An army of Paul Blart the Mall cop and a database walk into the Hero bar: recipes in nauseating social policy and corruption

So, I have documented a distinct link between crisis PR narrative control and how organizations like the Association of Threat Assessment Professionals (ATAP) has deliberately blurred the line between so-called terrorism and domestic violence, utilizing what they call the,”colluding parallel investigation,”and advisinglaw enforcement, LEIUs, and Infragard community policing elements to wage pre-emptive, multiple and never ending investigations on targets;and how auto-antonymal language and double entendre are used in “influence operations”which the ACLU has also noted; and how alternative media is under attack from the “deep state” and it’s hand maidens in civil conspiracy, the psychologists who gaslight TI’s, but who, by proxy, are also those who are causing mass shootings, suicides, social isolation, political corruption, and more.
I have also repeatedly documented the toxic blur between security contractors and police functions that operate in an “intelligence capacity,”as we see a link between the Yellow shirt security contractors and the Stephen Paddock shooting, as well as documented links between Omar Mateen and G4S concurrent with Mateen being “on the FBI radar,” directly because his father is an FBI asset/informant,but how these literally conspire under the ATAP “frame”work and also wage hidden terror and morality/coercion/social conformity/entrapment/social engineering campaigns “in darkness,” and without oversight.
It is these latter subjects who are what can rightfully be called the modern equivalent of Nazi Brownshirts, or Stalinist purge agents, or Israeli Sterns gang members, and the ‘whisper campaign’ is the tactic both groups used to cause strife in local populations. All of that whispering, starts in database abuse, and BOLO’s of various kinds.


UPDATE 10/28/2019
: Actress Rose McGowan, who I mention in this post you are reading , has now sued Harvey Weinstein and his sleazy gang stalking lawyers David Boise and Lisa Bloom, as well as the Mossad affiliated spies that he hired to ruin her life, the spy firm Black Cube of Israel.
Rose McGowan sues Harvey Weinstein, Lisa Bloom, more claiming ‘diabolical’ intimidation plot
Maria Puente

Also note that one of my personal stalkers is also a Mossadi jihadi, and WOW did my blog, and my communications device/s get interesting after I PROVED what gang stalking IS with that one example.

In case you don’t recall what a BOLO is, have a look here especially, then here, and here.
Then, have a look at this Wiki site where the excesses of the unethical post 9-11 “information sharing environment” as we see security industry are documented in one specific community, Aspen Hill Maryland, as an organized gang. This Wiki has valuable information, but also some classic total time wasters like the “”Old Men from Out of Town” story started by private detective David Lawson, which, while interesting in the way that other locker room talk is interesting, has no merit in our Constitutional crisis era of total system failure.
From Aspen Hill Wiki:

“Fake Cops”

Local law enforcement has a very effective and legitimate approach to dealing with localized crime problems. This is “PCAT” or “Police Community Action Teams” programs, in which officers from other areas are given significant opportunities to accrue overtime hours, by concentrating forces in one or a few beats. This effectively floods the streets with both uniformed and plainclothes officers.
Some Organized Stalking groups are well aware of this, and they will occasionally flood an area with their own staff during, or more commonly immediately after, periods of PCAT activity. They can expect cooperation from grateful shopkeepers, mall security, and other property-management types who are allowed to believe that these individuals are operating under, or personally possess, police authority. It’s possible that some persons affiliated with such organizations are in fact police officers, or more likely were at one time police officers. Yet the vast majority of these “Fake Cops” are in fact fake cops. Quite frequently they work with, or are part of, “security gangs”.

“Security Gangs”

Some commercial facilities such as shopping centers or office campuses may be unable or unwilling to afford the level of security available through legitimate private security services. Some such may be approached by organizations offering their services to “help clean up the place”. These organizations are, effectively, unlicensed security officers and also often operate as private investigators with no permits. Or, they may possess permits or licenses which do not apply to this sort of work. For example, Bounty Hunters are in fact law-enforcement and may have special permits… which do not apply to any duties outside of seeking bail jumpers. Yet neither the property managers nor the people “apprehended” (usually beaten, intimidated, or frightened away, instead) by these individuals or groups are quite cognizant of the fact that these persons have no legitimate special authority nor license in these places and situations.

Enablers

Certain specific shopkeepers or property-management people are quite cooperative with either “fake cops” or “security gangs”. To such groups, such enablers are golden. In the rare case that the “fake cops” or “security gang” operatives feel that they are at risk and choose to hide their presence rather than risk the exposure of their operations, such shopkeepers or comparable staffers can act as eyes and ears for the fake cops and/or security gangs. Indeed, given enough time in place, and they may come to manage them, if not in exactly a capacity of being a management-level employee of a corporation or company. Yet they can direct the operations of such organizations, in effect, picking victims.

What makes the documentation of “organized gang stalking” significant in this case is that we see how elements in policing trickle information to security contractors, and “cop wannabees” who then form literal gangs, and use technology and tactics of OGS to seize turf, and “run neighborhoods,” in the disguise of authority; and this, which is a recipe for corruption.
Then, take a look at how “security guards” were an integral feature of “narrative control” in an ever changing story about the Las Vegas shooter Stephen Paddock in order to understand how similar mass shootings are to activities in the Hitler era with Brownshirt marauders corrupting Democracy; and other periods of history where the Constitution of a nation was suspended, diminished, or eradicated entirely.
http://www.latimes.com/nation/la-na-vegas-shooting-20171009-story.html
So, the Maryland Wiki from Aspen Hill has great information, and names some names to some degree, and can help point the researcher, the psychologist, the criminal defense or civil attorney into the right direction in pursuing cases against gang stalkers.
As I have noted, my personal case of OGS began distinctly in 2003-4, and progressed throughout decades, and went into full swing in 2008, and I worked with great lawyers, and began and prevailed in a lawsuit that blossomed to five other independent litigants to literally take a cowardly security contractor OUT OF BUSINESS. As you can see, I am taking my time this time around, and making sure I get it right for everybody.
Without coincidence, 2008 is also when the Department of Homeland Security, working under the “intelligence sharing” platforms where the DEA/FBI/DHS/CIA waged hidden database backdoor searches across agencies, and began to target individuals with ferocity, and devoid of any due process, or even anything resembling due process protections.
In other words, systemic denial of substantive due process became the norm in 2008, as well as a host of other institutional practices that require a separate essay, but simply put: information sharing became indiscriminate, political, slanderous, and frequently sought targets that refused to participate in such a social scheme, which is well documented all over the web as one TI after another becomes targeted with “hidden operations” of many kinds.
Have a look at another of my encounters with hidden internet operators in 2011, which was another big year for DHS backdoor black operations. Like Rose McGwan and tens of tousands of others, we can begin to envision how civil conspiracies of deprivation of rights are traceable to both private contractors, who can  be sued for actual damages, and the DHS which can be sued for complicity and reform, which won’t come easy as major senators sitting on the intelligence committees continue to derive substantial kickbacks under the watchful eyes of the FBI and other agencies.
But because the federal government has managed to skirt color of law claims, due process claims, ad substantive due process claims bu claiming state secrets, FISA exceptions, section 702 loopholes and more, I will leave it to actual lawyers to make the larger arguments.
It is at this point, beyond a reasonable doubt that the government acts pre-emptively in these cases with actual prejudice, maliciously, and with selective enforcement, and that the government has excercised bad faith by using back door searches and OTB methods. But for the lay reader, here below is basic Due Process, 14th Amendment where the federal scheme has shifted the burden of proof to the citizen to bring claims:

Every Due Process Clause analysis begins with the question “Has the government deprived some person of life, liberty, or property?” If there has been no government action, or if there has been no deprivation, then there cannot be a Due Process issue; substantive or procedural.
Substantive Due Process issues involve the states’ power to regulate certain activities.
Procedural Due Process issues involve an analysis of the procedure required by the Constitution when states seek to deprive people of life, liberty or property.

While the majority of persons targeted with these hidden schemes that are waged from behind the DHS and other agencies target low status, low income individuals, a savvy civil or criminal lawyer will see the merits of pursuing redress in cases of OGS because there are other venues whereby proving substantive due process has been occurring on a massive and industrial scale, as we are now faced, literally, with predatory “law enforcement” that is actually not enforcing any laws, but rather, seizing property in record numbers, framing suspects, and using intelligence agency tactics in local communities to create the appearance of crimes instead.
So, OGS has morphed into real estate red-lining, and a CIA styled asset forfeiture racket; but in many other ways too. ANd here is a case from a local community where a citizen has documented other real estate related claims, as did Bob Krlich.
Up until ROGS, few would risk speaking out about ths form of corruption, and worse, the actual language didn’t even exist in many cases, which is by design of the corrupt, and the corruption itself. Look through ROGS foor more links to the dialectic itself-search for tags with “linguistics” and “para-language” and “semantics”  and “jargon” for examples.
One of the chief and main reasons this is allowed to continue is because “security gangs” and “private contractors” are not held accountable to the public, and as we see on an  industrial scale, the public doesn’t even know what any of the many “hidden operators” online are even doing. And how can you litigate for a client, or in a class action lawsuit of the proof of such a diabolical state-level brownshirt scheme remains under authoritarian control, disguised by “state secrets” and other unchallenged privileges?
Well, it helps to have a starting point, but as we see pre-ROGS, there was a dearth of data that verifies OGS as an actual complaint. Fightgangstalking.com is one of the few who has stuck with the facts, and occasionally whistle blowers step forwards; and there are some highly credible online testimonials and a few court attempts like the case of Jeffrey Kantor, but other than that, where to start?!
So-start with the private security contractors and their chain of oversight. and work your way up, combined with other data that proves patterns of state conduct, substantive due process violations that stem directly from the DHS scheme, and the hidden data about back door searches and the electronic trails they leave that became available since Edward Snowden and corporate collusion at the database level.
Further Reading: What is substantive Due Process?

Due Process Clause:
The Fourteenth Amendment reads, in part, that no state shall “deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law.” This applies to the states and to local governments. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment applies to the federal government. Most Due Process issues involve state laws.
Common Law:
The two sources of law are statutory law and common law. The common law is that body of rules and principles developed through the courts over time. While legislatures often overrule an area of common law by enacting a statute, and while courts often overrule an area of common law by refusing to follow it further or by handing down a decision which makes use of a competing principle, the common law carries with it the force of law and is generally binding on courts within that jurisdiction.
Burden of Proof:
In every case one party or another has the onus of demonstrating the truth of some fact or another. The party who must so demonstrate is said to have the burden of proof. In addition to who carries the burden, the burden can be of different loads. For example, in a criminal case the prosecution carries the burden of proof and must prove every element of the crime “beyond a reasonable doubt.” In most civil cases the plaintiff generally carries the burden of proof but must prove every element of her claim only by “a preponderance of the evidence,” which is far short of “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

 

Organized Gang Stalking case study: Real Estate, Rotary Club's and www.fightgangstalking.com

Bulletin: I have decided to continue to write at this blog on occasion, as day after day validates that OGS is a very real thing, and actual victims of this have written to me to share their stories (I have not published the accounts of those who I believe to be actual victims without their permission) involving all of the groups and tactics outlined herein.

Related: of the two studies that “examine” gang stalking, and both have recommended that those who claim it be isolated, shunned, silenced, and/or declared “mentally ill.”
And here is how one “community newspaper” has “framed”the narrative of OGS victims fighting back using the First Amendment- the irony meter explodes every time it meets OGS denialists and free speech rights. Especially note who the “badguys” are to that community, and to others who deny OGS:
“The flier that was distributed ” praises “patriots” such as Daniel Ellsberg, who released the “Pentagon papers” in 1971; Edward Snowden, who recently exposed thousands of intelligence documents; and Frank Serpico, a former New York City police officer who blew the whistle on police corruption in the late 1960s and early ’70s.”

And equally important to note is that these posts here, here, here and here have become integral to this narrative, and can be tested and retested against my many hypotheses. And, one of my many hypotheses is that the NSA et ass-hat has been telling us since forever that they are NOT spying on Americans-but targeted individuals and others have been telling us the opposite.
While I have not experienced rape or death threats from anonymous douchebags online or off for a few years now, or minor car burglaries since around December of 2016, or watched floating bubbles on my security camera’s that were placed there after being followed on Twitter by a retired liaison to a foreign intelligence service, or even had any new GPS signals emanating from my car (as tested with a LM-8 bug sweeper, which is one of the best pocket sized bug sweepers I have ever used), or experienced actual “24/7” daily stalking for nearly a year, it is important to note that this blog, and associated writings have been around for nearly a year as well.

[UPDATE 01/13/2018: Well, there were a few things after I wrote this post last year-maybe YOU can help me find my lost/stolen GPS?]

Do you see any correlations? Any causation/correlation errors? Any proofs of my many hypotheses about claims made by those who discuss online and offline gang stalking?
But without any rational doubt, targeted individuals have been telling us with increasing frequency that our government, working with five other “allies” and Israel-beyond spying on American citizens since 2001, is also waging targeted hidden campaigns of “psychological and influence operations” so that their domestic spying scheme never sees a court room challenge.

UPDATE 01/13/2018: Note that the FISA domestic Spying on Citizens bill has passed for another 6 years, as the NSA continues to target citizens tat it has been targeting since it first dumped piles of haystacks on citizens who knew what it was up to in 2001-13. And as Marcy Wheeler, aka emptywheel notes, the lipstick on the pig is not to be called anything but what it is-and what it HAS BEEN, since 2001:

THE SENATE INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE 702 BILL IS A DOMESTIC SPYING BILL

And, Ms. Wheeler would also like to note that the NSA wants to reassure all the “good peeple” that “targeted individuals” are just the tip of the slippery slope,”
Oh, my-how rude and presumptuous and possibly sexist that I would attempt to speak for Wheeler- I will let her say it herself:

ON 702, NSA WANTS TO ASSURE YOU YOU’RE NOT A TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET

While legitimate researchers of organized gang stalking would find my thesis validated time and time again, cultists, secret societies, religious fanatics who hide in secular culture, and organized gangs of statist’s and institutional psychopaths will find no such correlations. Academic fraud’s will most certainly find a lack of correlation here as well.
But to continue my thesis: Here is yet another correlation straight from the coveted anus of the Sacred Cow that is Main Stream Media (MSM). It is YET ANOTHER correlation between claims of “organized gang stalking” and “real estate,“which comes to me from www.fightgangstalking.com
In this case of “the Guilford CT Gang Stalkers,” we see once again that real estate related organized stalking, OGS and policing mix together in the toxic brew of secret, occulted, hidden and obscured un-Constitutional harassment, and we also find a real estate developer, who also “coincidentally” is Rotary Club member. I must point out that in the general literature of psychology, coincidence is often mistaken as a feature of delusional thinking. However, any historian, sociologist, or propagandist instantly recognizes the correlation between real estate red lining and coincidence, or KKK activity and coincidence, but also how it is a well known feature of cult activity and religious superstitions. Atheists, secular humanists and rationalists-and many Libertarians for some reason- seldom are obstructed by these last two major hurdles that psychology-by some coincidence-cannot seem to overcome.

Related Story: How the worlds most famous coincidence-the relationship between psychologist, Sigmund Freud and his nephew, the world’s greatest propagandist Edward Bernay’s literally mind-controlled much of the last century much like the NSA-to-Israel-then-to-FiveEyes Alliance is doing today

As I have noted and written about before this is ALSO directly correlated and substantiated in many cases of  OGS. Note especially that the local police are actively working to discredit “whoever” it is that is distributing fliers about OGS that they obtained from the website mentioned above.
Without irony (if this is still possible at this point), also note the following: a whistle blower is being called “anti-government,” and this likely due to the DHS thought and word policing aka the “terrorist threat matrix” which targets pure first ammendment activity by design; and that whistle blower is being “framed” as a threat, rather than as a concerned citizen. Are you seeing any more correlations, kids? Yeah?
Well that’s interesting. Those who derive their income from carefully phrasing what is or isn’t; who is or who isn’t a “threat” can’t seem to find correlations! And even refutation is perceived as a threat. Seeing a pattern there, with the “silencing” and “isolating narrative? No? Then look a little harder. Maybe take a look at the DHS “badwerdz” list.

Guilford Police Investigate Anti-Government Fliers In Mailboxes

July 04, 2014|By DANIELA ALTIMARI, [email protected], The Hartford Courant
GUILFORD — Police are investigating anti-government fliers left in hundreds of mailboxes throughout town over the past two months.
The fliers refer to “gang stalking” and direct recipients to a website that likens U.S. intelligence agencies to the Stasi, the former East Germany’s secret police agency.

“This neighborhood has an ongoing ‘gang stalking’ operation involving covert surveillance and harassment of targeted individuals,” the flier reads.
The website, FightGangStalking.com, professes to expose “the use of illegal counterintelligence tactics against American citizens by U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies and private security-intelligence contractors.”
It praises “patriots” such as Daniel Ellsberg, who released the “Pentagon papers” in 1971; Edward Snowden, who recently exposed thousands of intelligence documents; and Frank Serpico, a former New York City police officer who blew the whistle on police corruption in the late 1960s and early ’70s.
Guilford police Det. Martina Jakober said Friday that versions of the fliers began appearing in mailboxes about two months ago, prompting complaints.
Among those filing a complaint was Tony Fappiano, a local real estate agent and a member of the town’s board of ethics. The flier suggests that Fappiano is the “gang-stalking” coordinator and instructs those concerned about the operation to contact him.
The flier also suggests that Guilford police department may have sanctioned the alleged “gang stalking.”
Jakober said neither Fappiano nor the Guilford police is involved in any such surveillance or stalking operation.
Fappiano, who has served on a number of municipal panels, said on Friday that he has no idea why he was mentioned in the flier.
“I’m in business 41 years in this town. … I’m a former member of the economic development commission. Why somebody is targeting me is beyond me,” Fappiano said. “I had nothing to do with it and I look forward to meeting the coward that started this.”
Jakober is investigating whether the fliers constitute harassment. Also, by law, only stamped and metered mail may be placed in a mailbox, so the placement of the fliers in residents’ mailboxes is a violation.
Anyone with information about the fliers is asked to call the Guilford Police Department at 203-453-8061 or the anonymous tip line at 203-453-8240.

Any legitimate researcher of OGS will also connect immediately with other parts of my thesis-that “homelessness” or the threat of it is also a constant here as well.
Did Edward Bernay’s REALLY die, or was he absorbed into the Panopticon?
So if there were “gang stalking BINGO,” such as the case of the argest DNA exoneration in history which vindicated six people who were LITERALLY mind controlled so badly that they STILL have Stockholme Syndrome-but sued the pants off of that city and won 30 MILLION DOLLARS, then this would be a good second place candidate for having B-I-N-G——O.K.
Let’s recap, kids:

  1. real estate
  2. police running disinformation
  3. free speech-speaking up about your targeted harassment is demonized
  4. an individual claimant is villified
  5. isolation is suggested as a cure
  6. Rotary Club/secret societies involved
  7. us-versus-them, goodguy’s-badguy’s binary
  8. homelessness is an under current
  9. information/influence operations in local media
  10. lot’s of mysterious “well who knows fer sure?” and “can you prove it?” and “This guy’s a threat, likely delusional!” and so on
  11. in group, out group inter-relations
  12. hidden/occulted relationships working behind the scenes against an individual
  13. hmmmmm. What might 13 be? Oh Yeah! Disinformation spread through official channels…no wait, um……

Disclaimer: I make no opinion or otherwise make a statement about the individuals involved in this case, but rather, document these as indisputable facts, and actual proof of how “gang stalking” exists in the narrative of modern culture, and how it is interwoven between the powerful, and how it hamstrings the powerless.
Here below is the realtor mentioned in the article-note the associations that I have discussed above, and especially-again, without irony-note that he sits on the local “ethics commission” too!:

Anthony Fappiano [linked in here]

Owner, Shoreline Real Estate Company

Greater New York City Area
Real Estate
Current
  1. Shoreline Real Estate Company
Previous
  1. Guilford Ethics Commission,
  2. Ct Assoc of Realtors-Legislative Committee,
  3. Guilford CT Rotary Club
Education
  1. Univ of Connecticut

Organized stalking, the Martha Mitchell effect, and disinformation.

While many people are currently being persecuted in ways that are seldom discussed in the news, when they write about it online, they are targeted for extra harassment by paid agents of the state-many states- who are seeking to create a class of citizens for whom justice is denied.
While the actual cases of actual cases of actual people who are stalked are not always the best written accounts, nor do those so targeted possess the best writing skills, sadly, they are mocked for their attempts to bring attention to this topic.
As is well known today, the CIA and other intelligence agencies have long been influential in media, steering stories and content. Today, there is-for some reason- a huge media push to discredit those who claim they are gang stalked. Why is that?
Internet culture is infused with this thing called the Streisand effect which states that the harder one tries to stop, or censor an idea, a meme, or a story that has truth in it, the bigger the story becomes. And, there is the Martha Mitchell effect which is a common ploy by psychologists to label all people who  have been harmed byillegal government activity as schizophrenics:

The Martha Mitchell effect is a process by which a belief is mistakenly diagnosed as a delusion by a psychiatrist. This is named after Martha Beall Mitchell (the wife of John Mitchell, the United States Attorney General in the Nixon administration), who alleged that illegal activity was taking place in the White House. At the time her claims were thought to be signs of mental illness, and only after the Watergate scandal broke was she proved right (and hence sane).

DISCLAIMER: this post will now take on a “satirical tone” as regards the seriously flawed work of Dr, Lorraine Sheridan, who interviewed “the internet” in order to formulate an opinion about OGS that is “New Yarwk Times” worthy (the many pieces of orve CIA propaganda that have run in the Times are themselves wrthy of derision and satire.)
Starting in about June of 2016, major media began a discrediting narrative, and attempted to smear and defame those who claim they have been gang stalked. They quoted a highly un-scientific study by a likely transhumanist intelligence cult type psychologist, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, (it was little more than an online poll, really) of people who claimed to be stalked. Unsurprisingly, she did not interview a single person in person, and relied upon anonymous internet results.
And, she attempts to relegate the entire community into a single category of nutters-likely schizophrenics. Hmmm. Where have we seen that before?

Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, who is co-author of perhaps the only study of gang-stalking, said the community poses a danger that sets it apart from other groups promoting troubling ideas, such as anorexia or suicide. On those topics, the internet abounds with medical information and treatment options.
An internet search for “gang-stalking,” however, turns up page after page of results that regard it as fact. “What’s scary for me is that there are no counter sites that try and convince targeted individuals that they are delusional,” Dr. Sheridan said.
“They end up in a closed ideology echo chamber,” she said.
 

Speaking of “closed echo chambers”-Dr. Sheridan and her comrade David V. James make a living running with DVIC narratives, and authoring work that panders to the ability to gain the feelz crowd and its associated crybullies by draining the tax payer, while pandering primarily to the middle class, and it’s poice mechanisms.
And here, “Boingboing media” runs with that, and discredits those who expose organized gang stalking (and really-who the hell is “Boingboing” media anyways? The intel agencies start as many news stories today as they stop, and literally use media to wage “influence operations,” aka “mind control-how weird is THAT? Thaaat? Thaaaaat? T-h-aaaaaat….?)
Here is doctor Lorraine Sheridan, speech pathologist:
Dr Lorraine Sheridan
Here is all of her contact information. This information is posted in other publicly available outlets, and is posted in the public’s interests, directing researchers and TI’s to the NYT’s primary contact person and undisputed internet “authority” on OGS.

Position Senior Lecturer
Faculty Faculty of Health Sciences
School School of Psychology and Speech Pathology
Campus Bentley Campus
Location 401
Email [email protected]

Here’s Curtin University’s phone number-call them, they look like one of those online colleges that could use some attention-any attention:
Telephone: +61 8 9266 9266
Fax: +61 8 9266 3131
I suggest you call and write Ms. Sheridan anonymous letters-letters, and emails, emails, anonymous, anonymous, frequently, very anonymously, and very frequently, from several different anonymous email services. Because based on her online poll/survey/study that was so prominently featured in the NYT, she’s a big fan and devoted believer in the power and truth of anonymity, and the internet to tell the truthto tell the truth.
And call Ms. Sheridan at her office a lot. A LOT. A looooot.
Call her every day, and give her a piece of your mind-or not. She’d probably dissect it with a child’s scissors, and eat it, if my read on her type of psychological approach to silencing victims of OGS is any indicator. After all-wasn’t Hannibal Lecter a big fan of talking around his victims, even as he talked to them?

Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, gang stalking, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan gang stalking study, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan contact information, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan email address, anonymous internet poll, David V. James, handmaidens of international finance, neo-con toilet slaves and other academics.
Here is the guy that the New York Times chose to pass off as the poster child for the online gang stalking community. His name is Timothy Trespas:

Timothy Trespas, the New York Times poster child for gang stalking (Dude-why did you let them USE YOU this way?-Oh, never mind. It’s what they do!)

From the NYT article

A growing tribe of troubled minds

Mental health professionals say the narrative has taken hold among a group of people experiencing psychotic symptoms that have troubled the human mind since time immemorial. Except now victims are connecting on the internet, organizing and defying medical explanations for what’s happening to them.

The community, conservatively estimated to exceed 10,000 members, has proliferated since 9/11, cradled by the internet and fed by genuine concerns over government surveillance. A large number appear to have delusional disorder or schizophrenia, psychiatrists say.

And history has shown on nearly every available opportunity that the pseudo-science of psychology, combined with propaganda, which is itself a sort of echo chamber of citations, and accreditation that bounces references after references of other pseudo-science and theoretical hypotheticals off of each other, works hand in hand with EVERY abuse by any government EVER on unsuspecting citizens, and that, backed by a powerful Bernaysian theoretical base of influence operations.