Guest Post from 4rec3s: Gang stalking and artificial intelligence-a world of false positives and death

This essay is based on this post on the Boingboing article, “NSA and GCHQ’s crappy Big Data techniques may be killing thousands of innocents”, which reminded me of a video of a robotic drone-death art installation that really puts this killing into a particularly inhuman perspective.

Notice: This essay does not deal with ‘electronic mind control’, drugging, ‘creating alters’, V2K or paranormal. All these links are from mainstream sources and my purpose is to glue it together as a feasibility of how gangstalking could happen with existing, known technologies. Namely social psychology, HUMINT-based pattern prediction, ubiquitous surveillance and communications.

Gangster Computer God
Every day, increasingly, our reality is validating Francis Dee’s racist, paranoid, schizophrenic prophecy of the “Gangster Computer God Worldwide Secret Containment Policy” as less fiction and more fact (sans the mullatto-jew robot doctors). More fact because it’s become feasible (except for the cosmetic surgery).
Mass surveillance innovations[1][2][3][4][5]), purposeful efforts and accomplishments[6][7][8][9]; a drive towards total information awareness[10] and such compelling integration of technology leading to a Panopticon[11][12], creates a situation in which a system could be devised capable of data-mining and heuristic pattern-of-life analysis of all citizens[12]. Coupling such a system with astoundingly capable AI technology; an extreme willingness to help (and profit motive) by industry[14][15]; an hegelian (‘ends justify the means’) ethos quite contrary to that of Christianity, secular humanism and altruism generally[16][17][18][19][20]; and “machine learning algorithms”[21][22][23][322]; form the constants of an addition equation that yields the very real possibility and therefore threat of an worldwide, technocratic, AI-based Gangstalking system.
Requirements and Purpose
The only requirements are paranoia and an utter lack of trust of the Government towards the global everycitizen[24]. In other words, “to shut down a political enemy by gaslighting[25][26][27][28] them to the extent that they end up in jail or in a mental facility”. There may be other incentives however:

  • Random harassment ‘like a game’
  • Targetted harassment of non-threat ‘undesirables’
  • Spiritual warfare ‘to demoralize the population’
  • Human / Social experimentation
  • Data collection efforts (pushing people around to see where they go / with whom they talk in ‘crisis’ mode)
  • Psychopathologizing an individual through trauma-based mind control—to develop them as asset
  • Playing both the targetted individual and deputized stalker against each other. Why is the TI the only victim?

All Watched Over By Machines Of Loving Grace[29]
Consider the following scenario.
1) You have an AI program that is hooked up with mass surveillance and has decades of social psychology to understand how humans work (HUMANINT + psychology/sociology, ‘game theory’, ‘prisoner’s dilemma’, ‘milgram’s’)[30].
2) The AI program finds ways to manipulate people (stalkers) into ‘being at a certain place at a certain time’, ‘to look out for a certain individual’. Perhaps they’ve been getting fed emails from a “protected’ or ‘authoritative source’ (AI::outreach), someone from an intelligence agency for example, that has ‘deputized’ him/her, to help assist them in tracking down ‘an alleged (serial killer / pedophile / drug dealer / murderer / stalker)‘ in the community. This person then is notified to go to a certain place and ‘watch out for’ this disreputable / potential criminal.

Everyone wants to be a hero. All that is required is exploiting our vanity.

3) This AI program has a deep knowledge of everyone from mass surveillance[1][2][3][4][5]). Enough to ‘predict behavior’ and generate a deep, heuristic, ‘life pattern’ analysis[1][2]
4) The AI knows when you leave your home, when you take a shower, approx where you are located and headed using your cellphone’s gps/wifi and cell tower triangulation sent back to servers. Also, if the AI has access to NRO satellite data, they can actually see you, with a potential resolution of 50 cm2 to 1cm2 (drone)!!
5) Using the ‘pattern of life’ and seeing that you left your home, it can send email / sms / skype / facebook / twitter / foursquare / ‘other’ instant messages to various ‘deputized’ community citizens to ‘watch you’.
6) The targetted individual is now under humanint field surveillance by people who have been tricked, duped with disinformation into thinking they are doing good, protecting the community.

Con Game, Not Mind Kontrol
None of this requires mind control. All it requires is panopticon, vain authoritarians as ‘faux-insiders’, and a highly-available communication network with dynamic asset development and appropriation software.
If this is happening, it’s immoral and abusive and it’s also lacking in manners. Military-industrial aristocrats are supposed to have manners and respect. After all, their guarded culture demands those things. But their development of rights-destroying, ‘tough guy mafioso abuses’ reveal the ruling class as irresponsible, lacking a keen foresight into consequence they claim generally has guided their successes in life and which differentiate them from the masses.
Their lack of manners has created an uncouth robot that reduces everyone to numbered accounts in a microserfdom. This robot is going to mix up the salad fork with the dinner fork, which is a metaphor for ‘killing everyone’—it’s a matter of time before it’s discernments become so specific that everyone, poor and rich alike, need to be subject to ‘quantitative easing’. And that’s too is a metaphor, for this.

Organized gang stalking and linguistics: targeted individuals are often victims of linguistic manipulation, aka, soft force mind control

Any blog, anywhere on the topic of OGS is derived from within a wider dialectic of gang stalking, and then, contains individual narrative, influenced by the language and terminology of others within the dialectic. As such, linguistic analyses infers that the Sapir-Whorf hypotheses, and linguistic relativity of strong and weak language applies.

“The principle of linguistic relativity holds that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ world view or cognition. Popularly known as the Sapir–Whorf hypothesis, or Whorfianism, the principle is often defined to include two versions. The strong version says that language determines thought, and that linguistic categories limit and determine cognitive categories, whereas the weak version says that linguistic categories and usage only influence thought and decisions”
from Wikipedia “linguistic relativity”

I have already demonstrated that the OGS dialectic is a mind control and influence operation full of information, disinformation, and misinformation (and here, and here, and here, and here) on some-or on many levels. Also, I have demonstrated that it has real world consequences, and that law enforcement is not doing its job to stop those who encourage the dialectic, and who profit from it; and that law enforcement is quite frequently involved directly, and indirectly.
But more than any one proof is the general flow of the data, as we discover that the dialectic itself is purely and easily understood as language in action to influence, confirm, interrogate, or otherwise manipulate individuals who, for whatever reason, find themselves trapped-entrapped-within the dialectic, which is itself a form of neuro linguistic programming (NLP).
While most targeted individuals do not or cannot answer or state openly or apparently the six w’s of journalistic inquiry -who directed them to the dialectic? What happened just before you were directed or redirected into this dialogue? Where did this happen?when did this happen? Why did you get brought into this abusive dialectic? How did you become aware of the dialectic?-the evidence is clear that memetics and influence via language are at work, and that certain people are involved, and many others are, statistically, not even aware that such a dialectic -that of organized gang stalking-exists. Any researcher, lawyer, psychologist or other concerned researcher should be aware of the need to ask these questions.
But what does exist a solid fact, or set of facts as regards the language and terms of OGS: that the structure of a language affects its speakers’ world view or cognition. This is undeniable, and there exists evidence of this fact in every log ever written about OGS.
Then, when you add influence operations, pseudo-legal “investigations” by LEO’s and LEIU members across the internet-which is used malevolently as both a tool of investigation, aka “webterrogation,” and also as a purely vindictive and petty tool of harassment by bullies in official places- we se a new picture emerge: that the root of the problem is that the internet backbone is full of cancerous, state sponsored and illegal activity, directed at targeted persons, groups, and their ideas; and that the Panopticon that has been designed by bad actors in high places has been abused-which we also know with plentiful evidence.
So, if one chose to, one could analyse the structure of the dialectic is itself for evidence that OGS is a real, and directed, and valid potential complaint, rather than a hoarde of mentally ill folks who sabotage legitimate mechanisms of communication for nefarious purposes, when in fact, it is state, and institutional, and academic, and professional actors that are this exact disease ridden apathetic and complicit group, as this blog attempts to document and demonstrate.
The evidence I direct the reader to herein should be an ample and well endowed starting point for any researcher, sociologist, psychologist, criminal or civil rights defense attorney to have a secure starting point for any case that involves claims of OGS. As such, I invite you to test or retest my evidence, and come up with your own hypotheses, but what I have herein is fairly hard to refute, and each refutation opens a door to a new line of inquiry, which has so far been missing from the discussion.
But clearly, it is not merely a dialogue of the mentally ill talking to others who are mentally ill, unless we are willing to engage in the fact based discussion about institutional sociopathy, and narcissistic abuse by those in power directed at those who do not have power.
And as we see in example after example that some, who have power, often working in institutions or governments who are very well financed are targeting and directing others-who are generally low status or low intellect individuals into this abusive dialectic, and keeping them enmeshed in occulted and unclear, and often nefarious scenarios within the Panopticon that our internet has, in fact and practice, become. In that light, we can see that the internet is in fact and also in ractice, oe of the largest and most potentially dubious forms of electronic abuse ever, being used to cause harm or to force ‘normalization’ upon unwitting subjects.