One of the problems that existed in the online community of gang stalking before ROGS began writing was the usual problem of biases, and particularly confirmation bias in observers who are actual victims of gang stalking.
But heres another ROGS Bingo which is confirmed by ROGS Analysis:CAMPAIGN OF HARASSMENT ‘Racist’ white couple spent years ‘tormenting black neighbor by leaving dog poop and dead animals in their yard’
Image Credit Instagram /Sun.co.uk
So, sure, biases get in the way, and ROGS -A has eliminated that by separating the “gang stalking denialists ” from their victims, aka targeted individuals, and isolating crackpots who yammer on about total crap like electronic brain zappers, and biblical, mind reading locusts, while others have their heads crammed up the ideologies of various assholes, ranging from white privileged, white female narratives in the case of psychobabbling fruitcake Dr. Tomo Shibata; or in cases where any of the many military trained disinformation and misinformation specialists proliferate, such as,the USAF OSI, or actual milutary and intel agency spies, like this one here.
RELATED CONCEPTS: The dialectic of gang stalking is full of strange words and phrases, most of which trace to specialized military and police or intelligence sources. ROGS calls this “gang stalking para -language ” because up until I began to write, only Dr. Robert Guffey had described the paucity of evidence of “what the gang stalkers call themselves, ” mych less,what language and terms they ude amongst themselves.So,
here is a milutary related and actual use of electronics, and “bomb sniffing locusts.”
Then: Confirmation Bias is the tendency to look for information that supports, rather than rejects, one’s preconceptions, typically by interpreting evidence to confirm existing beliefs while rejecting or ignoring any conflicting data (Source: Britannica online encyclopedia )
So, ROGS solved that biases problem by developing ROGS Analysis. You can search my blog for those posts, using search term ROGS Analysis, or read this, my “conclusion” post where I discuss a twelve year period wherein ROGS-A was refined as a scientific method based predictive tool with which to assess these cases.
And, using the scientific method, I discovered that nearly all gang stalking is police, firefighters, city workers, and their related tenracles in the community, such as various political NGOs, Infragard agents, local block clubs full of ex -military and retired police, and government workers, working with active police, and city /state /federal officials, and stalking individuals for years, as we saw with the murder of Ahmaud Arbery, by a highly organized “gang ” of the exact types of “members ” that I describe.
So, what exactly is “Proactive Policing,”and “threat assessment ” aka gang stalking and threat creation, anyways? See this post, where police, and police affilliated persons from a specific town, and town council harass an old lady, including poisoning her yard, and her, with lawn chemicals.
Lets examine a recent case against ROGS Analysis to see if we can confirm, or refute my analysis. And, its important to when note that I was gang stalked, I had no “preconceptions, ” or beliefs, one way or another about “what is gang stalking, and who are the gang stalkers.”
I simply followed the evidence, which led me to unexpected conclusions, like this one here, and even better evidence, like the organized gang stalking of Bob Deis, or the case study of Rick Krlich in Ohio, where a firefighter from the local stalking gang (made up entirely of current and former police, city council persons, their associates and relatives ) was convicted of stalking, and calling in fake fires, robbing the town till, as Krlich succeeded in getting restraining orders on the other local, highly organized gang members, who work, or worked in, official capacities.
So, in the following gang stalking case study, I ask the reader to note the following “claims ” that targeted individuals make about gang stalkers and their enabling Karens:
- they throw shit in your yard – they use, “no touch torture ” to threaten you, or to simulate fight or flight provoking responses, or near death experiences
- dead animals, as we see in the case of the Ebay executives who gang stalked critics of Ebay, and also used dead animals as symbolic threats
- they will wage a harassment campaign using city workers, and city protocols (false claims /slander/defamation /harassment )
- they will target you as an organized group, using friends, relatives and associates; and misuse city resources too
All this, and much more, in the following gang stalking that lasted three years, and ended with a successful lawsuit.
And now, the local prosecutor has filed a gang staljing lawsuit, and charged these stalkers . TIs, this is how you fight gang stalking!
Jennifer taped a sign to her door – photos of which have went viral – detailing the allegations and how police allegedly refused to help her.
She admits she clashed with fellow residents over her supposedly untidy garden when she first moved in.
The nurse told WABC-TV: “I bought the property when I was pregnant and this is the truth, the property was in bad shape.
“I’m trying my best to make every effort to clean the property. I’ve done my best to clean the property.”
Jennifer claims that her neighbors have thrown dog poo onto her yard leading to her being fined.
She said: “I kept on noticing dog feces. I kept on noticing ticket ordinances from the Valley Stream Village town.
“I keep getting tickets. I keep seeing dog feces.”
This prompted her to install a camera which she claims captured her neighbor throwing the animal excrement.
Now, ROGS will move into phase two of this analysis to see if any.of the people in that story are police, firefighters, city workers, and other “narrative control agents. ” Stay tuned, because preliminary research seems to link one of the stalkers to an NYPD fire engine, E231.
Is gang stalking real? Are police, and firefighters nearly always involved?
Is ROGS Analysis of organized gang stalking worth the paper its written on!?