Gangs of police =”who are the gang stalkers.”

As we see repeatedly in the news, the narrative of gang stalking is gradually changing, thanks to journalists who have learned to separate the real cases from those that are rife with psychobabble and gibberish about “aliens, lizard people, electronic poop and ghosts.”

stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.

The US Department of Justice is now prosecuting the eBay Gang of Stalkers, which goes all thecway to the executive level, and included the EXACT suspects that ROGS Analysis predicts: a high percentage of retired police, their associates, and many (many) faemale stalkers.

Read It: Inside eBay’s Cockroach Cult

So, we also see that nearly every single “narrator” of the gang stalking dialectic who appears as an “official source” in previous news stories is exactly that same ratio: high percentages of police, intelligence agents, forensic cold case investigators, and pro-prosecution psychologists, and many women amongst them.

Frauds like Dr.Lorraine Sheridan, famously quoted as having “interviewed the internet” for testimonials of gang stalking, is a prison psychologist allied with forensic psychology, as is her partner in crime Dr. David V.James, who seems to author a paper every week about how bad patients stalk “good doctors” like himself after they are fraudulently diagnosed, or mis-represented in psychological narratives.

Then, there are police and state sponsored cultists like Dr. Christine Sarteschi, whose gibberish on this topic rivals Sheridans, and she pops up everywhere that the domestic violence crowd and their “Warrior Sistah’s”are waging a (police assisted) stalking campaign.

Related Story: The Womens Ku Klux Klan “poison squads”– is the #MeToo movement and cancel culture just more far right social engineering?

So: How Bizarre is Gang Stalking Anyways? Dirty Police and Their Poison Squads Are Extremely Creative, Bizzarre, and “Empowered” Bullies

As we see time and again gang stalking is standard police and investigator practice, assisted by community assets, and hidden under the cloak of “police investigation privilege,” and a lot of other civil rights and due process defying b.s. It is a hidden form of police brutality.

We also see that the mainstream news is getting “woke,”too.

Teri Webster of the Fort Worth Weekly has written two excellent articles, one, aptly titled “Gangstalking” chronicling how gangs of police, and their affiliated community assets cyberstalked and slandered a woman who questioned a coroners verdict-and found that its very common.

Gangstalking

As these mothers fight for justice, they’re also opening themselves up to online attacks and even hacking

We talked about a story that until now has remained untold: the harassment of families who have lost loved ones under suspicious or unusual circumstances.

Most people probably cannot fathom how online trolls or people on apparent power trips could savagely attack Barton and other grieving families, but what these victims have experienced has a name. It’s called “gangstalking”: harassment that centers on a group effort to surveil, attack, discredit, and silence a target, sometimes to the point of destroying his or her life.

When Barton spoke out on Facebook and Twitter about her son’s death, she found something that surprised her. Other families came forward and told her they have experienced the same types of attacks. They, too, were stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.

Webster also covered gang stalking as regards the psychobabbling crowd in a piece called “Targeting Targeted Individuals” where the usual suspects appear, yammering on about electronic satellite brain zappers, patents on strange military gear, and lots of unfounded evidence free claims about electronics too.

Unsurprisingly, amidst that articles clatter, we see a low level sex offender pop up, talking about how the local volunteer fire department has a camera positioned to record his house “24/7,” qand how cars box him in while driving on the freeway. All of that is well known gang stalker behavior documented in many sources.

This is significant, because the “sex offender” is the raison d’être of the entire Domestic Industrial Violence Complex (DIVC) which is the quasi-judicial extra-legal set of rules and constraints that has largely replaced democratic processes in the west with kangaroo courts and he said/she-said slanders and insinuations instead of jury trials, with heavy empasis on gendered narratives.

It is also significant, because sex offenders are a highly targeted group, and gang stalking is “community custody and control.

Remarkably, after that person appears in the forum comments, a woman named Tiffany Fontenot appears, doing exactly what these people do-causing division and slandering:

Teri? There is a particular man in your article who literally appears to be a perp. Moore is a registered sex offender complete with tattooed tear drop coming out of his eye. How did you find that guy? He ran a smear campaign on a leading member in the TI community using very common perping tactics such as name calling (one thing he called her was a whore among many others) and claiming others were doing to him what he, himself was actually perpetrating, and yet that same guy showed up in your article? Interesting coincidence isn’t it? There are many people claiming to be TI’s who actually are not in order to attempt to keep this global torture and trafficking network from being discovered by the public. They attack TI’s and try to make TI’s look delusional in order to keep the torture/trafficking network going.

Teri? Did you get benefit for writing this article in any way from the defense or law enforcement, or medical industry, or through anyone at FWW in ANY way via an EMF..(blahblahcetera*)

Fontenot is a subscriber to the long debunked CIA psychobabble about “reverse speech” and other SATANIC PANIC era fundamentalist and neocon religious gibberish. It is them, most of the time who are who gang stalkers are, and the news is now beginning to cover it appropriately.

So, go over there, and read those articles for an explainer about the right wing/left wing split in the dialectic-and to support Ms. Websters excellent coverage of this topic.

*blahblahcetera is ROGS commentary

Dear Joe Schuman, Deputy National Service Portfolio Director at NSIN: why are you following me?

Hi, Joe- do you mind if I call you Joe? Its ok, right? You can call me ROGS, ok?
But I noticed you following me yesterday, in my WordPress dashboard.
Here, have a look yourself:
1560921569367
1560921297210
And, I noticed that you, like I share a sort of radical, centrist approach to free speech (my number one issue), and also, politics that are critical of how Progressives have adopted the ADLification of our dialectic, and use Kommunity Kulture Klubs and Kovens, aka K4 “community policing” tactics, and KKK like online and offline gang stalking of American and other dissidents.

Related Story: the Association of Threat Assessment Professionals works with current and retired police, civilian, and military investgators to frame narratives of social control, aka social engineering, and they call the hidden, militarized, multi-alphabet agency attack on individuals and activists the “colluding parallel investigation,” known colloquially in laymans vernacular as“organized gang stalking.” Even.more curiously, this group of triple dippers also name their various FBI/DHS beneficiary companies with acronyms that spell PsyOps in one form or another.

Or, am I misinterpreting your work at The Cipher, and your blog? Feel free to shoot me….an email and we can discuss it (see my contact page).
1560921457020
But your online profile sure looks interesting.
And, you dont appear at all the kind of guy that would find my blog about organized gang stalking in the private, civilian, domestic theater, by military contractors and private security and investigators who manufacture terrorism in America to be all that interesting.
1560921753056
Regardless, I see you smoke cigars(not that theres anything wrong with that). What would Freud say (or the gay mafia) about that?!
1560921192121So,
Anyways: notice that I have asked this question before, of others as I was personally followed by Brad Eyre of Lonetree Petroleum, just after I covered the case of Asian American Matt Riehl, who was gang stalked by elements in community policing because he criticised the #fakerape cults, white females, and Nazis-and even threatened to run for sherrif against a corrupt Wyoming sherrif; and finally, he was murdered in his home after a multi year, interstate gang stalking event, by gung ho dogfuckers in Colorado policing as he demanded that the officers kicking in his door provide a warrant with probable cause (which they didnt) before he excercised his right to protect himself in his own home.
And, I also note that you are affiliated with the Brookings Institute, which is where, interestingly, one of my cyberstalker a retire USAF OSI investigator/cultist is also affiliated.
Well, you get the idea: what is,a Departmeent of Defense,affiliated guy like you, doing, folliwing a guy like me?
I invite you to contact me here, ASAP.
Otherwise, I will write even mooorrre stories about gang stalking, implicating people from the DoD, like Mr. Sterling, and other .mil contractors who followed me around in the USA, who I wrote about here.
But before you do, maybe read this piece here about an upcoming lawsuit against 3M, who used one of the biggest identity management databases in the world as,a personal political tool.
Or, read this piece about how dirty cops and DHS contractors work in Minnesota, which is on record using some 180 police departments to stalk, and intimidate five reporters.
But a,word of fair warning: those who seek to “undo” me like “they” did to Lucie, will soon find that I am like the fat girl at a drunken frat party who kisses and tells.

Related Story: Regardless of my personal opinion of Alex Jones and Infowars, or how,Adam Lanza fits the profile of a mind controlled product of the deep state I believe Jones has a fundamental right to hypothesise as he sees fit, within the boundaries of known case law regarding free speech.
Here, in the news today, we see the well known child pornography frame and smear job in action as people who forced Alex Jones to reveal his private and company related emails in court then claim that Jones gave them chikd pirn, despite the fact that the embedded content was unopened, and had been sent to Jones FIRST, most likely by Israeli security contractors like this guy described in this story herehere.
THEN we,see those who likely attempted to frame him with child porn “discovering ” these alleged materials in his email -materials that Jones never opened, and only released to the plaintiffs by court order, and after he was forced to release it on discovery -almost as if they KNEW IT WAS THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE.
See this post about USAF OSID and the porn deluge, or this piece about standard pornography operations in the intelligence fields; and this and this,about Joshua Schulte, the CIA Vault 7 leaker

.