Sharyl Attkisson: please ask Marcy Wheeler about the Tor Exception, and then "what is a "targeted individual."

More and more, we see reporters are targets of the “Fourteen Eyed Monster,” aka the NSA warrantless hacking, redirection, and targeting scheme.And, keep the CIA plausible deniability that I write aout all over ROGS here in mind as you read this case study of computer hacking, redirection, an monitoring of a targeted individual, CBS news reporter Sharyl Attkisson, and American citizen.
And-remember: one of the main threats of “gang stalkers” is that they will force a “target” to go broke suing them.

forensic work of my computer laptop system has revealed a second government Internet Protocol (IP) address used in the illegal cyber-attacks on my computer laptop system

While forensically, we must look at “organized gang stalking” as “counter-intelligence stalking,” which is what it is properly called in the intelligence agency, law enforcement and military circles where it originated, we also must look at the complaints of “targeted individuals much the way that Marcy Wheeler, aka emptywheel.com and others are starting to see the term: as something more than ‘ordinary complaints.
Because what these claims are is EXTRAORDINARY complaints-once we weed out the counter-intelligence psychobabble, disinformation, misinformation, and the massive fraud that most of the spy-state is.
And, we can begin to perform a biopsy on many cases that otherwise defied explanation up until recently, such as the “kill book” that some BLM agents brag about, as they literally stalk people to suicide, using hidden methods and tactics of counter-intelligence that never see the inside of a court room.
Or former New Yarwk Times reporter James Risen’s case of being stalked for 12 years because he did what journalists are supposed to do in a healthy democracy-he protected his source Jeffrey Sterling, who was railroaded by the CIA;for allegedly revealing a cartoonish CIA plot.

Related: Why Every Reporter Must Understand the Sharyl Attkisson Lawsuit

Or the well known cases of “frame jobs” such as how the Beatrice Six were literally bullied into Stockholme Syndrome and framed for a crime they didn’t commit. But like I say quite frequently-in a word where counter-intelligence stalking is designed to “slice the enemies throats with Occam’s Razor,” well, get out the ROGS BINGO card for the case of Sharyl Atkisson too, because many-if not all OGS is political stalking that began in the “building the haystack era of political policing via database abuse.
And-take note of the similarities across ALL of these cases, because “hacking the computers of TI’s” is one of the most common threats in the dialectic online.

Related Story: How 5-9-or-14 nations are spying on you at any given time, aka the UKUSA (rhymes with Yakuza). Or, “what is a state sponsored shell game, 101.”

shell game
ˈSHel ˌɡām/
noun

NORTH AMERICAN
  1. a game involving sleight of hand, in which three inverted cups or nutshells are moved about, and contestants must spot which is the one with a pea or other object underneath.
    • a deceptive and evasive action or ploy, especially a political one.
      plural noun: shell games
      “officials played a shell game by loading prisoners onto buses during population counts at the jail”

      or “What is NSA-14 Other Nations Spying” for the win.

     
    From SharylAttkisson.com:
    It “is not a mistake; it is not a random event; and it is not technically possible for these IP addresses to simply appear on her computer systems without activity by someone using them as part of the cyber-attack.” –David Scantling, cyber-security expert.
     

    I’m frequently asked about the status of my lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Justice over the secret, unlawful intrusions into my computers, exposed in 2013. As my federal case moves slowly through court system, there is a new development: ongoing forensic work of my computer laptop system has revealed a second government Internet Protocol (IP) address used in the illegal cyber-attacks on my computer laptop system.
    The IP addresses don’t belong there.
    In a new affidavit filed in federal court last week, cyber-security expert David Scantling states, “[T]he presence of these USPS addresses on [Attkisson’s] computer is not a mistake; it is not a random event; and it is not technically possible for these IP addresses to simply appear on her computer systems without activity by someone using them as part of the cyber-attack.”
    Scantling served as a contractor for the National Security Agency (NSA), the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), and as a Department of Defense (DoD) civilian employee. He’s familiar with “Advanced Persistent Threat” (“APT”) cyber-attacks. In fact, he developed and deployed similar APT cyber-attacks against foreign government, commercial, insurgent and terrorist targets. He also developed and deployed cyber-security countermeasures in the private sector to defend against such attacks.

    Interestingly, both government IP addresses found embedded deep in my computer system trace to the U.S. Postal Service (U.S.P.S.), which has been known to cooperate with intelligence agencies on various levels. The U.S.P.S. refused to cooperate with me, prior to my lawsuit, after my forensics expert recovered evidence of an IP address mysteriously residing in my computer. At the time, an agency official dismissed the forensics evidence as some sort of unexplainable mistake, and refused to help us learn how its IP addresses are maintained and accessed so we could identify the perpetrators.
    Tracing the evidence of the government-related intrusion to individual participants hasn’t been easy. The attackers attempted to erase their tracks once they were discovered. And neither the U.S.P.S. nor the Department of Justice (DOJ) are voluntarily cooperating. But experts familiar with the tools and tradecraft that are proprietary to government intelligence agencies have painstakingly recovered and pieced together compelling forensic proof as to attribution.
    “There can be no reasonable question that an [Advanced Persistent Threat]-style cyber-attack was carried on Attkisson’s computer systems and Internet connection,” stated Scantling in an affidavit filed last week. “Specifically, the APT methods deployed against [Attkisson’s] computers and Internet connection…were sophisticated and of the type only available to government-type activities and operations.”
    This latest information builds upon earlier forensic examinations already conducted by: a confidential government-linked source, an independent forensics specialist hired by CBS, and a forensics expert consulting on my lawsuit.

    The Counter-Narratives

    The facts at hand are at odds with widespread attempts to establish public counter-narratives, resulting in reckless reporting in the past that wrongly implied the Department of Justice Inspector General (IG) had rejected any notion of an intrusion into my computer(s). In fact, the IG never even reviewed the primary computer in question—a CBS laptop—because CBS News would not permit it. I had asked the IG to examine my personal computer, in which two independent forensics examiners had also identified evidence of intrusions. The IG investigators found and described to me significant suspicious anomalies in that system much like the CBS laptop, unearthing similar efforts by someone to erase data and evidence. However, when the IG computer experts finished their review, the findings went to higher ups and the resulting report was inexplicably withheld from me in its entirety.
    I was shut out.
    Many months later, under pressure from Congress, the IG eventually released a very different-sounding summary of its forensics report to the press. It recast or excluded much of what the investigators had told me they’d found. I attempted to obtain the full report and original notes, some of which I reviewed while the investigation was underway, describing the suspicious activity found on my personal computer. However, the IG has stonewalled my Freedom of Information (FOI) requests for these documents for several years. If the Department of Justice won’t comply with FOI law, then what recourse does a citizen have?
    Meantime, instead of helping us get at the facts, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has attempted to block the federal lawsuit at every turn. For example, their lawyers improperly ignored our first notice asking that the appropriate U.S. Postal Service employee(s) appear to give testimony for discovery. The DOJ lawyers didn’t even go through the appropriate legal processes to oppose discovery; they literally ignored the motion entirely. If the nation’s top law enforcement body doesn’t follow the rule of law, what recourse does a citizen have?
    If the Department of Justice wishes to establish that it had nothing to do with the forensically verified intrusions into my computers, it should help us get to the bottom of who did — instead of obstructing the effort. Above all, in the interest of justice, the Justice Department should want to identify who would have spied on a national journalist reporting on a number of international news stories impacting political officials. To me, there are few more chilling scenarios from the standpoint of constitutional press freedoms and protections in our society.
    Deep gratitude to the honest patriots who have been sources for my case because they believe the government attack on a member of the free press is so egregious. (As the case progresses, it’s better to be on the side of the law than exposed as someone who knew but kept silent. Government whistleblowers will receive legal protection.)
    Contact for Whistleblowers, and for more information: Attorney Tab Turner  501-791-2277
    Announcement of lawsuit
    Recent pleading in case denying DOJ motion to dismiss the lawsuit

    Sharyl Attkisson is a five-time Emmy award winning investigative correspondent and recipient of the Edward R. Murrow award for investigative reporting. She hosts the Sinclair weekly Sunday TV program: Full Measure, and is author of two New York Times bestsellers, including the new book: “The Smear: How Shady Political Operatives and Fake News Control What You See, What You Think and How You Vote.”

     

    Share
    • 11
    • 11
      Shares

The Shirky-Masnik bureaucracy perpetuation principle

In well organized assaults waged by governments that work in hidden capacities to enforce and socially engineer a society through constant attacks on civil liberties, we frequently find useful idiots who willingly place themselves as obstacles to free speech, and especially, as obstructionist forces that ‘steal time,’ aka ‘time-thieves.’

these are situations where people will often seek to preserve a problem or a falsehood, rather than recognize that it doesn’t need to be that way. There are lots of industries where this is a major issue.
-Mike Masnik of Techdirt.com

Organized gang stalking is one such case where we see this at work-how bureaucracies work in “the gray area of law and social oversight” to prevent insight. This is best embodied in the common phrase that appears in the OGS dialectic “what is hidden” which some use because it is a Masonic/other symbolic speech, while others use it to flaunt their access to the many hidden technologies that I document herein, as well as their ability to abuse others in this capacity.
Obstructionism and OGS are Partners in Crime and Civil Consiracy
Techdirt.com does some of the most reputable, fearless, well written public interest journalism in the history of technology-and journalism. As such, while most MSM journalists cower(or put on their knee pads and slurp down some payola) in the face of the 72 Billion dollar per year NSA/CIA/FBI/DEA privacy rape machine, Mike Masnik, and the excellent writers over there have incurred their unfair share of  detractors.
And, as can be predicted, some of those detractors are little more than liars and punks who live in their mothers basements, and guys like Shiva Ayyadurai, who claimed he invented email. And gay robotic toilet slaves, like Peter Thiel, the guy who worked hard to subvert ALL democratic liberty via the Palantir/CIA/Google collaboration. Notably, Thiel has skipped town, and run off to New Zealand, where he is hiding out, no doubt doing “special work” for his corporate and military and CIA overlords.
In the fight to demolish free speech, the MIC and its DVIC handmaidens use every dirty trick, every crooked backdoor trick to obstruct due process and civil rights; but also useful idiots like Thiel and Ayyadurai are the  backup girls for the band of merry robbers who wantonly lie, cheat or steal to destroy the rights of others while getting filthy rich. They are the contrarians of logic, and the cock-block of free enterprise; and it begins with their pillow bitingly wimpish and vain, immature, fascist impulses, attacking pure speech and then, the free press.
SO it cannot be missed that these same are also on the forefront of the technologies that are currently accessing other peoples privacy via their “inventions, and imputing to those who they steal from “intentions” that are not only false, but aslo” classic Freudian projections, and in that light, they are also perverse voyeurs.
A world of smoke and mirrors indeed. From Techdirt.com, Mike Masnik scores a victory over Shiva Ayyadurai’s perversity, and his perversion and abuse of law:

Case Dismissed: Judge Throws Out Shiva Ayyadurai’s Defamation Lawsuit n

As you likely know, for most of the past nine months, we’ve been dealing with a defamation lawsuit from Shiva Ayyadurai, who claims to have invented email. This is a claim that we have disputed at great length and in great detail, showing how email existed long before Ayyadurai wrote his program. We pointed to the well documented public history of email, and how basically all of the components that Ayyadurai now claims credit for preceded his own work.
We discussed how his arguments were, at best, misleading, such as arguing that the copyright on his program proved that he was the “inventor of email” — since patents and copyrights are very different, and just because Microsoft has a copyright on “Windows” it does not mean it “invented” the concept of a windowed graphical user interface (because it did not). As I have said, a case like this is extremely draining — especially on an emotional level — and can create massive chilling effects on free speech.
A few hours ago, the judge ruled and we prevailed.

Now- an object lesson in how all of these companies-and then, their complete subversion of intelligence agents and agencies have the ability to destroy speech at the switch. Look at this paragraph below:

The Shirky Masnik principle states that bureaucracies will d anything to perpetuate themselves-anything.. And that includes using total sh!tbags like Ayyadurai, or his counterpart in institutional sociopathy, Peter Thiel-who was so mad that he was outed as queer by Gawker media that he sued it into the dirt and put it o ut of business. to subvert the very foundations of both free economies, and free democracies.

 
Do you see the paragraph -how convoluted and broken it is? This paragraph was written as this blog, and the computer it is written with, came under ‘attack’ by ‘unknowns’ and the browser froze, and Tor reported multiple “j-script’ malfunctions. And this, just one day after the same browser, on the same computer, was crashed using an attack I cannot identify-one where the browser opened repeated multiple windows until it was useless ( I could identify it, but I am still researching that particular attack).
You see- speech itself is under attack, by the multiple agents and agencies I describe herein, and that attack is at the site of the speaker, which is me in this case, but this goes on all across democracies everywhere, as the United States, working with the Five Eyes Alliance, and literally HUNDREDS of other agencies, NGO’s target speech itself, online speech, and all other media with disruption campaigns; in this case at the site of speech itself as I type into this blog.
I document this as well as note its psychological, and ‘real world’ effects here, but elsewhere too, I have records of these attacks, which are incessant. And in the “TI” community of gang stalking victims, this is an extremely common complaint, and dis-information agents can be found mocking TI’s with comments such as “yes, I have heard that TI’s frequently complain about sticky keyboards, e-mail theft, and computer hacking.”

In fact, hacking “target’s” is what the NSA and the rest are doing, as even the famous (and well funded) “OSI informers” has noted, alongside the fact that TI’s are also targeted with other nefarious attacks such as “porn deluges.” I have preserved a copy of the web page where OSI informers makes this claim, because frequently, the web gets “scrubbed” after I validate one or another fact or tactic of these hidden operators at our internet switches, and the thousands of programs that are trained on TI’s.
Here is a snippet of “OSI informers”claim/advice:
CYBER-STALKING

Cyber Stalking or Cyber Harassment is a related group of harassing behavior occurring via internet/online. Cyber Stalking includes, but is not limited to; Computer Hacking, “Trolling”, Spamming (Often including “Porn Deluges”, Verbal Assaults, Character Assassination, and Impersonations of the victim. Online harassment is a plank of the harassment protocol. If you have a website devoted to Organized Stalking you may have people emailing you to flame you, or claiming that they are victims & asking for support with the intention of discrediting you.

Now- I will rewrite the paragraph above as it was intended, but I note that my computer literally heated up to an extreme degree, and I was forced eventually to crash the browser, reload, and change settings-this is what is called a “social engineering attack” where hidden operators force the user to change behavior, aka “behavior modification.” And I note that while my computer is less secure in this second attempt to write this post, I can write easily now. See how that works? Seeing any patterns yet?
The Shirky-Masnik Bureaucracy Perpetuation Principle
The Shirky Principle forms the headline of the following piece of writing by Mike Masnik of Techdirt.com forms the Shirky-Masnik Principle stated as below describes how OGS online has become an institutional force,with offline consequences, and especially, how writers are targeted by morons with kewl toolz directed at us from ilitary bases, police and Fusion Centers, as well as NGO’s with dominionists, zionists, and Infragard rats working behind the scenes:

Institutions Will Seek To Preserve The Problem For Which They Are The Solution

by Mike Masnick

Filed Under:
business models, innovator’s dilemma, institutions, problems, solutions


from the the-shirky-principle dept

We already wrote a detailed analysis of Clay Shirky’s recent writeup on complex business models. However, a few of you have sent over Kevin Kelly’s recent post about Shirky’s piece that also compares it to Clayton Christensen’s Innovator’s Dilemma, but thankfully highlights the one key line in Shirky’s piece that may have gotten lost in the original:

“Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.”

Kelly calls this the “Shirky Principle.” To me, it calls to mind Upton Sinclair’s famous line:

“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!”

They are not the same point, but they are related. In both cases, these are situations where people will often seek to preserve a problem or a falsehood, rather than recognize that it doesn’t need to be that way. There are lots of industries where this is a major issue.


Eleanor White tries to change the terms of the OGS argument for the better, and others contemplate civil lawsuits against OGS

What is Organized gang stalking and why Eleanor White did not like the term

My focus, and I urge all targets to adopt this focus, is on how to speak and write to UNAWARE members of the public, which most quickly and easily helps them understand what this crime is all about.–Eleanor White

Eleanor White was a crusader who raised awareness of OGS, and as such, she tried like many to change the terms of the argument, starting with what many consider to be a loaded term- “gang stalking,” which discredits those who have encountered this nefarious practice.
If you are a researcher of organized gang stalking, a therapist, or psychologist or a civil or criminal defense lawyer charged with the care or representation of TI’s, take note that Eleanor White’s work is rapidly being scrubbed from the web.
But as a term of an influence operation, it is very descriptive of those who stalk gangs-in the “jargon” or the “argot” language of policing, it is in fact and practice a valid term. Search this blog for “NSA data theft pipeline” or “CalGang database which demonstrate how databases are used to track and entrap “gang members” from birth.

And maybe read up on how the LEIU’s stated purpose of breaking the law in order to create cases became a national and now international practice back in the 1970’s as their stated goal was to chase “organized crime.”

Here below is the discussion about the term gang stalking, from Eleanor White:
 
Chazzy
Posts: 2069
Joined: Fri Mar 26, 2004 2:52 am
Law of Parties
“One of the few prosecutors I talked to who accepted the “reality” of my situation called it participatory stalking which probably is a better term because the individuals involved are participating in a stalking at someone’s request. There is always one person who “targets” the victim. In some states where they have what’s called the “Law of Parties” the “participants” can also be charged as a “party to the crime.”
It’s a matter of semantics. In a general sense I use the word cause stalking to indicate someone being targeted because of their involvement in something that results in their being targeted by a group who are motivated by political and/or religious positions and I use the word gang stalking to indicate someone being targeted, as noted above, simply to discredit them and their complaint against someone. And they do act similarly to the way a gang acts. It is a form of bullying behavior in both instances. The “participants” are bullies. Which is why they so willingly participate. But both are participatory stalking simply on the basis of the participation.
One member has posted about her psychosis. She was not psychotic to begin with. She became psychotic as a result of the post traumatic stress and has won half the battle by acknowledging it. The cause of the psychosis is something psychologists and psychiatrists overlook when “treating” a stalking victim. They also do not “know it.”
Eleanor White says:
“Participatory” stalking carries the danger that some may interpret that as what is called “stalking by proxy.” Stalking by proxy is the usual single stalker, who is the sole source of the criminal activity, enlisting the help of others.
That’s not what organized stalking is. Organized stalking is carried on by an international network of stalking groups in each community. These groups, according to David Lawson and my own observations, think they are “helping police” keep someone “dangerous” under control.”
My focus, and I urge all targets to adopt this focus, is on how to speak and write to UNAWARE members of the public, which most quickly and easily helps them understand what this crime is all about. This includes carefully reflecting on how unware people assimilate information that is negative, information they’d rather not hear about. That’s our greatest need.
“Gang” stalking utterly fails at that.”
Chazzy later notes:
I have to add that some people do know the reality. And simply are afraid of speaking out. Some organizations that deal with domestic abuse/violence have spoken out about the problem of law enforcement “looking the other way” when the situation involves a law enforcement officer. But they are quickly silenced. But reality is reality. And if law enforcement “looks the other way” with its own it is reasonable to assume that many of these officers who are abusers themselves are going to “look the other way” with other abusers. The same dynamic is at work with regard to stalking victims in many cases. The officer doesn’t see a problem and decides they will be the prosecutor and make the call themselves instead of allowing a prosecutor to. One reason why so few cases are prosecuted may be that so few cases are actually taken to a prosecutor. It is a problem that has begun to affect all victims.
One other reality is that the “professions” including law and medicine do attract sociopaths who in many cases simply are looking for a “position of authority” that in essence allows them to view themselves above the law. They seek out positions of authority that allow them to abuse that authority in order to be able to abuse others. The “code of honor” is at work in all the “professions” not just law enforcement.
The bottom line is stalking victims are left to fend for themselves. Part of the “fending” is accepting that those we turn to in most cases turn their backs to us.”
Eleanor later replies:
http://www.stopos.info/osatv.pdf
… you will see that local community members are co-opted by spreading vicious lies about the target, often that the target is a child molester. Anyone with half a brain can see that immediately, so it’s not a problem to explain why community members participate.
I’ve had people call me, a senior lady, a pedophile to my face, and spit on the sidewalk in front of me. A colleague in another city in this province was a successful mainstream media reporter. She also is a senior and has brutal harassment everywhere she goes by people who believe she is a child molester.
The problem is, most targets are so flustered by their experience that they forget to mention that important motivation.
You can hold the opinion that organized stalking is “gang” stalking but clearly you are not a target. Commonly known gangs, youth, ethnic, biker, Mafia, are NOT carrying out organized stalking. If you say they are, you are not painting an accurate picture and are making it more difficult for OS targets to achieve justice.
As I explained, the stalkers are community members from every walk of life who have been told they are “helping police keep dangerous criminals under control.”
As I explained, any reference to “gang” stalking with unaware people throws the conversation way off on an irrelevant side track, burning up all the available attention span.
If you insist on calling this “gang” stalking, I hope you will minimize your use of that term as it does not help our cause.
We all need to EDUCATE THE PUBLIC about the reality of organized stalking, and do so regardless of whether the perps see it as a “reaction” or not. If we don’t educate the public, the nightmare of organized stalking will never end.
(A good step in that direction would be to find a way to force the National Center for Victims of Crime to stop treating OS as mental illness, and include it in their educational materials.)
I’m sad to report that the relatively small number of targets who do speak out choose absolutely the very worst things to say and write. This is such a huge problem I don’t see any way it will be solved in my lifetime. Targets do not care at all about how their words are received by the public – all they want to do is rant and shout about their pain.
Now that is perfectly natural, and it is NOT the “fault” of the very human OS targets. But this natural and blameless behaviour is keeping the perps in business.
To see examples of different activism material and my credibility ratings, visit:
http://www.multistalkervictims.org/creviews
To see a booklet of the things I have learned (the hard way) over my 15 years as an activist, visit:
http://www.randomcollection.info/osih.pdf
Eleanor White
Talking with unaware people throws the conversation way off on an irrelevant side track, burning up all the available attention span.
If you insist on calling this “gang” stalking, I hope you will minimize your use of that term as it does not help our cause.
 
 

The Chinese teachers and the MDMA drug: Minigh dimol/ waterinch, psychology, and drug experiments, SWAT, Cigarettes and Suffragettes, and gang stalking

The Chinese teachers and the MDMA drug: Minigh dimol/ waterinch, psychology, and drug experiments, and gang stalking, with commentary from a SWAT officer

minigh dimol: Evidence is quite conclusive, though no one seems to care or take notice. Organised psychological harassment, ongoing, equates to psychological violence, and all involved in such violence are guilty of criminal harassment, whether they see it that way or not.

Discussions about organized gang stalking have political undertones. Much like the ‘War on Drugs,’ the current moral panic’s and the ‘War on Terrorism’ reveal the stresses at the seams of our democracy, as some will do ANYTHING for DVIC dollars, while other’s resist such ‘blood money’ and the accompanying lies and half truths-what blood libel’s one must speak in order to get more of it.
And still other’s recognize the militarized bleed-over that has likely affected those who claim OGS spilled all over America like the guts of a 10,000 deer hung on America’s tree limb. What is called “mission creep,” and it’s effects on “we the people” as police and corporate interests, database abusers, and politicized organizations ranging from AIPAC to other NGO’s (many of which are also coincidentally embezzling or otherwise selectively mis-managing funds) to psychology work and the healing professions, with crisis PR manufacturers ready to create the appearance of an America under attack by anyone BUT them.
It is these hidden black operations that need to see the light of day, because OGS is certainly one indicator of a social disease, not necessarily mental health. And certainly, as we watch the failed “War on Terror” casting an ever widening net to now encompass “domestic violence” which is and always has been a one way narrative, the Ich Du is showing some bloat.
As noted by a retired SWAT Lieutenant, a highly decorated officer, and wounded warrior who saw service all across the globe as exactly the black operator that I criticize here,  here, here and elsewhere, ” Anyone above me is a politican-they’re not even real cops. They’re a different clss of people-they are making political decisions, not using common sense.
Maybe there are occasions where MRAP’s are actually needed. Watts, riots and that sort of thing. But these small towns-and their police are ill equipped to even operate those things, much less have a need for them. It’s ridiculous. “
In the case of Lucie, aka “Miranda” I presented a tenuous link from unethical human exprimentation that was financed by US drug industries in Guatemala in the 1940-50’s, to a homeless street person who had lost “millions” by her own account due to unethical and amoral punitive psychology. I make no claims of this being an entirely accurate assessment, but rather, as a sociological sketch of one person’s story derived from a well known era of government and corporate psychological harassment and abuse of discredited or easily discreditable victims, and that the homeless are notoriously targeted from many interests groups ranging from real estate developers and other’s who seek to profit in real estate, to those who pass them around in the ‘helping’ industries, rather than root out the social problem that “causes” them.  As such it is a derivative analogy of one person who for all practical purposes and who fits the categories of advanced sequalae described by OGS TI’s; and only that. But mental health is not the WHOLE story-not even close.
One man’s online testimony about OGS has the absolute ring of truth to it, not least of which is that he documents times and dates of “onset” and specific drug use; and those directly from the notes of psychologists and inpatient treatment, and he presents a case that OGS being neither an imaginary thing, a delusion, or necessarily psychosis, and also points the finger directly at a mis-diagnosis that becomes a lie repeated in the “echo chamber” of drug rehab’s and treatment centers and the various “on message” care providers.  Here is the hard link to one of his/her many websites that chronicle the use of the party drug MDMA, which is arguably the “new LSD”: https://weathernotes.wordpress.com/2006/11/19/pasychological-harhassment-methods-to-undermine-a-personss-life/ written November 19, 2006
While the CIA is widely discussed as having perpetrated drug experiments, little focus is on what might be a modern version of these experiments that takes place across international jurisdictions and across cultures and countries. But the American layperson is most prone to blame the CIA, FBI or other domestic agencies because that is what our propaganda system has on one hand encouraged, and on the other discouraged when it comes to OGS.
And it cannot be forgotten how Nancy Reagan’s War on Drugs affected the other side of the political aisle of morality policing-namely that Mothers Against Drunk Driving coincided with rape hysteria and bad guys (men, primarily, for some reason) are everywhere; the boogieman manufacturing and “Take Back the Night” rallies, which really just created women as cheerleaders for the modern DVIC, using the exact tactical and strategic marketing and the social shepherding to “manipulate the breeding stock with flattery and safety” formula that Edward Bernays used to sell cigarettes as “Torches of Freedom” to the same class of primarily European, middle class white females.
Related Reading: the easily manipulated American woman: Cigarettes and Suffragettes, and America’s most famous  Pimp of Propaganda
One must also remember that America’s GDP isn’t measured by actual productivity, but rather the appearance of it, because we produce very little, so “products” in America are drunk driving arrests, sex offender statistics, domestic violence creation, prison beds filled nearly at random and frequently in advance as “gangster babies” are targeted literally from birth and stalked in databases from day 1.
And that PR “placements” of these ideas have replaced an actual economy, and keeping everyone who benefits from these industries, down to local police and the affiliated DVIC industries, such as social workers, psychologists, and drug rehabs ‘on message”and saying the same thing at all times, to keep DVIC dollars flowing, aka “official source gas-lighting” and CVE collusion AGAINST the mental health of clients entrusted to them. This is in stark contrast to the 1960’s when actual products were manufactured here, and men were conscripted for the draft. The DVIC incentivizes false claims and one sided story telling via Martin Buber’s zionist framework of othering and “us versus them,” rather than creating insight into cause and effect related research; much less enlists the truth of those who are for all practical purposes the people who were spoken of when it was written “first they came for___________, and I said nothing, for I was not a __________.”
Then, as we saw in the election of 2016, foreign intelligence agencies ranging from Russia to Israel, corporate spying, and likely more, are operating on American soil, and in American politics, enjoying the impunity that a special class of citizen’s also enjoy here-the political class*; that it could be argued, America is under siege, or that those who sit at the gate employing the “gatekeepers mechanism” willingly allowing the subversion of our citizens.
Adding to this potential and actual proven abuse are other American intelligence agencies, or even private contractors such as the firms like Stratfor, or CIA funded fronts that hire surveillance role players to stalk American’s and others as target practice are also clearly spying ON American’s and more.
While many celebrities such as writer Ken Kesey, The Grateful Dead, Timothy Leary, and others participated in these experiments of the 1960’s and even acted as nearly positive public relations, and made few dollars talking about it. But it seems that the dialogue of drug experiments and the general public is somehow stuck in the 60’s, and today, in American Studies programs and Pop Culture, much of which is so fused with women’s studies programs and multi-culti classes that the Marxist blur of indoctrination, propaganda, and history is complete; and we see many teachers, and especially those who ‘work’ in the DVIC-all of whom were propagandized a certain and specfic way-  adulating this era as well.
But what are the modern version’s of “The ElectricKool Aid Acid Test,”and is psychology and psychiatry as much a part of this ‘junk science’ that produces ‘junk economy’ as it was then? Because listening to James Mitchell-one of the CIA’s torture psychiatrists justify his participation-his hands on water boarding of detainees- is just sickening, and illustrates EXACTLY how deep the OGS denialist collusion-with-psychology rabbit hole goes. I mean, these guys got 81 million to design scientifically sound, but ethically bankrupt torture, just so Dick Cheney could catch a woodie again. I mean-who cares if your name is forever cemented in infamy-81 million will buy lots of return trips to Tel Aviv, where Russian hookers are cheaper than blow up dolls (this last phrase was for the guys at the Fusion Center.)
One case stands out in the online community of OGS victims as one man’s quest to overcome what most of us would call intense and life-crippling stigma from a couple of ‘bad night’s on the town’ in his time as a language teacher in China, which was later diagnosed as a mental disorder accompanied by delusions. While some might say he is mentally ill, o otherwise infer this or that-it cannot be forgotten that secret LSD experiments created lifelong informants and HUMINT out of whole cloth as well:
The case of minigh dimol aka ‘waterinch’ is all over “the internet”and his claim that on  several occasion’s, which he can date and virtually timestamp, of the “rapid onset” of his OGS “symptoms,and delusions” which he had NEVER had before meeting specific, nameable people in a foreign country and doing MDHA.”http://minighjk.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/gang-stalking-and-the-demise-of-moral-consciouness/
Minigh dimol is extremely well spoken, and devotes a large part of their commentary to trying to explain the “psychosis” from a different viewpoint than labeling it mental illness. Most importantly-and this cannot be overlooked from a historical perspective, or from the stand point of sociology-it is noted that the way this person was introduced to MDMA is exactly how many were introduced to LSD at the height of the MKULTRA era:

“The terror stalking campaign involving the writer of this text is campaign that begins in the central region of Hunan Province China, a place called Shaoyang, were the target was a teacher. A torturous protracted nightly noise campaign disrupts his sleep for more than a year, and while he has on going discussions with the schools administration concerning the harassers, nothing is done.
After leaving his teaching postition at Shaoyang University, he relocates to the southern city of Guangzhou, the fourth largest city in Mainland China, for a year of language study, and though the torturous noise harassments seem a far away and in the past, his life is slowly visited by a series of mishaps, misfortunes, and an unexplained injury.
By the end of his year of study, supposed friends he had met in the second half of the year, have set a stage on which we see the target become entangled through set ups, thefts that include his laptop and other expensive items, all leading to the eventual onslaught of an intense gang stalking campaign, one that carefully causes him to feel that he under investigation for suspicions regarding the death of his parents, or is being set up to look as if he had murdered his parents, committed rape and other sorted and grotesque act.It is not until months later, after being in the US for a nearly five months, that he discovers that all he has experienced is part of a phenomena called terror stalking (also multistalking/gang stalking).
A simple search on the internet using the words ‘secret harassment’ enlightens him to the facts concerning the sick reality brought onto him by organized criminals who are bent on exercising a sadistic psychopathic practice, for reasons that are not understood by the victim. Learning from accounts of other victims, who in the initial stages of terror stalking, endure countless noise harassments, he is brought back in mind to Shaoyang University and his own encounter with such a form of harassment.
The unfortunate reality is that these exercises in the destruction of innocent peoples lives are happening to individuals in many countries of the world today, especially here in the United States and Canada.
The effects of terror stalking will undoubtedly cause the victim of this horrific crime to appear mentally unstable, for the tactics of psychological harassment, demoralization and dehumanization are so subtle and 100% tailored for the targeted individual, so that a target’s accounts of gang stalking, when heard by others, seems surreal, strange and unbelievable.
http://minighjk.wordpress.com/2006/11/08/gang-stalking-and-the-demise-of-moral-consciouness/
http://formationquay.wordpress.com
One of the contentions many people have said in response to my accounts what has happened of this seemingly protracted harassment and insidious activity, is that in the months between October and January of last year, I had engaged in the use of MDMA, with other foreigners in Guangzhou, China, most of them English teachers and foreign teachers. The use was limited to weekends only, and such weekend use was not consistent for the entire three to four month period, and tapered off by mid January. My association with these foreign teachers seems to have led to the set ups, and gaslighting which took place in mid February. It is clear in my mind that these foreign teachers lured me into weekend parties, so that when the terror stalking began, I could be labeled with substance abuse psychosis. This is often the protocal for terror stalking, to cause a victim to fall into vulnerable situations before the stalking.
I have been diagnosed with substance abuse psychosis in a number of institutions, simply because I have recollected out loud to others the event that took place in China in February of 2006. I might add that the serious assault using chemicals, fumes, and laced items of consumption would not have been ideal unless the victim, myself, had aquired a history, however short, or using MDMA. It lends much to having accounts of such covert harassment be labeled as substance abuse psychosis. All of the diagnosis of such have had no medical verification, and could very well be contested in court.
Substance abuse psychosis is typically due to extended periods of binge use, in people who are chronic longtime users, who use other drugs as well, and who also have unhealthy eating habits and lifestyles. Below is collected facts sited from DEA and research websites specific to MDMA psychosis. It states that such a psychosis due to MDMA is rarely seen, though may appear in persons who have had a history of mental illness, prior to using the MDMA. This victim of psychological harassment has never been diagnosed with any mental illness during his entire life, nor does such illnesses run in his family.

dimol has a large web presence, and the story is documented in many places on the web. If you follow the link above, you will find more links to dimol’s personal narrative and testimonial about OGS.
* the political class is not a new topic, nor is it imagined that they operate with scurrilous immunity, and impunity. In fact, CA, which leads national trends in politics and fashion, has had an ever-growing list of “untouchables” since they enacted the”cover our asses, not yours,” and “we can carry arms as per the second amendment, even as we stand against your own rights to do so,” policies of granting rights to anonymity, and the right to be “left alone” to those who work in government, policing, politics, and public sector unions. Beyond this being an affront to both the state constitution and the federal constitution as well, it is plainly unethical by any standard, and is one place we see that what are rights for some, are phrased as ‘privileges’ for others, as was the case in pre-Constitutional America.
In a recent conversation with a retired SWAT Lieutenant who had set up SWAT styled units across the world at the height of the drug wars, he noted that “everyone above a certain level of policing is a politician. They’re not even real cops. They make decisions based on politics,” and not even on what is or isn’t uniquely and Constitutinally American.
So, when examining topics as wide ranging and opinionated on “what is a police state” or “what is thee Domestic Violence Industrial Complex” it is valuable to note that those who have been shot or shot at, fash banged or otherwise seen combat, and those who have literally been on the front lines have a distinctly different viewpoint even of ‘what is a cop,’ than thse who work behind closed doors writing laws that are designed to protect them from insight, oversight, or even dissenting opinions.