WA Fusion Center, limited hangouts, disinformatio, misinformation, mind control documents.

Mr X:
The WA state Fusion Center mind control docs are what is called a limited hangout in intelligence circles. The LH is designed to taint a dialogue, or misguide you, but in themselves reveal the cavalier attitude of these domestic spies.
The images widely circulated from raven1.net are among many that were used by one Eleanor White, a self described whistle blower.
She reigned as the go to disinformation specialist about a topic called gang stalking, between 2001- and 2011. White claimed that she was slandered as a pedophile everywhere she went, but in reality, was likely part of the pre-Fusion center deep state, a likely courier for illegally intercepted communications, and the defamation campaigs that followed.
These materials are used to discredit people who psychologists then label as delusional. But as we see, they also nearly and completely describe how the NSA trickles data to state and federal agencies, who then use Fusion Centers, so called community policing elements, and more to monitor activists and dissidents, via real time cell phone tracking, computers, ALPRs, BOLOs, and more, frequently utilizing plainly bizarre methods.
I also wish to inform you that I have been tracked since 2001, by many agencies across America, for many reasons not least of which is that [REDACTED] also wrote the Lewinsky defense, and represented Cheney during the Scooter Libby, Valerie Plame affair; And, a few other things.
I appreciate [REDACTED] FOIA release from the Fusion Center, but also wish to inform you that there are other questions to ask in these cases, because those documents are designed to discredit any who take them too seriously.
The good news is that the real questions that should be asked are easy, once you know where to look.
For instance~regardless of your political stance on gun control~ask about Fusion Centers monitoring activists, and people in alternative media, or even Facebook.
So, black activists, and mass shooters are a great place to start with mind control. Fusion Centers monitor these guys relentlessly, and mercilessly, via phone, computer, ALPRs, and BOLOs.
To understand the mind part, separate it from the control part, outside of due process, and constituting what could arguably be called unusual punishments.
Then, understand it like this: the FVEY nations
cooperate to target and harass each others activists. A great example is a boy named William Atchison, who shot two kids in a NM school, and who was killed by SWAT.
In his case, he was contacted online by British intel, who waged Gamergate across the globe, and also on American citizens, outside the law, and likely in violation of international treaties.
Then, they passed the “anonymous” tip to FBI, who then waged community policing on the boy.
FBI contacted the kid~who never owned a gun in his life~and then FBI CVE kicked in, meaning the kid was frequently followed online and off, by any of many domestic spy/intel/Rotary clubbers/VFW members/etc organizations attempting to “conform him” and these take on plainly bizarre online and offline stalking proportions.
Only after this, did the boy buy a gun, and this we see in case after case after case. Then, the boy goes ballistic, after being isolated and terrorized by literal hidden and actual armies of psychological operations specialists, for WORDS he expressed online.
So, in that one case alone, you can find evidence that what I say above is true, if you learn to ask the right questions.
How many calls went to which Fusion Centers, about What, When, and Why about this one boy, william Atchison. Were ALPRs reporting his license plate every time he drove, and were satellites literally tracking and recording his every move? Which police departments/school officers pinged his computer or cell phone~or did bad stuff like redirect his internet switch?
Did his computer have electronic implants, aka, coded applications that did/do as yet described things/wiretapped/ monitored and utilized key stroke logging?
Etc.
But taken as a whole, the boy was without a doubt, surrounded by influencers, and others who aided, coerced, and manipulated his choices from his first contact online with British intel, who flagged him during Gamergate.
First, they came for the kid online who said bad words (and those words decided by religious theocrats, and others)~then, they came for the mass shooter after they, working internationally, from sectarian religious basis, occulted pisitions along the internet backbone, and in violation of due process, civil rights, and treaties, bullied him mercillessly, via electronic platforms online, commmunity policing offline, and CVE provocateurs.
I hope this can help point you in the right direction.
I can be contacted here, if you wish more details.
Best Regards,
ROGS (my obvious nym)

NCIS, US Navy, targeted individuals and surveillance of Americans: criminal defense lawyers and gang stalking

It is no longer a secret that the United States military, and its various intelligence collectors are targeting Americans. Criminal defense lawyers should be especially keen to note that the ACLU has been fighting a case since 2014, where a Navy NCIS officer was wiretapping American citizens internet connections.
From the Electronic Frontier Foundation:

Military investigators with the Naval Criminal Investigative Service (“NCIS”) launched an investigation into online criminal activity by anyone in the state of Washington without limiting their search to military personnel or computers.

And from the ACLU:
In United States v. Dreyer, a Naval Criminal Investigative Service (NCIS) officer stationed in Georgia believed he was entitled to conduct Internet surveillance of any computer within a specific jurisdiction and did not have to limit his monitoring to U.S. military or government computers or personnel. While monitoring computers in the state of Washington, he identified an IP address sharing child pornography, determined the IP address belonged to Dreyer, and passed that information along to local police who arrested Dreyer.

The problem? Dreyer, like most residents of Washington, was a civilian and had no connection to the military. The Posse Comitatus Act (PCA), a federal statute enacted in 1876, prohibits the military from investigating civilians and otherwise participating in civilian law enforcement activities.
In the district court, Dreyer unsuccessfully challenged the NCIS surveillance as a violation of the PCA, but a three-judge panel of the Ninth Circuit reversed. Noting this wasn’t the first time the NCIS had engaged in this sort of activity, the appellate court found the surveillance “extraordinary” and in clear violation of the PCA. Most importantly, the panel found that the evidence NCIS obtained should be suppressed. This is the first time a federal court has suppressed evidence obtained in violation of the PCA (a few state courts have suppressed PCA violations). The government asked the court to rehear the case but abandoned any argument that there was a PCA violation. Instead, the government merely urged the court to reconsider its decision to suppress the evidence. The Ninth Circuit agreed to reconsider, deciding to have the case argued again before an 11-judge en banc panel.