, when heard by others, seems surreal, strange and unbelievable.
http://minighjk.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/gang-stalking-and-the-demise-of-moral-consciouness/
http://formationquay.wordpress.com
One of the contentions many people have said in response to my accounts what has happened of this seemingly protracted harassment and insidious activity, is that in the months between October and January of last year, I had engaged in the use of MDMA, with other foreigners in Guangzhou, China, most of them English teachers and foreign teachers. The use was limited to weekends only, and such weekend use was not consistent for the entire three to four month period, and tapered off by mid January. My association with these foreign teachers seems to have led to the set ups, and gaslighting which took place in mid February. It is clear in my mind that these foreign teachers lured me into weekend parties, so that when the terror stalking began, I could be labeled with substance abuse psychosis. This is often the protocal for terror stalking, to cause a victim to fall into vulnerable situations before the stalking.
I have been diagnosed with substance abuse psychosis in a number of institutions, simply because I have recollected out loud to others the event that took place in China in February of 2006. I might add that the serious assault using chemicals, fumes, and laced items of consumption would not have been ideal unless the victim, myself, had aquired a history, however short, or using MDMA. It lends much to having accounts of such covert harassment be labeled as substance abuse psychosis. All of the diagnosis of such have had no medical verification, and could very well be contested in court.
Substance abuse psychosis is typically due to extended periods of binge use, in people who are chronic longtime users, who use other drugs as well, and who also have unhealthy eating habits and lifestyles. Below is collected facts sited from DEA and research websites specific to MDMA psychosis. It states that such a psychosis due to MDMA is rarely seen, though may appear in persons who have had a history of mental illness, prior to using the MDMA. This victim of psychological harassment has never been diagnosed with any mental illness during his entire life, nor does such illnesses run in his family.

dimol has a large web presence, and the story is documented in many places on the web. If you follow the link above, you will find more links to dimol’s personal narrative and testimonial about OGS.
* the political class is not a new topic, nor is it imagined that they operate with scurrilous immunity, and impunity. In fact, CA, which leads national trends in politics and fashion, has had an ever-growing list of “untouchables” since they enacted the”cover our asses, not yours,” and “we can carry arms as per the second amendment, even as we stand against your own rights to do so,” policies of granting rights to anonymity, and the right to be “left alone” to those who work in government, policing, politics, and public sector unions. Beyond this being an affront to both the state constitution and the federal constitution as well, it is plainly unethical by any standard, and is one place we see that what are rights for some, are phrased as ‘privileges’ for others, as was the case in pre-Constitutional America.
In a recent conversation with a retired SWAT Lieutenant who had set up SWAT styled units across the world at the height of the drug wars, he noted that “everyone above a certain level of policing is a politician. They’re not even real cops. They make decisions based on politics,” and not even on what is or isn’t uniquely and Constitutinally American.
So, when examining topics as wide ranging and opinionated on “what is a police state” or “what is thee Domestic Violence Industrial Complex” it is valuable to note that those who have been shot or shot at, fash banged or otherwise seen combat, and those who have literally been on the front lines have a distinctly different viewpoint even of ‘what is a cop,’ than thse who work behind closed doors writing laws that are designed to protect them from insight, oversight, or even dissenting opinions.