I write about the social phenomenon called "gang stalking," which is the direct and predictable result of the surveillance states that were released upon us after 2001, a directed effort of social control, deployed against activists, and dissidents in what were formerly known as "western democracies." All cases of gang stalking are actually current and former police, military, intelligence, security contractors, and their related fraternal and sororal organizations, working to target ordinary citizens. You can find proof of gang stalking, and related gang stalking lawsuits here- because they leave distinctive tracks, and so I follow them where they lead.
Most if not all blogs that talk about OGS mention being harassed by cars. And, because we know that counter-intelligence stalking is what OGS is, mostly, we can presume that counter-measures within the law are necessary. One of those things that is “within the law” is shaking your tail feathers! But even then, notice how it is one huge money wasting “make work project” for the surveillance state and it’s many trough slurping cowards.
OGS is perhaps the one situation in law and society where Occam’s Razor, which posits that the simplest explanation is the right one, does not apply, because the simplest explanation is exactly what intel/counter-intel seeks to avoid. And, when those who are tailing you do it in big black SUV’s whose tail lights are equipped to signal like airplane runways (red lights become yellow, become white, or go from red stop lights to flashing blue and reds, and so on, like a signal man with colored flags), well, good luck shaking those.
But do it if you can shake a tail, do it within the law, and if you can’t then get some good photographs. But leave Occam of it, because what you are enduring is NOT simple, by design (read nearly any post on this blog, but especially, the ones that advise you to document everything.)
See how that works? Invent a boogieman, chase the boogieman, and then, when the boogieman gets wise, call in another guys whose job fits the exact same clock-milking scheme as your own job. Niiiiice. Bottomless security theater slop-trough, seemingly endless food supply, AND you own the keys to the boogieman creation complex– until “they” finally chew the bottom out, which is inevitable.
Who do YOU call when the good guys do bad things? I have an idea- don’t call ANYONE. Write about it instead, which leaves a record for others to follow. But don’t forget the basics of the SDR!
From Gabe Suarez, on Warrior Talk, who “cut’s the enemies throats with Occam’s Razor”- and especially note how all of this godguyism is a make work project- that when being harassed by one good guy, call another good guy to shake the tail!
We used to do tail checks if we were working UC and wanted to know if the bad guys were now surveilling us. Some call this a “cleaning run” as well. We would often see the bad guys do this as well when they suspected they were being followed. The more thorough their cleaning run, the harder it was to follow them discreetly. The purpose of the tail check is to identify and/or lose surveillance. When you’ve finished a tail check you should feel confident that no one is watching or following. The tail check can be done in various ways or combinations, or by traveling a confusing or unpredictable route. A thorough tail check could take several hours, could cover a large area and involve various means of transportation. If you identify a “tail”, it is always best to never acknowledges it. Some will want to go confront the tail, but that leads nowhere. After all, when you grab the tail by the lapels and growl at him, he can simply deny everything and that is that. Use the tail check to observe and if you realize someone is in fact following you, there are some things that can be done to identify them, and/or elude them. One option is to make a very obvious drop of something inconsequential…a manila envelope with nothing in it, a folded piece of paper, or a gum pack. Leave it on the table at the coffee shop, discreetly place it in someone’s briefcase, etc. Or simply strike up a conversation with a total stranger and the abruptly leave. All of these will diminish the “tail team’s” ability to stay up with you as they redeploy assets to retrieve things and follow inconsequential leads.
Another option – is to make a discreet call to the police identifying the possibly armed man “casing the store” across from your coffee shop. This is another possible use for a burn phone. Watch the police contact the “tail”. Does he show ID? Do they arrest him? Do they act as if he is a colleague? How do they interact with him? This will give you a great deal of information on your “tail”. This can also be used to elude the tail.
Try not to focus on patterns- some say that patterns can indicate mental health issues.
But one “psychometric” of the success of crisis PR in the classic Bernaysian framework is the causation of mass shootings, and the public’s ‘reliance’ upon mass shooter drills to ‘educate them.’ Oh- and trauma induced bonding, of course.
A school shooting in Spokane Washington yesterday, on the thirteenth of Septemberby a kid who had been “on the radar” took the lives of one, and wounded three others.
And, it was reportedly a janitor that stopped the shooting.
From UPI, we also see that-like many if not ALL of the so-called mass shooter events, an “active shooter drill” had taken place just the day before. Try not to….oh never mind:
“Annie Baxter, who has two daughters attend the nearby middle school, told The Spokesman-Review children were running into buildings and an alarm was sounding.
“They did a modified lockdown drill yesterday,” she said. “I thought it was weird because they wouldn’t do [a drill] two days in a row.”
Rotary Club and Crisis Public Relations: gun control hit’s home at those who control guns.
If I were a cop, a public servant, or someone charged with “public health” I would think that this pattern of mass shooters being “on the radar” for awhile, and then, the other pattern, where “active shooter drills” take place “coincidentally” close to these events would be an indicator that something is amiss. You can research that ‘amissing’ link yourself, but try not to make yourself…oh never mind. And what might that something be that is amiss?
I dunno- I’m jus’ doin’ mah’ job as a blogger. I dunno. They don’t pay me enough to figure it all out. But from what I can gauge, here are some links below- and I welcome any and all refutation, or alternative explanations, if such can be found… which they can’t be, other than these are part of the OGS framework, and the associated “mysterious and hidden processes” of those who have placed themselves as God, hidden behind every internet transaction, and every online discourse, and pre-empted the Constitutional due processes, and the Bill of Rights guarantees, and, …etc. HEY! I have an idea! Let’s ask the Rotary Club’s Internationale’ about “who sponsors mass shooter events”!!!
Hmmmm…. Let’s first look at “brand management, Rotary Clubs, and gun control lobbyists
Rotary and Weapons (from a blog post initially entitled Rotary International Tells Clubs to Drop their Guns)
Why do you distance your brand from certain industries or merchandise? Obviously, because you feel that a connection could potentially hurt it. In this singling out of “weapons” it is clear that the Board thinks that Rotary is universally negatively impacted by a Club’s use of the Rotary logo in an advertisement for a Club fundraiser in which a rifle and archery bow are displayed, alongside a sponsor’s logo for a local gun and archery shop. To those of us who think differently, the opposite is true.
This is a revised version of the post I made on Monday, Feb. 27. Since my initial post, which was based on a Feb. 23 article “Rotary International Tells Clubs to Drop their Guns” by Larry Keane on the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s website, official Rotary documents have become known which support Mr. Keane’s article. http://www.nssfblog.com/rotary-international-tells-clubs-to-drop-their-guns/ Also, the rapid spread of the details of the Board decision has created much concern and anger among many US Rotarians, to the point that it is rumored that the Board will be holding an emergency meeting to discuss the situation as it stands now.
After my initial post, and an abbreviated version on the LinkedIn Official RI Group, I received some word that the information was incorrect, and that this was a “regional” decision not affecting the US. Since it appeared to come from sources who would know, I pulled my LinkedIn thread, and put a note on the post here. Subsequent to that, two RI documents came to me: a FAQ on Rotary’s Weapons Policy, and an item titled “B-16 Code Amendments: Weapons and Rotary Clubs, Districts and Other Rotary Entities”. What follows is based upon those documents.
Crisis PR, gun control, and ‘amissing links.’
*The search terms travis air force base shooting and “rotary club” returns just over 56,000 links.
*There are 122,000 Google hits for the phrase “rotary cub sponsors active shooter event”
*Here is a literal few of those links- do you see a growing connection yet?:
MJ: “In the wake of the nation’s many recent mass shootings, and in the absence of any meaningful gun control that might stem them, employers and schools have started training their staff to respond should a madman with a gun turn up on their doorsteps. “Active shooter” drills have become the norm in many school districts and downtown office buildings; in many schools, such drills are now mandated by the state. But it turns out that bringing SWAT teams into buildings to simulate an active shooter situation doesn’t always make people feel safer. In fact, according to the Wall Street Journal, such simulations have seriously traumatized and occasionally injured people, sparking a wave of lawsuits.
The Journal tells several amazing stories of people who were injured or utterly freaked out during such drills, which often weren’t announced ahead of time. One involves a Colorado nursing home employee whom a man forced at gunpoint into an empty room at work. The “shooter” was actually a local cop and the gun was fake, but the nurse was so scared that even when the “shooter” finally identified himself as a cop after she started crying and begging for her life, she wasn’t really sure he was telling the truth. She was so traumatized that she had to quit her job and has since filed a lawsuit against the nursing home.”
So, up until now, we have seen many many examples of how gang stalking is related to policing, and community policing, aka “communitarian” policing, and how there are racial, class, gendered elements that conspire to phrase “the other” as mentally ill, rather than as persons needing protection that is guaranteed to them by due process rights, but which is more often than not denied to TI’s in ‘official source gas lighting’ campaigns, as may TI’s report this exact fact.
And, we have seen how the MSM has so far played along with this odd and dishonest narrative, literally framing the dialectic as that of dangerous crazy people versus “everyone else.” So it cannot be overlooked that this is an extension of psychology as a pseudo science, directly and LITERALLY related to Edward Bernay’s and “mind control.”
So now we must take a look at the type of material that Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, as well as other DVIC profiteers use to “organize” their version of a society. And the key here, it will be noted, is that these same are at war with “individuals.”
Here, from Heng Choon Chan and Lorraine Sheridan, we see another clear indicator that “individuality” is an issue, as many “targeted individuals” will tell you, but also, that these researchers are deliberately pairing the individual against the collective-and remember, that in the Hegelian Dialectic, constant conflict is a purely profitable model for some individuals, at the expense of many others who are targeted by them. In the case I am about to introduce, we see a comparison between a communist countries perceptions of stalking contrasted (conflicted) with western individualist perceptions.
And before I introduce the link between stalking and attacks on individuality-and many of those attacks BY the exact academics that believe in the collective-I would first like to point the reader to Sheridan’s following online, which clearly indicates two things: 1) she is closely affiliated with police and the DVIC, as well as the many newly emerged groups of organized gang stalkers that I have implicated elsewhere on this blog, and 2) her work in prisons is nearly as inhumane and antithetical to the lived experience of an actual target of organized stalking, Dr. Moss David Posner, who died as a TI while advocating for prisoners rights.
Then, I would like to point the researcher to the fact that much of Sheridan and James-et al’s work-indeed the entire dialectic of who or what is stalking or stalkers is also very closely centered on police and police perception management, and “influence:”Are police under the influence of influence operations by pseudo-science and psychology?
And here we see the “conflict” begin:
Is This Stalking? Perceptions of Stalking Behavior Among Young Male and Female Adults in Hong Kong and Mainland China
Most studies of stalking are conducted with samples from individualist cultures. Little is known about the phenomenon within collectivist cultures. The present study is arguably the first stalking study conducted in Hong Kong. Specifically, this study investigates a large sample of Asian college students’ (N = 2,496) perceptions of stalking behavior, potential reasons for stalking, and coping strategies that may be employed by stalking victims. Associations between these variables and gender and culture (Hong Kong vs. Mainland China) were also explored. Gender was more strongly associated with perceptions of stalking behavior than was culture. Gender was less strongly associated with perceptions concerning motivations for stalking and the effectiveness of coping strategies that may be employed by stalking victims than was culture.
….follow this link to read more
Epilepsy warning: this post contains a swirling graphic image
While our governments, our corporations, and our intelligence and law enforcement agencies believe it is their right to steal our data, and use it to maniulate and even abuse certain people and to wage influence operations on us, in secret, I believe in fair warning, in anticipation of un-intended consequences, hence my epilepsy warning above. This is the difference between consensual behavior, and non-consensual behavior, and the NSA/CIA/FBI/DEA data theft pipeline had 15 year head start on all of us. Except, me, maybe.
Any cursory research into organized gang stalking reveals that politics are a major factor in “who gets targeted with OGS.” While there are varying levels of targeting, ranging from simple “influence” operations through the internet, to extreme cases where local politicians and others gang up on individuals to harass, intimidate, or otherwise coerce them, the most common “targeting” that individuals face is through advertising.
As we saw in the case of “Moonshot CVE” and in the cases of Twitter monitoring activists and feeding the data to law enforcement and other un-named parties, and programs like DataminR and Media Sonar being used concurrently at Fusion Centers, and the local police department, as well as yet un-named intelligence agency level programs, there is a constant blurring of lines between advertisers, governments, political PAC’s corporations, and then, police and intelligence agencies targeting of activists and others in spying or conformity enforcement operations. Welcome to PsyOps, mind control, and world wide”influence by constant suggestion. Now, ad a targeted audience-and a targeted influencer of that audience….
You’re getting sleepy now….count backwards….as I redirect your internet connection….breath deeply….watch as Google suggests a few (harmless) things to you to make your life easier, better, breezier, Nabisco cheddar….
Plus The Hive Mind:
And that “one guy” somewhere-anywhere in the world hidden behind the switch (with NO accountability, no records of hi/her actions, and no recourse for citizens to sue these bastards), with “the master list”:
So, to put this in common terms, imagine yourself walking down the sidewalk, dodging blots of chewing gum, and the residue of mop water, or even broken glass dumped across your path. These are ordinary pedestrian obstacles, and most if not all people expect some of that when out walking.
As you continue on your path, all of a sudden, a bicyclist heads straight towards you, so fast that they seem as if they might just run you over. What do you do? Of course, you step aside, thinking-“what a rude prick. I had the right of way- and bicycles are supposed to ride on the street!”
You brush it off, and continue on your path. An the obstacles become more and more: the couple walking along is as wide as the sidewalk, and you step off into the grass to let them pass. And then, five teenagers on skateboards; and then, at a crosswalk, people are bumping into you from all directions as if you are not there.
These scenarios above are what is described by TI’s who are being gang stalked, and particularly in the last example, this is what is known as “community mbbing,” and also “street theater.” TI’s write endlessly about this online, but they are also described by others who “suffer delusional disorders.” What’s the main difference? Proof- proof is required to indicate that such is actual, real, and happening to you.
In OGS, proof is hard to get, because of the design of community harassment and community policing, but online, it is easier to prove, now that we know with certainty that it IS happening, it IS targeted, and it IS political. And, as we see above, it IS attempting to influence you, your behavior, and your choices.
Here, below, from Breitbart News, we see targeted individuals as swing voters, but we also see that language and particularly, coded and slanderous language is used to label, and further harass or otherwise cause harm to individuals who don’t toe a party line.
While on the surface, it cannot be missed that this targeted “outreach” is yet another example of Democrat demagoguery, it also cannot be missed that “hetero-normative white people” are being labeled in ways that can and do trigger the Department of Homeland Security “threat matrix” and “bad words” lists, as “white supremacists are on every list as “hate groups”:
NH Dem Party Chair Calls Rural, Disaffected Voters ‘White Supremacists’
This weekend WMUR’s “CloseUp” interviewed the executive director of “Look Ahead America” Matt Braynard, whose new organization is planning outreach to inactive voters in New Hampshire.
Braynard said, “We’ve identified maybe 15,000 inactive voters who we would consider disaffected, patriotic Americans. And potentially 100,000 or more unregistered adults we’re going to reach out to.”
He explained his organization was using “psychometrics,” saying, “Normally it gets applied to likely voters universes for purposes of persuasion. We are applying it towards identifying patriotic Americans who’ve become disaffected and cynical, so we can engage them on issues relevant to them, get them registered, get them educated and turn them out to vote.”
In response, the chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party Ray Buckley said, “The organizing and activating of these extremists, these white supremacists, really could have a detrimental effect on the entire culture of New Hampshire.”
In the aricle above, note the use of the word “psychometrics” which literally means ” the measure of psychological effects in order to cause persuasion.” This is not insignificant, as we see that “influence” is the goal, and that “psychology” is applied as a tool.
In relatively harmless incidents such as this, we must ask ourselves if “influence operations” are harmful, and most likely come up with the answer that they are mildly intrusive, but not necessarily “causing harm.”
However, in these cases, when we add the fact that the data used is derived from the “profiles” that our own ISP’s have sold to outside organizations; and that these profiles are shared and re-sold across gvernment, private industry, political PAC’s, the Five Eyes Alliance, and even in the case of Israel, that our profiles are literally given to a theocratic, apartheid nation state that has not signed any nuclear treaty or even officially disclosed that it is a nuclear power the story of harm versus “no harm” becomes a question that few are willing to ask out loud; being used against their and it becomes a question where the individual this targeted must make a stand, or simply succumb to being used against their free will in such a manner.
So, this issue of “supremacy” becomes for some of us, a crucial and key point wherein we must ask “whose white supremacy” is being targeted and whose white supremacy is not (most Israeli’s and other supremacist Jews still encourage their daughters to marry only white men). And certainly, other theocratic, nationalistic, racial, and psychological supremacy becomes part of each persons targeting as well. So-whose decisions are we actually making when we are under chronic and constant “influence operations”?
Regardless of the answer, there is one other level of questionable targeting: the fact that beyond advertisers profiling us, we also have intelligence agencies profiling us, and then, targeting us as well, individually n levels that only nazi maad scientists were able to conceive of in decades past.
Because the past is the present is the future with intelligence agencies, we know with certainty that other, more nefarious and unethical targeting takes place, and that this takes place in secret, without our informed consent- that this entire internet entrapment scheme that has made everyone a target, has now morphed into a wider scheme of political targeting on the ‘consumer’ level; and that despite the consumer’s awareness that it is them, being consumed first, and targeted advertising only after that.
So beyond the citizens rights to protest or even to withdraw from these big data schemes, or the use of our data to make us targets, multiple levels of targeting are taking place at all times, and our decisions are under constant and chronic attack.
Few doubt that psychiatry and psychology are fraught with junk science, or are as fields of study, politically motivated tools of corporate, secular and even sometimes, cultic religious interests. Indeed, considering the non-secular and perverse narcisssim of Sigmund Freud-himself fueled by cocaine- and his nephew, the great Public Relation’s hypnotist Edward Bernay’s, we see that much of the last century and even today, these fields are little more than ahistorical political sociology with drugs and PR applied to, or around, and directed at the individual experience as a tool of silencing or criminalization of speech, and speakers- much like police science itself.
And all of that, mediated by the gate keeping of narrative that policing -and in the case of OGS especially-the hidden mechanism’s of social control that exert themselves when “mind control”and influence operations via narrative distortion and co-option takes place “at the gate,” which is the person who will claim OGS victimization( I am currently seeking an interview with a several times convicted felon who cliams that he is enduring an attempt to force him to confess to an unsolved child homicide from the 1990’s. He resides in a city that operated a “black site,” where victims were tortured and abused into false confessions.)
In the case of minigh dimol, aka waterinch, we have one persons online testimony to the farce that rehab clinics and their associated echo chamber of psychiatry and psychology attempting to control narrative in a systematic assassination of “the individual” for the direct benefit of the industrial complex of Big Pharma. This destruction of narrative is not a new phenomenon, as psychology has long grappled with knowledge that, in order to be even one drop better than sociology or Svengali science, they would need that extra “something,” to validate their own narrative-that they are a science.Police power functions this way, but so to does junk science which is a lie that travels the world a thousand times before the truth wakes up.
While psychiatry does have a certain political utility, and sometimes, works to envelope the stories of the poor and the disadvantaged in rationalizations that otherwise would not have protection in the wider society, the simple fact is that psychology is little more than sociology with official prescriptions from Big Pharma dope dealers.
And there is very little irony lost on “criminals” and “drug addicts” and others who encounter legal settings in the form of court rooms, custody hearings, or other legal attempts to “bypass their humanity and their narrative” aka “transhumanism,” and put in it’s place another thing that has more “utility for the greater good”: aka systemic gate l keeping and control of individual narrative.
Many is the man or woman who has been arrested and dragged into court over the last century as a deviant and a criminal, only to be told that they need to get off of “Mary Juana” or some other club drug such as MDMA as we saw in te case of minigh dimol, and get ON Prozac, or some other drug-of-the-month-club drug that Big Pharma is using to experiment on people.
Never mind the many notorious failures of prescription drugs, or how they are polluting the seas, and never mind that these drugs are themselves time and time again shown to be little better than Mary Juana at controlling the body politic of self-prescribers and “dual diagnoses” people for whom Mary has always worked just fine, and for whom Jim Beam does just the trick, better than any pill of the month. Most studies conclude that Mary and Jim don’t poison the oceans, or the people that use them with discretion.
And it is at the juncture where artificial intelligence meets the internet where we see what a monstrosity “predictive software” like Peter Thiel’s Palantir databases and their manipulative features that can be programmed to form situations of influence and custodial control operations; and DataMinr technology which is programmed to monitor “thought’s” and infer “actions” in real time, like Media Sonar-which was and is used by Fusion Center operatives to control, contain, monitor and influence activists until Twitter cut them off, and Moonshot CVE that is used by advertisers and corporate interests AS WELL AS the many LEO’s around the world that have foregone the “protect and serve” model of policing in favor of a “seize it all, exploit it all, capitalize on it all ” model of policing, to LITERALLY target SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS and their “ideologies,” as much as they target actual real estate.
And psychology is truly in on it at every level, thick as thieves and fat as rats, and we know this based on the cases of Jessen and Mitchell, the angel of death Joseph Mengele, MKULTRA’s Scottish knight in academic armor DE Cameron, and now Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James and Elizabeth Dietrich that seek to overlay the pseudo-science of psychology over the suffering of targeted individuals of organized gang stalking.
This political abuse of psychology begins when we look at the key component of “schizophrenic narrative,” which has historically been a trouble zone for psychologists, especially in the heyday of CIA psychiatry where D.E. Cameron, first in Europe, and later at the notorious McGill University human torture and experimentation facility in Canada. So, Cameron and others like the CIA’s official poisoner, the LSD doctor Sidney Gottlieb first diagnosed an entire nation (Germany) with mental illness, and that illness was, apparently, “the patriarchy,” aka “the warrior class,” and then, used children in experiments of all kinds-because in lieu of father’s now decapitated, the children of “the future” were then and are now in their sights.
As transhumanist types like Sheridan and James; and their progenitors Mengele and Gottlieb and especially Cameron, an heir kindred Mitchell and Jessen, for whom removing the “human” from the “experience” is a main goal, as they seek to replace, alter, medicate or otherwise mediate around the lived, human experience that exists in an individual mind; or to create it as a “hive” to be exploited by artificial intelligence in the case of Thiel and his intelligence cult, we see the field of robotics struggling with a unique problem: the problem that psychiatry has always managed to side step, which is the “human soul,” which is based in longevity of memory, and human experience that is sorted out and mediated through human filters within the brain that are stilll entirely unknown, and under-explored-precisely because psychiatry has been medicating AROUND this unknown.
Here below, wehave a study that encapsulates this problem in robotics- the problem of memory, longevity, and lived experience coalescing to form a “whole,” from Phoebe Sengers:
Artificial-agent technology has become commonplace in technical research from computer graphics to interface design and in popular culture through the Web and computer games. On the one hand, the population of the Web and our PCs with characters who reflect us can be seen as a humanization of a previously purely mechanical interface. On the other hand, the mechanization of subjectivity carries the danger of simply reducing the human to the machine. The author argues that predominant artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to modeling agents are based on an erasure of subjectivity analogous to that which appears when people are subjected to institutionalization. The result is agent behavior that is fragmented, depersonalized, lifeless and incomprehensible. Approaching the problem using a hybrid of critical theory and AI agent technology, the author argues that agent behavior should be narratively understandable; she presents a new agent architecture that structures behavior to be comprehensible as narrative.
The premise of this work is that there is something deeply missing from artificial intelligence (AI) or, more specifically, from the currently dominant ways of building artificial agents. This uncomfortable intuition has been with me for a long time, although for most of that time I was not able to articulate it clearly. Artificial agents seem to be lacking a primeval awareness, a coherence of action over time, something one might, for lack of a better metaphor, term “soul.”
Roboticist Rodney Brooks expressed this worry eloquently:
Perhaps it is the case that all the approaches to building intelligent systems are just completely off-base, and are doomed to fail. . . . [C]ertainly it is the case that all biological systems . . . [b]ehave in a way which just simply seems life-like in a way that our robots never do.
Perhaps we have all missed some organizing principle of biological systems, or some general truth about them. Perhaps there is a way of looking at biological systems which will illuminate an inherent necessity in some aspect of the interactions of their parts that is completely missing from our artificial systems. . . . [P]erhaps we are currently missing the juice of life .
Here, I argue that the “juice” that we are missing is narrative. The divide-and-conquer methodologies currently used to design artificial agents result in fragmented, depersonalized behavior, which mimics the fragmentation and depersonalization of schizophrenia seen in institutional psychiatry. Anti-psychiatry and narrative psychology suggest that the fundamental problem for both schizophrenic patients and agents is that observers have difficulty understanding them narratively. This motivates my work on a narrative agent architecture, the Expressivator, which structures agent behavior to support narrative, thereby enabling the creation of agents that are intentionally comprehensible.
Building complex, integrated artificial agents is one of the dreams of AI. Classically, complex agents are constructed by identifying functional components—natural-language processing, vision, planning, etc.—designing and building each separately and then integrating them into an agent. More recently, some practitioners have argued that the various components of an agent strongly constrain one another and that the complex functionalities of classical AI cannot be easily coordinated into a whole system. Instead, behavior-based AI proposes that the agent be split up, not into disparate cognitive functionalities, but into “behaviors,” such as foraging, sleeping and hunting. Each of these behaviors would integrate all of the agent’s functions for that behavior.
Even such approaches, however, have not been entirely successful in building agents that integrate a wide range of behaviors. Rod Brooks, for example, has stated that one of the challenges of the field is to find a way to build an agent that can integrate many behaviors (he defines “many” as more than a dozen) . Programmers can create robust, subtle, effective and expressive behaviors, but the agent’s overall behavior tends to fall apart gradually as more behaviors are combined. For small numbers of behaviors, this disintegration can be managed by the programmer, but as more behaviors are combined their interactions become so complex that they become at least time-consuming and at worst impossible to manage.
Val is a merchant mariner, one of the most noble professions I can think of. When he is not at sea, he works with his family as an apprentice electrician, in a wealthy area of a large city. Then, like most men who are men, he spends some time when he is not at sea hanging out with other men in gritty urban environments, and associating with friends from where he grew up.
The only problem for he and his friends is that they all grew up in one of the biggest and most notorious urban American ghetto’s that is a virtual powder keg of the toxins and effects of racism and the disparity of wealth in America which is more evident every day, and highlighted by the DHS/DEA/FBI/Etc Alohabet asset forfeiture racket that targets real estate for profit.
And, they grew up on a watchlist called the CalGang database, which literally monitors gangster babies from birth as if they are a threat to organized society.
And this database like so many others today which are hidden beyond the view of those who are catalogued in them-this database presumes criminality from birth (and most, if not all DVIC and DHHS lists also are used to track, and target lower tier American males, much like a modern slave net).
As such these men are literally and in every sense “targeted individuals.”
As you have probably guessed by now, Val is also black. Such is the power of stereotypes, but also the power of language used in propaganda-most western people believe that blacks are the primary residents of ghetto’s ( an out dated term in itself, as “the hood” is used by ghetto dwellers all around the world due to Hip Hop music.) And as such, Val hangs out with other black people. And unlike Jewish ghetto’s of earlier era’s, these men are not self segregated.
” I hang out there when I am not at sea, because it’s my way of giving back, and trying to let them know there’s more than that-living there.”
What Val is saying is that he was fortunate, and that he “got out,” of the enforced entrapment and containment scheme that American ghetto’s are-and that in order to inspire others, he feels he has a duty to go back and “associate” with those who are “still there.” And it is this which made him a target of recruitment for gang stalking; and a possible “threat” in the matrix should he not comply with community policing.
Related Story: “Iconic” civil rights era phtographer Ernest Withers photographed all of the major civil rights era leaders at point blank range. And, he was also an FBI informant-a rat and spy. Not incoincidentally, he was with Martin L. King the day he was murdered (try not to let these coincidences bother you when you make the connection between FBI gag stalking and murdered dissidents, authors, activists and “others”)
Then, there is a little known fact that black American’s who police their own neighborhoods are tracked, targeted and assassinated for doing so, as we saw in the 1960’s with Black Panthers and others, and even today; whereas Jews have their own police in the Bronx and other places. In fact, in western nations, only Jews are allowed to police “their own.” SO certainly, we must ask who it is that enforces racial barriers, as well as polices speech, and association around these topics.
While association isn’t illegal yet in western countries, in the paradigm of OGS, association becomes a de facto reason whereby police power can entrap and recruit others into the “community policing scheme.” As anyone who has watched the last few decades, change comes very slowly, if at all, and even then, it is mediated by police power, which acts as a gatekeeper between what is “good,” and what is “bad,”- but all of THAT takes place in the many gray area community policing schemes. Good and evil then, are mediated in the internecine battle ground of hidden strife between police power, and “we the people” in a hidden battleground where every day rights and liberties are pphrased-for some, but not all- as “privileges and immunities” or as “necessary compromises.” Val’s story of being recruited into community policing
” I was back one time, and all of a sudden they swept up on us. We were in a pretty large group, mostly a bunch of guys just hanging out. They put us up on the wall- you know, spread your legs, keep your hands out of your pockets, like that. I had no problem with it really, you get used to it(….) and I complied. Then, after they went through all of our pockets like that the usual stuff(…), they had a job to do (….).”
“So I told them about my service, and he was kind of, you know, surprised, and he took me into his SUV. He was the watch commander- four stripes…and one loop. He asked me why I was hanging around these guys, and I told him what I just told you-because I believe that the only way to make a difference is to come back here, and, you know, show thee guys that there’s something else. He left me his card, and told me to call, you know if you see something and all that. I stilll have his card on my dashboard.”
What Val is describing is the gray area between our Constitutional rights of assembly and rights of association, and the paradox that gray area has produced for exploitation of “the little guy’s” while corporate interests ranging from Peter Thiel’s conspiracy with Google and Palantir, to psychologies reliance on drug comany definitions of mental health. For some, obviously, torture is ok, as lng as it’s the “bad guys” getting water up there nose, or a few “dangerous mentally ill people” popping a few fix-society-by-drugging-you pills when they complain about being “stalked” or “hunted” or otherwise ham stringed and black bagged by gray area policing schemes.
So, for some policing is purely profitable, but for most, the community policing scheme has produced an opposite effect on our society, and on our liberty, that is itself a civil conspiracy by those in power to force the police to become abusers of the Constitution itself.
Due to the lifting of the Constitutional guarantees of rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” via the un-Constitutional gray area policing scheme of organized gang stalking, aka community policing, and the full blown assault on our rights of privacy, speech, press, assembly, and every single other right that can be inferred from the right of privacy not yet enumerated-we see that a vast encroachment on our rights to “freedom of association” are crimped at the internet switch, or our telephones, and thereafter.
So, yes, this can have a disparate effect on select people, not least of which is to with draw from society that “perpetrates” such day to day abuses.
So- I would like to re-examine a main thesis of Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, two academics whose lives have been lived in academia-which is a major social disease of our times, and which can lead to an echo chamber effect within researchers who have spent NO time in the real world-that part of it where whole neighborhoods and cities, and communities are .put on eatch lists, or databased as “gang members,” In fact, their famous study on OGS interviewed “the internet.” take a moment to let that sink in.
Then, note that the term “gang stalking” is termed “group stalking” because those who wrote the study are practicing what amounts to a form of class based, and in this case racist and sexist “gas lighting.” This happens because of the social disconnect between the modern transhumanists and actual, real people from across the spectrum who have lives outside of being mouth-pieces for the prison industrial complex. And not insignificantly, academics notoriously live and dwell in “ivory towers,” which Emil Durkheim discussed when he coined the term “anomie.”
For my purposes, I will note that ivory towers, and the incredible amounts of MIC and AIPAC money consumed by academics, can nearly eradicate human conscience, and any sense of ethics, much less insight into issues as complex as OGS as the fat of the DVIC trough swells their senses to dullness, and glues their eyes shut.
Here below is the definition of “anomie,” and some discussion of it next to a summary of the Sheridan James study-and it MUST be noted that those who are “suffering” OGS are being referred BACK INTO THE POLICING SCHEME by Sheridan and James! Let me know if you start seeing paterns here, because obsession with patterns can indicate ‘apophenia,‘ or far worse, common sense, both of which are dangerous to those who live in Ivory Towers, protected by armed assassins:
noun: anomie; noun: anomy
lack of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group.
“the theory that high-rise architecture leads to anomie in the residents”
And here is the summary of Sheridan and James analyses of OGS as a likely “delusional disorder:”
Group-stalking appears to be delusional in basis, but complainants suffer marked psychological and practical sequelae. This is important in assessment of risk in stalking cases, early referral to psychiatric services and allocation of police resources.
So, Val, who I talked with this morning, reported an attempt to recruit him into the community policing scheme, by a “gang strike force” and offered the hint that cooperation with this as a “normative” duty of his citizenship was expected. Val is neither delusional, nor is he suffering trauma, because unlike others in his peer group, he had a father, he respects his fathers authority, and that father was also a world traveler. His father, as opposed to many others who got swept into high heels policing, such as this example here, encouraged individuality within “normative” association.
And, he imparted to Val a desire to “get out and see the world,” which he did. In doing so, Val, unlike his peer group, Val learned about the “hierarchy of relationships,” and probably a thing or two about kyriarchical paradigms, though he didn’t elaborate it as such.
Instead, he had a grasp on what is anomie, what causes it, and he tries to make a difference, realizing that “all things are NOT created equal.”
It was popularized by French sociologist Émile Durkheim in his influential book Suicide (1897). Durkheim never uses the term normlessness; rather, he describes anomie as “derangement”, and “an insatiable will”. Durkheim used the term “the malady of the infinite” because desire without limit can never be fulfilled; it only becomes more intense.
Durkheim, who used the concept to speak of the ways in which an individual’s actions are matched, or integrated, with a system of social norms and practices… anomie is a mismatch, not simply the absence of norms.
I have discussed anomie and organized gang stalking in terms of gang stalking being an unethical, illicit and illegal practice that psychology, and policing and the hidden networks of abusive social power that are wielded by “community policing” and NGO’s and other’s who participate in it, and yet because there is an absence of “norms” or even awareness, and worse, that in a society where power is the goal, that “norms” themselves are unhealthy; as do the methods of enforcing them, and that inequitably.
Academia is ill suited to deal with OGS in any substantive way- and I suggest it is because they are socially disconnected themselves- that they embody the worst that Durkheim could have imagined. And, it is not surprising that in Durkheim’s anomie, and our current pervasive police and surveillance state, that in:
a society with too much rigidity and little individual discretion could also produce a kind of anomie… Thus, fatalistic suicide arises when a person is too rule-governed
Note that in anomie, suicide is a possible outcome, and in fact was the subject f Durkheim’s analyses- and in the OGS dialectic, there is nearly a constant drum beat for victims to do exactly that.
This is not incidental- it is an integral component of the eugenic nature inherent to the entire dialectic, and as such, and in the case of Val, who “got out” we see the disparate police power attempting to enlist him in the aid of becoming a rat, rather than an individual attempting to make a difference by merely setting a good example as an accomplished individual. That he is being subtly encouraged to become an informer as a first step into a wider dialectical power base, and thus, recruited into the gray area.
So, of the many things that this one example provides, I cannot tell you if Val was stalked in a specific database before the event he describes. I cannot tell you if Dataminr, Palantir, Media Sonar, or any of the many other ways that our relationships are tracked and monitored by police and others every day were deployed on him because the public does not have open access to these privatized and illicit databases.
But I can tell you with scientific certainty that he was profiled and targeted; and an attempt was made to recruit him to become an informant in his community. And with certainty, I can tell you that this all happened in a highly targeted environment, whose future has been mapped frequently from birth.
The Domestic Violence Industrial Complex is a privacy raping gray area policing scheme, a dismal failure at protecting rights, or children, or anyone else, and it’s a well-oiled tax-dollar sucking vampire.
Martin S. Fiebert of California State University Long Beach has been telling us that all along, but -for some reason-no one wants to note that women’s assaults on their spouses and partners occur more frequently, or that the very core of “international feminism” is overt and covert attacks on men.
Why is that? My guess is this privacy raping, domestic violence waging boondoggle that we now know as a full blown police and surveillance state that targets us all now is very profitable to some people, and not helping We The People one bit. And, sometimes, vampires NEED a kick in the teeth-I know this from personal experience (see my ‘who is the author of ROGS’ section).
Here, below we see a woman murdering her kids, her kids father, and that fathers girlfriend, because-as we have known forever-some women who entrap men in baby scams are themselves psychopaths. And-for some reason- the DVIC has overlooked this since, well, forever. Not that the DVIC isn’t highly concerned for children– because Kids for Cash is what pays their bills, and buys them lots of nice real estate as well.
Which bears out one part of my thesis, which is that some in the system are purely profiteering from children, exploiting human relationships, and all of that under the guise and the appearance of “protecting the children.”
So at the end of this particular story below, a story about the oppressed girl next door, Jessica Edens, whose womanly frailty and “patriarchal oppressed” life caused her to murder her kids and two others, we can see who the real “winners” are: THE DVIC SCORECARD: DVIC: $72 billion or more per year for MRAPs parked in front of Ye Olden Tymes Donut Shoppe, or any Starbucks during break-which occurs all across America at noon, 2:30, four p.m., 8-8-30 p.m., 10 p.m., etc. Added bonus round: DVIC lawyers got paid in the custody fight, social workers got to run around for hours saying “who knows what really happened!?”; the cops got paid for the delivering restraining orders, moving men out of houses, slanderous paperwork, and associated costs. And the psychologists and other’s at the “Fusion Center” somehow missed this act of “domestic terrorism,” perhaps due to the deliberatly slanderous profiles of men as domestic abusers and pedophiles. We The People: minus three more children, one father, and that fathers girlfriend, a woman who probably wasn’t a psychopath, and DEFINITELY wasn’t the narcissistic sociopath that ensnared him with children in the first place. Prison Industrial Complex (PIC) plus one more at plus/minus $40K per bed, per year. Prison psychologist: plus one more “client” in a “case file,” net 5-25k per year. Mom’s Gone Mad:
“On July 13, Jessica Edens stole a .40 caliber handgun from her parents’ house, drove to the apartment complex where her husband lives and shot and killed Meredith Rahme, his coworker and alleged girlfriend. Afterward, she drove off and called her husband once before shooting and killing their 5-year-old daughter, Harper, and her 9-year-old son, Hayden, in the back of her Jeep.
She then called him again to say, “Everyone you love is gone. Do you hear me? I’m about to be gone too” before turning the gun on herself. Police have indicated that she wanted revenge after a bitter custody battle with her husband, and her suicide notes appear to confirm that theory. RELATED: Text messages reveal the chilling reason why a mom killed her children and herself
In the note left for her husband Benjamin, Edens wrote, “You have caused me more pain [than] I’ve ever been in in my life. You have caused my children pain. I hope you rot one day for what you have done to me and my kids … I hope you live with pain and shame and guilt for the rest of your life.”
The thing about gang stalking though, is that it is largely non-partisan, and wholly fascist, as part of the master plan of globalists is divide and conquer: first they create the right and left, then they smash them together like Ken and Barbie in a back yard tiff. So regardless of whether one is zionist/dominionist, racist/anti-racist, communist/fascist- “they” win! Because YOU have adopted their dualistic and Hegelian conflict oriented paradigm.
Even feminists get gang stalked. And Jews, and Catholics and ex-Mormons; Roma gypsies, the homeless, ex-cons; drug addicts and lawyers, journalists, and others.
And in this light, the case of Seana Sperling-a woman who is being gang stalked in the “progressive” state of Oregon stands out as interesting, as does the well known case of Rachel Orban, who is being gang stalked in Boston MA (and it is important to note that those who raise awareness about gang stalking in Massachusets are villified BY THE POLICE, and stalked as thought criminals, as in this case here).
Here, below, Ms. Sperling-who is one of those many “rape is everywhere” types, claims she is being gang stalked. Possibly it is because she ‘has a Jewish sounding name(….) and possibly it is because she is a Roma gypsy(….)’. But also, like many white women such as Rachel Dolezal, the head of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People(NAACP), she is white, and perhaps psychologically deluded by rote of the curent crybully narratives into believing she is not, or that somehow female whiteness carries some ‘invisibility cloak’ properties of mystical protection that it does not.
Among white females, the phenomenon of being a “shiksa” also carries with it the weight of being whatever other ethnicity competes against it, as the white female is forever in distress, with ample, wealthy, balding, old, smelly eastern bloc socialists dying to ‘help them’.
Then, she goes on to blame the right wing of politics, and indicates that like so many so-called feminist cause based stalkings, derived from the ADL political rhetoric, or Jewish Federation and other AIPAC and “progressive” type slander campaigns, it could go either way. These organizations are snout-deep in all of the federal dollars that the DVIC slurps up every year, and they are right there at the front of the massive DHS crisis PR industry as well, that continues to manufacture crisis after crisis that only they benefit from, snout deep in the trough.
While Ms. Sperling is quick to accuse the right wing, she misses the opportunity to ask the question “what do Jewish and Progressive groups, and then, the “umbrella” of “human rights” groups that masquerade as do-goodniks do with the money that the Department of Homeland Security grant them every year” as these groups get between 94 and 97 percent of every dollar that the DHS ‘spends’ on dealing with the ever morphing and nebulous ‘security threats’ that they-for some reason- are always under. And words certainly seem to be more dangerous than IED’s on this topic, aas we see time and again as they trip all over themselves to label every common crime an act of “domestic terrorism.”
While this is on the surface seems a necessary and decent use of such black budget funds, it is interesting to note that in the long history of America, most if not ALL Swastika hoaxes and ‘bomb threats’ are perpetrated BY Jews ON other Jews (for example, only blacks,whites, and Hispanics have been lynching victims), and that even the much heralded ACLU case of defending Nazi’s right to free speech was a case that involved one of the many Jewish Nazi’s- Frank Collin.
I remeber how tattooed concentration camp survivors taked in hushed tones about his Jewishness, almost ashamed to admit it- that the famous “Nazi” of Skokie Illinois was himself a Jew; and whereas tens of thousands of other American’s are mercilessly and brutally slandered, maligned, stalked, beaten, or murdered every year Jews and white women are not amongst the dead for the most part. So much like shiksa’s masquerading as the treasured house slaves of the Khazarian’s, we see Frank Collin masquerading as a racist in order to keep the forever-in-crisis narrative alive.
And, we see a sort of “culling” taking place in the case of Sperling and others. Let me know when and if you start seeing patterns, as ‘irrational’ fears or obsessions with patterns can indicate delusional thinking. And worse, those who take action against others due to these irrational fears are certainly clinical, if not outright sociopathological. Blood money, blood libel, black budgets, and Seana Sperling’s complaint-is she writing about ritual defamation, or Zigeunernacht, the “Night of the Gypsies”- or is something else afoot, such as the slanderous rhetoric of some reaching into academia targeting others? You decide.
Being under surveillance and the slander that accompanies these lists, can wreak havoc with your career and your life as I have found out. If you apply for a job, the watch team will contact the prospective employer claiming you are under investigation for something, and you will not hear back. If the prospective employer does an Internet search of your name and finds a false Police Report or false Police Record they will not call back. If you go for an eye exam, go for a haircut, the snitch groups will call them up, thus you will be treated badly.
I found a false Police Record under my name on www.instantcheckmate.com. This website claims to have “Real Records,” but is a con. I have no record and I am not a criminal, terrorist, pervert or whatever. I clicked on my name and at the top of the page that opened read: “CAUTION: This background report is very graphic. We do not censor our reports. We trust you to use this information responsibly. Please do not abuse this tool, or we could be forced to take it offline. The content of the report might shock you, so please prepare for the unexpected.” I paid the $9.95 to see what I was being accused of this time. There was no record. I contacted the site and threatened litigation and they took the slander down the next day. I called City Hall Records and said I was finding things online about some sort of Police Record and they confirmed that they had nothing negative about me.
Award winning Author, Gloria Naylor writes about this type of vilification and organized bullying in her fictionalized memoir 1996. What begins with a simple dispute with a neighbor escalates into a DEA investigation and gullible citizens are manipulated into stalking and harassing Naylor everywhere she goes. She writes of how friends turned on her and were actually aiding the bullies
A tale of two Doctors: Moss David Posner versus Lorraine Sheridan, and the author of the resoundingly debunked study on gang stalking.
The Good Doctor Posner
Dr. Moss David Posner was an M.D., and a former Viet Nam draft resistor– a man for whom involuntary conscription into the military forces was both unethical, and a necessary act of resistance, as he was charged with the care of his elderly parents. He made a reluctant decision to become a conscientious objector against the Viet Nam draft.
Like many men of his era, and men of all era’s where men are seen as cheap dsiposable labor and military cannon fodder, he was targeted and prosecuted with every niggling and quibbling detail under the laws that existed at the time- and those laws targeting men as potential victims of the sex-biased draft. The local draft board “expressly found that Posner was not a “genuine conscientious objector,” and like all laws that target male labor, male resistance, or male calls for ethical treatment-and that attempt to frame, or conscript men into violence one way or another, Posner lost his bid at resistance (the Domestic Violence Industry is the modern reaction formation from the MIC, and it’s dominists and zionists to men who resisted the draft).
Years later, after service to the state of California working with prisoners in some of the worlds most inhumane prisons, he was fired for treating prisoners humanely. He died in 2011, and was buried in Beth Israel cemetery, just as gang stalking had started to become a main stream topic.
For many decades after his act of civil disobedience, and throughout his prison advocacy efforts, where he quite nefariously advocated for the humane treatment of elderly prisoners-Dr. Posner endured organized gang stalking for decades, and he counseled others who also have been targets of this military-police-community policing-corporate stalking nightmare. He taught coping mechanisms and tactics on how to “fight back” using peaceful means of resistance, and and he is remembered as a man who fought “the good fight.”
Here are two of the several video’s that he and others put on Youtube to preserve his efforts, but there are many more, and you can find tidbits about him around the net:
In order to understand the exact nature of how the discrediting and disinformation smear campaigns work in regards to gang stalking, here is a screen capture of a Google search for Dr. Posner’s video’s, with Google autocomplete utilizing “suggestions,” which any hypnotist, propagandist, or other influence operator will recognize by its colloquial name, which is “mind control:
Also keep in mind that Google, which keeps a “back door” open on all Google searches, routing everything you search directly to the NSA and the CIA, but also to the FBI and some 14 other intelligence agencies-and which have notoriously co-opted the communication channels via back door searches in real time of all Google data. And, Google is basically a CIA creation to begin with. Wait a minute: did the CIA create Google, or did Google create the CIA? In a word of smoke and mirrors, sometimes the cut outs look identical.
There literally is no difference between them now, except for the black bag jobs, and the assassinations and high level targeting of…consumers, of course. OH-and the physical as opposed to mental torture. Oh and the budgets- Google makes WAAAAAAY more money. Oh wait….. Related Story: How the CIA built Google “They” see gangs of deep state parrots, crisis PR professionals, and psychologists who are complicit with the Military Industrial Complex and the Carceral State. Those Other doctors
In the summer of 2016, as the American election was in full swing, and the partisan MSM as revealed as a mere tool of deep state propaganda dissemination rather than anything even remotely close to being the heralded “fourth estate” that championed the will of the people, a string of mass shootings took place across America, and across the world. Lie most staged terror events that are eventually traced to deep state interests, Israel, or one of many international banking cartels, the summer of 2016 was unique in that the collusion between deep state narrative and actual homicides was linked irrevocably.
The issue of “targeted individuals” who are victims of organized gang stalking was linked as well. because some of these mass shooters had contacted online resource and support groups to attempt to get the help that modern psychiatry will not, and cannot provide to TI’s, chiefly because psychiatry is in bed with the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex (DVIC), the Military Industrial Complex (MIC), and the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC), all of which are also involved heavily with the drug companies and the mega-pharmaceutical interests.
What a difference a few decades make. In the era of Dr Posner resisting the draft and today, deep state involved mass shootings have swelled, as has the PIC and endless war. And one important detail that cannot be missed is how deeply in bed all of the above named interests are with both psychiatry and Big Pharma, but also with main stream media(MSM), which is little more than a propaganda dispensary.
It is here where the internet became for some an outlet of alternative news, and hard hitting social critique that filled a gap where the left-which once spoke for prison refrm and humane treatment-slid to the right, and now spoke for endless war and incarceration rates that are at record levels.
Through fear inducement and morality panics, the old left had become the neo-con new right, and they began to craft very misanthropic rationalizations and trans-humanist messages in Kantian “greater good” packages. And all of this with “official sources” backing deep state social engineering schemes, one of which was gun control through the memetic that “targeted individuals” are dangerous.
It was at this un-American juncture where the New York Times met the Canadian “journalist” Mike McPhate, and his cohabitants in deep state propaganda factories, Australian psychologist and speech pathologist Dr. Loraine Sheridan, both of whom willingly and not-naively played along with disinformation and discrediting of TI’s and other vulnerable individuals-but also broad brushed all of those who experience abuse buy hidden surveillance state players into the category of mentally ill.
Like much of the NYT’s recent propaganda work, Sheridan was the perfect fit for their “official source,” and no doubt she has been handsomely rewarded since she forever juxtaposed junk science with mental health in a way that foreshadowed the death of the reputability of both journalism and psychiatry .
The infamous article was ominously billed as
Here, below, is the clown prince of information mediation about gang stalking via the discrediting narrative His name is Mike McPhate, and this picture is from his Twitter account (which was curiously silent just after the backlash from this dubious piece). I suggest you contact him-frequently-and ask him about gang stalking. And-contact him from an anonymous email on “the internet,” because the study that he supports believes in anonymous input.
And here below, once again is the “official source” and “only person to ever do a study on gang stalking that was quoted all over the internet as an authority on organized gang stalking- his handmaiden in propaganda dispensing, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan (not including Posner, Dietrich, or dozens of others who have done studes on this EXACT toic, and several related topics-which McPhate did not. Such is the nature of journalism today-who needs a fact checker-or facts for that matter, when the deep state is running propaganda into your mouth and out your ass?)
Without irony, these two concocted a narrative of “what is organized gang stalking” by consulting an arguably mentally ill person, Timothy Trespas*, and then, adding to their “sources” the results of Sheridan’s study where she literally, and without irony, interviewed “the internet” for her data, without speaking to any real person, in person. Let that sink in a bit, and get back to me. I thou, Ich Du and all that, right Dr. Wood?
But one of the main themes from all these “official sources” seems to be that shutting down un-mediated, un-infiltrated, and un-fileted discussion by victims of OGS is a necessary step to understanding the dialogue-and that by isolating individuals who have been gang staked, problem solved!
Even and especially, one of the few others who have attempted to muddy the dialectic of OGS, Elizabeth E. Dietrich, also recommends “isolation” of “these” individuals, because conversation-words- are somehow dangerous. Not without irony or coincidence, she is widely quoted by those in the gay community, and those who believe that every Twitter post have a “trigger warning.” Speech, it seems, is a threat to some people-especially those who have harmed others with junk science.
But these people are not simply attempting to stifle free expression, they are also trying to control a narrative, which has historically been the work of the CIA itself, and even the New York Times as a propaganda outlet for the CIA to take a leak.
As one example of how tightly controlled and diabolical all of this narrative control is, one must look at Sheridan’s partner in crime that co-authored the study, David V. James, who studies stalking, and authors pieces that indicate words are a threat to him as well, and all of their work, one notices almost immediately, is tailored to the current terrorism and “threat assessment” funding sources, and then, threat assessments of critical opinions of their ‘work.’ And all of that without a blink of irony, as these two perpetrated a major hoax where words became threats, and actual victims discredited.
To whit, here is some titles of his work:
The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre: preventing harm and facilitating care
And this one below, a classic form of pre-emptive CYA when one of his botched ‘patients’ gets wise to operand conditioning, or other forms of the classic Martha Mitchell type official pinion gas-lighting that is prevalent in creationist communities, or police states and third world dictatorships, as well as neo-con artists that finance navel gazing junk science:
Which brings me back to Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, and the difference between Dr. Moss David Posner, activist, prisoners rights advocate, and Viet Nam War era draft resistor: the main targets of MIC stalking are always peace activists, dissidents, and others who challenge the lockup on “narrative.” Or who use “bad words,” that challenge these other coward directly.
While victims of OGS range from whistle blowers like decorated intelligence officer William Binney, to common victims of real estate developers and the llocal police such as Timothy Trespas, what any and all ‘studies’ of gang stalking indicate is that the pro’s want to keep a lid on it in the least, and to stop discussion about it entirely without their “divine intervention”. Cuz, bad words hurt waaaay more than bombs on babies heads in Syria, or Gaza; and certainly woods hertz way more to the sensitives in the trigger warning crowd.
Here is Dr. Sheridan’s work, co-authored by James:
Then, adding to the “BDS is Hitler!!” echo chamber that these academics are trapped in, there is Elizabeth E. Dietrich, who comes to similar conclusions-that OGS claimants are dangerous, and should be isolated. Without doubt, all these ‘official sources’ agree-isolation, and then, defamation via diagnoses is the key to containing the narrative, and that these ‘crazies’ must be silenced.
Here is Dietrich’s easily discredited work-maybe you can help her, and make her ‘internet famous’ and maybe, explain her flawed, kind of dangerous reasoning about isolating individuals (which has NEVER been shown to be a positive therapy):Gang stalking : internet connectivity as an emerging mental health concern Elizabeth E. Dietrich
(UPDATE 11-20-2019: I have removed the link to Elizabeth “Liz ” Dietrichs paper because some unscrupulous POS had used an automated likn -bot to cluck the link to her paper once per day, and I suspect that the unscrupulous cunt that did that was none other than….well, you know who it was. )
Is it just me, or are all these Nazi sounding names on these psychologists a coincidence? Maybe I am losing my mind, with a bit of help, because no psychologist I have ever known would or ethically could agree that silencing victims-or isolating actually mentally ill people- is EVER a good idea.
And, the practices that are described by victims are certainly the kind of thing that can cause stress, and PTSD, as well as what appear to be delusions because the “good guys” are in fact one and the same as those who harass them. And when you add official source gas-lighting from the ‘healing professions’, certainly that can’t help.
So if anything in the data is clear, it is that psychologists are obsessed with narrative control, and discrediting those who claim they have been gang stalked.
SO, any legitimate researcher, civil or criminal defense lawyer or other advocate that seeks to understand a targeted individuals complaint for a lawsuit about organized gang stalking, one must factor in the ‘suppression mechanism” that some psychologists are using.
But Timothy Trespas, who was featured prominently on the cover of the story, and who looks like a guy who has spent one two many nights on skid row, coincidentally lives in one of New York’s gentrifying communities, where there is a high correlation between the likelihood of low income people being harassed and targeted with gang stalking, and property developers who hire teams of armed thugs to push the homeless out of these areas-as their is a connection between OGS and real estate.
While the most famous case of real estate related gang stalking could well be the case of Bob Deis in Stockton Ca, happened in Stockton CA, where the police and fire unions bought the house next to him and waged a war of attrition after Deis suggested cuts to pension funds, there are many others.
I could go on, but for any genuine researcher of organized gang stalking, the tale of two doctors should be instructive. One man with ethics, a conscience, and a cause; a bunch of others like the many heads of a Hydra, or Medusa herself, squawking lies and disinformation like panhandlers and hucksters with their paws so deep in the deep state that it is nearly impossible to refute them properly.
But if we put on our thinking caps, and disconnect the wires from these ‘offical sources’ I am sure there’s hope for TI’s-once we locate the source of their gas-lighting (which comes from official sources) and their “electronic harassment” (which is what we know today as the total surveillance state and its constant wiretapping of ALL citizens, hooked in with community policing that has so far existed in hidden form.) Then, we can clealy see that the only “implants” involved are these people, planted like a CIA leak in mainstream media.
“I will tell you that those who think to hurt me will be surprised.”
Lucie is a 60-70 year old Los Angeles bag lady, who could easily be mistaken for a delusional schizophrenic. She has all the traits. Talks to herself, homeless, speaks in long streams, unedited, and unfiltered; has mysterious figures following her around all the time, and has an extensive back story that involves what is colloquially called “mind control”. She sleeps outdoors, and resists attempts by “the psychiatrists who are always coming around here” to “help” her.
But when I looked into her story, it checked out in many parts, not least of which is that non-violent resistance to false narratives, and highly organized, well funded bullies often takes unusual forms in the self protective mind.
It goes like this:
Guatemala, in this era, and particularly, this end of that era:
This morning, I saw her in her usual neighborhood, slumped on a bus bench. Driving by, I was touched with a rare affection for a homeless person, warm with recognition of her, in the sense of the root word affect, and then, as I analyzed my emotion, I realized I had actual affection for her in a nearly familial sense. Maybe it is her regular pick up line, or maybe it was that she told me she is a virgin, and I believe her every time she says it.
While I had given her toasted bagels on many previous occasions, and generally avoided getting close to her in the literal or the physical sense-because of my own personal issues with body odor and dirt-her regular line, every time, is “Are you the guy who bought me a sandwich that one time?“-I was particularly affected today, because I had never seen her sleeping before.
Despite the morning chill, she looked comfortable-and even comforting. As if her head, resting on her chest in a pile of tangled hair was itself in a warm bed, and my own head, somehow felt the warmth of it; and had the urge to provide for her.
I circled the block, with a smile on my heart at the sight of her. Matted hair, dyed tawny red sometime in the recent several months past-the grey was showing at about two inches; usual sweat suit type casual slacks, coupled with a stylish dumpster dived blazer and various bags, and terribly sporty, colorful shoes-and a huge but silent boombox.
The thing about Lucie is that even as a homeless bag lady, one can tell in seconds that she is quite a charmer, and has some class. That even at 60-70 she has a wink in her eyes, and delight in her heart, despite anything; and despite what the psychiatrists/ologists might say, and have said about “people like her.”
And she has quite an entertaining wit-her mind, as far as I have ever seen-is clear as a bell. Not delusional at all, unless you count “avoiding psycholigical meta -narrative and those who deploy it ” as a delusion.
She has a quick smile, and is full of life, with a lilt in her step as if she has likely known a dance floor or two. Surprisingly full of wit and awareness of her surroundings, and status in life. “I will tell you that those who think to hurt me will be surprised.”
This morning, I spent an hour or so with her, as she treated me to story after story about the psychiatrists who try to “save her,” and how she craftily avoids them at all costs. Which, based on her history with psychiatrists, is probably not a bad idea. She even has a regular and clear recall of a particular psychiatrist, complete with a name that rings like the name of a mad doctor in any SciFi novel. Or a Mengele; or Strangelove. Or- Gottlieb; Jessen and Mitchell, D.E. Cameron; now come Sheridan, James, and Dietrich to tell us how crazy the gang stalked people are. Related Story: Ten real victims of the CIA corporocratic MKULTRA program. Sure. Nothing to see here. Move along now. Our country has evolved-look! We almost had a woman president!
“Who is going to find out? These women are trash. Nobody’s going to believe them.” –Hillary Clinton on Bill Clinton’s bimbo eruptions
As I listened to Lucie-again-and every time I listen to her-she fills in a new blank that makes it all clear-that targeted individuals are often actual victims, very well hidden and discredited victims, and very bullied people, victims most often of highly orchestrated, highly targeted, extremely nefarious state and internationalist medical/legal/moral/narrative control practices; and all of that mixed in with biographical data that checks out with known historical events, and since-revealed nefarious state/corporate/church/intelligence agency/police practices, and echoes much of what you will find here on this blog.
The last time I bought her a toasted bagel and cream cheese-because that is what she asks for, telling me each time ” I lie everything toasted!” she regaled me with flirtations of all kinds, sometimes bordering on the charming and sort-of-really-cute. Even beyond old lady cute, she still has exactly what she claims to have-magic!
“I tell you I have not had sex for over twenty years. Twenty years. the last sex was with my husband. But I tell you, I have some very magical things that I can do-very magical. Even for you, they would be like magic.”
Of course I believe her. Without a doubt, after twenty years since her husband died, I am certain sex has crossed her mind many times. Often, women need to get very very old before they can admit to themselves a biological desire for sex, for it’s own sake. And certainly, those who have endured the trauma of Judeo-Christian narratology, and its attendant lies, mythologies and industries that exploit every piece of a person as thoroughly as a rendering plant, must recognize when they are being loved without penalty.
And such was she this morning-frisky, and flirtatious, and she loved my clothes, told me that she looks better with her hair washed, and loved my telling her that she is beautiful even with dirty hair.
And again, she regaled me with stories of the psychiatrist- the guy who kept her and pursued her, and tried to convince her it is all in her head. How he used ‘the black men*’ to threaten to rape her, and how they chased her out of her apartment. How the psychiatrist became a millionaire after he took her share of something or other. How Guatemala “was a long time ago, but they are still here, all the time. The psychiatrists are looking for me, and I know how to hide from them.”
That Lucie’s an everything bagel with garlic and all that; the real cream cheese. And I believe her. It is for the reader herein t decide what they believe, and what they do not. But you an look it all up, and do your own research, but herein, I have tried to point you in the right direction. You are welcome to listen to the “professionals” all you want-but Lucie, aka “Miranda” which is her real name, but which she disavows for some as yet undisclosed reason-has already been down that route, like many before her. These take the life right out of people by sheer utter stupid and circular DSM-V Big Pharma funded psychiatry, and it’s affiliated hench-persons and their black bags of dirty tricks, wielded like swords in court rooms, confinement hearings, and jails-prisons across America.
“But I tell you right now-I am thinking of that psychiatrist-and that witch! How they robbed me. Many millions I assure you. And I can tell you this, that even right now do you know what I am thinking? I am thinking magic. I tell you this-I can do magic things. Many men would want me to do this magic, and I tell you I have very special things I can do. But I will not do them, you know, they are that good. But I have done them before-one man, without even touching him, I made him very happy. Even women would want this magic. But that witch….”
Her voice trails off, and she is giving me her smile-the alertness in her eye, the keen awareness of her story telling ability, and her audience-the knowledge that what she is telling me has been heard, and appreciated, and believed, if only for the humor of the situation-her a bag lady, me a guy in a thrift store suit jacket, like a Harold and Maude at the back end of this generations Titanic-too in love for the youngsters to believe is possible-with magic, tossing chum out the mess windows, and marveling at the colorful sparkling wake behind our conversation, as everyone else drinks the fine and exotic cruise ship wine called “KoolAid” on the bow, sycophantic and helpless, waiting for an appearance of the captain who will reassure them that they are all the good guys, and everyone else, well….
When I first started writing this leg of the story, I had “Piper” on my mind-and how she told me that she had been a 12 year old prostitute, how I met her at 17 and thought she was nuts when she talked of “gangs of people who chase me everywhere, and always seem to know where I am,” but who I came to believe over time; a story much like the exact story of Jasmine, who, perhaps NOT un-coincidentally-also hails from Guatemala. It seems these things that I write about herein are interlinked in ways that seldom make the news. And also-as “they” like to remind those who “they” stalk: “What happens in darkness…”
And when I write, the hackers and the exploiters always take over my blogs, and sometimes, online harassment comes offline. So adios for now. Or, more in the vernacular “a Dios,” with toasted bagels-because Lucie likes everything toasty.
UPDATE 09-04-2017: A source close to Lucie’s neighbrhood reported that Lucie was hauled off to the insane asylum, or “5150’d” because someone called her in for dancing, just over a month after I wrote this article.
Kesey was himself a victim of CIA experimentation, as was the Boston gangster “captured” in Santa Monica after decades on the run, and who had FBI agents on his payroll, Whitey Bulger; and the UnaBomber Ted Kaczinski and many more men and women whose faces and names have graced the newspapers and mass media over the years.
In the famous scenes from that movie, the notorious Nurse Ratched-a white female- cuckolded and cauterized male libidinal energy, creativity, and raw sexuality with psychopathic and dispassionate force, targeting the brain, and it’s companion in thought crime, the mind. And when she couldn’t intimidate men into silence, she called in the “Orderlies” who were all black males, much like we see with “progressive” politics today.
If you liked this story, read its companion piece, about David the son of a Long Island millionaire, who was once coincidentally set to inherit a fortune, but then onecsunny day above Houston….
The internet has enabled the potential for democracy like never before in history. It has also enabled massive repression, and hidden surveillance operations as well as what could be called “mind control” and influence operations.
This is all possible because entire military battalions work side by side with the CIA, intelligence agencies, and domestic law enforcement agents and agencies to suppress free speech, or control the narrative entirely, funded by massive budgets.
The blog comment forum has long been subverted by hidden agents and agencies, and many if not most trolls are working for war lobbyists, think tanks, NGO’s and more to drown genuine dissent, and to infiltrate all levels of dialogue in full spectrum dominance of any narrative that challenges their special interests.
Here, below, is a comment I received from someone who claims they are a targeted individual, and whose ‘crime’ was that they “pissed of the son of a four star general.” This person, Almost Dead, made that remark after I left a comment at another blog, written by Dr. Michael Wood.
Because most gang stalking related comments use pseudonyms, I have found that it is not wirth getting involved too deeply in any one narrative, unless the person uses their real name, and cites examples that make some kind of sense, i.e. ” I am targeted because I was an informant for MI5,” or something credible that establishes a baseline reality-otherwise, you are swept into plainly abusive and harmful dialogues with complete strangers, many of them bizarre sadists, or other unstable types.
This person also claims other things, but trying to get to the bottom of any online narrative is a deep rabbit hole.Most interesting is that of the posts that are getting attention on my 1.5 week old blog about OGS, these indicate that there is a ‘special interest’ reading what I write, and I won’t disclose that quite yet.
So, I post this comment below from someone who has made three comments directed at me- I inure you to explore this comment below in any way you wish as a researcher of organized gang staking. And, as a researcher, a psychologist, a linguist, or whatever discipline you practice, note also that that the comment is front-loaded with words, phrases and concepts inferring threats of violence, real or imaginary, starting with the nym’ of the poster; and that taken as a whole, is ominous, and threatening, but also imagine reading dozens of such comments over a period of time? The net effect becomes like a neuro-linguistic programming session filled with life threats and other negativity:
Comment from “Almost Dead” at Dr. Mike Wood’s Conspiracy Theory Psychology blog:
Lastly, the pseudonym “Almost Dead” and “gang stalking” appears nowhere on the internet BEFORE that series of posts but the phrase does-and so I note the nym and the phrase are not related.
And Dr. Wood himself-and his web server-can easily document these facts and the IP’s related to my claim. Certainly, Dr. Wood has encountered interesting scenarios since these postings-and his blog is surprisingly silenced since this discussion took place there as well-go over there and note the dramatic drop in postings, but also the general dialogues that have taken place since that one post.
Then, there are the linguistic traits, and semiotic meanings within the posters psychological profile that indicate many other things, which any researcher can cross-check and validate across the online dialectic.
I am updating this post for this specific reason: I made several predictions above, and a specific a prediction that linguistics can help solve the language puzzles of “who are gang stalkers.” In this case, you will note that the phrase not “even the gang stalkers” is highlighted above, and also, time-stamped at the time I wrote it in my WOrdpress blog here.
I did this for a very specific reason. I ask you the reader now to use the duckduckgo.com search engine and search that exact phrase, and see how specific it is to another writer who claims to work from the Las Vegas/Clark County “public library” aka “Fusion Center/LEO affiliated organization/institution.
I also ask any law enforcement personnel reading in to ROGS right now to do this search immediately, because you will find an actual gang stalker in action.The phrase “”even the gang stalkers””uses colloquial syntax in a specific mid-western American way-specific to the more rural regions of the American South, and the midwest-and specifically is a hybrid language structure that you can find anywhere rural/southern descended persons mix with more cosmopolitan society (you can research the etymology of the phrase yourself).
Then, I ask you to note that ROGS has specifically implicated a four stripe lieutenant, whose name is exactly the same as a four star Canadian General in this blog here.
Lastly, that you find and investigate or open a prosecution that person, known variously as “Gladys” and several other nyms. As the reader will note, many “gang stalkers” say frequently that their goal is to stalk people until their victims are “institutionalized, incarcerated, or commit suicide.”
This is the nature of this sort of harassment-the gang stalker/s in this case are able to find my writing online, and specifically target me, personally, across the web, despite all attempts at anonymization.
So-here is two variants of the phrase, as of today’s date, as they appear in Google-this phrase is SO SPECIFIC that Google has only four results for “even the gang stalkers”, and two of them are here at ROGS as I outline my case against people who I have named elsewhere.
Here are Google.com’s results as of today, 01/06/2018 and I note that because WordPress.com keeps copies of changes and “drafts” of blog posts, it will be noteworthy tat my claim is “evidentiary” in that it fulfills most states/federal definitions of admissible evidence. Then, it is noteworthy that Google also provides back-up E-discovery materials that can and will validate my result:
No one, not even the gang stalkers, are safe from becoming a TI. A look at TI testimonies can show that the campaigns have taken place in the most prestigious to the most poverty-stricken neighborhoods. The Nazis and other hate groups started to eliminate those who posed a threat to their movement this way. Street gangs …
Mar 9, 2017 – However, at the time of the posting above, many specific things will bear my thesis to fruition, not least of which are that posters mention of Washington state, Utah, and then, the phrase “even the gang stalkers” and more is evidentiary, and related to other facts and claims that make throughout ROGS. Lastly …
Even the gang stalkers are not exempt from being tested on. This isn’t a bunch tin-foil hat wearing loonies. There claims of attack by energy weapons can be proven once someone is brave enough to stand up and test their biological signatures. The video below is a 12 minute clip of a 60 minutes special demonstrating how …
Here are Duckduckgo.com’s results-and note that I have previously indicted or made claims about the speaker in other writing:
As a final note, I would like to bring attention to this academic paper called “General Information On Gang Stalking“, whereby a poster going by the nym “protectlifenow” appears in the Google results, and has also provided this paper calling upon law enforcement to note that “The Community and Criminal Administration Segments” are integral in this problem.
From that paper:
Currently, the Community and Criminal Administration segmentsare the most detrimental to society.
The focus will be on the community and criminal administration segments because these seem to coincide often and are the most detrimental tosociety at this point in time. The segments are not distinct and often overlap. The community usually supplies the workforce for the campaign by using influential locals to recruit, follow, harass and spread misinformation about TIs. The recruits report to their “handlers” who in turn report to their own “handler”. The street team may not know the person or people in charge of the operation. Information is usually released on a need-to-know basis and in some cases stalkers are unknown or appear unknown to each other.
Currently, the Community and Criminal Administration segments are the most detrimental to society. Segments often overlap with the community supplying the workforce for the campaign