Gangs of police =”who are the gang stalkers.”

As we see repeatedly in the news, the narrative of gang stalking is gradually changing, thanks to journalists who have learned to separate the real cases from those that are rife with psychobabble and gibberish about “aliens, lizard people, electronic poop and ghosts.”

stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.

The US Department of Justice is now prosecuting the eBay Gang of Stalkers, which goes all thecway to the executive level, and included the EXACT suspects that ROGS Analysis predicts: a high percentage of retired police, their associates, and many (many) faemale stalkers.

Read It: Inside eBay’s Cockroach Cult

So, we also see that nearly every single “narrator” of the gang stalking dialectic who appears as an “official source” in previous news stories is exactly that same ratio: high percentages of police, intelligence agents, forensic cold case investigators, and pro-prosecution psychologists, and many women amongst them.

Frauds like Dr.Lorraine Sheridan, famously quoted as having “interviewed the internet” for testimonials of gang stalking, is a prison psychologist allied with forensic psychology, as is her partner in crime Dr. David V.James, who seems to author a paper every week about how bad patients stalk “good doctors” like himself after they are fraudulently diagnosed, or mis-represented in psychological narratives.

Then, there are police and state sponsored cultists like Dr. Christine Sarteschi, whose gibberish on this topic rivals Sheridans, and she pops up everywhere that the domestic violence crowd and their “Warrior Sistah’s”are waging a (police assisted) stalking campaign.

Related Story: The Womens Ku Klux Klan “poison squads”– is the #MeToo movement and cancel culture just more far right social engineering?

So: How Bizarre is Gang Stalking Anyways? Dirty Police and Their Poison Squads Are Extremely Creative, Bizzarre, and “Empowered” Bullies

As we see time and again gang stalking is standard police and investigator practice, assisted by community assets, and hidden under the cloak of “police investigation privilege,” and a lot of other civil rights and due process defying b.s. It is a hidden form of police brutality.

We also see that the mainstream news is getting “woke,”too.

Teri Webster of the Fort Worth Weekly has written two excellent articles, one, aptly titled “Gangstalking” chronicling how gangs of police, and their affiliated community assets cyberstalked and slandered a woman who questioned a coroners verdict-and found that its very common.

Gangstalking

As these mothers fight for justice, they’re also opening themselves up to online attacks and even hacking

We talked about a story that until now has remained untold: the harassment of families who have lost loved ones under suspicious or unusual circumstances.

Most people probably cannot fathom how online trolls or people on apparent power trips could savagely attack Barton and other grieving families, but what these victims have experienced has a name. It’s called “gangstalking”: harassment that centers on a group effort to surveil, attack, discredit, and silence a target, sometimes to the point of destroying his or her life.

When Barton spoke out on Facebook and Twitter about her son’s death, she found something that surprised her. Other families came forward and told her they have experienced the same types of attacks. They, too, were stalked and discredited for disagreeing with the official theories and conclusions of police and other experts.

Webster also covered gang stalking as regards the psychobabbling crowd in a piece called “Targeting Targeted Individuals” where the usual suspects appear, yammering on about electronic satellite brain zappers, patents on strange military gear, and lots of unfounded evidence free claims about electronics too.

Unsurprisingly, amidst that articles clatter, we see a low level sex offender pop up, talking about how the local volunteer fire department has a camera positioned to record his house “24/7,” qand how cars box him in while driving on the freeway. All of that is well known gang stalker behavior documented in many sources.

This is significant, because the “sex offender” is the raison d’être of the entire Domestic Industrial Violence Complex (DIVC) which is the quasi-judicial extra-legal set of rules and constraints that has largely replaced democratic processes in the west with kangaroo courts and he said/she-said slanders and insinuations instead of jury trials, with heavy empasis on gendered narratives.

It is also significant, because sex offenders are a highly targeted group, and gang stalking is “community custody and control.

Remarkably, after that person appears in the forum comments, a woman named Tiffany Fontenot appears, doing exactly what these people do-causing division and slandering:

Teri? There is a particular man in your article who literally appears to be a perp. Moore is a registered sex offender complete with tattooed tear drop coming out of his eye. How did you find that guy? He ran a smear campaign on a leading member in the TI community using very common perping tactics such as name calling (one thing he called her was a whore among many others) and claiming others were doing to him what he, himself was actually perpetrating, and yet that same guy showed up in your article? Interesting coincidence isn’t it? There are many people claiming to be TI’s who actually are not in order to attempt to keep this global torture and trafficking network from being discovered by the public. They attack TI’s and try to make TI’s look delusional in order to keep the torture/trafficking network going.

Teri? Did you get benefit for writing this article in any way from the defense or law enforcement, or medical industry, or through anyone at FWW in ANY way via an EMF..(blahblahcetera*)

Fontenot is a subscriber to the long debunked CIA psychobabble about “reverse speech” and other SATANIC PANIC era fundamentalist and neocon religious gibberish. It is them, most of the time who are who gang stalkers are, and the news is now beginning to cover it appropriately.

So, go over there, and read those articles for an explainer about the right wing/left wing split in the dialectic-and to support Ms. Websters excellent coverage of this topic.

*blahblahcetera is ROGS commentary

ROGS Blog was deplatformed by WordPress because I named my stalkers

Nearly 100% of all cases of gang stalking are committed by current and former police, military, and intelligence trained persons and groups.I named many of my personal stalkers here, and also documented a series of events and the names of other stalkers here and here too, all of whom had literally “followed”my blog, and many of whom are current and former military, and actual spies, which I traced through their online associations and other methods.

Most curiously, many of them work in human resources too, a linkage that I have not fully explored yet.

High tech gear is required to properly investigate any gang stalking situation. Use it as soon as possible, starting with simple dash cameras, home security, etc.

 

Revisiting the “eBay stalkers case“, we must notice that the New York Times has now contradicted itself by acknowledging gang stalking. And, they called that gang “eBays cockroach cult,”too, validating the narrative of targeted individuals who know that gang stalkers are indeed cockroaches.

In that case we see a “bizarre”gang composed of eBay executives, and their security wing comprised of former police,and intelligence agents, and we get a glimpse of how the bizarre activity that online gang stalking is gets even more frightening when it comes offline, and into your home. ROGS Analysis predicts exactly that composition too.

So, ROGS, the blog you are reading, documents those kind of gangs, and with little surprise, my personal gang of stalkers persistently monitored my writing, and demanded that WordPress deplatform my writing. I will discuss that in further posts, but for now, I ask my readers to note that my blog is up and running again, though many of my links that reference my own work have been destroyed, as well as many photos lost, due to WordPress actions.

They literally deplatformed me with zero notice, and I am certain it is because I am critical of the gang stalking perpetrated by current and former FBI/DHS/CIA and especially the toxic Anti Defamation League that I have named and identified herein.

So, in the posts below, outbound links to other content outside my blog still work, but other links are not up and running yet.

As recently as 2/10/2021 this blog was also under attack from various persons and bots who were attempting a log in page attack, as verified by my security software.

This is what gang stalking is, and what I write below is “who, what, when, and why” they do it, whoever your “they”might be. I have named mine, and traced them using ordinary investigative tools, and you too can name, and trace your stalkers, with evidence.

Here are Fifty Free or Cheap Investigative Tools to track gangs of stalkers, and turn your evidence over to others, and there are many more free tools online too.

Read through this website and find out how I “proved” that I was stalked, and named a few cockroaches that did it, and stay tuned.

But how to prove it all, or challenge western colonial hegemony? It starts by exposing it. Then, taking on the false, loaded terms-and tactics- of the FVEY arguments

是不是有点不寒而栗呢?

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_13284060_1.html/ ]

境外,有五只眼睛,几十年来,一直紧盯着中国。这不是在写电影剧本。

“五眼联盟”,听说过吗?这个跨国情报联盟机构是冷战的产物,本该随着冷战的结束而画上句号,却在后冷战时代找到了一个新“使命”,就是盯防中国。

“五眼联盟”,针对中国的一面越来越不加掩饰。因它而起的事端也日益增多。

特殊

这究竟是什么样的组织呢?

五眼联盟,FIVE EYES,分别是美国、英国、澳大利亚、加拿大和新西兰这5个国家。不难看出,它们都是英语系国家,英国及它的前殖民地。组织的基本守则自称是共享情报,并且互不监控。

[ 转自铁血社区 http://www.tiexue.net/ ]

说说它的特殊性吧。世界上也有一些其他多边情报共享安排,比如北约内部。但即使北约各国间也很难做到分享所有情报,因为国家太多,它们的利益并不是时时都一致的。

五眼之间不存在这个问题,因为5个成员国是有着共同语言、价值观和几十年相互信任的好基友。

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

五眼的历史可以追溯到第二次世界大战。最开始,只有英国和美国。它俩在破解苏联电文的过程中,感受到分享情报的重要性,决定加强情报方面的协作。1946年3月5日,美英签署信号情报合作多边协议,正式成立情报分享联盟,该协议被称为UKUSA协议。

UKUSA协议为冷战期间的英美合作奠定基础。换句话说,该协议巩固了英美之间的特殊关系。

加拿大1948年加入,澳大利亚和新西兰1956年加入。后来加入的这3个国家都是英语国家,同时也是英联邦成员,与英国有着相似的政治体制。至此,五眼联盟成立。

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

在联盟内,每份情报都标有秘密等级,并注明哪个国家拥有阅读权限。比如,一份美国情报机构才能阅读的情报上会盖有“绝密仅限美国眼睛”的红色印戳,而“五眼”源自于冗长的“澳大利亚/加拿大/新西兰/英国/美国五眼可见”保密级别,有该标记的文件预示着高级别的文件和信息。

70多年里,这一联盟的隐匿性或者说秘密性非常高,以至于1973年时任澳大利亚总理高夫·惠特拉姆都不知道它的创建条约是什么。直到2010年6月,UKUSA协议的全文才由英美政府公布,并首次得到官方认可。

分工

随着时代的发展,UKUSA协议也在不断演进,目前只解密了最初的文本。

根据1946年的原始条约,签约方同意交换以下与外国通讯有关的行动成果:流量收集、通讯文件和设备获取、使用分析、密码分析、解密和转换以及所有获取的与通讯组织、方式、步骤和设备相关的信息。

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_13284060_1.html/ ]

如今,各国都有专门与“五眼”对接的情报机构:美国国家安全局、英国政府通信总部、澳大利亚信息理事会、加拿大通信安全局和新西兰政府通信安全局。

2012年12月加拿大智库“防务与外交事务研究所”发布了一份关于加拿大在“五眼”中作用的报告。该报告指出,“五眼”将全球分为五大区域,每个成员负责一区。

英国监测欧洲、俄罗斯西部、中东北非和中国香港。

美国负责监督中东、中国、俄罗斯、非洲和加勒比地区。

澳大利亚负责南亚和东亚。

新西兰负责南太平洋和东南亚。

[ 转自铁血社区 http://www.tiexue.net/ ]

加拿大监测的是俄罗斯和中国的内陆,以及拉丁美洲的部分地区。

尽管如此,区域划分并不意味着各方只能将其努力仅限于这些地区,而是它们对某些地区“负有责任”,却没有义务只监测这些地区。况且情报汇总后将作为一个整体进行分析评测。

发展至今,五眼联盟不再局限于最初的信号情报合作,合作范围还扩大至人工情报、秘密行动、反间谍、地理空间情报、执法以及金融和交通安全等领域的合作。

比如在海洋领域,五眼监测战略海域的航运交通;在航空航天领域,监测弹道导弹试验、外国卫星部署和空军的相关军事活动。

恐怖组织和武器交易也在五眼联盟的监控范畴,特别是现在它们对五眼成员的威胁与日俱增。五眼收集的情报和数据有助于政策制定,也对日常工作至关重要。这些日常工作,包括跟踪和识别恐怖行动,以及其他非传统威胁的可能来源。

斯诺登曾将“五眼联盟”描述为“超国家情报机构”,表示“它不遵守任何国家的已知法律”。他爆料说,“五眼”的成员一直在监视彼此的公民,并分享各自收集的信息,以绕过禁止监视公民的国家法律。

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

圈子

这些年,“五眼”成员之间也曾出现过一些紧张局面。去年5月,英国曼切斯特音乐会遭遇自杀炸弹袭击,美国有官员泄露了该事件的调查情况,英国就曾一度停止与美国之间的情报共享。

然而,这样的紧张不宜被夸大。

“五眼”历经70多年,5个成员国说着一样的语言,享有相似的文化、历史与体制,它们一直是铁杆盟友,是以美国为老大的核心朋友圈。

这种基于互信的情报共享具有明显的战略优势,而成员的扩充会弱化这一优势,因此,“五眼”眼下不太可能再吸收新的成员。

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_13284060_1.html/ ]

这并不妨碍“五眼”成员与其他国家建立双边合作关系。“五眼”之前就曾与丹麦、法国、挪威和荷兰的合作,被称为“九眼联盟”。再加上比利时、德国、意大利、西班牙和瑞典,成为“十四眼联盟”。“十四眼联盟”的更正式名称是欧洲高阶信号情报,其主要任务是协调成员国间的军事信号交换。

美国还与法国、德国和日本等盟国保持着情报共享关系。在中东,美国也正式或非正式地与约旦、沙特、埃及、土耳其等几个国家分享情报,以打击伊斯兰国和其他恐怖组织。

针对

知道了“五眼”的前世今生,我们再看看最近的新闻:“五眼联盟加强合作,对付中国”。

这似乎给人一种误解,那就是“五眼联盟”以前只关注苏联,没中国什么事。显然不是这样。“五眼”作为一个正常的情报交换机制,中国从来都是它情报搜集的主要对象。

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

[ 转自铁血社区 http://www.tiexue.net/ ]

对几乎所有国家来说,隐形战线的对抗从来都是各国对外关系中必不可少的一部分。无论双边关系是好是坏,各国都会搜集对方情报,只是活跃程度有所不同。

当两国关系稳定发展时,彼此间的间谍丑闻和矛盾都是闭门解决。如果关系不好,外界就会看到公开的指责、驱逐外交官等摩擦。同时,媒体也会得到一些安全部门的爆料,公开一些对方的情报活动、间谍案件等等。

所以说,改变的不是中国针对西方,或者西方针对中国的情报活动,而是中美关系。

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

这也说明一点:“五眼联盟”作为冷战产物,本来没有什么存在的必要,但是美国却有意保留并大加利用,因为它便于美国影响核心盟友,尤其是澳大利亚受美国影响至深,在中澳关系上一轮的紧张中,华盛顿起到了推波助澜的作用。相较之下,其他国家对美国几乎没有影响力。

据说,为了应对“越来越强硬”的中国外交政策,“五眼”联合日德法等国家经常碰头。一名在过去几个月参加了多次相关会谈的人士说:“我们如今生活在一个新世界中,突如其来的威权政府正在促进我们之间更紧密的合作,强化我们的情报共享。”

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/ ]

在这一针对中国的跨国联合阵线中,华盛顿和堪培拉扮演了重要角色。

美国主要负责中国投资方面的情报协调事务,澳大利亚则致力于抵御中国的政治影响。

澳大利亚政府援引对中国影响力的担忧,公布了反外国渗透法案,收紧对外国游说和政治捐款的规定,同时扩大对叛国和间谍活动的定义。

美国推行了一项名为《外国投资风险评估现代化法案》的法律,赋予华盛顿新的权力以阻止某些类型的外国投资。该法案的文本要求特朗普进行“更强有力的国际外联努力”,以说服盟国采取类似的保护措施。

再看看频繁爆出的中国间谍、中国黑客等等诸多事件,其目的很清楚,美国及其盟友就是试图阻挠中国的高科技发展,不想中国继续做大。

惊!境外有五只眼睛 几十年来一直在暗处盯着中国

[ 转自铁血社区 http://bbs.tiexue.net/post_13284060_1.html/ ]

舆论干扰是其中很重要的一种手段,这些舆论在营造中国已经“被冷战”的感觉,想要带偏节奏,让我们疑神疑鬼,自乱阵脚,最后自毁长城。

五眼联盟搜集涉华情报,这是正常情报机构都会做的事情。斯诺登公开的大量文件,就曾涉及“五眼”围绕中国的网络窃听计划,难道那个时候它就开始全面针对中国了。

越是外界纷纷扰扰的时候,我们越要保持战略定力和战略清醒,不要跟着西方的瞎咋呼起舞。苏联是怎么倒的,就是跟着美国的节奏,被美国玩死的。

所以,我们要做的事情很简单:保持自己的节奏,坚持正确的发展道路。切勿被外媒牵制,产生基础性的误判。

文中图片均来自网络。

环球网

[ 转自铁血社区 http://www.tiexue.net/ ]

Related Story: How US Billionaires finance “black operations” using private security firms, NGOs, and target activists who are critical of western hypocrisy about human rights and “freedom”; and who do the bidding of the CIA around the world

‘Mind control’ experiences on the internet: Vaughan Bell et al., and “psychologists are complicit”: Psychopathology and gang stalking, delusions, the redirect method Moonshot CVE, and racist hate groups alter our choices online

Non governmental organizations (NGOs), governments, police and intelligence firms, corporate interests, and even sectarian and religious and hate groups like the Anti Defamation League (ADL), with its tentacles in the NGOs and their related industries are using non -consensual, unethical ,and possibly illegal “middle man attacks ” of web browser searches online to target people they dont like. And, those online operations come offline too.

Related Story:  CAIR Los Angeles sues the government for disclosure about how LA is spending the $425,000 government grant allicated for “countering violent extremism (CVE )” programs. These programs include onlune and offline “redirection and disruption ” of individuals who fall into these targeting programs.

These religion based hate groups and their compatriots in the altRight, a hodgepodge of occulted religious orders working through activist circles, police, intelligence firms, and private contractors aka DHS /FBI/Mi5-6 private contractor spies are employing(deploying ) varying levels of “extrinsic religion ” as we saw with former FBI director James Comey and his allegiance to theologian Rienhold Niehbur; and  using programs like Moonshot CVE, and the Palantir octopus of “predictive policing” technology and internet monitoring “tools” to “target individuals” and whole demographics with non-consensual “internet redirection”online, based on Google search language; and then, its associated unconstitutional “proactive policing” offline.

This “redirection,”and military “psychological operations ” waged against non-consensual subjects is what “mind control” actually is in the extant literature, and by definition and an example of what is commonly known as a, “black program,”in military and intelligence circles, and in these dangerous, mind manipulating black ops, we now see them privatized, wholly unaccountable to anyone .

Related Story: anti-Muslim bigot and terror manufacturer Rita Katz and her gang of intelligence /security thugs pops up at the site of many strange mass shootings, and other mayhem both BEFORE and AFTER,these events, almost as if she had written the script: Search ROGS for cases yhat examine “mind control”, strange internet happenings, and the terminology or weaponized use of of pornography.

And, these corporate operatives, police, and others like British Intelligence (GCHQ-JTRIG) widely use internet forum infiltration, hacking, redirection, and more to manipulate speakers, cyberstalk, harass, defame, and otherwise “control” people and their choices too.

Psychology and the quaint, pre-internet, pre-redirection, post “free will” internet, and post-MKULTRA era notion of “free will”

The average citizens chances of encountering “spies” used to be nearly impossible, whereas today, the chance of “average, normal people” encountering spies and their assets is a 1/30 chance, EVERY DAY, according to the numbers on the rosters of US based security industry, intelligence, and policing agents, who act in hidden capacities online and off. That means  there is one security /intel /police agent per US person, compared to the general population, and that number does not include retired police and military agents who are still active in organizations like ATAP, LEIUs,  Citizens on Patrol, or the often cited anti -democracy FBI -Infragard.

The anti-democratic FBI Infragard is behind every internet switch, using cowardly police state, Fusion Center monitoring and provocateur manipulation of real-time conversations on social media, and more to alter, redirect, and otherwise “influence” the minds, and choices of individuals that they target online.

And then, after that, comes their offline, real time harassment of activists as documented by the ACLU, dissenters, and first amendment speakers. Like this, for example. 

So: Why do psychologists resist using the term “mind control” in discussing the above mentioned psychological manipulation of targeted audiences, and targeted individuals? Is it only because the APA squashed the research into that topic in the 1980s, or that they are deliberately stuck in the past, struggling over the legitimacy of not just the legitimacy of claims of mind control, but especially narrative control, post MKULTRA, and at the height of the Ronald Reagan/Edwin Meese-pornography and Moral Majority era?

From Wikipedia:

  • Dualism makes the problem insoluble; materialism denies the existence of any phenomenon to study, and hence of any problem.

The short bus answer, is that psychologists are simply and often deliberately out of touch with the reality of the internet and its hidden speech police, as we see with Dr.Lorraine Sheridan, Vaughan Bell, et al., but also focus on the following examples of gang stalking denialism by Vaughan Bell, et. al. because these were written at exactly the time that the US -FVEYs were actually torturing human beings in Iraq, and imprisoning-and drugging – men in Guantanamo Bay Cuba, which many argue is a mere ectension of MKULTRA programs providing torture porn to people like US vice president Dick Cheney.

Laypersons, public relations industry persons, sociologists, movie script writers, and others call these types of targeted “non-consensual alterations of human perception, aka perception management” mind control because the targets dont have a “choice” in these matters. And its at this juncture where we can make educated guesses that anyone who calls targeted, non-consensual internet experiences anything other than “mind control” is likely getting research grants from government or other “vested” resources.

So, lets examine gang stalking denialism from the perspective of the related concept of mind control denialism.

Psychology has almost always been nearly junk science, because its purely subjective* and relies heavily upon the subjective opinions and diagnoses of biased, non-objective, primarily white christian and Jewish observers.

As such, it is an inneffective tool with which to analyze delusions in any form other than the white Jews,and christians who adhere to those “beliefs ” and the exigent religion based societies that enforce those beliefs, as this analyses relies upon cultural observers who themselves are denying the experiences–and story telling conventions and traditions– of the other two thirds of the worlds population.

But also, because it is entirely subjective, not objective in the clinical sense at all, because of that glaring Jewish -christian bias inherent in the research at its foundations.

Lets look at a few of the infamous Western Holy War era psychological studies that sought to “question” the narratives of people who had claimed mind control experiences online, what some studies called MCEs, and correlate these studies with the well known and oft repeated gang stalking memetic, that “psychologists are in on it,” which they generally are, bbased in what they read(such as these studies below), and their strange belief systems, like the,absolute “good” of government funding.

So, ROGS,asks: is the “government” part of some “conspiracy” to deny the ample evidence of “non-consensual redirection and psychological and influence operations,” stated above (and stated in millions of internet and MSM sources too)?

Lets ask the US National Institute of Health, and the National Library of Medicine about their “mind control denialism” study from 2006, and a few others, and, as usual, ROGS asks you, the reader to decide for yourself. But also, if your lawter, shrink, parole officer, medical doctor, social worker, etc. says you are “delusional”, point them here to these junk science papers, written by pseudo-scientists, aka psychologists:

Comparative Study

‘Mind control’ experiences on the internet: implications for the psychiatric diagnosis of delusions
Vaughan Bell et al. Psychopathology. 2006.

Abstract

Background: The DSM criteria for a delusion indicate that it should not include any beliefs held by a person’s ‘culture or subculture’. The internet has many examples of people reporting ‘mind control experiences’ (MCEs) on self-published web pages, many of which suggest a community based around such beliefs and experiences. It was hypothesized that some of these reports are likely to reflect delusional beliefs and the hyperlinks between web reports were likely to show evidence of social structure, demonstrating the ‘culture or subculture’ exemption to be increasingly redundant in light of new technology.

Sampling and methods: Texts from web sites reporting MCEs (n = 10), experience of cancer (n = 10), depression (n = 10) and being stalked (n = 10) were identified, and were blind-rated by three independent psychiatrists for the presence of delusions. Hyperlinks from web sites reporting MCEs were used to create a network structure; this was compared with a size-matched, randomly generated network and known social networks from the literature using social network analysis.

Conclusions: The sampled web-published accounts of MCEs are highly likely to be influenced by delusional beliefs. Social network analysis suggests there is significant evidence of an online community based around these beliefs. The fact that individuals can form a community based on the content of a potentially delusional belief presents a paradox for the DSM diagnostic criteria for a delusion, and suggests the need to revise and revisit the original operational definition in the light of these new technological developments.

Heres a few more moldie oldies from the War on (manufactured) Terror era of endless money spent on junk science and psycholigy to justify that illegal war, and likely beneficiaries like Vaughan Bell:

Bells pre-masterpiece of fraudulent (or merely uninformed and pandering)junk science, pondering “delusions” that the governments of the western world and their propaganda agents are manipulating our online experiences:

‘Internet delusions’: a case series and theoretical integration
Vaughan Bell et al. Psychopathology. May-Jun 2005.

Heres some other crackpot junk science pushing shrink from that era too:


Why do people with delusions fail to choose more realistic explanations for their experiences? An empirical investigation
Daniel Freeman et al. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2004 Aug.

ROGS CHALLENGE: ROGS,dares,any and,all gang stalking denialists, and mind control deniers, and “internet delusions” espousing psychologists, therapists and others, to refute the evidence above, that proves definitively that “psycholigists are in on it,” fat as rats, and thick as thieves.

* Subjective, meaning that most diagnoses of various “mental illnesses” ranging from personality disorders to delusions, and Type 1&2 errors, are largely derived from Jewish-christian culture and its flawed, biased, incentivized cultural observers.

So, while issues like physical brain damage, Alzheimers, aneurysms, and other “organic” brain disorders have observable effects,and affective symptoms, backed by actual science which can be analyzed using the scientific method, issues like “delusions,” or ratings of narcissism, schizo-affect, and other western gibberish have less than scientific interpretations, are wholly an opinion, and are not consistent across cultures.

So, organic brain disorders are observable across cultures, and separate from so called “mental disorders” based in some square pegs opinion about cogs in wheels.