Lynne Stewart-the “terrorists lawyer” speaks from the grave.
As you can see by the headline there, ROGS is a blog that asks the questions that could get a guy killed by the “good guys.” You see, in a police state-every police state- the good guys HATE journalists and lawyers-especially criminal defense lawyers, cuz’ “We don’t need no steenking warrant” and all that other hero stuff (apologies for my bad, stereotypical accent to any Latino’s and especially the Senor Gomez and family who invaded my class room a couple years back with bad street theater. But the word “steenking” is actually James Cagney, imitating George Raft, imitating someone from the middle east.)
*SIGH* I guess that is the short history of journalism in America. I mean- at least America isn’t “Bleeding Kansas”-yet.
Not that the Israelification and the ADLification of American police isn’t trying real hard to make it so, though….
And, I have pointed readers of the future to who it is that might do me in, and specifically, I have implicated the NSA data theft as a starting point; and certainly, it is widely known that the center of my claim is that hey have spied on me since 2004, and that, specifically targeted me as I have documented throughout this blog. I have also noted that mysterious secret society members show up in my life (the last several years have all the “good people” from the Rotary Club International setting up stake outs next to my apartments, or otherwise doing stuff like THIS that the MSM doesn’t cover.)
I have moments of pure bliss though, when I see a story that I covered some 13 years ago finally make it into the MSM, or the Intercept. That’s how far behind into the dark ages that the Democrat neocons have pushed free speech.
Here- Look: just yesterday, Aviva Stahl covered Lynne Stewart, the “terrorists lawyer” who was a target of nefarious police conduct for several decades, because as Stewart told me once that cops, and The NYPD HATED her (and so did those pork-nosed assclowns whose slogans say “Stop HATE!” and “End HATE! and “A World of Deference” and so on).
A prisoner prohibited from speaking to his family for four months after uttering the words “As-Salaam-Alaikum.” Books that have to be destroyed after one prisoner reads them, lest he somehow use the pages to pass along secret notes. Letters to family members that have to be copied and analyzed by intelligence officers before they are sent out, meaning they may take months and months to arrive.
These are the types of restrictions faced by a small number of prisoners locked up in the United States, including some people who have never been convicted of a crime The rules, called Special Administrative Measures, or SAMs, are the subject of a recently released report by the Center for Constitutional Rights and Yale Law School’s Allard K. Lowenstein’s International Human Rights Clinic. The study, an unusual undertaking, makes the case that SAMs violate both U.S. and international law, threaten basic constitutional protections, and may even constitute torture.
Prisoners who have previously been subject to this sort of detention describe the experience as like being in a world unto itself.
Just about 50 prisoners nationwide were subject to SAMs as of June this year, most of them Muslim. Prisoners who have previously been subject to this sort of detention describe the experience as like being in a world unto itself, in which they have no human contact with anyone other than their lawyers and very occasional, highly restricted communication with immediate family members. Many of those on SAMs have developed mental health issues as a result of the isolation, which may prevent them from contributing to their own defense. Moreover, people under SAMs are prohibited from contacting the media, and their attorneys and family members could be prosecuted for revealing anything the prisoner has said — meaning the highly restrictive world of SAMs is highly secretive, too.
“I wouldn’t be able to publicly repeat anything a SAMs client might have told me, whether about her health, her conditions, her treatment by guards, the weather, what she ate for lunch,” said Pardiss Kebriaei, a senior staff attorney at the Center for Constitutional Rights who has represented clients on SAMs in the past. “Every utterance is off limits, even if it is in no reasonable way linked to safety and security.”
Justice Department officials have claimed that SAMs are a crucial tool in the government’s national security arsenal, an assertion fiercely disputed by defense attorneys of terrorism suspects as well as human rights advocates. Among the most serious concerns raised in the CCR report is that the government uses SAMs to coerce accused terrorists into pleading guilty or sharing sensitive information.
Her “crime,” long before she was “taken out” by gray area administrative rules called SAM provisions? Lynne said “I refuse to be intimidated by the police.”
And then-even worse than cowering before the authorities-she committed speech crimes, and spoke to the relatives of her client, in order to vigorously provide a defense.
See how that works- America’s police are so corrupt that they targeted and harassed people for decades with frame jobs, and set-ups; IRS audits, drive by’s and hone taps, StingRays and more. Then, they busted her for words. Because this is what cowards do.
And-silencing has become the tool of choice in the DVIC asault against speech too. see how that works? First they came for the word “fart” and then….”butterfly wing!”
And I said nothing….
It was said that Ms. Stewart was an advocate of violence every official smear online and in the news, and even Wikipedia repeat that in some form.But to my knowledge, she never caled for specific armed resistance, or otherwise advcated tat people take up arms. As far as I know, she believed as I do-that the word is mightier than the sword.
Which is why, of course, they came for her because of what she said. See how that works? Systemic violence directed at a woman, and not a single SJW stood up for her rights, because they were too busy inventing fakerape scandals like Sabrina Rubin Erdeley and the UVA rape hoax or plotting the next gold theft like they did in Benghazi.
so-words themselves have now been pushed to the edge of the slippery slope, and so, I got to thinkin’ that if there is any sad feature of the lives of targeted individuals, it is that they do not do their research-and then hunt down and maim/maul/stalk/frame/setup/or kill the exact people from the exact agencies that hunt and target them.
Really- this is a tragedy, that TI’s take out their frustrations on abortion clinics, and country music fans, and random strangers, instead of researching who it is that their stalkers are, and then, taking names and addresses, and then, organizing, and working together in hidden ways, selectively….well you can use your imagination what you can do if you put your mind to it.
But fighting sociopaths who hide behind institutional networks of cowards is not easy. And when psychologists like Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James write studies back to back which basically state:
- people targeted as individuals, in illegal ways, by institutions, groups and persons using the well known and forensically described processes of OGS, and then are abused by secret societies and institutional forces- that these should be isolated, discredited, and then, returned into the control of police–who are the exact group of people that are implicated time and time and time again as the primary participants in organized gang stalking, such as we saw with the Beatrice Six, and
- that we just ignore the problem of institutional sociopaths and good guys and gallies who use the lives of others as foils against insight into the huge fraud that DVIC policing initiatives are, and or to create human beings as “Manchurian Candidate’s” like mass shooters and active shooters, as we see time and again that LEO’s ranging from the FBI to the NSA, to local community policing and security guards all participate in individualized harassment, over extensive periods of time lasting sometimes for years, until a Stephen Paddock or a Myron May-or, a Jared Loughner especially is created from whole cloth(it is wdiely reported in blogs about OGS that Loughner was stalked by official institutional elements), and so I would like to draw the journalists and the lawyers here, where we see a boy leave his mother’s house one day, excited to get a brand new, privacy protecting Apple Iphone, only to come into the conclusion that “sure, why not- I think I will just stab a few people until-coincidentally-an off duty cop shows up, whereupon I will be killed” just “happens,”
- that these same “caregivers” and social workers, doctors, and more frequently subscribe to the same magazine where these psychologists publish articles such as the famous “More Lies and pap: don’t let those dangerous people tell it like it is” as we saw in the case of David V. James, and his extensive body of work entitled “How to CYA with botched patients under the DVIC and CVE disruption scheme.”
so- as an early caasualty in COINTELPRO 2.0, yes-I practiced journalism once, and ten, watched in horror as every single thiing that I learned in classes ranging from “Journalism Ethics,” to “The AP Style Guide” and especially all those lectures from first amendment scholars, and “embedded” reporters” were literally rendered useless when this “new thing” took over.
Yah. Ethics scmethicks. Edit this punctuate that, and especially- try to write live into WordPress as the “good guys” hidden all over the cancerous backbone of the net try to perform brain surgery on the writer with J-script errors, and Ruby on Rails exploits; and metasploitation of a Tor browser, who even remember such things.
Yah, sure. Misogyny wutever. Rape-prolly not enough of it on women who do little else than worry about their vahjayjay’s. And Anthony Weiner/Weinstein/et al. God that’s hilarious.
Again, I ask: when did THIS….become this….become this….*
*The regular reader knows what this means, and if you do not, use my search feature to look it up