Gangs of police =”who are the gang stalkers.”

As we see repeatedly in the news, the narrative of gang stalking is gradually changing, thanks to journalists who have learned to separate the real cases from those that are rife with psychobabble and gibberish about “aliens, lizard people, electronic poop and ghosts.”

stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.

The US Department of Justice is now prosecuting the eBay Gang of Stalkers, which goes all thecway to the executive level, and included the EXACT suspects that ROGS Analysis predicts: a high percentage of retired police, their associates, and many (many) faemale stalkers.

Read It: Inside eBay’s Cockroach Cult

So, we also see that nearly every single “narrator” of the gang stalking dialectic who appears as an “official source” in previous news stories is exactly that same ratio: high percentages of police, intelligence agents, forensic cold case investigators, and pro-prosecution psychologists, and many women amongst them.

Frauds like Dr.Lorraine Sheridan, famously quoted as having “interviewed the internet” for testimonials of gang stalking, is a prison psychologist allied with forensic psychology, as is her partner in crime Dr. David V.James, who seems to author a paper every week about how bad patients stalk “good doctors” like himself after they are fraudulently diagnosed, or mis-represented in psychological narratives.

Then, there are police and state sponsored cultists like Dr. Christine Sarteschi, whose gibberish on this topic rivals Sheridans, and she pops up everywhere that the domestic violence crowd and their “Warrior Sistah’s”are waging a (police assisted) stalking campaign.

Related Story: The Womens Ku Klux Klan “poison squads”– is the #MeToo movement and cancel culture just more far right social engineering?

So: How Bizarre is Gang Stalking Anyways? Dirty Police and Their Poison Squads Are Extremely Creative, Bizzarre, and “Empowered” Bullies

As we see time and again gang stalking is standard police and investigator practice, assisted by community assets, and hidden under the cloak of “police investigation privilege,” and a lot of other civil rights and due process defying b.s. It is a hidden form of police brutality.

We also see that the mainstream news is getting “woke,”too.

Teri Webster of the Fort Worth Weekly has written two excellent articles, one, aptly titled “Gangstalking” chronicling how gangs of police, and their affiliated community assets cyberstalked and slandered a woman who questioned a coroners verdict-and found that its very common.

Gangstalking

As these mothers fight for justice, they’re also opening themselves up to online attacks and even hacking

We talked about a story that until now has remained untold: the harassment of families who have lost loved ones under suspicious or unusual circumstances.

Most people probably cannot fathom how online trolls or people on apparent power trips could savagely attack Barton and other grieving families, but what these victims have experienced has a name. It’s called “gangstalking”: harassment that centers on a group effort to surveil, attack, discredit, and silence a target, sometimes to the point of destroying his or her life.

When Barton spoke out on Facebook and Twitter about her son’s death, she found something that surprised her. Other families came forward and told her they have experienced the same types of attacks. They, too, were stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.

Webster also covered gang stalking as regards the psychobabbling crowd in a piece called “Targeting Targeted Individuals” where the usual suspects appear, yammering on about electronic satellite brain zappers, patents on strange military gear, and lots of unfounded evidence free claims about electronics too.

Unsurprisingly, amidst that articles clatter, we see a low level sex offender pop up, talking about how the local volunteer fire department has a camera positioned to record his house “24/7,” qand how cars box him in while driving on the freeway. All of that is well known gang stalker behavior documented in many sources.

This is significant, because the “sex offender” is the raison d’être of the entire Domestic Industrial Violence Complex (DIVC) which is the quasi-judicial extra-legal set of rules and constraints that has largely replaced democratic processes in the west with kangaroo courts and he said/she-said slanders and insinuations instead of jury trials, with heavy empasis on gendered narratives.

It is also significant, because sex offenders are a highly targeted group, and gang stalking is “community custody and control.

Remarkably, after that person appears in the forum comments, a woman named Tiffany Fontenot appears, doing exactly what these people do-causing division and slandering:

Teri? There is a particular man in your article who literally appears to be a perp. Moore is a registered sex offender complete with tattooed tear drop coming out of his eye. How did you find that guy? He ran a smear campaign on a leading member in the TI community using very common perping tactics such as name calling (one thing he called her was a whore among many others) and claiming others were doing to him what he, himself was actually perpetrating, and yet that same guy showed up in your article? Interesting coincidence isn’t it? There are many people claiming to be TI’s who actually are not in order to attempt to keep this global torture and trafficking network from being discovered by the public. They attack TI’s and try to make TI’s look delusional in order to keep the torture/trafficking network going.

Teri? Did you get benefit for writing this article in any way from the defense or law enforcement, or medical industry, or through anyone at FWW in ANY way via an EMF..(blahblahcetera*)

Fontenot is a subscriber to the long debunked CIA psychobabble about “reverse speech” and other SATANIC PANIC era fundamentalist and neocon religious gibberish. It is them, most of the time who are who gang stalkers are, and the news is now beginning to cover it appropriately.

So, go over there, and read those articles for an explainer about the right wing/left wing split in the dialectic-and to support Ms. Websters excellent coverage of this topic.

*blahblahcetera is ROGS commentary

Organized stalking, the Martha Mitchell effect, and disinformation.

While many people are currently being persecuted in ways that are seldom discussed in the news, when they write about it online, they are targeted for extra harassment by paid agents of the state-many states- who are seeking to create a class of citizens for whom justice is denied.
While the actual cases of actual cases of actual people who are stalked are not always the best written accounts, nor do those so targeted possess the best writing skills, sadly, they are mocked for their attempts to bring attention to this topic.
As is well known today, the CIA and other intelligence agencies have long been influential in media, steering stories and content. Today, there is-for some reason- a huge media push to discredit those who claim they are gang stalked. Why is that?
Internet culture is infused with this thing called the Streisand effect which states that the harder one tries to stop, or censor an idea, a meme, or a story that has truth in it, the bigger the story becomes. And, there is the Martha Mitchell effect which is a common ploy by psychologists to label all people who  have been harmed byillegal government activity as schizophrenics:

The Martha Mitchell effect is a process by which a belief is mistakenly diagnosed as a delusion by a psychiatrist. This is named after Martha Beall Mitchell (the wife of John Mitchell, the United States Attorney General in the Nixon administration), who alleged that illegal activity was taking place in the White House. At the time her claims were thought to be signs of mental illness, and only after the Watergate scandal broke was she proved right (and hence sane).

DISCLAIMER: this post will now take on a “satirical tone” as regards the seriously flawed work of Dr, Lorraine Sheridan, who interviewed “the internet” in order to formulate an opinion about OGS that is “New Yarwk Times” worthy (the many pieces of orve CIA propaganda that have run in the Times are themselves wrthy of derision and satire.)
Starting in about June of 2016, major media began a discrediting narrative, and attempted to smear and defame those who claim they have been gang stalked. They quoted a highly un-scientific study by a likely transhumanist intelligence cult type psychologist, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, (it was little more than an online poll, really) of people who claimed to be stalked. Unsurprisingly, she did not interview a single person in person, and relied upon anonymous internet results.
And, she attempts to relegate the entire community into a single category of nutters-likely schizophrenics. Hmmm. Where have we seen that before?

Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, who is co-author of perhaps the only study of gang-stalking, said the community poses a danger that sets it apart from other groups promoting troubling ideas, such as anorexia or suicide. On those topics, the internet abounds with medical information and treatment options.
An internet search for “gang-stalking,” however, turns up page after page of results that regard it as fact. “What’s scary for me is that there are no counter sites that try and convince targeted individuals that they are delusional,” Dr. Sheridan said.
“They end up in a closed ideology echo chamber,” she said.
 

Speaking of “closed echo chambers”-Dr. Sheridan and her comrade David V. James make a living running with DVIC narratives, and authoring work that panders to the ability to gain the feelz crowd and its associated crybullies by draining the tax payer, while pandering primarily to the middle class, and it’s poice mechanisms.
And here, “Boingboing media” runs with that, and discredits those who expose organized gang stalking (and really-who the hell is “Boingboing” media anyways? The intel agencies start as many news stories today as they stop, and literally use media to wage “influence operations,” aka “mind control-how weird is THAT? Thaaat? Thaaaaat? T-h-aaaaaat….?)
Here is doctor Lorraine Sheridan, speech pathologist:
Dr Lorraine Sheridan
Here is all of her contact information. This information is posted in other publicly available outlets, and is posted in the public’s interests, directing researchers and TI’s to the NYT’s primary contact person and undisputed internet “authority” on OGS.

Position Senior Lecturer
Faculty Faculty of Health Sciences
School School of Psychology and Speech Pathology
Campus Bentley Campus
Location 401
Email [email protected]

Here’s Curtin University’s phone number-call them, they look like one of those online colleges that could use some attention-any attention:
Telephone: +61 8 9266 9266
Fax: +61 8 9266 3131
I suggest you call and write Ms. Sheridan anonymous letters-letters, and emails, emails, anonymous, anonymous, frequently, very anonymously, and very frequently, from several different anonymous email services. Because based on her online poll/survey/study that was so prominently featured in the NYT, she’s a big fan and devoted believer in the power and truth of anonymity, and the internet to tell the truthto tell the truth.
And call Ms. Sheridan at her office a lot. A LOT. A looooot.
Call her every day, and give her a piece of your mind-or not. She’d probably dissect it with a child’s scissors, and eat it, if my read on her type of psychological approach to silencing victims of OGS is any indicator. After all-wasn’t Hannibal Lecter a big fan of talking around his victims, even as he talked to them?

Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, gang stalking, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan gang stalking study, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan contact information, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan email address, anonymous internet poll, David V. James, handmaidens of international finance, neo-con toilet slaves and other academics.
Here is the guy that the New York Times chose to pass off as the poster child for the online gang stalking community. His name is Timothy Trespas:

Timothy Trespas, the New York Times poster child for gang stalking (Dude-why did you let them USE YOU this way?-Oh, never mind. It’s what they do!)

From the NYT article

A growing tribe of troubled minds

Mental health professionals say the narrative has taken hold among a group of people experiencing psychotic symptoms that have troubled the human mind since time immemorial. Except now victims are connecting on the internet, organizing and defying medical explanations for what’s happening to them.

The community, conservatively estimated to exceed 10,000 members, has proliferated since 9/11, cradled by the internet and fed by genuine concerns over government surveillance. A large number appear to have delusional disorder or schizophrenia, psychiatrists say.

And history has shown on nearly every available opportunity that the pseudo-science of psychology, combined with propaganda, which is itself a sort of echo chamber of citations, and accreditation that bounces references after references of other pseudo-science and theoretical hypotheticals off of each other, works hand in hand with EVERY abuse by any government EVER on unsuspecting citizens, and that, backed by a powerful Bernaysian theoretical base of influence operations.