UPDATE: Since I chronicled the story below, the web has been scrubbed of the story mentioned herein, shortly thereafter.
That story was about how Canadian intelligence agencies selectively utilize internet and MSM, to create cross-talk (feedback loops ) to speak with mainland Chinese police investigators, while pursuing a suspect, and a gang of suspects.
There is no difference between actual gang stalkers and actual gang members. Zero- Cero. Zip. Zilch. Nada-except for the federal/state paycheck. And the “high policing” basis of criminal morality, of course.
Oh-that, and the fact that official corruption is better financed, far more brutal, operates with total impunity, and it’s illegality and mercenary scope far better hidden from the courts (as we see with the Section 702 and the FISA charade/masquerade ball), because it is easy to pick easy targets and then, drag them before a judge, and say “look! We got a badguy!” because this serves the social purpose of “security theater,” or, what has been referred to in the gang stalking dialectic as “street theater,” finalized by the three well known and often repeated phrases: gang stalking “ends in institutionalization, incarceration, or suicide.”
Related Google Fun: “Bush phone and gang stalking” returns 514,000 results “Obama phone and gang stalking” returns 641,000 results. “Trump phone and gang stalking” returns 750,000 results. Is organized gang stalking just a phenomenon, or is it the emergence of a social contagion? Emergent norm theory predicts that gang stalking is becoming a new normal-and that’s not good for democracy.
The Alcoholics Anonymous variant is ” incarceration, institutionalization, or death,” and in the online dialogues of gang stalking, we can also find links between it and M. Scott Peck, a Catholic psychologist,and a debunked ponerologist. So, these strange and limited outcomes of organized gang stalking ALSO and without irony, derive from the Cult of Bill W., and AA’s across America.In a tenuous way, this links OGS directly to the FBI, and the curious rise of gang stalking complaints.
It cannot be missed that this is a direct dialectical link to specifically James Comey’s FBI, which ran from 2005 until his firing in 2017 because he had turned the agency into a political police that J.Edgar would only drem of, because they didnt have internet drag queen porn durng Hoover’s reign, which would have kept him very busy-possibly TOO BUSY to wage war on American’s.
And, this AA phrase is also linked directly to Mr. Comey’s chosen buddha, Reinhold Niehbur, who is said to have written the serenity prayer(although a few spurious crickets in the head of Bill W.’s Protestant/Catholic universe dispute the origins-remember; ALL WORDS and SYMBOLS ARE SECTARIAN, and POLITICAL in “WESTERN” JEWISH-cHRISTIANITY)
Sure- real gangs sometimes use cell phones and computers to stalk, harass, and harm people. But keep in mind that all of THOSE phones are monitored by any of 17 agencies here in the US and hundreds of others in the FiveEyes scheme AS CRIME HAPPENS. Then, the “goodguys” sweep in and grab all the cash from the “badguys”, after pre-emptivey pre-targeting real estate after pre-assessing and pre-apraising and predictively pre-empting crimes that could/might/would/will happen in or on or around a house, aka “real estate;”and that just after they have manipulated a rental property via a Fusion Center, or manipulated a landlord from long distance-Virginia to Minnesota for instance-and filled the property with drug dealers and sex offenders (Google “real estate” and “gang stalking,” or “John Lang Fresno” and “sex offender”).
Tell ya what: if John Forbes Nash didn’t sound nuts BEFORE he met those guys, he sure did AFTER he met those guys. I mean- no gang has anything on this new federal-state-local scheme. The goodguys lost and this is all that’s left of the shredded democracy we all once trusted to rely upon due process. It’s enough to make you wear shoes on your head.
Moving on now: some have at times confused the terminology and blurred the line between “organized criminal gangs” and “organized gang stalkers,” which would be a false binary. As we see time and time again, the Hegelian dialectic has demanded that we choose an “us versus them” paradigm. It also makes us look stupid, corrupt, short sighted, and weak.
As I have noted, I am biologically and psychologically unable to think that way, whereas some 98% of American’s and others from cricket headed cultures think that way by default. I admit: it’s a personal flaw. A fault of my birth, also in unfortunate circumstances in a Catholic-Jewish cultureruled from hidden mechanisms and hidden activity from a sky god who sits “in the cloud.”
Related Stories: What is the FBI’s “bizarre” method of off-the-books harassment aka COINTELPRO 2.0? It’s called a “disruption” campaign. And according to byline.com, these are “How the U.S. Federal Bureau of Investigation is violating the liberty and privacy interests of Americans by using extra-judicial investigations designed to never lead to a formal criminal charge.”
But the problem with that type of thinking is that once “we” adopt it (whoever “we” are on that day/that election/that locality), “we” become gangs ourselves, and thus, there can be no actual morality, and no actual higher purpose. And for me at least, the war on terror has actually been a war on ideas, and the people who have them, because the predatory structure of highly institutionalized and RITUALIZED illegality (the inter-connected tribal-religious-sectarian FISA/Section 702/Fusion Center/FBI-DHS-CIA ‘backdoor searches’/ political spying/ targeted police brutality/etc) affects some of us, provably more than others of us.
Here- look where their war on my ideas began. I was just a lil’ ol’ amateur journalist then. Imagine where the narrative would be if I hadn’t become a target of their hidden and brutal and constant attacks on my ability to write? I mean-this happened less than three years ago. Whoever the apophonetic “they” are of course, “on that day” in this bizarre inter-connected web of hidden and constant atrocities against liberty.
So as you might guess, I am the crazy guy on the internet, walking around in cyberspace with a pair of shoes on my head, and nothing but pocket litter in my worn out overhauls. And even that, “they” pick through it like a gold strike.
And, as I have documented repeatedly, in many ways, with the best saved for that one important day in the light, because it will take more than me to gain standing to sue this monstrosity of the Panopticon in a court room. And, there is much more than meets the blog- the rabbit hole goes much deeper than your eyes, there, reading this post. And that is what is colloquially called a “Constitutional crisis,” and a well considered challenge to its basis.
Wheeeeeew. I am glad others are on the case now. I’m very tired! I can’t keep the shoes on my head much longer. AND: my green hat falls off when I hang my head, remembering those oddly timed car accidents. But these, too, will have their day in court, again-because, it is in fact, all related.
And look! The ACLU, and the EFF, and the NACDL now has a manual for civil and criminal litigators to challenge government hacking! And generally, it is becoming more widely known that gang stalking” is actually “counter-surveillance stalking” by the “goodguys,” against “everyone else who ruffles their flying pig feathers. Now, if we can just get them onboard with these many entrapment and containment schemes that all agencies are practicing.
That will be THE game changer-when “we” get wider publicity for the fact that kids like the mass shooter in New Mexico are created from the information “sharing” GCHQ/FBI/CVE fraud that targets our son’s online gaming habits on pure speech grounds-or no grounds other than that they are easy targets, alone in “their mothers basements”; and then “privacy rapes” them, while stirring up gender wars via “Gamergate.” How Catholic/Jewish/Protestant is THAT?
Here- have a look at a Chinese gangsters cell phone from 2012, and see how many forensic clues YOU can pick out from his culture/location/situation/status/power.
How big IS this little guy? One western/American/British linguistic feature is to use diminutives like “little” when speaking about Asian men and women, whereas many Asian cultures and specifically Chinese culture uses the diminutive the opposite way- to state that a person has great status and great power)?