‘Mind control’ experiences on the internet: Vaughan Bell et al., and “psychologists are complicit”: Psychopathology and gang stalking, delusions, the redirect method Moonshot CVE, and racist hate groups alter our choices online

Non governmental organizations (NGOs), governments, police and intelligence firms, corporate interests, and even sectarian and religious and hate groups like the Anti Defamation League (ADL), with its tentacles in the NGOs and their related industries are using non -consensual, unethical ,and possibly illegal “middle man attacks ” of web browser searches online to target people they dont like. And, those online operations come offline too.

Related Story:  CAIR Los Angeles sues the government for disclosure about how LA is spending the $425,000 government grant allicated for “countering violent extremism (CVE )” programs. These programs include onlune and offline “redirection and disruption ” of individuals who fall into these targeting programs.

These religion based hate groups and their compatriots in the altRight, a hodgepodge of occulted religious orders working through activist circles, police, intelligence firms, and private contractors aka DHS /FBI/Mi5-6 private contractor spies are employing(deploying ) varying levels of “extrinsic religion ” as we saw with former FBI director James Comey and his allegiance to theologian Rienhold Niehbur; and  using programs like Moonshot CVE, and the Palantir octopus of “predictive policing” technology and internet monitoring “tools” to “target individuals” and whole demographics with non-consensual “internet redirection”online, based on Google search language; and then, its associated unconstitutional “proactive policing” offline.

This “redirection,”and military “psychological operations ” waged against non-consensual subjects is what “mind control” actually is in the extant literature, and by definition and an example of what is commonly known as a, “black program,”in military and intelligence circles, and in these dangerous, mind manipulating black ops, we now see them privatized, wholly unaccountable to anyone .

Related Story: anti-Muslim bigot and terror manufacturer Rita Katz and her gang of intelligence /security thugs pops up at the site of many strange mass shootings, and other mayhem both BEFORE and AFTER,these events, almost as if she had written the script: Search ROGS for cases yhat examine “mind control”, strange internet happenings, and the terminology or weaponized use of of pornography.

And, these corporate operatives, police, and others like British Intelligence (GCHQ-JTRIG) widely use internet forum infiltration, hacking, redirection, and more to manipulate speakers, cyberstalk, harass, defame, and otherwise “control” people and their choices too.

Psychology and the quaint, pre-internet, pre-redirection, post “free will” internet, and post-MKULTRA era notion of “free will”

The average citizens chances of encountering “spies” used to be nearly impossible, whereas today, the chance of “average, normal people” encountering spies and their assets is a 1/30 chance, EVERY DAY, according to the numbers on the rosters of US based security industry, intelligence, and policing agents, who act in hidden capacities online and off. That means  there is one security /intel /police agent per US person, compared to the general population, and that number does not include retired police and military agents who are still active in organizations like ATAP, LEIUs,  Citizens on Patrol, or the often cited anti -democracy FBI -Infragard.

The anti-democratic FBI Infragard is behind every internet switch, using cowardly police state, Fusion Center monitoring and provocateur manipulation of real-time conversations on social media, and more to alter, redirect, and otherwise “influence” the minds, and choices of individuals that they target online.

And then, after that, comes their offline, real time harassment of activists as documented by the ACLU, dissenters, and first amendment speakers. Like this, for example. 

So: Why do psychologists resist using the term “mind control” in discussing the above mentioned psychological manipulation of targeted audiences, and targeted individuals? Is it only because the APA squashed the research into that topic in the 1980s, or that they are deliberately stuck in the past, struggling over the legitimacy of not just the legitimacy of claims of mind control, but especially narrative control, post MKULTRA, and at the height of the Ronald Reagan/Edwin Meese-pornography and Moral Majority era?

From Wikipedia:

  • Dualism makes the problem insoluble; materialism denies the existence of any phenomenon to study, and hence of any problem.

The short bus answer, is that psychologists are simply and often deliberately out of touch with the reality of the internet and its hidden speech police, as we see with Dr.Lorraine Sheridan, Vaughan Bell, et al., but also focus on the following examples of gang stalking denialism by Vaughan Bell, et. al. because these were written at exactly the time that the US -FVEYs were actually torturing human beings in Iraq, and imprisoning-and drugging – men in Guantanamo Bay Cuba, which many argue is a mere ectension of MKULTRA programs providing torture porn to people like US vice president Dick Cheney.

Laypersons, public relations industry persons, sociologists, movie script writers, and others call these types of targeted “non-consensual alterations of human perception, aka perception management” mind control because the targets dont have a “choice” in these matters. And its at this juncture where we can make educated guesses that anyone who calls targeted, non-consensual internet experiences anything other than “mind control” is likely getting research grants from government or other “vested” resources.

So, lets examine gang stalking denialism from the perspective of the related concept of mind control denialism.

Psychology has almost always been nearly junk science, because its purely subjective* and relies heavily upon the subjective opinions and diagnoses of biased, non-objective, primarily white christian and Jewish observers.

As such, it is an inneffective tool with which to analyze delusions in any form other than the white Jews,and christians who adhere to those “beliefs ” and the exigent religion based societies that enforce those beliefs, as this analyses relies upon cultural observers who themselves are denying the experiences–and story telling conventions and traditions– of the other two thirds of the worlds population.

But also, because it is entirely subjective, not objective in the clinical sense at all, because of that glaring Jewish -christian bias inherent in the research at its foundations.

Lets look at a few of the infamous Western Holy War era psychological studies that sought to “question” the narratives of people who had claimed mind control experiences online, what some studies called MCEs, and correlate these studies with the well known and oft repeated gang stalking memetic, that “psychologists are in on it,” which they generally are, bbased in what they read(such as these studies below), and their strange belief systems, like the,absolute “good” of government funding.

So, ROGS,asks: is the “government” part of some “conspiracy” to deny the ample evidence of “non-consensual redirection and psychological and influence operations,” stated above (and stated in millions of internet and MSM sources too)?

Lets ask the US National Institute of Health, and the National Library of Medicine about their “mind control denialism” study from 2006, and a few others, and, as usual, ROGS asks you, the reader to decide for yourself. But also, if your lawter, shrink, parole officer, medical doctor, social worker, etc. says you are “delusional”, point them here to these junk science papers, written by pseudo-scientists, aka psychologists:

Comparative Study

‘Mind control’ experiences on the internet: implications for the psychiatric diagnosis of delusions
Vaughan Bell et al. Psychopathology. 2006.

Abstract

Background: The DSM criteria for a delusion indicate that it should not include any beliefs held by a person’s ‘culture or subculture’. The internet has many examples of people reporting ‘mind control experiences’ (MCEs) on self-published web pages, many of which suggest a community based around such beliefs and experiences. It was hypothesized that some of these reports are likely to reflect delusional beliefs and the hyperlinks between web reports were likely to show evidence of social structure, demonstrating the ‘culture or subculture’ exemption to be increasingly redundant in light of new technology.

Sampling and methods: Texts from web sites reporting MCEs (n = 10), experience of cancer (n = 10), depression (n = 10) and being stalked (n = 10) were identified, and were blind-rated by three independent psychiatrists for the presence of delusions. Hyperlinks from web sites reporting MCEs were used to create a network structure; this was compared with a size-matched, randomly generated network and known social networks from the literature using social network analysis.

Conclusions: The sampled web-published accounts of MCEs are highly likely to be influenced by delusional beliefs. Social network analysis suggests there is significant evidence of an online community based around these beliefs. The fact that individuals can form a community based on the content of a potentially delusional belief presents a paradox for the DSM diagnostic criteria for a delusion, and suggests the need to revise and revisit the original operational definition in the light of these new technological developments.

Heres a few more moldie oldies from the War on (manufactured) Terror era of endless money spent on junk science and psycholigy to justify that illegal war, and likely beneficiaries like Vaughan Bell:

Bells pre-masterpiece of fraudulent (or merely uninformed and pandering)junk science, pondering “delusions” that the governments of the western world and their propaganda agents are manipulating our online experiences:

‘Internet delusions’: a case series and theoretical integration
Vaughan Bell et al. Psychopathology. May-Jun 2005.

Heres some other crackpot junk science pushing shrink from that era too:


Why do people with delusions fail to choose more realistic explanations for their experiences? An empirical investigation
Daniel Freeman et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Aug.

ROGS CHALLENGE: ROGS,dares,any and,all gang stalking denialists, and mind control deniers, and “internet delusions” espousing psychologists, therapists and others, to refute the evidence above, that proves definitively that “psycholigists are in on it,” fat as rats, and thick as thieves.

* Subjective, meaning that most diagnoses of various “mental illnesses” ranging from personality disorders to delusions, and Type 1&2 errors, are largely derived from Jewish-christian culture and its flawed, biased, incentivized cultural observers.

So, while issues like physical brain damage, Alzheimers, aneurysms, and other “organic” brain disorders have observable effects,and affective symptoms, backed by actual science which can be analyzed using the scientific method, issues like “delusions,” or ratings of narcissism, schizo-affect, and other western gibberish have less than scientific interpretations, are wholly an opinion, and are not consistent across cultures.

So, organic brain disorders are observable across cultures, and separate from so called “mental disorders” based in some square pegs opinion about cogs in wheels.

Feminism, safe spaces, cry bullies and organized gang stalking: the case of the Rwandan Genocide and 'empowered women.'

The Rwandan Genocide was a “women’s war.”
Much of the research on organized gang stalking indicates a police element run amok as it works with the “community policing scheme” that favors the lop-sided narrative of violence, which internationalists phrase as “male” and then, ‘shelters’ the worst elements of criminality in the heart of what is left of the American home: women’s violence, which is the ‘marriage’ of a nation’s women to internationalist finance and agenda.
Why is that?
Women’s violence is covert, networked, and slanderous;  dangerous because of the pedadstalization of women BY women and the men they choose as co-conspirators.

Related Stories: When viewed from a public relations perspective, there is a well financed effort to hide search results that explore violent women, and womens violence against men and children.
A Bing search for “womens violence” returns ONLY results for anything but that search term, and page after page of results promoting, and heralding the DVIC industries of womens shelters, and related industries.
Then, searches for “mean girls and violence” returns a few results about gangs, and this link, about mean girls in churches, or in the office, and its only when I use academic search terms–which are NOT terms that men or children who seek relief from violent mothers or spouses would use–only then do we get results that indicate that womens violence is a real thing.
Lastly, the humans closest ape relative, the chimp, does not utilize “third party punishment” whereas the matriarchal bonobos fully utilize sexual abusecas,a tool of social control.
This is because the World Health Organization (WHO), and other vested interests have phrased all violence as male-initiated, and also why many call that organization “big sister.” Here is the WHOs gender biased assessment of domestic violence.

And, women’s violence takes many creative forms, and none of them are held accountable, because in part right wingers and conservatives view women as “delicate flowers” and left wingers, no matter how loudly they scream for equality, socialism, or the erasure of gender exploit that perception to the hilt.
So- first, and experiment:

  1. Close your eyes and think of a woman you love; that you care for- a wife, a sister, a mother, a friend
  2. ask yourself “what would it take for me t hurt a woman?
  3. Open your eyes-and look below:

5da90-iu
And then recall that the thesis here is that women are delicate flowers, with wonderful intentions, full of hugs and kisses and all that other morally superior stuff, wutever.
Now, let’s look at how this has affected others-let’s look at women’s ‘words’ into action:
Walk-A-Mile-In-Her-Shoes-police-stilletos
And this:
walk-a-mile-military zpsmxjciqsq-618x383
Honey- do I look FAAAaaaaAAAAAAAt in these heels?
So, to explain women’s violence, we must look at it as an institutional force that has been the driving force behind every single one of the last centures wars; and was behind what was called “The Red Squads” under J. Edgar Hoover, during the heyday of the FBI using the Ku Klux Klan and other social groups to terrorize “uppity negroes” and more as primarily white women who had extensive power networked then as they do now to on one hand hide their influence, and on the other, to cry wolf, on queue whenever they are challenged in their power-and then, their henchmen and wimmin step in to maintain narrative control.
Rwandan women called for rape and dismemberment of other women, much as the “academic left” today puts on masks and lobs rocks at the altRight.
Today, we see a similar element, working with different and ‘more diverse’ groups, to cause domestic terror in the form of the DVIC, as the same rallying cries urge us into “forever wars” overseas.
What is the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex, and who pays for it?.
And despite the so-called “rise of the altRight” we know from history that most Nazi organizers were, or are gay Jewish men like Frank Collin, or quite frequently are FBI informants. So, while you can quit worrying about the Klan, you might want to examine these other lunatic fringes.
Without a doubt, we see that violent women use institutional forces to wage purely psychopathic campaigns. For instance, in the most recent genocide on record, women were instrumental in leading the charge that other women be raped; murdered, dismembered, and more. So, women’s violence is institutional, aka the DVIC.
Women as Leaders in GenocideWomen as Leaders in Genocide and the similarity between women’s actual violence, and women’s social or cultural violence

ISSN: 1558-8769

Women Leaders in the Rwandan Genocide: When Women Choose To Kill

Donna J. Maier
The role of women as perpetrators in the Rwanda Genocide has been documented much more so than that of women in other genocides and crimes against humanity: more than in the holocaust of World War II, than in the massacres of Mayan Guatemala’s Indians in 1982, and more even than in the widespread atrocities that accompanied the break-up of the former Yugoslavia which were virtually concurrent with the Rwanda Genocide. It is not entirely clear why this is the case. Testimonies of women perpetrators and victims were collected in the immediate aftermath of the Rwandan Genocide by various human rights groups, most completely by the United Kingdom based NGO African Rights which published its data within a year of the genocide.[1] More evidence has emerged in the trials of genocidaires at the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda, and in trials in the national courts of Rwanda,Belgium, and other countries.  These trials include the evidence of female victims, but also have included prosecution of high level women perpetrators which have resulted in guilty verdicts.

Lies of the left, women’s war’s, and OGS as a practice of the “culture warriors”(the root word of culture is ‘cult’)
In feminist circles, the co-option of social cause, and the essential destruction of any person’s individual narrative by globalist agenda’s takes place in ‘closed settings,’ aka ‘safe spaces’ as some seek to build a following, or enforce a cult mentality via closed door intimidation. The isolation factor cannot be lost on any in the ‘healing professions’ or law enforcement. And cry bullies, a recent scourge of those who practice identity politics-and who were resoundingly ousted from power in the election of 2016-are frequently the precursor to organized gang stalking.
Related Story: Left-wing stalking on Campuses-a silent epidemic
And, OGS is an actual social contagion on modern college campuses, as young women and others are brainwashed via hysterical trance formation to mouth words and act out scripts of trauma that seldom resemble the actual events they claim to have endured. Indeed, there are forms of female initiated violence that could use an updated profile on Fakerape.

Related Stories:
Serial single mother Tracy West ties herself up, beats herself up, and files fakerape charges against a child’s father-State of California refuses to prosecute her.
[email protected] me in the ^$$, please, please, please!: How one young woman, Emma Sulkowicz virtually begged a young man for anal sex, and then, claimed he was her was a rapist when he didn’t submit to her other perverse means of control(nothing against experimental sex, butt….)
The UVA fakerape hoax was one piece of a larger bunch of asses, magnified around the world, thanks to the now fully discredited stake in the heart of journalism, Sabrina Rubin Erdeley, a serial rapehoaxer.
Eight famous FakeRape’s
UVA fraternity sues Rolling Stone magazine for fakerape hoax:  defamed and libeled by Sabrina Rubin Erdeley’s fake rape story in Rolling Stone magazine settles for 1.65 million
In the UVA case, the score is:
Gang Stalkers: Minus 1.65 million We the People: plus 1.65 million

So-forget “fakerape” as an issue of merit and begin to see it as a nefarious ploy of those who are likely institutional sociopaths, psychopaths, and degenerates, or merely serial hoaxers or fraudulent journalists that have no sense of ethics or professional responsibility to the craft of writing – such as Sabrina Rubin Erdeley and others who practice the lowliest form of activist journalism, called “lying their asses off” for a dollar or two. The DVIC score on that is: Journalism 1, Fakerape Hoaxes 0
Then, begin to take note that some women are mercilessly gang stalked in academia-often BY other women, in numbers that are likely far greater than “fakerape’s” that are mediated in-you guessed it-as in the Sulkowicz case and the UVA rape hoaxes, these cases are mediated in academic settings and “closed door adjudication hearings” that have no legal standing, but can ruin a young boys academic career by slander and defamation. Let me know if you start seeing patterns in the data-or Martin Buber’s beard bristles peeking out of these women’s blouses….

And all of this in a climate of “safe spaces” where these hidden domestic terrorists and bullies plot their crimes, and then cry foul when they are discovered. And LEO’s for the most part just don’t care- they get paid no matter what. In fact, fake rape and other DVIC plots are helping to drain taxpayers, and break he countries bank-but some certainly get Dworkin-fat off the deal. And all of this has swung feminism, and handed progress to their altRight companions in Hegelianism.
So, in these cases of organized academic gang stalking, trauma can be presumed, as the stalkers and harassers all deploy a form of “trauma-bonding” that is written about in the literature of torture, and also, is part of the diagnoses of Stockholm Syndrome as we saw with the largest DNA exoneration in American history; and this form of emotional/physical/psychological terrorism is very effective at silencing opposition-which is their goal.

Here is a snapshot of Ms. Sulkowicz rape theater:
In recent months, Emma Sulkowicz, the Columbia University senior who carries her mattress around campus as a protest against the university’s non-expulsion of her alleged rapist (and an art project for her senior thesis) has been hailed as a heroine in the battle against campus sexual assault.

While Sheridan and James maintain that somehow, group stalking and gang stalking are dissimilar, one glance at the data tells us that it is nearly all the same. However, because they are ensconced in the “fake world” of academia, they seldom see the similarity-or deal with victims of this horrible practice. I myself have known one individual who committed suicide after extensive harassment in her social work master’s degree program.
From HER online, a discussion about organized gang stalking in academic and institutional settings:

Gang Stalking: Psychological Targeting in a Group Setting

By Rheyanne Weaver HERWriter

The average functioning individual does not have a lot to be logically paranoid about. Sure, there’s the occasional whisper that you overhear and think is about yourself. There’s also the fear that someone is following you. Then there is gang stalking.

This is the ultimate form of paranoia that turns out to be a well-founded suspicion and mistrust. Gang stalking is when a group of people decide to target an individual and attempt to control aspects of that individual’s life and monitor them 24/7. Generally, this is done without the person actually knowing about this organized stalking group, but if a person does find out, the results and helplessness can be devastating.
According to gangstalkingworld.com, “gang stalking is experienced as a covert psychological, emotional and physical attack, that is capable of immobilizing and destroying a target over time.”
Sound sick yet? It gets worse. Targets are chosen for many reasons, including dissenting opinions in politics and the workplace. The overall goal is to break the targets down, from making them just look crazy for suspecting gang stalking to isolating them to ruining their reputation and credibility to forcing them to commit suicide.
People might participate in gang stalking without knowing these horrible consequences. They might gang stalk to be accepted into a group or be forced into gang stalking.

The Brush pass: what is 'directed conversation' in the OGS dialectic?

Those refreshing interludes.

“Every time we are sent down to Mexico to train one group in SWAT tactics, we know they’ll be sending us down there in ten years to kill the same guys we are training today.” and “It used to be that the Israeli’s came here to train, and now we go over there.”
–spoken to me by an anonymous retired SWAT lieutenant just this afternoon 08-15-2017

While on  the surface, my writings may seem to some to be provocative-which is what all respectable words SHOULD be-a certain group of ‘umbrella’ organizations and their adherents in and outside of policing and its affiliated brethren and sisterns might feel that my writings herein are “anti-police, or even “anti-government,” based on their political leanings, or payola.
I wish to point out the that nothing is further from the truth as pertains to my intentions, or more important than free speech regarding this topic, and that, unfettered by political compromises, or the silencing that can happen through the great blackmail scheme that we have come to learn is the NSA data collection scheme and its accompanying database abuse; and that due process is the first step and the last step one will ever take in America, and know with great pride that they are fortunate to live here, and interact here, as citizens. This is, I would like to remind my 26 readers from today, a right, and NOT a privilege.

UPDATE 10-8-2019: If any police in America want to break thevthin blue line protocol, and talk about this, ROGS can be reached via my comments section, where you can add your voice. There is no longer any need to ramble on about DEWs, and aliens, because ROGS Predictive Analysis has forever changed the way we can talk about police gang stalking.
Use Tor (which is in NO WAY secure anymore, due to MIT script kiddies, etc. ), Guerillamail, and a throwaway phone that you bought with cash. I will send further instructions, to journalists and others who can protect you. Simply tell the story, and leave out the auto-antonymal language and psychobabble -you dont need it anymore.

One of the biggest problems facing American’s today is the same problem that is facing policing, which is that of defining the “us” from the “them.” This has and always been a problem in policing of any kind. When speaking of “us versus them,” it is important to look at the roots of this dual and dichotomous narrative, but also ask if “the right people” are the ones being targeted. Then, it is important to know that targeting via database operations has taken on nightmarish proportions for ALL American’s, including police.
So, ironically, I find myself lending voice to another kind of voiceless person, which are those in  policing, government, and other public sectors who themselves are targeted on multiple levels, and then, burdened with the need to keep silent, based on the heirarchy of blindly following orders, speaking when spoken to, keeping secrets, and doing as they are told.All of these can and do produce special, and specific mental disruptions, and certainly do affect mental processes; just as it does to citizens.
Of the OGS denialists, there seems to be a unified version of “these people are all mentally ill,” whereas of those targeted, they are, until recently, fairly silent, and frequently compromised in ways that defy conventional explanations. One such “targeting” took place upon American diplomats, and the US government clearly and decidedly implicated “sound weapons”in a main stream news story carried by the Associated Press.
So, of those who practice OGS, and those who are targeted, few know that police officers, and law enforcement in general are among the most targeted of all “individuals” as this new scheme of database abuse has some of them in it’s sights, as it once had common  criminals, and political targets in it’s vast net. Also in the net are frequently targeted diplomats, foreign service employees, and more. Then, beyond American’s being targeted, there is the fact that their relatives and associates are also targeted.
When I, for one, sit down to contemplate “what is America?” and “what is Democracy,” like most, I come up with the answer that we are world leaders and that the United States Constitution is a document written for everyone-it is written for the alt-left protester and the crybully as much as it is written for the alt-right racists and their affiliated groups who argue over statues in culture wars, rather than statutes which are violated every day by those who have abused citizens via database collection, and as such the Constitution, due process, which should be the focal point of our “American” discussion, has bee subsumed by identity politics of race class and gender wars; and Syria, or Iran is “our” enemy, instead of those who are tearing us apart, and using the Constitution as toilet paper; because regardless of the mess that international finance, and black operations of any and every kind put us in, we are, all still American’s FIRST.
And in that light, policing takes on an especially important role: that of “upholding an oath” to protect American’s, FIRST from enemies “both foreign and domestic.” This oath is not one that includes “well, you know, that American, versus that American is a better American, so we don’t have to protect him or her.” And it certainly does not include overlooking the long term, and frequently harmful targeting that factions of the LE community perpetrate against other factions of the LE community.
I myself have several members of my family who worked and who work in policing. And like all families, I also have many family members targeted-an  uncle just returned from Israel; an uncle who runs an American business that is highly targeted by mobsters and others; a cousin who is a past and current legal counsel for two former sitting presidents. And my own father- a Korea veteran, wore a wire for the FBI in the 1960’s, which certainly explains why I have chosen to write, rather than any other course of action, to peacefully protest the subversion of Democracy via database abuse, and it’s accompanying blackmail schemes.
As such, I have written this blog as a guide, and to encourage others to write their own, based in this as an example. My readership has blossomed, and certainly, the stories they are reading validate each and every thesis herein. My other work can be seen in other places, and I will continue to write as long as I am able, for the word is indeed mightier than the sword, if the hornets nest that I have kicked up here by breaking my own silence is any indicator.
On that note, let me add a few sprinkles of salt and pepper to (((cooking analogy thanks to Libra who hates it when I use his seekrit nym without accreditation)))  the story herein:

  1. I have been approached by no less than 6 people in the last three months who call themselves targeted individuals. One was a hacker,  two were Viet Nam era veterans, one was his ‘running partner’ who had bad dealings with the VA in the 1960’s and who mentioned a certain man, the mad bomber Irv Rubin of Jewish Defense League fame, who was imprisoned for terrorism in 2001 or so, and who died under mysterious circumstances;  one was a bag lady, one just a street kid who wished he could hack better. Another was chased out of his neighbrhood because he reads leftist literature, and his kid has autism.Three black, two hispanic. One white. This is more “TI’s” than I have ever met in such a short span of time.
  2. I watched over a period of 8 years as my life became ‘infiltrated’ and coincidence after coincidence piled up, as did compromising situations, situations that directly affected my life and safety, and much more.
    Finally, I will note that a relative of mine was affiliated with a certain database which contains the identities of every single American or foreigner who has ever passed a background check, or who has been fingerprinted-and this database was the exact one which was also used during the elections in Hugo Chavez’ elections.
    And as such, I blew the whistle when it was compromised BY those who work IN the exact organizations that are paid to protect that information. One of those people was an African American corporate diversity assassin, and the other, a Syrian who breached CJIS clearance policy in a level three breach at 3Ms Cogent division.
    There is today, such a collaboration between those who work in corporations, and those who work in law enforcement to undermine us all via database abuse, and the selective leaking of information for political reasons, whereas I blew the whistle because it was simply the right thing to do.
  3. Like any whistle blower, journalist, or anyone else who has ever endured OGS, I can say with certainty that I fear for my life and safety, and the lives and safety of my family members. As such, I write this to inform the public at large, and those who have sought to compromise me that you are on notice; and I hope the wheels of government find you, and prosecute you to the fullest extent of  the law.

Lastly, on a refreshing note: I believe to the fullest extent that what I put forwards herein is a valid thesis which can and will be useful to those who are in similar positions. And to those who I might feel mocked, chided, or derided herein, maybe take a look at your own thesis, your own complicity, or your own immorality, and ask yourself why the things I write here are a challenge to you. But I for one, hope that my peaceful dissent and resistance can be seen as exactly that, and for the criminal, civil defense lawyer or other constitutional rights scholar; to those in the healing professions, and those in the wider dialectic find value herein.

Related Reading and Update: Since I wrote this post a couple years ago, both the Association of Threat Assessment Professionals, and the nefarious Anti Defamation League( which shared ideological goals, and office space with Irv Rubin, who I mentioned above) have since come out of the closet and linked themselves to organized cyber/gang stalking AND the deployment of military grade psycholigical operations targeting individuals, and some of those have now gone on shooting rampages at synagogues and other places. Click those links for more information.

UPDATE 10-28-2019: This post is causing a few guys/gals to sweat, and some 20 or more people have read it in the last three days alone, after this post started a HUGE butterfly wing effect, literally across the world according to WordPress stats, and that was preceded by THIS HERE where I literally proved my thesis , and also where ROGS named names, associated with the Brookings Institute, the Department of Defense, and several intelligence agents and agencies; then occulted State Department Save the Wimmins types who cloak hidden religion in NGOs; and gee, I hope I dont get gang stalked, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan!
But, yeah, OGS is what our horrifying modern total surveillance state is; its how religious zealots keep cintrol of “the narrative. ”
For the record: this conversation with a retired SWAT lieutenant took place at the foot of the Sierra Madres, right next to this beleaguered racetrack, and it wasnt a brush pass in the IC clinical sense: it was a whistle blower who flew combat missions over drug lord territory in several nations, who retired with honors, and who gave me the bare bones thesis about the modern misuse and abuse of police resources that I discuss here at ROGS, aka gang stalking.
So, the brush pass was an.entirely different story, and I used that phrase to remind myself of that entirely different story.
Beyond being upset by the #culturewars that are raging all over America, with police/agency-created mass shooters, car crashers, abd Incel chronic masturbators, he was particularly “not happy with ” Israelification of US para -military police, or how current LAPD had actually used his service as a helicopter pilot to literally fly helicopters above targeted individuals, much as this story documents.
And, as you might have guessed, other information that he relayed to me (about the workings of police and political shenanigans in several SWAT divisions ranging from West Hollywood to the San Gabriel, and Fernando Valley’s in California is stored offline, in a #safespace, with witnesses, and a backup copy should ROGS meet an untimely end, or other “mysterious” situation.
tenor.gif

Val is an electrician, and he was approached as a gang stalking recruit in an environment loaded with Durkheim's 'anomie'

Val is a merchant mariner, one of the most noble professions I can think of. When he is not at sea, he works with his family as an apprentice electrician, in a wealthy area of a large city. Then, like most men who are men, he spends some time when he is not at sea hanging out with other men in gritty urban environments, and associating with friends from where he grew up.
The only problem for he and his friends is that they all grew up in one of the biggest and most notorious urban American ghetto’s that is a virtual powder keg of the toxins and effects of racism and the disparity of wealth in America which is more evident every day, and highlighted by the DHS/DEA/FBI/Etc Alohabet asset forfeiture racket that targets real estate for profit.
And, they grew up on a watchlist called the CalGang database, which literally monitors gangster babies from birth as if they are a threat to organized society.
And this database like so many others today which are hidden beyond the view of those who are catalogued in them-this database presumes criminality from birth (and most, if not all DVIC and DHHS lists also are used to track, and target lower tier American males, much like a modern slave net).
As such these men are literally and in every sense “targeted individuals.”

Related Story: It’s time to ask why so many Ferguson, MO Activists are dying in odd “suicides” One of them, Darren Seals, even reported that he was stopped and interrogated by ‘ten men who ‘told me I that I chose the wrong friends.’ Then,shortly thereafter, Seals apparently shot himself in the head, and then, set his own car on fire to hide the evidence.
So, we see that strange suicide is one way to measure the “effectiveness” of gang stalking.
UPDATE: The Daily Beast has documented many more murders of black men in that area, during that time period.

As you have probably guessed by now, Val is also black. Such is the power of stereotypes, but also the power of language used in propaganda-most western people believe that blacks are the primary residents of ghetto’s ( an out dated term in itself, as “the hood” is used by ghetto dwellers all around the world due to Hip Hop music.) And as such, Val hangs out with other black people. And unlike Jewish ghetto’s of earlier era’s, these men are not self segregated.
” I hang out there when I am not at sea, because it’s my way of giving back, and trying to let them know there’s more than that-living there.”
What Val is saying is that he was fortunate, and that he “got out,” of the enforced entrapment and containment scheme that American ghetto’s are-and that in order to inspire others, he feels he has a duty to go back and “associate” with those who are “still there.” And it is this which made him a target of recruitment for gang stalking; and a possible “threat” in the matrix should he not comply with community policing.

Related Story: “Iconic” civil rights era phtographer Ernest Withers photographed all of the major civil rights era leaders at point blank range. And, he was also an FBI informant-a rat and spy. Not incoincidentally, he was with Martin L. King the day he was murdered (try not to let these coincidences bother you when you make the connection between FBI gag stalking and murdered dissidents, authors, activists and “others”)
0505-edward-crawford-tear-gas-canister-8
And,the subject of this “iconic” photo above of the Ferguson protester Edward Crawford fits into the cohincidental patterns you find in the gang stalking dialectic too, as Mr. Crawford was found dead shortly after this photo was taken. Try not to let these patterns with photographs, and photographers bother you-it might make you crazy, according to the experts!

Then, there is a little known fact that black American’s who police their own neighborhoods are tracked, targeted and assassinated for doing so, as we saw in the 1960’s with Black Panthers and others, and even today; whereas Jews have their own police in the Bronx and other places. In fact, in western nations, only Jews are allowed to police “their own.” SO certainly, we must ask who it is that enforces racial barriers, as well as polices speech, and association around these topics.
While association isn’t illegal yet in western countries, in the paradigm of OGS, association becomes a de facto reason whereby police power can entrap and recruit others into the “community policing scheme.” As anyone who has watched the last few decades, change comes very slowly, if at all, and even then, it is mediated by police power, which acts as a gatekeeper between what is “good,” and what is “bad,”- but all of THAT takes place in the many gray area community policing schemes. Good and evil then, are mediated in the internecine battle ground of hidden strife between police power, and “we the people” in a hidden battleground where every day rights and liberties are pphrased-for some, but not all- as “privileges and immunities” or as “necessary compromises.”
Val’s story of being recruited into community policing
” I was back one time, and all of a sudden they swept up on us. We were in a pretty large group, mostly a bunch of guys just hanging out. They put us up on the wall- you know, spread your legs, keep your hands out of your pockets, like that. I had no problem with it really, you get used to it(….) and I complied. Then, after they went through all of our pockets like that the usual stuff(…), they had a job to do (….).”
“So I told them about my service, and he was kind of, you know, surprised, and he took me into his SUV. He was the watch commander- four stripes…and one loop. He asked me why I was hanging around these guys, and I told him what I just told you-because I believe that the only way to make a difference is to come back here, and, you know, show thee guys that there’s something else. He left me his card, and told me to call, you know if you see something and all that. I stilll have his card on my dashboard.”
What Val is describing is the gray area between our Constitutional rights of assembly and rights of association, and the paradox that gray area has produced for exploitation of “the little guy’s” while corporate interests ranging from Peter Thiel’s conspiracy with Google and Palantir, to psychologies reliance on drug comany definitions of mental health. For some, obviously, torture is ok, as lng as it’s the “bad guys” getting water up there nose, or a few “dangerous mentally ill people” popping a few fix-society-by-drugging-you pills when they complain about being “stalked” or “hunted” or otherwise ham stringed and black bagged by gray area policing schemes.
So, for some policing is purely profitable, but for most, the community policing scheme has produced an opposite effect on our society, and on our liberty, that is itself a civil conspiracy by those in power to force the police to become abusers of the Constitution itself.
Due to the lifting of the Constitutional guarantees of rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” via the un-Constitutional gray area policing scheme of organized gang stalking, aka community policing,  and the full blown assault on our rights of privacy, speech, press, assembly, and every single other right that can be inferred from the right of privacy not yet enumerated-we see that a vast encroachment on our rights to “freedom of association” are crimped at the internet switch, or our telephones, and thereafter.
So, yes, this can have a disparate effect on select people, not least of which is to with draw from society that “perpetrates” such day to day abuses.
So- I would like to re-examine a main thesis of Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, two academics whose lives have been lived in academia-which is a major social disease of our times, and which can lead to an echo chamber effect within researchers who have spent NO time in the real world-that part of it where whole neighborhoods and cities, and communities are .put on eatch lists, or databased as “gang members,” In fact, their famous study on OGS interviewed “the internet.” take a moment to let that sink in.
Then, note that the term “gang stalking” is termed “group stalking” because those who wrote the study are practicing what amounts to a form of class based, and in this case racist and sexist “gas lighting.” This happens because of the social disconnect between the modern transhumanists and actual, real people from across the spectrum who have lives outside of being mouth-pieces for the prison industrial complex. And not insignificantly, academics notoriously live and dwell in “ivory towers,” which Emil Durkheim discussed when he coined the term “anomie.”
For my purposes, I will note that ivory towers, and the incredible amounts of MIC and AIPAC money consumed by academics, can nearly eradicate human conscience, and any sense of ethics, much less insight into issues as complex as OGS as the fat of the DVIC trough swells their senses to dullness, and glues their eyes shut.
Here below is the definition of “anomie,” and some discussion of it next to a summary of the Sheridan James study-and it MUST be noted that those who are “suffering” OGS are being referred BACK INTO THE POLICING SCHEME by Sheridan and James! Let me know if you start seeing paterns here, because obsession with patterns can indicate ‘apophenia,‘ or far worse, common sense, both of which are dangerous to those who live in Ivory Towers, protected by armed assassins:

an·o·mie
ˈanəˌmē/
noun
noun: anomie; noun: anomy
  1. lack of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group.
    “the theory that high-rise architecture leads to anomie in the residents”

And here is the summary of Sheridan and James analyses of OGS as a likely “delusional disorder:”

Group-stalking appears to be delusional in basis, but complainants suffer marked psychological and practical sequelae. This is important in assessment of risk in stalking cases, early referral to psychiatric services and allocation of police resources.

So, Val, who I talked with this morning, reported an attempt to recruit him into the community policing scheme, by a “gang strike force” and offered the hint that cooperation with this as a “normative” duty of his citizenship was expected. Val is neither delusional, nor is he suffering trauma, because unlike others in his peer group, he had a father, he respects his fathers authority, and that father was also a world traveler. His father, as opposed to many others who got swept into high heels policing, such as this example here, encouraged individuality within “normative” association.
And, he imparted to Val a desire to “get out and see the world,” which he did. In doing so, Val, unlike his peer group, Val learned about the “hierarchy of relationships,” and probably a thing or two about kyriarchical paradigms, though he didn’t elaborate it as such.
Instead, he had a grasp on what is anomie, what causes it, and he tries to make a difference, realizing that “all things are NOT created equal.”
Here is a bit more about Durkheim’s anomie:
It was popularized by French sociologist Émile Durkheim in his influential book Suicide (1897). Durkheim never uses the term normlessness; rather, he describes anomie as “derangement”, and “an insatiable will”.[3] Durkheim used the term “the malady of the infinite” because desire without limit can never be fulfilled; it only becomes more intense.
Durkheim, who used the concept to speak of the ways in which an individual’s actions are matched, or integrated, with a system of social norms and practices… anomie is a mismatch, not simply the absence of norms.
I have discussed anomie and organized gang stalking in terms of gang stalking being an unethical, illicit and illegal practice that psychology, and policing and the hidden networks of abusive social power that are wielded by “community policing” and NGO’s and other’s who participate in it, and yet because there is an absence of “norms” or even awareness, and worse, that in a society where power is the goal, that “norms” themselves are unhealthy; as do the methods of enforcing them, and that inequitably.
None of these that act as gatekeepers and interpreters of “what is normal” have any insight whatsoever, as I have noted that hose who have written on the topic are part of the official denial of the practice; and those that do are themselves corrupt to the point of being OGS denialists who use power to enforce corruption- that corruption for powers sake IS the norm; and that OGS “symptoms” are anomie that is experienced bu those who cannot in any way participate in our current society.
Academia is ill suited to deal with OGS in any substantive way- and I suggest it is because they are socially disconnected themselves- that they embody the worst that Durkheim could have imagined. And, it is not surprising that  in Durkheim’s anomie, and our current pervasive police and surveillance state, that in:
a society with too much rigidity and little individual discretion could also produce a kind of anomie… Thus, fatalistic suicide arises when a person is too rule-governed
Note that in anomie, suicide is a possible outcome, and in fact was the subject f Durkheim’s analyses- and in the OGS dialectic,  there is nearly a constant drum beat for victims to do exactly that.
This is not incidental- it is an integral component of the eugenic nature inherent to the entire dialectic, and as such, and in the case of Val, who “got out” we see the disparate police power attempting to enlist him in the aid of becoming a rat, rather than an individual attempting to make a difference by merely setting a good example as an accomplished individual. That he is being subtly encouraged to become an informer as a first step into a wider dialectical power base, and thus, recruited into the gray area.
So, of the many things that this one example provides, I cannot tell you if Val was stalked in a specific database before the event he describes. I cannot tell you if Dataminr, Palantir, Media Sonar, or any of the many other ways that our relationships are tracked and monitored by police and others every day were deployed on him because the public does not have open access to these privatized and illicit databases.
But I can tell you with scientific certainty that he was profiled and targeted; and an attempt was made to recruit him to become an informant in his community. And with certainty, I can tell you that this all happened in a highly targeted environment, whose future has been mapped frequently from birth.

Related Story: Meet the actual, illegal, criminal, organized gangs that work in the Los Angeles policing,and tactical units.