Marcy Wheeler, aka emptywheel, wants you to know that the NSA WANTS you to know that "ON 702, NSA WANTS TO ASSURE YOU YOU’RE NOT A TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET"

What journalists should know about the deep state Alphabetross domestic spying on Americans by the NSA/CIA/DEA/ODNI/FBI/SOD and FiveEyes-Israel Alliance, according to Marcy Wheeler (and I quote):

“ON 702, NSA WANTS TO ASSURE YOU YOU’RE NOT A TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET TARGET”


NSA just released a touchy-feely Q&A, complete with a touchy-feely image of the NSA, explaining “the Impact of Section 702 on the Typical American.”
I shall now shred it.
First note that this document deals with 702? It should be dealing with Title VII, because the entire thing gets reauthorized by 702 reauthorization. That means Sections 704 and 705(b), which are used to target Americans, will be reauthorized. And they have had egregious problems in recent years (even if the problems only affect some subset of around 300 Americans). Sure, Paul Manafort and Carter Page are not your “typical” Americans, but abuses against them would be problematic for reasons that could affect Americans (not least that they could fuck up the Mueller probe if FISA disclosure for defendants weren’t so broken).
The piece starts by talking about how the IC uses 702 to “hunt” for information on “adversaries,” which it suggests include terrorists and hackers.

The U.S. Intelligence Community relies on Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act in the constant hunt for information about foreign adversaries determined to harm the nation or our allies. The National Security Agency (NSA), for example, uses this law to target terrorists and thwart their plans. In a time of increasing cyber threats, Section 702 also aids the Intelligence Community’s cybersecurity efforts.

Somehow, it neglects to mention the foreign government certificate — which can target people who aren’t “adversaries” at all, but instead foreign muckety mucks we want to know about — or the counterproliferation certificate — which can target businesses of all kinds that deal in dual use technologies. Not to mention the SysAdmins that it might target for all these purposes.
The piece then lays out in two paragraphs and six questions (I include just one below) the basic principles that 702 can only “target” foreigners overseas.

Under Section 702, the government cannot target a U.S. person anywhere in the world, or any person located in the United States.
Under Section 702, NSA can target foreigners reasonably believed to be located outside the United States only if it has a basis to believe it will acquire certain types of foreign intelligence information that have been authorized for collection.
[snip]
Q: Can I, as an American, be the target of Section 702 surveillance?
A: No. As an American citizen, you cannot be the target of surveillance under Section 702. Even if you were not an American, you could not be targeted under Section 702 if you were located in the United States.

Effectively, this passage might as well say, “target target target target target target target target target target
target target target target target target target target target,” which is how many times (19) the word is used in the touchy-feely piece. The word “incidental” appears just once, where it entertains what happens if one of “Mary’s” foreign relatives were in a terrorist organization….[follow this link to read more!]

The First Amendment versus the cumulative effect of decades of Fusion Center Spying: time to test drive our rights.

The ROGS reader will note that I have been a target of “the war on pure speech” and due process via “high policing” since 2004, but also, that I saw this coming in 1993 (search this blog for links to these years).
The reader will also note that I have endured decades of harm because I consistently stand on first amendment rights to speech, and have been 1) shot 2) tracked 3) surveilled 4) jailed 5) black bagged 6) slandered 7) much more, because I have stood for speech online and off since forever-but especially after I published stories in 2003-4 that were critical of how internet spyng and offline surveillance were then ad are now measureably worse than anything Joseph McCarthy, COINTELPRO 1, MHCHAOS, or Adolph Hitler EVER did to news media or propaganda and speakers of prtected first amendment speech.
This is all well documented in the record-some Americans are violent animals, who have manipulated the dialectic so abusively that it defies logic, in a lop-sided narrative that pits us against them, women against men, blacks against whites, etc-and “they” all belong to some insider club or another as they do this, in the pure cowardice of secrecy. some, have it far worse than others and some have plainly never been on the downside of our nation’s.
And for the record, ROGS has no more tears to weep for “progressive” white females in power who whinge on about their troubles with guys like Al Franken as if they actually HAVE troubles-these are little more than what Edward Bernay’s did as he manufactured women as pseudo feminist “Liberty Torches“; the handmaidens of the subversion of the Constitution and due process. And NONE of them have ever seen the inside of the jails they built, but should.
I have no tolerance for the one percent, racist zionist’s, dominionists, and others who who work for the One Percent, or new arrivals from India, and other places who have seized the American dialectic of race and forgone any awareness of class issues; or black billionaires like Oprah, for whom no end of derision, or destruction of black men could ever be enough too satisfy her power hunger.
The facts are that white women, for the most part, simply have no burden. Fakerape is a cover for the atrocities that these same wage on primarily low income black, white, and Hispanic men (who they birthed for a state check, and then fed into the prison pipeline), and not just in America; but also, their jaded narrative incessantly murders others around the world.
And too, all of the new arrivals from India, the Middle East, China, or other places have no right whatsoever to wade into the complex dialectic of race in America, without examining who the One Percent are, and how their propaganda system works-and most of them are egregiously wealthy and jaded-not at all the poverty stricken immigrants of decades ago.
These all are co-conspirators in the modern peonage systems of the DVIC, the MIC, and the PIC that targets our own fathers and sons, brothers and friends. Here is more on who these handmaidens off the police state are, from John Whitehead, describing the new peonage system’s in America, and debt bondage:
A Tale of Two America’s  “Despite prior attempts on the federal level and across the country to prevent the profound injustice of locking people in cages because they are too poor to pay a debt,” concludes The Atlantic, “the practice persists every day.”

Related Story: Who are “they”? One of the word games that psychologists/social workers/judges/litigators who are on the state teat like to play is asking you “who are “they”-why are you so important that someone would do this to you?” As if one NEEDS to be important-this is how distorted and out of touch political psychiatry is with the reality of modern policing and political targeting. So tell them to read this post here first, and these here, here, and here in order to understand the diabolical and enormous and unfathomable burden that was foist upon our people after 911
And- who are the One Percent that mocks us, and pits us against each other one generation after the next, in every century, and especially now that our Cnstitution has been suspended, and our own agencies target our citizens every word online, and stalk us in various ways offline?

And so: those who currently milk the DVIC teats (those who get paid hundreds of billions per year) get paid for this, more than anything else. They are complete psychopathic word twisters, and bullies, much as we see with all of this manufactured terrorism that targets the low income, the mentally ill, or the easily manipulated.
SO, in order to understand ROGS’ Thoreau styled peaceful, non-violent resistance to this fully blossomed “security state” that seems to think law does not apply to it, as it applies bizarre, scret, hidden interpretations of law to me/us/you, it is important to understand how long cases are dragged around in hidden dossiere’s and databases that are inaccessible to the public or to those who have been targeted by federal state and local agencies for decades.
And, how this all started at the NSA, when they decided to use a 4 BILLION dollar program to target the speech of American’s, instead of a 3.4 MILLION dollar program, that protected “our” rights (this in and of itself indicates “intent” on the part of government to violate the Constitution, to selectively target individuals and groups, and is prima facie evidence that these speakers were and are targeted; and PRISM, XKEYSCORE, Moonshoot CVE type programs, corporate-government sector collusion, and thousands of other government speech policing activities as well.)
And so, I can state with empirical evidence that  yet another state, federal, or internationalist NGO paid moron who derives their income from speech suppression is reading through stuff I wrote online four years ago, and cross reading other material that I wrote equally long ago. This IS what online gang stalking and speech policing IS-“they” literally databases our communications online, stalk you offline in community policing schemes, for years and years, passing you from one database or Fusion Center to another, without the benefit of a court trial or  court challenge to these practices.
Because, only two people in the world know what my blogs even are, and one of them is my lawyer. The other, is the guy’s/gal’s who listened to my phone in 2004-2016. While on the surface, this will seem a paranoid, or unrealistic claim, I ask the reader to know this: I wrote it here, now, for that EXACT reason, because proving NSA/Fusion Center/DHS/FBI/CIA/FiveEyes/JTRIG data theft and harassment is perhaps one of the most difficult things one could ever attempt to do, but that I attempt it reluctantly, because I have literally had existential threats otherwise. Here- have a look at one of my existential threats, and compare it to this, and this, then, note how I use an underground journalism style here,  and then, decide for yourself.
But this is how online speech policing works, and how it comes offline-this IS what organized gang stalking IS. And, it is against the law, against due process, and against substantive due process-but only if it gets seen in a court room, and sadly, “they” are murdering those of “us” who know this. And-who can afford such a fight in court? This is why fascism is prevailing, on both sides f the political aisle, and in all religious/cultic/sectarian elements in our society. They literaly are DVIC deep in it, together.
One might wonder how I know this about my readers-that they read across blogs, and some of those written half a decade ago? The answer is this: my writing is, primarily, an exercise in pure speech, which has been under attack by federal forces and state actors who hide like cancer along the internet backbone since 2001 (you can easily find my example and today’s proof by Googling “gang stalking” and “psychic driving.”)
In that year, 2001, deep state cults and bankers and states dependent upon federal handouts (otherwise known as “the Cult of Intelligence,”conspired in the sense of true conspiracy to limit our rights of privacy, and every right that could come after that. We are literally in an advanced phase of MHCHAOS, which is a CIA/bankster program to control dissent. And according to the intent of the Constitutional Framers, this is anathema to democracy. But I am one of many who this happens to, and some have it worse than me.
Here is a peek at how this plays itself out online: another blogger was recently imprisoned because some DVIC teat sucking narcissistic prick at the FBI wanted to privacy rape him, and did so because the guy used A SINGLE EMOJI. Then the state paid pathological narcissists kicked in his door, and traumatized his three children-FOR LIFE. His kids are literally scared to open their blinds now. This IS what a police state IS, nearly by definition. Not coincidentally, it is also one of the tactics used during the Palestinian exodus of 1948 and Hitler’s pogroms as well.
Here below is a case that demonstrates how far into the sh!tter pure speech online has been dropped by federal agents and the massive bureaucracy that is the NSA/DHS/FBI/CIA/FiveEyes data rape scheme, where agencies that manufacture terror, use funds to target speakers instead. In other words-the war hasn’t merely morphed from “fightin’ turrerriss'”, but now has openly fired yet another shot across the bow of one of nearly all of the pillars of American Democracy, which is the emoji, expressed in anonymity (….)
From Mike Masnick of Techdirt.com (Masnick is the inventor of the Streisand Effect, and also the Shirky-Masnick Bureaucracy Perpetuation Principle-that states “police states don’t just go away overnight“):

The DOJ’s Bizarre Subpoena Over An Emoji Highlights Its Ridiculous Vendetta Against A Security Researcher

from the lawlessness-under-the-guise-of-law-enforcement dept

Yesterday we broke the crazy story of how the DOJ issued a subpoena to Twitter attempting to identify five Twitter users, not because of anything they had done, but because someone else the DOJ disliked — a security researcher named Justin Shafer — had tweeted an emoji at them in response to a discussion about a different case. You can read all the details in that original post, in case you missed it yesterday. There was so much craziness in that story that I didn’t even get to cover all of it. Some of those named in the subpoena have posted their thoughts — including Ken “Popehat” White and Keith Lee. I suggest reading both, as the subpoena directed at each of them was particularly silly, given that both freely make their identities public. The DOJ didn’t seem to do even the slightest research into the accounts it was demanding info on, or it would have known just how easy it was to “unmask” White and Lee.
As for the other three Twitter accountholders — all of them are anonymous. But the DOJ certainly has zero legal basis for unmasking them. As we’ve discussed repeatedly in the past, anonymous speech is also protected by the First Amendment, and there’s a very high bar for law enforcement to get past to unmask anonymous speakers. EFF’s Kurt Opsahl pointed to a concise statement on this in a recent ruling in the Awtry v. Glassdoor case, which Lee also reposts in his blog:
The Supreme Court has recognized that “an author’s decision to remain anonymous, like other decisions concerning omissions or additions to the content of a publication, is an aspect of the freedom of speech protected by the First Amendment.” McIntyre v. Ohio Elections Comm’n, 514 U.S. 334, 342 (1995). Indeed, “[t]he right to speak anonymously was of fundamental importance to the establishment of our Constitution.” Doe v. 2TheMart.com Inc., 140 F. Supp. 2d 1088, 1092 (W.D. Wash. 2001) (citing McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 341-42). In particular, “Justice Black . . . reminded us that even the arguments favoring the ratification of the Constitution advanced in the Federalist Papers were published under fictitious names.” McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 342 (citing Talley v. California, 362 U.S. 60, 64 (1960)). So too were the responses of the anti-federalists, which were published by authors who used such fictitious names as “Centinel,” “Brutus” and “The Federal Farmer.” In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168, 1172-73 (9th Cir. 2011).
Further, it is well-established that anonymous speech on the Internet, like other types of anonymous speech, enjoys First Amendment protection. In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168, 1173 (9th Cir. 2011)(“online speech stands on the same footing as other speech—there is `no basis for qualifying the level of First Amendment scrutiny that should be applied’ to online speech”) (quoting Reno v. Am. Civil Liberties Union, 521 U.S. 844, 870 (1997)). As the Ninth Circuit has explained, “the ability to speak anonymously on the Internet promotes the robust exchange of ideas and allows individuals to express themselves freely without `fear of economic or official retaliation . . . [or] concern about social ostracism.’” Id.(quoting McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 341-42).
First Amendment protection of anonymous speech “is not unlimited, however, and the degree of scrutiny varies depending on the circumstances and the type of speech at issue.” Id. Political speech is considered to be “core” speech and is afforded the highest level of First Amendment protection. McIntyre, 514 U.S. at 346. Online messages such as the ones at issue here are also entitled to some level of First Amendment protection, even if the hurdle for overcoming that protection is less stringent than it is for political speech. See In re Anonymous Online Speakers, 661 F.3d 1168 at 1177; see also Highfields Capital Mgmt., L.P. v. Doe, 385 F. Supp. 2d 969 (N.D. Cal. 2005) (finding that identity of individual who anonymously posted derogatory comments about a company on an online message board was protected from disclosure under the First Amendment); Art of Living Foundation v. Does 1-10, No. 10-cv-5022 LHK, 2011 WL 5444622, at *5 (N.D. Cal. Nov. 9, 2011) (finding the standard articulated in Highfields applied to anonymously posted online commentary criticizing the plaintiff’s organization).

That the Assistant US Attoreny, Douglas Gardner, who signed off on the subpoena, either didn’t know this or didn’t care is hugely troubling and problematic. As Scott Greenfield colorfully summarizes of the federal agents involved in this case, looking at the details, “this situation is so utterly idiotic as to make one wonder how they can get out of bed without hurting themselves.”

It is important to note that in the one extant study cited online, that “targeted individuals are trapped into an echo chamber” it is extremely difficult, if not impossible for he average targeted individual to prove that they are indeed targeted and that their experiences are the cause of hidden actors. Because what is happening is tha one hidden actor passes your data to another hidden actor,,  and across state lines and across databases for years and years, as “they” build dossiers and tabulate potential speech crimes online.
SO it is beyond a doubt that these hidden actors are what I say they are-and that online speech itself is under attack. In fact, “they” have engineered an entire generation of online speakers who were entrapped at the internet switch from birth, as any kid born in 2001, who woke up to internet use between 2005-2017 has had their ENTIRE ONLINE ACTIVITY recorded at the NSA, and then, that data was given to 16 other US agencies to cull through, as well as Israel, which is a theocratic apartheid state.
Best of all, all of that data that was captured is now stored in Utah, at the Utah Data Center, which is controlled by Mormons. Does that make you think a bit about what is pure speech? What is “free” speech? And what is Online speech?” And especially “can speech be leveraged against a person’s other rights aka blackmail?”
I will let you answer that question yourself, but also leave you to ponder: what if all of your child’s data was kept at the Catholic Vatican; or in Saudi Arabia’s Mecca-maybe at the Forbidden City? Would you trust THOSE people with your data-and all of the back doors they have demonstrated that they use to manipulate you and your choices? So why do you trust the NSA/CIA/Zio-dominionists and their Mormon pets in Utah with it?
Yup-without a doubt, we see certain theocratic interests working from within secular cover to mediate the future of your child, from hidden positions along the cancerous internet backbone. It is extremely hard to document this link.

Related Story: How The NSA Hides Section 702 Surveillance with no oversight, or meaningful reform. Or “the definition of an un-Constitutional surveillance state.”

So-what CAN be documented is the ROGS model of using honeynets to catch stalkers in action. As I have documented- I have ad death threats, rape threats, and worse for many years for just speaking up. And, I have had many people before today’s special reader try to mis-use my words, or otherwise construe their meaning as potentially harmful. Obviously, I am not in this for fun.
Here, have a look at were my actual gang stalking began, in 2003-4, which was a “pure speech” related series of events, as opposed to a bunch of crooked people from various cults and sects of American society harassing me previous to that. And here is when it went into overdrive, and also centered around free speech expressed online.
See how long they-whoever “they” are can drag these things out? Yup. It is an insidious and completely new form of harassment that has up until ROGS avoided being named properly, because it is an overwhelming form of social dysfunction that has been enabled by the total surveillance state. And by design, it is nearly impossible to challenge, in life, or in a court room. But is IS what gang stalking IS online.
Well, as we see today the trend is that the “deep state” has sought by every hook and crook to stop speech at the switch using initiatives and pretexts ranging from “save the 16 year old girls of Japan (so that international bankers and white females can pimp them); to the nefarious Save Eastern Sex Traders Act, which seeks to keep online speech relegated to the middle ages, so that the same tribes and groups can profit from the control women, AND control narratives after that. Because boogiemen, of course. And scapegoating-lots of scapegoating.
And, stealing my GPS here and there too; or working from within public and private sectors and corporate “partnerships” to obfuscate rights; or black bag a reporters notes here and there. Don’t forget that.
 

The Chinese teachers and the MDMA drug: Minigh dimol/ waterinch, psychology, and drug experiments, SWAT, Cigarettes and Suffragettes, and gang stalking

The Chinese teachers and the MDMA drug: Minigh dimol/ waterinch, psychology, and drug experiments, and gang stalking, with commentary from a SWAT officer

minigh dimol: Evidence is quite conclusive, though no one seems to care or take notice. Organised psychological harassment, ongoing, equates to psychological violence, and all involved in such violence are guilty of criminal harassment, whether they see it that way or not.

Discussions about organized gang stalking have political undertones. Much like the ‘War on Drugs,’ the current moral panic’s and the ‘War on Terrorism’ reveal the stresses at the seams of our democracy, as some will do ANYTHING for DVIC dollars, while other’s resist such ‘blood money’ and the accompanying lies and half truths-what blood libel’s one must speak in order to get more of it.
And still other’s recognize the militarized bleed-over that has likely affected those who claim OGS spilled all over America like the guts of a 10,000 deer hung on America’s tree limb. What is called “mission creep,” and it’s effects on “we the people” as police and corporate interests, database abusers, and politicized organizations ranging from AIPAC to other NGO’s (many of which are also coincidentally embezzling or otherwise selectively mis-managing funds) to psychology work and the healing professions, with crisis PR manufacturers ready to create the appearance of an America under attack by anyone BUT them.
It is these hidden black operations that need to see the light of day, because OGS is certainly one indicator of a social disease, not necessarily mental health. And certainly, as we watch the failed “War on Terror” casting an ever widening net to now encompass “domestic violence” which is and always has been a one way narrative, the Ich Du is showing some bloat.
As noted by a retired SWAT Lieutenant, a highly decorated officer, and wounded warrior who saw service all across the globe as exactly the black operator that I criticize here,  here, here and elsewhere, ” Anyone above me is a politican-they’re not even real cops. They’re a different clss of people-they are making political decisions, not using common sense.
Maybe there are occasions where MRAP’s are actually needed. Watts, riots and that sort of thing. But these small towns-and their police are ill equipped to even operate those things, much less have a need for them. It’s ridiculous. “
In the case of Lucie, aka “Miranda” I presented a tenuous link from unethical human exprimentation that was financed by US drug industries in Guatemala in the 1940-50’s, to a homeless street person who had lost “millions” by her own account due to unethical and amoral punitive psychology. I make no claims of this being an entirely accurate assessment, but rather, as a sociological sketch of one person’s story derived from a well known era of government and corporate psychological harassment and abuse of discredited or easily discreditable victims, and that the homeless are notoriously targeted from many interests groups ranging from real estate developers and other’s who seek to profit in real estate, to those who pass them around in the ‘helping’ industries, rather than root out the social problem that “causes” them.  As such it is a derivative analogy of one person who for all practical purposes and who fits the categories of advanced sequalae described by OGS TI’s; and only that. But mental health is not the WHOLE story-not even close.
One man’s online testimony about OGS has the absolute ring of truth to it, not least of which is that he documents times and dates of “onset” and specific drug use; and those directly from the notes of psychologists and inpatient treatment, and he presents a case that OGS being neither an imaginary thing, a delusion, or necessarily psychosis, and also points the finger directly at a mis-diagnosis that becomes a lie repeated in the “echo chamber” of drug rehab’s and treatment centers and the various “on message” care providers.  Here is the hard link to one of his/her many websites that chronicle the use of the party drug MDMA, which is arguably the “new LSD”: https://weathernotes.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/pasychological-harhassment-methods-to-undermine-a-personss-life/ written November 19, 2006
While the CIA is widely discussed as having perpetrated drug experiments, little focus is on what might be a modern version of these experiments that takes place across international jurisdictions and across cultures and countries. But the American layperson is most prone to blame the CIA, FBI or other domestic agencies because that is what our propaganda system has on one hand encouraged, and on the other discouraged when it comes to OGS.
And it cannot be forgotten how Nancy Reagan’s War on Drugs affected the other side of the political aisle of morality policing-namely that Mothers Against Drunk Driving coincided with rape hysteria and bad guys (men, primarily, for some reason) are everywhere; the boogieman manufacturing and “Take Back the Night” rallies, which really just created women as cheerleaders for the modern DVIC, using the exact tactical and strategic marketing and the social shepherding to “manipulate the breeding stock with flattery and safety” formula that Edward Bernays used to sell cigarettes as “Torches of Freedom” to the same class of primarily European, middle class white females.
Related Reading: the easily manipulated American woman: Cigarettes and Suffragettes, and America’s most famous  Pimp of Propaganda
One must also remember that America’s GDP isn’t measured by actual productivity, but rather the appearance of it, because we produce very little, so “products” in America are drunk driving arrests, sex offender statistics, domestic violence creation, prison beds filled nearly at random and frequently in advance as “gangster babies” are targeted literally from birth and stalked in databases from day 1.
And that PR “placements” of these ideas have replaced an actual economy, and keeping everyone who benefits from these industries, down to local police and the affiliated DVIC industries, such as social workers, psychologists, and drug rehabs ‘on message”and saying the same thing at all times, to keep DVIC dollars flowing, aka “official source gas-lighting” and CVE collusion AGAINST the mental health of clients entrusted to them. This is in stark contrast to the 1960’s when actual products were manufactured here, and men were conscripted for the draft. The DVIC incentivizes false claims and one sided story telling via Martin Buber’s zionist framework of othering and “us versus them,” rather than creating insight into cause and effect related research; much less enlists the truth of those who are for all practical purposes the people who were spoken of when it was written “first they came for___________, and I said nothing, for I was not a __________.”
Then, as we saw in the election of 2016, foreign intelligence agencies ranging from Russia to Israel, corporate spying, and likely more, are operating on American soil, and in American politics, enjoying the impunity that a special class of citizen’s also enjoy here-the political class*; that it could be argued, America is under siege, or that those who sit at the gate employing the “gatekeepers mechanism” willingly allowing the subversion of our citizens.
Adding to this potential and actual proven abuse are other American intelligence agencies, or even private contractors such as the firms like Stratfor, or CIA funded fronts that hire surveillance role players to stalk American’s and others as target practice are also clearly spying ON American’s and more.
While many celebrities such as writer Ken Kesey, The Grateful Dead, Timothy Leary, and others participated in these experiments of the 1960’s and even acted as nearly positive public relations, and made few dollars talking about it. But it seems that the dialogue of drug experiments and the general public is somehow stuck in the 60’s, and today, in American Studies programs and Pop Culture, much of which is so fused with women’s studies programs and multi-culti classes that the Marxist blur of indoctrination, propaganda, and history is complete; and we see many teachers, and especially those who ‘work’ in the DVIC-all of whom were propagandized a certain and specfic way-  adulating this era as well.
But what are the modern version’s of “The ElectricKool Aid Acid Test,”and is psychology and psychiatry as much a part of this ‘junk science’ that produces ‘junk economy’ as it was then? Because listening to James Mitchell-one of the CIA’s torture psychiatrists justify his participation-his hands on water boarding of detainees- is just sickening, and illustrates EXACTLY how deep the OGS denialist collusion-with-psychology rabbit hole goes. I mean, these guys got 81 million to design scientifically sound, but ethically bankrupt torture, just so Dick Cheney could catch a woodie again. I mean-who cares if your name is forever cemented in infamy-81 million will buy lots of return trips to Tel Aviv, where Russian hookers are cheaper than blow up dolls (this last phrase was for the guys at the Fusion Center.)
One case stands out in the online community of OGS victims as one man’s quest to overcome what most of us would call intense and life-crippling stigma from a couple of ‘bad night’s on the town’ in his time as a language teacher in China, which was later diagnosed as a mental disorder accompanied by delusions. While some might say he is mentally ill, o otherwise infer this or that-it cannot be forgotten that secret LSD experiments created lifelong informants and HUMINT out of whole cloth as well:
The case of minigh dimol aka ‘waterinch’ is all over “the internet”and his claim that on  several occasion’s, which he can date and virtually timestamp, of the “rapid onset” of his OGS “symptoms,and delusions” which he had NEVER had before meeting specific, nameable people in a foreign country and doing MDHA.”http://minighjk.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/gang-stalking-and-the-demise-of-moral-consciouness/
Minigh dimol is extremely well spoken, and devotes a large part of their commentary to trying to explain the “psychosis” from a different viewpoint than labeling it mental illness. Most importantly-and this cannot be overlooked from a historical perspective, or from the stand point of sociology-it is noted that the way this person was introduced to MDMA is exactly how many were introduced to LSD at the height of the MKULTRA era:

“The terror stalking campaign involving the writer of this text is campaign that begins in the central region of Hunan Province China, a place called Shaoyang, were the target was a teacher. A torturous protracted nightly noise campaign disrupts his sleep for more than a year, and while he has on going discussions with the schools administration concerning the harassers, nothing is done.
After leaving his teaching postition at Shaoyang University, he relocates to the southern city of Guangzhou, the fourth largest city in Mainland China, for a year of language study, and though the torturous noise harassments seem a far away and in the past, his life is slowly visited by a series of mishaps, misfortunes, and an unexplained injury.
By the end of his year of study, supposed friends he had met in the second half of the year, have set a stage on which we see the target become entangled through set ups, thefts that include his laptop and other expensive items, all leading to the eventual onslaught of an intense gang stalking campaign, one that carefully causes him to feel that he under investigation for suspicions regarding the death of his parents, or is being set up to look as if he had murdered his parents, committed rape and other sorted and grotesque act.It is not until months later, after being in the US for a nearly five months, that he discovers that all he has experienced is part of a phenomena called terror stalking (also multistalking/gang stalking).
A simple search on the internet using the words ‘secret harassment’ enlightens him to the facts concerning the sick reality brought onto him by organized criminals who are bent on exercising a sadistic psychopathic practice, for reasons that are not understood by the victim. Learning from accounts of other victims, who in the initial stages of terror stalking, endure countless noise harassments, he is brought back in mind to Shaoyang University and his own encounter with such a form of harassment.
The unfortunate reality is that these exercises in the destruction of innocent peoples lives are happening to individuals in many countries of the world today, especially here in the United States and Canada.
The effects of terror stalking will undoubtedly cause the victim of this horrific crime to appear mentally unstable, for the tactics of psychological harassment, demoralization and dehumanization are so subtle and 100% tailored for the targeted individual, so that a target’s accounts of gang stalking, when heard by others, seems surreal, strange and unbelievable.
http://minighjk.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/gang-stalking-and-the-demise-of-moral-consciouness/
http://formationquay.wordpress.com
One of the contentions many people have said in response to my accounts what has happened of this seemingly protracted harassment and insidious activity, is that in the months between October and January of last year, I had engaged in the use of MDMA, with other foreigners in Guangzhou, China, most of them English teachers and foreign teachers. The use was limited to weekends only, and such weekend use was not consistent for the entire three to four month period, and tapered off by mid January. My association with these foreign teachers seems to have led to the set ups, and gaslighting which took place in mid February. It is clear in my mind that these foreign teachers lured me into weekend parties, so that when the terror stalking began, I could be labeled with substance abuse psychosis. This is often the protocal for terror stalking, to cause a victim to fall into vulnerable situations before the stalking.
I have been diagnosed with substance abuse psychosis in a number of institutions, simply because I have recollected out loud to others the event that took place in China in February of 2006. I might add that the serious assault using chemicals, fumes, and laced items of consumption would not have been ideal unless the victim, myself, had aquired a history, however short, or using MDMA. It lends much to having accounts of such covert harassment be labeled as substance abuse psychosis. All of the diagnosis of such have had no medical verification, and could very well be contested in court.
Substance abuse psychosis is typically due to extended periods of binge use, in people who are chronic longtime users, who use other drugs as well, and who also have unhealthy eating habits and lifestyles. Below is collected facts sited from DEA and research websites specific to MDMA psychosis. It states that such a psychosis due to MDMA is rarely seen, though may appear in persons who have had a history of mental illness, prior to using the MDMA. This victim of psychological harassment has never been diagnosed with any mental illness during his entire life, nor does such illnesses run in his family.

dimol has a large web presence, and the story is documented in many places on the web. If you follow the link above, you will find more links to dimol’s personal narrative and testimonial about OGS.
* the political class is not a new topic, nor is it imagined that they operate with scurrilous immunity, and impunity. In fact, CA, which leads national trends in politics and fashion, has had an ever-growing list of “untouchables” since they enacted the”cover our asses, not yours,” and “we can carry arms as per the second amendment, even as we stand against your own rights to do so,” policies of granting rights to anonymity, and the right to be “left alone” to those who work in government, policing, politics, and public sector unions. Beyond this being an affront to both the state constitution and the federal constitution as well, it is plainly unethical by any standard, and is one place we see that what are rights for some, are phrased as ‘privileges’ for others, as was the case in pre-Constitutional America.
In a recent conversation with a retired SWAT Lieutenant who had set up SWAT styled units across the world at the height of the drug wars, he noted that “everyone above a certain level of policing is a politician. They’re not even real cops. They make decisions based on politics,” and not even on what is or isn’t uniquely and Constitutinally American.
So, when examining topics as wide ranging and opinionated on “what is a police state” or “what is thee Domestic Violence Industrial Complex” it is valuable to note that those who have been shot or shot at, fash banged or otherwise seen combat, and those who have literally been on the front lines have a distinctly different viewpoint even of ‘what is a cop,’ than thse who work behind closed doors writing laws that are designed to protect them from insight, oversight, or even dissenting opinions.