As we see repeatedly in the news, the narrative of gang stalking is gradually changing, thanks to journalists who have learned to separate the real cases from those that are rife with psychobabble and gibberish about “aliens, lizard people, electronic poop and ghosts.”
stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.
The US Department of Justice is now prosecuting the eBay Gang of Stalkers, which goes all thecway to the executive level, and included the EXACT suspects that ROGS Analysis predicts: a high percentage of retired police, their associates, and many (many) faemale stalkers.
Read It: Inside eBay’s Cockroach Cult
So, we also see that nearly every single “narrator” of the gang stalking dialectic who appears as an “official source” in previous news stories is exactly that same ratio: high percentages of police, intelligence agents, forensic cold case investigators, and pro-prosecution psychologists, and many women amongst them.
Frauds like Dr.Lorraine Sheridan, famously quoted as having “interviewed the internet” for testimonials of gang stalking, is a prison psychologist allied with forensic psychology, as is her partner in crime Dr. David V.James, who seems to author a paper every week about how bad patients stalk “good doctors” like himself after they are fraudulently diagnosed, or mis-represented in psychological narratives.
Then, there are police and state sponsored cultists like Dr. Christine Sarteschi, whose gibberish on this topic rivals Sheridans, and she pops up everywhere that the domestic violence crowd and their “Warrior Sistah’s”are waging a (police assisted) stalking campaign.
Related Story: The Womens Ku Klux Klan “poison squads”– is the #MeToo movement and cancel culture just more far right social engineering?
So: How Bizarre is Gang Stalking Anyways? Dirty Police and Their Poison Squads Are Extremely Creative, Bizzarre, and “Empowered” Bullies
As we see time and again gang stalking is standard police and investigator practice, assisted by community assets, and hidden under the cloak of “police investigation privilege,” and a lot of other civil rights and due process defying b.s. It is a hidden form of police brutality.
We also see that the mainstream news is getting “woke,”too.
Teri Webster of the Fort Worth Weekly has written two excellent articles, one, aptly titled “Gangstalking” chronicling how gangs of police, and their affiliated community assets cyberstalked and slandered a woman who questioned a coroners verdict-and found that its very common.
As these mothers fight for justice, they’re also opening themselves up to online attacks and even hacking
We talked about a story that until now has remained untold: the harassment of families who have lost loved ones under suspicious or unusual circumstances.
Most people probably cannot fathom how online trolls or people on apparent power trips could savagely attack Barton and other grieving families, but what these victims have experienced has a name. It’s called “gangstalking”: harassment that centers on a group effort to surveil, attack, discredit, and silence a target, sometimes to the point of destroying his or her life.
When Barton spoke out on Facebook and Twitter about her son’s death, she found something that surprised her. Other families came forward and told her they have experienced the same types of attacks. They, too, were stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.
Webster also covered gang stalking as regards the psychobabbling crowd in a piece called “Targeting Targeted Individuals” where the usual suspects appear, yammering on about electronic satellite brain zappers, patents on strange military gear, and lots of unfounded evidence free claims about electronics too.
Unsurprisingly, amidst that articles clatter, we see a low level sex offender pop up, talking about how the local volunteer fire department has a camera positioned to record his house “24/7,” qand how cars box him in while driving on the freeway. All of that is well known gang stalker behavior documented in many sources.
This is significant, because the “sex offender” is the raison d’être of the entire Domestic Industrial Violence Complex (DIVC) which is the quasi-judicial extra-legal set of rules and constraints that has largely replaced democratic processes in the west with kangaroo courts and he said/she-said slanders and insinuations instead of jury trials, with heavy empasis on gendered narratives.
It is also significant, because sex offenders are a highly targeted group, and gang stalking is “community custody and control.”
Remarkably, after that person appears in the forum comments, a woman named Tiffany Fontenot appears, doing exactly what these people do-causing division and slandering:
Teri? There is a particular man in your article who literally appears to be a perp. Moore is a registered sex offender complete with tattooed tear drop coming out of his eye. How did you find that guy? He ran a smear campaign on a leading member in the TI community using very common perping tactics such as name calling (one thing he called her was a whore among many others) and claiming others were doing to him what he, himself was actually perpetrating, and yet that same guy showed up in your article? Interesting coincidence isn’t it? There are many people claiming to be TI’s who actually are not in order to attempt to keep this global torture and trafficking network from being discovered by the public. They attack TI’s and try to make TI’s look delusional in order to keep the torture/trafficking network going.
Teri? Did you get benefit for writing this article in any way from the defense or law enforcement, or medical industry, or through anyone at FWW in ANY way via an EMF..(blahblahcetera*)
Fontenot is a subscriber to the long debunked CIA psychobabble about “reverse speech” and other SATANIC PANIC era fundamentalist and neocon religious gibberish. It is them, most of the time who are who gang stalkers are, and the news is now beginning to cover it appropriately.
So, go over there, and read those articles for an explainer about the right wing/left wing split in the dialectic-and to support Ms. Websters excellent coverage of this topic.
*blahblahcetera is ROGS commentary