Is pscychopathy a choice in western nations and Jewish-christian societies that engender emotions as female, and the lack of emotions as male?
it seems as though for most of us, empathy is the default mode. If we see a victim, we share her pain. For the psychopathic criminals of our study, empathy seemed to be a voluntary activity
So, as I have demonstrated repeatedly, and as we see in the Los Angeles Times and other places today,police themselves are actual gang members, who utilize utterly bizarre online and offline language, tactics, and un-constitutional methods to target, entrap, and control individuals. And, the fact that these gangs are at all levels within police departments, the DHS, and even the FBI, one can infer that weaponized investigations, aka, “colliding parallel investigations” are themselves quite bizarre.
And all of that, plus military derived, weaponized psychological operations, run by various agencies, and tribal-religious groups online and off are actually applying weaponized psychology on non-consenting subjects sort of makes the case that the narrative of gang stalking itself is very flawed.
Related Story: Khalid Alexander writing for the LA Sentinel, talks about his thirteen years in a targeted neighborhood, full of targeted individuals, and how gangs of police, and horrific databases ensnare whole neighborhoods and generations of men via ritual defamation.
So, this post you are reading will now move past the Jewish-christian white supremacy that was highlighted by the New Yarwk Times pseudo-journalist Mike McPhates notoriously racist, ADL type smear campaign targeting individuals, titled
“United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers”and explore psychology and “expert opinion” and how it directly drives outdated narratives of mental health that are throwbacks to Operation Paperclip in the post-Nazi era, but also how it is little more than a great confabulation itself, and “gang stalking delusions,” are in fact the One Percent and its enablers further ritually defaming their victims.
As I have discussed with the situation of a two-tiered justice system, which is highlighted by Dr. Stephen Baskerville’s analyses in “From Welfare State to Police State”(.pdf here), we see that lower tier black and white, Asian, Native, and Hispanic men were caught in a huge slavers net, and that this system operates as a shadow America, a cartoon democracy overseen by DVIC industries for over 60% of the US population:
It’s not called the welfare “state” for nothing. Even more serious than the economic effects has been the quiet metamorphosis of welfare from a system of public assistance into a miniature penal apparatus, replete with its own tribunals, prosecutors, police, and jails.
So, because the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex (DVIC) operates outside of constitutional rights, and operates within a carefully Constitution-avoidant gray areas of due process of law and civil liberty(this is called “high policing” in criminology), it might be expected that any caught in its tentacles would naturally encounter Kafkaesque psychological processes as well, because punitive psychology is the norm in these cases, most often applied to men.
Its important also to note how closely the DVIC industries-ranging from social workers, to psychologists, to police and health professionals are to these cases, and even how the FBI is now monitoring the child custody and support hearings of men who resist the DVIC narratives, and its associated speech policing.
So,naturally then we now also see that Dr.s Lorraine Sheridan and David James, and Christine Sarteschi are in fact all associated with the DVIC/PIC and especially that they are all OGS denialists, and are on record in major media claiming that people who complain of gang stalking are “likely delusional,” and that their definitions of delusion comes straight out of the sectarian, Nazi-importation/MKULTRA era of the 1950s.
With recent major media covering the well known gangs of police in major cities like Chicago*, and Los Angeles, and the bizarre un-constitutional methods of policing in general, I would suggest that Lorraine Sheridan, David V.James, Christine Sarteschi, et al are in fact suffering from delusions-delusions of grandeur related to their white supremacist viewpoints, and willing complicity with such an actual police state by the very definition of the term.
Examining the term psychopath, and its often confused relative, sociopathy, which derive from the idea of genetic criminality and this which lead to eugenic social policies of the Freudian era, and even today
Now, having excised the fetid cancer of weaponized psychology that these peoples opinions are as regards delusions and OGS, and revealed their proponents as institutional sociopaths who advocate punitive psychology, I will now move on to yet another psychiatric label which had served their kind so well in the War on Drugs/DVIC/ VAWA era which gradually criminalized men primarily, while also removing access to civil rights and Constitutional challenges to these policies: the label of psychopath, which has been a convenient tool of labelling theory since people like Dr. Donald Ewen Cameron tweaked it and applied labels such as schizophrenic, and delusional quite loosely to serve the CIAs agenda of socially engineering a society that could accept the “new world order” and more.
Related Stories: Nobel Peace prize winning mathemetician, John Forbes Nash, the subject of a pro-drug industry book and film, A Beautiful Mind,was labelled a schizophrenic, and put onto a forced regimen of truth serum, aka, psychotropic drugs. He described being gang stalked for decades, and his theories about games, aka Game Theory single handedly modernized the worlds economies. With little irony, his biographer Sylvia Nassar was the daughter of a CIA case agent.
Then, we saw how one of Americas most famous gang members, Whitey Bulger was a documented CIA/FBI mind control victim, subjected to a regimen of daily LSD; and so many others were used unwittingly in that eras domestic mind control and social engineering programs that defied law and logic.
So now, we see the term of pyschopath is itself being revealed as little more that applied labelling theory, and that one of the key tropes about psychopatholigy, the lack of empathy, is itself incorrect.
The study below highlights the fact that psychopaths can in fact, empathize. This is significant in many ways, which I will not discuss here, other than to use it as yet another example of psycholigy asa fatally flawed pseudoscience.And, as we see the correlation of the rise in gang stalking complaints directly alongside the rise of the modern surveillance and due-process free police state, we now see psychologists “revealing” that so-called psychopaths can feel, and empathize.
It just doesnt get more bizarre than this, in Jewish-christian Ich Du world.
In one study, Keysers and his team analyzed the brain activity of 21 convicted violent psychopathic offenders, comparing the results with 26 men of similar age and IQ. The called participants were shown movies of people hurting each other while brain activity was measured. Later, a doctoral student would slap the patients on their hands to localize brain regions connected with feeling touch and pain. The goal was to see if patients’ brains activated a feeling of pain in their own brain when viewing the pain of others.
“The vicarious activation of motor, somatosensory and emotional brain regions was much lower in the patients with psychopathy than in the normal subjects,” writes Keysers. “The theory seemed right: their empathy was reduced, and this could explain why they committed such terrible crimes without feeling guilt.”
But one question still plagued Keysers.
How could these same individuals prove to be so charming at times?
“I remember chatting with one of the patients … a particularly severe psychopath (he had scored the full 40 points on the psychopathy checklist),” writes Keysers. “Surrounded by the guards, he seemed a most pleasant person. He was smiling, engaging, and seemed to feel exactly what we wanted from him.”
So Keysers and his partner decided to let the patients watch the movies again, this time asking them to try and empathize with the victims in the movies.
“What we found was that this simple instruction sufficed to boost the empathic activation in their brain to a level that was hard to distinguish from that of the healthy controls,” writes Keysers. “Suddenly, the psychopaths seemed as empathic as the next guy. Their empathy was switched on.”
“Psychopathic individuals do not simply lack empathy. Instead, it seems as though for most of us, empathy is the default mode. If we see a victim, we share her pain. For the psychopathic criminals of our study, empathy seemed to be a voluntary activity. If they want to, they can empathize, and that explains how they can be so charming, and maybe so manipulative. Once they have seduced you into doing what serves their purpose, the effortful empathy would probably disappear again.”