ROGS Blog has been hit by a nation-state level attack, and is on hiatus for awhile

My blog was recently hit by a nation state level attack, which likely came from US police and military assets. Here is a bit about nation state level cyber attacks, from BAE Systems.

Yes, indeed, words do have consequences, and those consequences are usually Jewish-christian and other western flying monkeys and fanatics who work in policing, politics, or in the matrix of Infragard, Fusion Centers, Law Enforcement Intelligence, current and retired military, and others lobbying cyber bombs and real bombs at people who believe in civil rights, due process, and constitutional rights.

That attack appears to have started in Harris County, Texas (one of the attackers referenced that locality ), where George Floyd was recently laid to rest, after having been murdered by Minneapolis, MN cops.

And, shortly before that attack, this blog was visited from Kuwait and other places, where the US military and its plague of private contractors wage cyberwar on free speech, and democracies upheld by free speech everywhere.

The avid reader will take notice that ROGS (the writer you are reading ) has been writing about gang stalking in Minnesota, the same state where George Floyd was murdered. And, that.my writing goes straight to the heart of an issue that has now become a world -wide issue. So, never doubt the power of one voice (and a few excellent, now world-wide slogans ).

1592021382618

The evidence of that attack is collected, and incident reports too.

The attack was staged in various ways, and included:

* Social engineering exploits that exploited features of WordPress insecure comment feature. This attack also referenced a crackpot case I once covered, that of Sarah Degeyter

* email and phishing attacks

* DNS cache poisoning, which you can read about here which utility zed the now defunct address www.lanelwilson.com, (which can still be accessed in the internet archive, though the blog has been closed. )

The net effect of these attacks is that it slows down my writing process, but it will not stop me entirely.

And, as we see, ROGS writing is quite effective, considering the world wide protests that started in the same city where George Floyd was murdered by police.

So, adios, for now, and ROGS will continue “Bringing people together, ” in other ways, much as we see with the Floyd protests, which started literally, at my doorstep.

Signing out for now, but I will be back, I promise you, “bringing peace by pleasing the palette, ” of those who are ensnared and entrapped in the illegal policing tactics of western governments and their bizarre, racist, due -process free “organized gang stalking” dialectic.

In the meantime, entertain yourselves with this video, and the related links, from a restaurant owner whose store was right next to the place where,Derek Chauvin worked with his coworker, George Floyd and where Chauvin likely began plotting that murder, as he gang stalked El Nuevo Rodeo (and undeniably gang infested dancehall in Minneapolis ).

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3NcQ6VkCfk&w=360&h=203]

And, a second hand blurb from the “New Yarwk Times,” just for fun:

A bit from the HuffPost:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/gandhi-mahal-minneapolis-protest-george-floyd_n_5ed142a8c5b6bc97e7682588

And, speaking of infiltration, informants, and spies in social justice, activist, and religious networks, have a look at this link, because religious gangs, and their affiliated NGOs are very real indeed :

Ruhel Islam

I guess theres more than one way to make it into the New Yarwk Times, Dr.s Lorraine Sheridan, David V. James, Christine Sarteschi, et al.

Next time you are tempted to open your (uninformed) yaps about gang stalking, and “are complaints of gang stalking delusional” maybe put your own vanity aside, and try this instead:

[email protected]

In the meantime, if you wanna actually help, DEFUND THE POLICE and dismantle the DHS /FUSION CENTER /FBI/LEIU /ATAP/NGO octopus of undemocratic, unconstitutional investigation, targeting, and extra-judicial homicide, because NONE of these local police act alone, without that type of support.

And, the simple fact is, that ROGS Analysis of organized gang stalking and the fact that even Google search results have changed dramatically since I began writing is spot on.

Gang stalking is: organized groups of current and former state actors doing illegal things, and targeting individual activists, dissenters, change agents, and others who challenge establishment power. These do this under the unconstitutional mob rule of “community policing ”, working with police, intelligence agencies, private contractors, and police affilliated non-governmental organizations such as the Ford Foundation, the Rotary club, Lions club, the Law Enforcement Intelligence Units (LEIUs ), the Association of Threat Assessment Professionals (ATAP ) etc.

Especially pernicious within the gang stalking dialectic is how state level actors spew total gibberish about aliens, Nibiru, UFOs, and other dubious crap about electronic brain beams online, in order to cover up state level police brutality, coercion, and manipulation of social discourse. Examples of that are plentiful such as Targeted Justice, and the US Air Force “OSI informers ”, which you can.contrast against cases like Ahmaud Arbery, stalked and hunted, and finally murdered by retired cops, their relatives, and others after a many years long gang stalking .

Hell, you can even have a look at my recent state level hack and the sunsequent state -level actors who tried to cover their tracks afterwards for evidence. The only “electronic weapons ” aimed at me that time were keyboards and internet cables, unlike this other electronic weapon called a “Taser”that was aimed at Ahmaud Arbery two years before his murder.

Y’all would do well to adopt it as a framework to investigate gang stalking complaints, from any angle, because unlike other blogs, ROGS provides evidence, using the scientific method. And, you can test and verify my results.

Narcissistic abuse, versus targeted individuals who are frequently trauma survivors.

Few situations present a more clear picture of institutional sociopaths who are actually somewhere on the scale between narcissistic bullies and full blown psychopaths than that of OGS and targeted individuals. And certainly, the current psychology is just not up with the times, as we face the most intrusive, privacy raping, mind melding force that ever existed: the internet and the Panopticon it has created.
Related Reading: Mind Control Experiences on the Internet: implications for the psychiatric diagnoses of delusions

Trauma bonded survivors “can come to find that it can be almost impossible to relate to anyone, even family or old friends, except superficially. There is a biological craving for intensity that no normal relationship will satisfy. This provides a feeling of being totally alone, and totally empty”

Not only do TI’s fit the profile of intelligence agency assets that are easily exploited, but they also fit many criterion for victims of common bullying.
So, my  reader might find it interesting that in propaganda operations, the numbers DO indicate certain things to readers who understand the ‘coded’ nature of propaganda, and speech itself. Have a look here, at the use of the number 13 in propaganda, and then, here below for the use of the number 12. I recommend that the reader read the entire post in order to connect my thesis with military grade trauma creation through propaganda, but here below, I have simply focused on the authors number “three”

12 Classic Propaganda Techniques Narcissists Use to Manipulate You

3) The Big Lie:  Spinning a lie so outrageous that others are at a loss where to even begin to refute it.
Narcissists are convinced that whatever they say in the moment is 100 percent true just because they are saying it. Lying often comes naturally. They know that the bigger the lie, the more it may overwhelm others’ critical faculties.
Example:  A narcissist when confronted with a credit-card bill evidence of an extra-marital affair:  “I’ve never been to that hotel in my life. That hotel is notorious for making up fake check-in records and then blackmailing innocent people like me. There was a big article online about that a while back. You probably saw it. I might even have an email from the hotel trying to blackmail me in my inbox right now. I will fight this slander all the way to the Supreme Court. They will be sorry they ever made up this lie about me.”

 
And, many in the OGS dialectic complain of narcissistic abuse, which any researcher will readily find to be true based on the many online blogs about this topic; and others seem to relish their positions hidden away on the internet backbone, which gives the psychopath ideal cover to sadistically persecute those whom they target.
Then, in order to comprehend the psychological aspects of it, it is helpful to know with certainty that psychology is, for the most part, not a “hard science,” but is instead, a centuries long attempt at mind control, through labeling theory an especially, through Public Relations, hence the term “pop-psychology.” In other words, psychology is the literal outward manifestation of “the lie that repeats itself so often it becomes a truth,” despite it being a lie in the first place.
And, much like today’s current ideological basis for neverending war, we see that those who bomb others first are “hero’s” and those who suggest better alternatives are “loser’s and badguys.”
1575274396350
So lets filter the dialectic through these two “mental illnesses,” those of narcissism, meeting victims of OGS, through first examining how trite and inaccurate most diagnoses can be, and how the ‘diagnoses’ are little more than labels that indicate conformity or resistance to it, or that indicate ‘ideal personalities’ versus ‘personalities that cannot be easily realized, and then idealized by the observer.”
Look! Even YOU can spot a narcissist! (and based in current propaganda, an male th i no easily conformable to the biological clocks o 20-30 something fertile myrtles is likely to end up being discussed on some internet chat forum by one of these as one of those ‘bad men.’ How dare he find his own life/time/biological impulses more important than my own!)
How to spot a narcissist with just on question.
Now, let’s look at the profile of many TI’s that I personally have encountered, but also, which is evident from reading their blogs online: many TI’s are classic victims of trauma, and then, trauma bonding through narcissistic abuse, aka OGS.
Trauma Bonding: from abuseandrelationships.org
We see time and time again that those who are drawn/coerced/manipulated/blackmailed/pushed/other into the OGS dialectic online have indicated trauma-there are literally too many examples to point at, ranging from drug addicts swept into OGS by LEO’s, or people who have been black bag jobbed by any of the numerous security contractors that derive funding fro the DHS, to prostitutes who have been pushed by hidden forces into online discourse; to whistle blowers whose careers ended when they “did the RIGHT thing.”[the reader can use my search feature to find examples, or just Google it.]
Most sites on bullying document this trauma connection, but here is a bit about trauma bonding from the link directly above- and it cannot be missed that isolation is a factor:

Trauma Bonding

Bonding is a biological and emotional process that makes people more important to each other over time. Unlike love, trust, or attraction, bonding is not something that can be lost. It is cumulative and only gets greater, never smaller. Bonding grows with spending time together, living together, eating together, making love together, having children together, and being together during stress or difficulty. Bad times bond people as strongly as good times, perhaps more so.
Bonding is in part why it is harder to leave an abusive relationship the longer it continues. Bonding makes it hard to enforce boundaries, because it is much harder to keep away from people to whom we have bonded. In leaving a long relationship, it is not always useful to judge the correctness of the decision by how hard it is, because it will always be hard.
Moreover, experiencing together extreme situations and extreme feelings tends to bond people in a special way.. Trauma bonding, a term developed by Patrick Carnes, is the misuse of fear, excitement, sexual feelings, and sexual physiology to entangle another person. Many primary aggressors tend toward extreme behavior and risk taking, and trauma bonding is a factor in their relationships.
Strangely, growing up in an unsafe home makes later unsafe situations have more holding power. This has a biological basis beyond any cognitive learning. It is trauma in one’s history that makes for trauma bonding. Because trauma (and developmental trauma or early relational trauma is epidemic) cause numbing around many aspects of intimacy, traumatized people often respond positively to a dangerous person or situation because it makes them feel. It is neither rational nor irrational. If survivors can come to see that part of the attraction is, while very unwanted, a natural process, they may be able to understand those feelings and manage the situation more intentionally.
An excellent book on the effects of trauma (and repair) is The Body Keeps the Score: Brain, Mind, and Body in the Healing of Trauma by Bessel van der Kolk MD
Intense relationships also tend to hijack all of a survivor’s relating capacity. It is like a state of being burnt out. First, while it is very easy to become attached to a very chaotic and inconsistent person, it is simply not possible to form a consistent internal object representation (feeling memory) about them. When separated from the intense partner, the urge to make contact is usually intense because it is a stable feeling memory (or internal object) that makes separation from an important other person tolerable in any circumstance.
Second. the survivor can come to find that it can be almost impossible to relate to anyone, even family or old friends, except superficially. There is a biological craving for intensity that no normal relationship will satisfy. This provides a feeling of being totally alone, and totally empty.
 

Spokane WA school shooter "on the radar" before shooting: Rotary Clubs, gun control, crisis PR, and 'active shooter drills.'

Try not to focus on patterns- some say that patterns can indicate mental health issues.
But one “psychometric” of the success of crisis PR in the classic Bernaysian framework is the causation of mass shootings, and the public’s ‘reliance’ upon mass shooter drills to ‘educate them.’
Oh- and trauma induced bonding, of course.

Related Story: Rotary Club “Cop of the Month ”NYPDs Valerie Cincinelli, indicted for plottingto hire a hit man to murder two people, one of them the daughter and child of her boyfriend. Ever notice how police departments and their accessory community club cheerleaders ALWAYS reward the worst actors in their ranks?

img_2520
A school shooting in Spokane Washington yesterday, on the thirteenth of September by a kid who had been “on the radar” took the lives of one, and wounded three others.
And, it was reportedly a janitor that stopped the shooting.
From UPI, we also see that-like many if not ALL of the so-called mass shooter events, an “active shooter drill” had taken place just the day before. Try not to….oh never mind:

Student killed in shooting at Spokane-area high school

By Allen Cone   |   Sept. 13, 2017 at 3:11 PM

 
“Annie Baxter, who has two daughters attend the nearby middle school, told The Spokesman-Review children were running into buildings and an alarm was sounding.
They did a modified lockdown drill yesterday,” she said. “I thought it was weird because they wouldn’t do [a drill] two days in a row.”

Rotary Club and Crisis Public Relations: gun control hit’s home at those who control guns.

Rotary Club blogger asks “Why do you distance your brand from certain industries or merchandise?

If I were a cop, a public servant, or someone charged with “public health” I would think that this pattern of mass shooters being “on the radar” for awhile, and then, the other pattern, where “active shooter drills” take place “coincidentally” close to these events would be an indicator that something is amiss. You can research that ‘amissing’ link yourself, but try not to make yourself…oh never mind.
And what might that something be that is amiss?
I dunno- I’m jus’ doin’ mah’ job as a blogger. I dunno. They don’t pay me enough to figure it all out. But from what I can gauge, here are some links below- and I welcome any and all refutation, or alternative explanations, if such can be found… which they can’t be, other than these are part of the OGS framework, and the associated “mysterious and hidden processes” of those who have placed themselves as God, hidden behind every internet transaction, and every online discourse, and pre-empted the Constitutional due processes, and the Bill of Rights guarantees, and, …etc.
HEY! I have an idea! Let’s ask the Rotary Club’s Internationale’ about “who sponsors mass shooter events”!!!
Hmmmm….
Let’s first look at “brand management, Rotary Clubs, and gun control lobbyists

Rotary and Weapons (from a blog post initially entitled  Rotary International Tells Clubs to Drop their Guns)

Why do you distance your brand from certain industries or merchandise? Obviously, because you feel that a connection could potentially hurt it. In this singling out of “weapons” it is clear that the Board thinks that Rotary is universally negatively impacted by a Club’s use of the Rotary logo in an advertisement for a Club fundraiser in which a rifle and archery bow are displayed, alongside a sponsor’s logo for a local gun and archery shop. To those of us who think differently, the opposite is true.
This is a revised version of the post I made on Monday, Feb. 27. Since my initial post, which was based on a Feb. 23 article “Rotary International Tells Clubs to Drop their Guns” by Larry Keane on the National Shooting Sports Foundation’s website, official Rotary documents have become known which support Mr. Keane’s article. http://www.nssfblog.com/rotary-international-tells-clubs-to-drop-their-guns/  Also, the rapid spread of the details of the Board decision has created much concern and anger among many US Rotarians, to the point that it is rumored that the Board will be holding an emergency meeting to discuss the situation as it stands now.
After my initial post, and an abbreviated version on the LinkedIn Official RI Group, I received some word that the information was incorrect, and that this was a “regional” decision not affecting the US. Since it appeared to come from sources who would know, I pulled my LinkedIn thread, and put a note on the post here. Subsequent to that, two RI documents came to me: a FAQ on Rotary’s Weapons Policy, and an item titled “B-16 Code Amendments: Weapons and Rotary Clubs, Districts and Other Rotary Entities”.  What follows is based upon those documents.

 
Crisis PR, gun control, and ‘amissing links.’
*The search terms travis air force base shooting and “rotary club” returns just over 56,000 links.
*There are 122,000 Google hits for the phrase “rotary cub sponsors active shooter event”
*Here is a literal few of those links- do you see a growing connection yet?:

Honolulu Police Dept. Presents “Active Shooters”

Police Partner with Rotary to Provide Free Active Shooter Training to Community

Heights police officer shares tips for handling active-shooter events

 
Hmmmm…. those links….
Active Shooter One Pager
From Mother Jones: Active Shooter drills, trace formation, and crisis PR interact to induce trauma, and then, trauma bonding

Active Shooter Drills Don’t Really Prepare People, But They Do Make Them Cry


MJ: “In the wake of the nation’s many recent mass shootings, and in the absence of any meaningful gun control that might stem them, employers and schools have started training their staff to respond should a madman with a gun turn up on their doorsteps. “Active shooter” drills have become the norm in many school districts and downtown office buildings; in many schools, such drills are now mandated by the state. But it turns out that bringing SWAT teams into buildings to simulate an active shooter situation doesn’t always make people feel safer. In fact, according to the Wall Street Journal, such simulations have seriously traumatized and occasionally injured people, sparking a wave of lawsuits.
The Journal tells several amazing stories of people who were injured or utterly freaked out during such drills, which often weren’t announced ahead of time. One involves a Colorado nursing home employee whom a man forced at gunpoint into an empty room at work. The “shooter” was actually a local cop and the gun was fake, but the nurse was so scared that even when the “shooter” finally identified himself as a cop after she started crying and begging for her life, she wasn’t really sure he was telling the truth. She was so traumatized that she had to quit her job and has since filed a lawsuit against the nursing home.”
 
 
 

Apophenia and the epiphany: can you spot the difference?

I briefly touched on the difference between schizophrenic delusions and delusions not yet specified, which is how crisis PR agents and agencies, disreputable media pundits, police, intelligence,and psychologists on the state teat manipulate the entire dialectic of online gang stalking through complicity with “perception management,” a well known propaganda technique.

Related Story:
UPDATE JANUARY, 07,2019
The Association of Threat Assessment Professionals (ATAP)officially linked gang stalking to mass shootings and domestic violence one and a half years AFTER I began to write this blog.
Note these stories here, here, and here, where I document OGS in Los Angeles, Hollywood, and Las Vegas, and indict the Million Man Army of Paul Blarts.
Then, take a look at a recent security guard involved murder of a gay black man in Hollywood, CA, where the cowardly guard Donald Vincent Ciota shot a man in the back.

Sure. Conspiracy theorists are all crazy, right? Except just that one guy….
the individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists
Here below is one source of opinion about the difference between the two related ‘phenomena’ of the epiphany, which is an important awakening of some kind, versus the apophanie, which is an “awareness false flag.” The reader will take speecial note that psychologists and psychology still use references from the 1950’s, which was the height of the MKULTRA era of bad science and human exprimentation meeting MIC budgets, and the associated Bernaysian crisis PR industry after that. Without irony again, we must examine the religious tribal narrative, and its attendants in psychology.
Or, how one persons/tribes/religious sect’s apophanie is another persons/tribes/religions sects epiphany. [ Special note to Islamic readers: if this is the first time you have encountered the horror of Jewish-christian mind control, then have a look at Radio Islam’s take on it here.]
This is the nature of the Jewish cultural narrative and its attendant perversity of sliding scales of morality, competing with the christian cultures false morality and rigidity imposed upon the weak and the accessible, as well as the cultural co-option of Jewish history and mythology, and then, the wider reach and appeal of christianity, which is NOT based in nepotism, racism, or tribalism. Regardless, they work together to replicate this form of culture.
Chaos and Order-from apophanie to epiphany, and back again
Then, in the piece below, by I ask the reader to take special note that Ms. Waldman has invoked “chaos”as well as “order,” directly, and also that the number 13 represents “chaos” in some numerological interpretations, and also that she has pointed the reader to “Ramsey Theory,” which is ” is a branch of mathematics that studies the conditions under which order must appear.”

It’s All Connected

A German scientist named Klaus Conrad coined apophanie (from the Greek apo, away, and phaenein, to show) in 1958. He was describing the acute stage of schizophrenia, during which unrelated details seem saturated in connections and meaning. Unlike an epiphany—a true intuition of the world’s interconnectedness—an apophany is a false realization. Swiss psychologist Peter Brugger introduced the term into English when he penned a chapter in a 2001 book on hauntings and poltergeists. Apophenia, he said, was a weakness of human cognition: the “pervasive tendency … to see order in random configurations,” an “unmotivated seeing of connections,” the experience of “delusion as revelation.” On the phone he unveiled his favorite formulation yet: “the tendency to be overwhelmed by meaningful coincidences.”
In statistics, a problem akin to apophenia is a Type I error, or false positive. It means believing something is real when it isn’t, based on a misleading pattern in the data. The equal and opposite misstep, a Type II error, involves attributing a true relationship to chance. Defaulting to Type I thinking may have once conferred a survival advantage: Assume every rustle in the grass is a tiger, and you’ll last a lot longer than the carefree naïf who chalks each disturbance up to the wind. So, the theory goes, human brains evolved into “belief engines” and “pattern-recognition machines,” keen to organize jumbled sensory inputs into meaningful data. We are also expert detectors of conspiracies in random events, whispers in radio static, and the Virgin Mary in grilled cheese. Sometimes these false positives create an orderly perceptual continuum that helps us think. They aren’t strictly necessary, but they are at least usually benign. When I see a scowling man in the moon, or you see clouds that remind you of fluffy lambs, our brains are making the world a more diverse and beautiful place. Plus, every now and then, chaos offers up glimmers of order.

Yet apophenia can also lure us into false and damaging convictions.

Now, here below is a case study between the difference between the two subjects-and notice that in order for a person labeled “mentally ill” and for that person so-labelled to be vindicated, in western society, there is always a “narrator” or an “intermediator” or a “man-in-the-middle” that cats as the “gatekeeper” of what is “sane” or “insane” and then, that mediator is frequently a member of one f our many cults, sects, and other orders.
So, here below is a series of photographs that I took a few days ago, as I was followed around by some unknown person who was photographing me (see if this seems familiar to you). Then, note the many different ways I have “filtered” these photos, in order to demonstrate a “viewpoint” as well a to manipulate color, which in turn, manipulates emotion and perception.
See what you think- and keep in mind that I was “shooting” these photo’s of this unknown person over my shoulder as I walked, just off of Sunset Blvd., in Hollywood, CA:
photog 1.jpg
 
photog 2.jpg
photog 3.jpg
photographer ominous.jpg
IMG_3216
So, I ask the reader to look at these photos above, and ask these questions:

  1. what is apophenia?
  2. which filter shows “reality”?
  3. which image provokes or invokes a profound response, or an ambiguos response in the reader? does a person following you provoke any ther resonses? Which responses might those be?
  4. how many “layers of schizophrenic narrative” would be entirely missed by a psychologist, a media pundit, or a lay person on a jury, without the advantage of photography as a form of evidence?
  5.  does filtering an image change the viewers perception of the image, and then, the incident captured on film? Does the media filter about OGS serve a similar purpose?
  6. does the viewers emotion change when incidents like this “occur”? How about their perceptions? Would the addition of proof of gang stalking change the way that an individual then perceives their individual situation in contrast to the ‘social compact?’ Woud it impact a psychological assessment (psychological assessments do not factor in photographic evidence)?
  7.  is there an epiphany that challenges the apopheny? Would there be-could there be- an epiphany, if the individual experience was filtered through societies gate keepers, without the aid of “proof of gang stalking?”

I will let the reader decide. Answer the questions above, through any filter that YOU choose. But for me, actual proof of the claim of being “followed around and photographed” requires the proof.
Seeing any patterns yet? Try not to let the patterns drive you crazy-some say that an obsession with patterns can indicate mental illness.
Here- have a look at some of the complaints that psychology relegates to the category of “likely delusional”-and keep in mind that psychology generally avoids deep contact with the “schizophrenic narrative” as a way to stigmatize, enforce, and reinforce stigma, such as the classic case of Martha Mitchel effect and  “mis-diagnoses,” aka, they will label you, hurt you, stigmatize you and gas light your complaints if they have power. And only proof will dispute their claims and invalidate the psychological pseudo science.
But due to the duration of many complaints of OGS, ranging from days too years to decades, certainly being followed around for years takes a mental toll, and as such, qualifies as “no touch torture” in every sense, starting with gross privacy invasions, and more (certainly data basing our photographs is bad enough to qualify, much less wondering what “they” are doing with them. I once had a photo of me at a peace march in a mid-western American city crop up on a website hosted in Toronto, Canada, with my body photoshopped into a rally in Toronto, which I had never attended.)
But it is important to note that psychology is ill equipped-and in fact, weaponized against-proper care, or interpretation of the experience of targeted individuals of organized gang stalking for many reasons, not least of which is that in systems governance and its curiously convenient ploy of labeling critical thinkers, non-conformists, individualists and others as “mentally ill”, as well as it’s associated conformity operations, it is the individual who is the target of communitarian policing and gatekeeping schemes-and indeed, individuality is itself under attack.
Related Reading: I use the number 13 frequently in my discussions of OGS, because I have found correlations between it, and it’s use in the OGS dialectic as both a sign and a signifier. Examples of this correlation can be found by using my “search” feature.
Because those who practice OGS seek to cause chaos for some, at the expense of others, I document this so that future readers will understand this one number, and weed out the rest of the endless numerological cr^p that otherwise can occupy your time.
Lastly, because I reject the Jewish-christian social confabulation/ “world order”, I could care less if they, or their social order all just fell off the planet. Every single one of them.
 
 
 
 

The UN's "Transatlantic organized crime" initiative: Pulling the number 13 out of a rabbit hole

I have demonstrated in multiple places on this blog that OGS is frequently implicated in cases that target the “control of the sex supply,” as international banking interests and billionaires seek to become the pimps of our daughters; but also that frequent targets are “free agency prostitutes,” and whole industries where profit is derived from children.

And, let me know if you are starting t see patterns, because….
READ THIS POST ABOUT enjo kosai/enjo kosei FOR REFERENCE, and especially this post, from a famous police misinformation hoax in Texas,where police claimed that gang stalking awareness fliers were laced with fentanyl. These fliers were later linked to the NSA.

OGS is also international; that it utilizes databases illegally, and the this data trickles down to local LEO’s who are devoid of concern for due process of law, but rather, working for internationalist interests for DVIC dollars.

I have also demonstrated that these signal to each other online and off with special “coded language,” and that the with little irony and even blatant lies and conflation, international money and it’s NGO’s seeks to court local populations and then, derive profit from the lucrative “sex trade.”
Here, AGAIN, without irony, we see that these use the number 13, the number of chaos in yet another total lie, and that lie told by an elderly white female.So- have a lok at how these types depend upon numerology and gematria to cause, or maintain superstitions-but also, as a form of veiled threats due to the common vernacular’s jargon about “the thirteens.” As such, it is a sign and a symbol to the oppressed from those who oppress them.

Related Story: Gangs frequently use the number 13, and that have affiliations with international intelligence operations, as well as religious sects that do not respect the rule of law, and these gangs are the modern “pirates” that governments and the IC shake down for cash in an extension of “black cash operations.”
MS13 and Donald Trump
Prison symbols and meaning from CorrectionsOne.com
Gang Awareness Guide from New Jersey State Attorney General

This combination fits a pattern, which is that in the sex trafficking narrative, which is thinly disguised as the “human trafficking” narrative, some seek to control sex itself AS AN INDUSTRY- and that conflation, lying, and then, dastardly, often illegal behind that scenes activity in order for them to create narrative, maintain narrative, or defeat counter-narrative.
And few know about oppression more directly than black/ African American women for who the white female has always been a bane and a shame- and white women who have been in all generations, a willing, and favored tool and a mouth piece- a sock puppet of the oppression of others.
Maya Angelou brought attention to this number in her poetry, as well as it’s potential for racialized meaning, when she called forth her childhood memories of “the Thirteens” which was a “rope skipping song” of our earlier era.
But beyond mere racial display, her version of it (and many kids of our era had their own versions), her version invokes class, gender, but especially- and this cannot be missed- she invokes deeper social issues such as cuckoldry and the carceral state- but with the next layer of the racialized versions of it!
In other words, Angelou’s version of the Thirteens invokes all the same themes that I have covered herein at ROGS, namely the DVIC, the MIC, and the PIC.
so, the Thirteens are themselves a description of  means and method of overt social control as well as covert social control.
Follow the link above for the “white version”of it. But here is the version for black folks:

Your Momma took to shouting,
Your Poppa’s gone to war,
Your sister’s in the streets,
Your brother’s in the bar,
The thirteens. Right On.
Your cousin’s taking smack,
Your uncle’s in the joint,
Your buddy’s in the gutter,
Shooting for his point,
The thirteens. Right On.
And you, you make me sorry,
You out here by yourself,
I’d call you something dirty,
But there just ain’t nothing left,
‘cept
The thirteens. Right On.

And here, below, we see the number 13 “coincidentally” pulled from the hat of someone who is in a position of power, representin foreign interests, and who seeks control of “the sex supply” of another group of people.

Are you seeing patterns yet? But when an “outside group” targets the females of an “inside group” in-group and out-group conflict occurs. SO too, do we see elements of Roberts’ strain theory predict that “deviance” will occur.

SO, at the juncture of the UN and culture wars in Japan, we see a case of western and christian, and Jewish definitional biases used in conquest through moral imperatives cast upon animists and buddhists and Shinto’s.

Strain theory, developed by Robert K. Merton, argued that society may be set up in a way that encourages too much deviance. Merton believed there was a disjunction between socially approved means to success and legitimate cultural goals.
Criminal bias: In sociology and criminology, strain theory states that social structures within society may pressure citizens to commit crime.
Third Way interpretation: western definitional biases conveniently situate themselves in moral imperatives to disrupt local economies via moral shaming; and then creating subsidiary sex supply based cultures, or, this.

Japan to UN: “No, 13% of school students are not doing compensated dating

When Maud de Boer-Buquicchio, the UN’s special rapporteur on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, told the media that Japan should “ban sexually abusive images of children in manga” at the end of her visit in October, you might think the manga industry would be the ones to get all hot under the collar.
Actually, the strongest reaction seems to have come from the Japanese government itself.
It was another comment Maud de Boer-Buquicchio made that has stoked up trouble.
She drew on unknown statistics to claim that “Some 13% of schoolgirls in Japan are involved in enjo kosei“.

Maud de Boer-Buquicchio  japan school girls enjo kosai 13% thirteen percent compensated dating
Aging and elderly white women derive phenomenal amounts of money from claiming to be concerned about how younger, prettier women use their bodies, and they frequently conflate statistics and mythology to gain control of the “sex supply.”

Enjo kosai, as regular readers will know, is the euphemistically named “compensated dating” where school students go on dates with salarymen they meet online in return for money or treats. Hence you can see very young girls with designer bags on their arms. They earn the cash somewhere.
Japan’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has demanded the remark be officially withdrawn.
It first asked for a source for the claim.
De Boer-Buquicchio apparently responded that she had not relied on one single source because there is no official statistic (we can’t help imagine why…).
“However, many of my interlocutors referred to it as a worrying trend which can easily lead to sexual exploitation of the minors involved in this lucrative business,” she added.
“In the press conference, I made reference to estimates I had seen in open sources to highlight a phenomenon that must be urgently tackled.”
Open sources means websites like this one?
The foreign ministry says her remarks are “inappropriate” and “regrettable”.

The enemy of organized gang stalkers is an unique suspect: "individualism." How Heng Choon Chan, and Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, are schtupping us with Hegellian phalluses.

So, up until now, we have seen many many examples of how gang stalking is related to policing, and community policing, aka “communitarian” policing, and how there are racial, class, gendered elements that conspire to phrase “the other” as mentally ill, rather than as persons needing protection that is guaranteed to them by due process rights, but which is more often than not denied to TI’s in ‘official source gas lighting’ campaigns, as may TI’s report this exact fact.
And, we have seen how the MSM has so far played along with this odd and dishonest narrative, literally framing the dialectic as that of dangerous crazy people versus “everyone else.” So it cannot be overlooked that this is an extension of psychology as a pseudo science, directly and LITERALLY related to Edward Bernay’s and “mind control.”
So now we must take a look at the type of material that Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, as well as other DVIC profiteers use to “organize” their version of a society. And the key here, it will be noted, is that these same are at war with “individuals.”
Here, from Heng Choon Chan and Lorraine Sheridan, we see another clear indicator that “individuality” is an issue, as many “targeted individuals” will tell you, but also, that these researchers are deliberately pairing the individual against the collective-and remember, that in the Hegelian Dialectic, constant conflict is a purely profitable model for some individuals, at the expense of many others who are targeted by them. In the case I am about to introduce, we see a comparison between a communist countries perceptions of stalking contrasted (conflicted) with western individualist perceptions.
And before I introduce the link between stalking and attacks on individuality-and many of those attacks BY the exact academics that believe in the collective-I would first like to point the reader to Sheridan’s following online, which clearly indicates two things: 1) she is closely affiliated with police and the DVIC, as well as the many newly emerged groups of organized gang stalkers that I have implicated elsewhere on this blog, and 2) her work in prisons is nearly as inhumane and antithetical to the lived experience of an actual target of organized stalking, Dr. Moss David Posner, who died as a TI while advocating for  prisoners rights.
Then, I would like to point the researcher to the fact that much of Sheridan and James-et al’s work-indeed the entire dialectic of who or what is stalking or stalkers  is also very closely centered on police and police perception management, and “influence:”Are police under the influence of influence operations by pseudo-science and psychology?
And here we see the “conflict” begin:

Organized stalking and "mind control" and influence operations: manipulating voters.

Epilepsy warning: this post contains a swirling graphic image
While our governments, our corporations, and our intelligence and law enforcement agencies believe it is their right to steal our data, and use it to maniulate and even abuse certain people and to wage influence operations on us, in secret, I believe in fair warning, in anticipation of un-intended consequences, hence my epilepsy warning above. This is the difference between consensual behavior, and non-consensual behavior, and the NSA/CIA/FBI/DEA data theft pipeline had  15 year head start on all of us.
Except, me, maybe.
Any cursory research into organized gang stalking reveals that politics are a major factor in “who gets targeted with OGS.” While there are varying levels of targeting, ranging from simple “influence” operations through the internet, to extreme cases where local politicians and others gang up on individuals to harass, intimidate, or otherwise coerce them, the most common “targeting” that individuals face is through advertising.
As we saw in the case of “Moonshot CVE” and in the cases of Twitter monitoring activists and feeding the data to law enforcement and other un-named parties, and programs like DataminR and Media Sonar being used concurrently at Fusion Centers, and the local police department, as well as yet un-named intelligence agency level programs, there is a constant blurring of lines between advertisers, governments, political PAC’s corporations, and then, police and intelligence agencies targeting of activists and others in spying or conformity enforcement operations.
Welcome to PsyOps, mind control, and  world wide”influence by constant suggestion. Now, ad a targeted audience-and a targeted influencer of that audience….
You’re getting sleepy now….count backwards….as I redirect your internet connection….breath deeply….watch as Google suggests a few (harmless) things to you to make your life easier, better, breezier, Nabisco cheddar….
Or, this:
Image result for swirling black and white gif

Plus The Hive Mind:

blak and white thinking.jpg
And that “one guy” somewhere-anywhere in the world hidden behind the switch (with NO accountability, no records of hi/her actions, and no recourse for citizens to sue these bastards), with “the master list”:

cropped-showimage-arcadia-switch
M: Are you there Bob? It’s me, Margaret. Yeah. He said it again. B: Said what? M: He said WASP. B: WASP? hahahaha. They haven’t had any control or power since the sixties. M: Yeah, but he called WASP’s JAP’s B: JAPS!!??? We kicked their asses into the dirt!  And we are STILL kicking their asses into the dirt, lookie, I even sicced the UN on ’em. Those A-rabs are getting hungry for young Jap girls and those Jap men are hogging them all with enjo kosei! The UN is gonna liberate a few of ’em. M: Bob-BoOOOob..slow down! He was talkin’ about those OTHER JAPs….and a few senators too, like Senator Dierand Klikenstein B: Oh, shit. That hits close to home. Better send a few fire trucks past his homeless shelter. Make sure the sirens are low and slow, like an omen or something. Tell the boys that this is a ‘schedule 13’ emergency. M: Not an 11 yet, Bob? B: No-this is schedule 13 stuff, save 11 for the ‘other guys’ M: Got it. Thanks Bob, what woud I do without all your good advice? B: I dunnno-but my ass sure gets sore sitting here for the last 103 years. Maybe you could…M: Don’t even think about it Bob.

Whhoooooo! WHoooooOOOOOOooooOOOoooOOoooOo!
So, to put this in common terms, imagine yourself walking down the sidewalk, dodging blots of chewing gum, and the residue of mop water, or even broken glass dumped across your path. These are ordinary pedestrian obstacles, and most if not all people expect some of that when out walking.
As you continue on your  path, all of a sudden, a bicyclist heads straight towards you, so fast that they seem as if they might just run you over. What do you do? Of course, you step aside, thinking-“what a rude prick. I had the right of way- and bicycles are supposed to ride on the street!”
You brush it off, and continue on your path. An the obstacles become more and more: the couple walking along is as wide as the sidewalk, and you step off into the grass to let them pass. And then, five teenagers on skateboards; and then, at a crosswalk, people are bumping into you from all directions as if you are not there.
These scenarios above are what is described by TI’s who are being gang stalked, and particularly in the last example, this is what is known as “community mbbing,” and also “street theater.” TI’s write endlessly about this online, but they are also described by others who “suffer delusional disorders.” What’s the main difference? Proof- proof is required to indicate that such is actual, real, and happening to you.
In OGS, proof is hard to get, because of the design of community harassment and community policing, but online, it is easier to prove, now that we know with certainty that it IS happening, it IS targeted, and it IS political. And, as we see above, it IS attempting to influence you, your behavior, and your choices.
Here, below, from Breitbart News, we see targeted individuals as swing voters, but we also see that language and particularly, coded and slanderous language is used to label, and further harass or otherwise cause harm to individuals who don’t toe a party line.
While on the surface, it cannot be missed that this targeted “outreach” is yet another example of Democrat demagoguery, it also cannot be missed that “hetero-normative white people” are being labeled in ways that can and do trigger the Department of Homeland Security “threat matrix” and “bad words” lists, as “white supremacists are on every list as “hate groups”:

NH Dem Party Chair Calls Rural, Disaffected Voters ‘White Supremacists’

 

This weekend WMUR’s “CloseUp” interviewed the executive director of “Look Ahead America” Matt Braynard, whose new organization is planning outreach to inactive voters in New Hampshire.
Braynard said, “We’ve identified maybe 15,000 inactive voters who we would consider disaffected, patriotic Americans. And potentially 100,000 or more unregistered adults we’re going to reach out to.”
He explained his organization was using “psychometrics,” saying, “Normally it gets applied to likely voters universes for purposes of persuasion. We are applying it towards identifying patriotic Americans who’ve become disaffected and cynical, so we can engage them on issues relevant to them, get them registered, get them educated and turn them out to vote.”
In response, the chairman of the New Hampshire Democratic Party Ray Buckley said, “The organizing and activating of these extremists, these white supremacists, really could have a detrimental effect on the entire culture of New Hampshire.”

In the aricle above, note the use of the word “psychometrics” which literally means ” the measure of psychological effects in order to cause persuasion.” This is not insignificant, as we see that “influence” is the goal, and that “psychology” is applied as a tool.
In relatively harmless incidents such as this, we must ask ourselves if “influence operations” are harmful, and most likely come up with the answer that they are mildly intrusive, but not necessarily “causing harm.”
However, in these cases, when we add the fact that the data used is derived from the “profiles” that our own ISP’s have sold to outside organizations; and that these profiles are shared and re-sold across gvernment, private industry, political PAC’s, the Five Eyes Alliance, and even in the case of Israel, that our profiles are literally given to a theocratic, apartheid nation state that has not signed any nuclear treaty or even officially disclosed that it is a nuclear power the story of harm versus “no harm” becomes a question that few are willing  to ask out loud; being used against their and it becomes a question where the individual this targeted must make a stand, or simply succumb to being used against their free will in such a manner.
So, this issue of “supremacy” becomes for some of us, a crucial and key point wherein we must ask “whose white supremacy” is being targeted and whose white supremacy is not (most Israeli’s and other supremacist Jews still encourage their daughters to marry only white men). And certainly, other theocratic, nationalistic, racial, and psychological  supremacy becomes part of each persons targeting as well. So-whose decisions are we actually making when we are under chronic and constant “influence operations”?
Regardless of the answer, there is one other level of questionable targeting: the fact that beyond advertisers profiling us, we also have intelligence agencies profiling us, and then, targeting us as well, individually n levels that only nazi maad scientists were able to conceive of in decades past.
Because the past is the present is the future with intelligence agencies, we know with certainty that other, more nefarious and unethical targeting takes place, and that this takes place in secret, without our informed consent- that this entire internet entrapment scheme that has made everyone a target, has now morphed into a wider scheme of political targeting on the ‘consumer’ level; and that despite the consumer’s awareness that it is them, being consumed first, and targeted advertising only after that.
So beyond the citizens rights to protest or even to withdraw from these big data schemes, or the use of our data to make us targets, multiple levels of targeting are taking place at all times, and our decisions are under constant and chronic attack.

Psychiatry's BIG "we are junk science" problem and artificial intelligence

Few doubt that psychiatry and psychology are fraught with junk science, or are as fields of study, politically motivated tools of corporate, secular and even sometimes, cultic religious  interests. Indeed, considering the non-secular and perverse narcisssim of Sigmund Freud-himself fueled by cocaine- and his nephew, the great Public Relation’s hypnotist Edward Bernay’s, we see that much of the last century and even today, these fields are little more than ahistorical political sociology with drugs and PR applied to, or around, and directed at the individual experience as a tool of silencing or criminalization of speech, and speakers- much like police science itself.
And all of that, mediated by the gate keeping of narrative that policing -and in the case of OGS especially-the hidden mechanism’s of social control that exert themselves when “mind control”and influence operations via narrative distortion and co-option takes place “at the gate,” which is the person who will claim OGS victimization( I am currently seeking an interview with a several times convicted felon who cliams that he is enduring an attempt to force him to confess to an unsolved child homicide from the 1990’s. He resides in a city that operated a “black site,” where victims were tortured and abused into false confessions.)
In the case of minigh dimol, aka waterinch, we have one persons online testimony to the farce that rehab clinics and their associated echo chamber of psychiatry and psychology attempting to control narrative in a systematic assassination of “the individual” for the direct benefit of the industrial complex of Big Pharma. This destruction of narrative is not a new phenomenon, as psychology has long grappled with knowledge that, in order to be even one drop better than sociology or Svengali science, they would need that extra “something,” to validate their own narrative-that they are a science.Police power functions this way, but so to does junk science which is a lie that travels the world a thousand times before the truth wakes up.
While psychiatry does have a certain political utility, and sometimes, works to envelope the stories of the poor and the disadvantaged in rationalizations that otherwise would not have protection in the wider society, the simple fact is that psychology is little more than sociology with official prescriptions from Big Pharma dope dealers.
And there is very little irony lost on “criminals” and  “drug addicts” and others who encounter legal settings in the form of court rooms, custody hearings,  or other legal attempts to “bypass their humanity and their narrative” aka “transhumanism,” and put in it’s place another thing that has more “utility for the greater good”: aka systemic gate l keeping and control of individual narrative.
Many is the man or woman who has been arrested and dragged into court over the last century as a deviant and a criminal, only to be told that they need to get off of “Mary Juana” or some other club drug such as MDMA as we saw in te case of minigh dimol, and get ON Prozac, or some other drug-of-the-month-club drug that Big Pharma is using to experiment on people.
Never mind the many notorious failures of prescription drugs, or how they are polluting the seas, and never mind that these drugs are themselves time and time again shown to be little better than Mary Juana at controlling the body politic of self-prescribers and “dual diagnoses” people for whom Mary has always worked just fine, and for whom Jim Beam does just the trick, better than any pill of the month. Most studies conclude that Mary and Jim don’t poison the oceans, or the people that use them with discretion.
And it is at the juncture where artificial intelligence meets the internet where we see what a monstrosity “predictive software” like Peter Thiel’s Palantir databases and their manipulative features that can be programmed to form situations of influence and custodial control operations; and DataMinr technology which is programmed to monitor “thought’s” and infer “actions” in real time, like Media Sonar-which was and is used by Fusion Center operatives to control, contain, monitor and influence activists until Twitter cut them off, and Moonshot CVE that is used by advertisers and corporate interests AS WELL AS the many LEO’s around the world that have foregone the “protect and serve” model of policing in favor of a “seize it all, exploit it all, capitalize on it all ” model of policing, to LITERALLY target SPECIFIC INDIVIDUALS and their “ideologies,” as much as they target actual real estate.
And psychology is truly in on it at every level, thick as thieves and fat as rats, and we know this based on the cases of Jessen and Mitchell, the angel of death Joseph Mengele, MKULTRA’s Scottish knight in academic armor DE Cameron, and now Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James and Elizabeth Dietrich that seek to overlay the pseudo-science of psychology over the suffering of targeted individuals of organized gang stalking.
This political abuse of psychology begins when we look at the key component of “schizophrenic narrative,” which has historically been a trouble zone for psychologists, especially in the heyday of CIA psychiatry where D.E. Cameron, first in Europe, and later at the notorious McGill University human torture and experimentation facility in Canada.  So, Cameron and others like the CIA’s official poisoner, the LSD doctor Sidney Gottlieb first diagnosed an entire nation (Germany) with mental illness, and that illness was, apparently, “the patriarchy,” aka “the warrior class,” and then, used children in experiments of all kinds-because in lieu of father’s now decapitated, the children of “the future” were then and are now in their sights.
As transhumanist types like Sheridan and James; and their progenitors Mengele and Gottlieb and especially Cameron, an heir kindred Mitchell and Jessen, for whom removing the “human” from the “experience” is a main goal, as they seek to replace, alter, medicate or otherwise mediate around the lived, human experience that exists in an individual mind; or to create it as a “hive” to be exploited by artificial intelligence in the case of Thiel and his intelligence cult, we see the field of robotics struggling with a unique problem: the problem that psychiatry has always managed to side step, which is the “human soul,” which is based in longevity of memory, and human experience that is sorted out and mediated through human filters within the brain that are stilll entirely unknown, and under-explored-precisely because psychiatry has been medicating AROUND this unknown.
Here below, wehave a study that encapsulates this problem in robotics- the problem of memory, longevity, and lived experience coalescing to form a “whole,”  from Phoebe Sengers:
 
Schizophrenia and Narrative in Artificial Agents
Phoebe Sengers
From: Leonardo
Volume 35, Number 4, August 2002
pp. 427-431
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Schizophrenia and Narrative in Artificial Agents

Phoebe Sengers (bio)
Abstract
Artificial-agent technology has become commonplace in technical research from computer graphics to interface design and in popular culture through the Web and computer games. On the one hand, the population of the Web and our PCs with characters who reflect us can be seen as a humanization of a previously purely mechanical interface. On the other hand, the mechanization of subjectivity carries the danger of simply reducing the human to the machine. The author argues that predominant artificial intelligence (AI) approaches to modeling agents are based on an erasure of subjectivity analogous to that which appears when people are subjected to institutionalization. The result is agent behavior that is fragmented, depersonalized, lifeless and incomprehensible. Approaching the problem using a hybrid of critical theory and AI agent technology, the author argues that agent behavior should be narratively understandable; she presents a new agent architecture that structures behavior to be comprehensible as narrative.

The premise of this work is that there is something deeply missing from artificial intelligence (AI) or, more specifically, from the currently dominant ways of building artificial agents. This uncomfortable intuition has been with me for a long time, although for most of that time I was not able to articulate it clearly. Artificial agents seem to be lacking a primeval awareness, a coherence of action over time, something one might, for lack of a better metaphor, term “soul.”
Roboticist Rodney Brooks expressed this worry eloquently:

Perhaps it is the case that all the approaches to building intelligent systems are just completely off-base, and are doomed to fail. . . . [C]ertainly it is the case that all biological systems . . . [b]ehave in a way which just simply seems life-like in a way that our robots never do.

Perhaps we have all missed some organizing principle of biological systems, or some general truth about them. Perhaps there is a way of looking at biological systems which will illuminate an inherent necessity in some aspect of the interactions of their parts that is completely missing from our artificial systems. . . . [P]erhaps we are currently missing the juice of life [1].

Here, I argue that the “juice” that we are missing is narrative. The divide-and-conquer methodologies currently used to design artificial agents result in fragmented, depersonalized behavior, which mimics the fragmentation and depersonalization of schizophrenia seen in institutional psychiatry. Anti-psychiatry and narrative psychology suggest that the fundamental problem for both schizophrenic patients and agents is that observers have difficulty understanding them narratively. This motivates my work on a narrative agent architecture, the Expressivator, which structures agent behavior to support narrative, thereby enabling the creation of agents that are intentionally comprehensible.

The Problem

Building complex, integrated artificial agents is one of the dreams of AI. Classically, complex agents are constructed by identifying functional components—natural-language processing, vision, planning, etc.—designing and building each separately and then integrating them into an agent. More recently, some practitioners have argued that the various components of an agent strongly constrain one another and that the complex functionalities of classical AI cannot be easily coordinated into a whole system. Instead, behavior-based AI proposes that the agent be split up, not into disparate cognitive functionalities, but into “behaviors,” such as foraging, sleeping and hunting. Each of these behaviors would integrate all of the agent’s functions for that behavior.
Even such approaches, however, have not been entirely successful in building agents that integrate a wide range of behaviors. Rod Brooks, for example, has stated that one of the challenges of the field is to find a way to build an agent that can integrate many behaviors (he defines “many” as more than a dozen) [2]. Programmers can create robust, subtle, effective and expressive behaviors, but the agent’s overall behavior tends to fall apart gradually as more behaviors are combined. For small numbers of behaviors, this disintegration can be managed by the programmer, but as more behaviors are combined their interactions become so complex that they become at least time-consuming and at worst impossible to manage.

 

Val is an electrician, and he was approached as a gang stalking recruit in an environment loaded with Durkheim's 'anomie'

Val is a merchant mariner, one of the most noble professions I can think of. When he is not at sea, he works with his family as an apprentice electrician, in a wealthy area of a large city. Then, like most men who are men, he spends some time when he is not at sea hanging out with other men in gritty urban environments, and associating with friends from where he grew up.
The only problem for he and his friends is that they all grew up in one of the biggest and most notorious urban American ghetto’s that is a virtual powder keg of the toxins and effects of racism and the disparity of wealth in America which is more evident every day, and highlighted by the DHS/DEA/FBI/Etc Alohabet asset forfeiture racket that targets real estate for profit.
And, they grew up on a watchlist called the CalGang database, which literally monitors gangster babies from birth as if they are a threat to organized society.
And this database like so many others today which are hidden beyond the view of those who are catalogued in them-this database presumes criminality from birth (and most, if not all DVIC and DHHS lists also are used to track, and target lower tier American males, much like a modern slave net).
As such these men are literally and in every sense “targeted individuals.”

Related Story: It’s time to ask why so many Ferguson, MO Activists are dying in odd “suicides” One of them, Darren Seals, even reported that he was stopped and interrogated by ‘ten men who ‘told me I that I chose the wrong friends.’ Then,shortly thereafter, Seals apparently shot himself in the head, and then, set his own car on fire to hide the evidence.
So, we see that strange suicide is one way to measure the “effectiveness” of gang stalking.
UPDATE: The Daily Beast has documented many more murders of black men in that area, during that time period.

As you have probably guessed by now, Val is also black. Such is the power of stereotypes, but also the power of language used in propaganda-most western people believe that blacks are the primary residents of ghetto’s ( an out dated term in itself, as “the hood” is used by ghetto dwellers all around the world due to Hip Hop music.) And as such, Val hangs out with other black people. And unlike Jewish ghetto’s of earlier era’s, these men are not self segregated.
” I hang out there when I am not at sea, because it’s my way of giving back, and trying to let them know there’s more than that-living there.”
What Val is saying is that he was fortunate, and that he “got out,” of the enforced entrapment and containment scheme that American ghetto’s are-and that in order to inspire others, he feels he has a duty to go back and “associate” with those who are “still there.” And it is this which made him a target of recruitment for gang stalking; and a possible “threat” in the matrix should he not comply with community policing.

Related Story: “Iconic” civil rights era phtographer Ernest Withers photographed all of the major civil rights era leaders at point blank range. And, he was also an FBI informant-a rat and spy. Not incoincidentally, he was with Martin L. King the day he was murdered (try not to let these coincidences bother you when you make the connection between FBI gag stalking and murdered dissidents, authors, activists and “others”)
0505-edward-crawford-tear-gas-canister-8
And,the subject of this “iconic” photo above of the Ferguson protester Edward Crawford fits into the cohincidental patterns you find in the gang stalking dialectic too, as Mr. Crawford was found dead shortly after this photo was taken. Try not to let these patterns with photographs, and photographers bother you-it might make you crazy, according to the experts!

Then, there is a little known fact that black American’s who police their own neighborhoods are tracked, targeted and assassinated for doing so, as we saw in the 1960’s with Black Panthers and others, and even today; whereas Jews have their own police in the Bronx and other places. In fact, in western nations, only Jews are allowed to police “their own.” SO certainly, we must ask who it is that enforces racial barriers, as well as polices speech, and association around these topics.
While association isn’t illegal yet in western countries, in the paradigm of OGS, association becomes a de facto reason whereby police power can entrap and recruit others into the “community policing scheme.” As anyone who has watched the last few decades, change comes very slowly, if at all, and even then, it is mediated by police power, which acts as a gatekeeper between what is “good,” and what is “bad,”- but all of THAT takes place in the many gray area community policing schemes. Good and evil then, are mediated in the internecine battle ground of hidden strife between police power, and “we the people” in a hidden battleground where every day rights and liberties are pphrased-for some, but not all- as “privileges and immunities” or as “necessary compromises.”
Val’s story of being recruited into community policing
” I was back one time, and all of a sudden they swept up on us. We were in a pretty large group, mostly a bunch of guys just hanging out. They put us up on the wall- you know, spread your legs, keep your hands out of your pockets, like that. I had no problem with it really, you get used to it(….) and I complied. Then, after they went through all of our pockets like that the usual stuff(…), they had a job to do (….).”
“So I told them about my service, and he was kind of, you know, surprised, and he took me into his SUV. He was the watch commander- four stripes…and one loop. He asked me why I was hanging around these guys, and I told him what I just told you-because I believe that the only way to make a difference is to come back here, and, you know, show thee guys that there’s something else. He left me his card, and told me to call, you know if you see something and all that. I stilll have his card on my dashboard.”
What Val is describing is the gray area between our Constitutional rights of assembly and rights of association, and the paradox that gray area has produced for exploitation of “the little guy’s” while corporate interests ranging from Peter Thiel’s conspiracy with Google and Palantir, to psychologies reliance on drug comany definitions of mental health. For some, obviously, torture is ok, as lng as it’s the “bad guys” getting water up there nose, or a few “dangerous mentally ill people” popping a few fix-society-by-drugging-you pills when they complain about being “stalked” or “hunted” or otherwise ham stringed and black bagged by gray area policing schemes.
So, for some policing is purely profitable, but for most, the community policing scheme has produced an opposite effect on our society, and on our liberty, that is itself a civil conspiracy by those in power to force the police to become abusers of the Constitution itself.
Due to the lifting of the Constitutional guarantees of rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness,” via the un-Constitutional gray area policing scheme of organized gang stalking, aka community policing,  and the full blown assault on our rights of privacy, speech, press, assembly, and every single other right that can be inferred from the right of privacy not yet enumerated-we see that a vast encroachment on our rights to “freedom of association” are crimped at the internet switch, or our telephones, and thereafter.
So, yes, this can have a disparate effect on select people, not least of which is to with draw from society that “perpetrates” such day to day abuses.
So- I would like to re-examine a main thesis of Dr. Lorraine Sheridan and David V. James, two academics whose lives have been lived in academia-which is a major social disease of our times, and which can lead to an echo chamber effect within researchers who have spent NO time in the real world-that part of it where whole neighborhoods and cities, and communities are .put on eatch lists, or databased as “gang members,” In fact, their famous study on OGS interviewed “the internet.” take a moment to let that sink in.
Then, note that the term “gang stalking” is termed “group stalking” because those who wrote the study are practicing what amounts to a form of class based, and in this case racist and sexist “gas lighting.” This happens because of the social disconnect between the modern transhumanists and actual, real people from across the spectrum who have lives outside of being mouth-pieces for the prison industrial complex. And not insignificantly, academics notoriously live and dwell in “ivory towers,” which Emil Durkheim discussed when he coined the term “anomie.”
For my purposes, I will note that ivory towers, and the incredible amounts of MIC and AIPAC money consumed by academics, can nearly eradicate human conscience, and any sense of ethics, much less insight into issues as complex as OGS as the fat of the DVIC trough swells their senses to dullness, and glues their eyes shut.
Here below is the definition of “anomie,” and some discussion of it next to a summary of the Sheridan James study-and it MUST be noted that those who are “suffering” OGS are being referred BACK INTO THE POLICING SCHEME by Sheridan and James! Let me know if you start seeing paterns here, because obsession with patterns can indicate ‘apophenia,‘ or far worse, common sense, both of which are dangerous to those who live in Ivory Towers, protected by armed assassins:

an·o·mie
ˈanəˌmē/
noun
noun: anomie; noun: anomy
  1. lack of the usual social or ethical standards in an individual or group.
    “the theory that high-rise architecture leads to anomie in the residents”

And here is the summary of Sheridan and James analyses of OGS as a likely “delusional disorder:”

Group-stalking appears to be delusional in basis, but complainants suffer marked psychological and practical sequelae. This is important in assessment of risk in stalking cases, early referral to psychiatric services and allocation of police resources.

So, Val, who I talked with this morning, reported an attempt to recruit him into the community policing scheme, by a “gang strike force” and offered the hint that cooperation with this as a “normative” duty of his citizenship was expected. Val is neither delusional, nor is he suffering trauma, because unlike others in his peer group, he had a father, he respects his fathers authority, and that father was also a world traveler. His father, as opposed to many others who got swept into high heels policing, such as this example here, encouraged individuality within “normative” association.
And, he imparted to Val a desire to “get out and see the world,” which he did. In doing so, Val, unlike his peer group, Val learned about the “hierarchy of relationships,” and probably a thing or two about kyriarchical paradigms, though he didn’t elaborate it as such.
Instead, he had a grasp on what is anomie, what causes it, and he tries to make a difference, realizing that “all things are NOT created equal.”
Here is a bit more about Durkheim’s anomie:
It was popularized by French sociologist Émile Durkheim in his influential book Suicide (1897). Durkheim never uses the term normlessness; rather, he describes anomie as “derangement”, and “an insatiable will”.[3] Durkheim used the term “the malady of the infinite” because desire without limit can never be fulfilled; it only becomes more intense.
Durkheim, who used the concept to speak of the ways in which an individual’s actions are matched, or integrated, with a system of social norms and practices… anomie is a mismatch, not simply the absence of norms.
I have discussed anomie and organized gang stalking in terms of gang stalking being an unethical, illicit and illegal practice that psychology, and policing and the hidden networks of abusive social power that are wielded by “community policing” and NGO’s and other’s who participate in it, and yet because there is an absence of “norms” or even awareness, and worse, that in a society where power is the goal, that “norms” themselves are unhealthy; as do the methods of enforcing them, and that inequitably.
None of these that act as gatekeepers and interpreters of “what is normal” have any insight whatsoever, as I have noted that hose who have written on the topic are part of the official denial of the practice; and those that do are themselves corrupt to the point of being OGS denialists who use power to enforce corruption- that corruption for powers sake IS the norm; and that OGS “symptoms” are anomie that is experienced bu those who cannot in any way participate in our current society.
Academia is ill suited to deal with OGS in any substantive way- and I suggest it is because they are socially disconnected themselves- that they embody the worst that Durkheim could have imagined. And, it is not surprising that  in Durkheim’s anomie, and our current pervasive police and surveillance state, that in:
a society with too much rigidity and little individual discretion could also produce a kind of anomie… Thus, fatalistic suicide arises when a person is too rule-governed
Note that in anomie, suicide is a possible outcome, and in fact was the subject f Durkheim’s analyses- and in the OGS dialectic,  there is nearly a constant drum beat for victims to do exactly that.
This is not incidental- it is an integral component of the eugenic nature inherent to the entire dialectic, and as such, and in the case of Val, who “got out” we see the disparate police power attempting to enlist him in the aid of becoming a rat, rather than an individual attempting to make a difference by merely setting a good example as an accomplished individual. That he is being subtly encouraged to become an informer as a first step into a wider dialectical power base, and thus, recruited into the gray area.
So, of the many things that this one example provides, I cannot tell you if Val was stalked in a specific database before the event he describes. I cannot tell you if Dataminr, Palantir, Media Sonar, or any of the many other ways that our relationships are tracked and monitored by police and others every day were deployed on him because the public does not have open access to these privatized and illicit databases.
But I can tell you with scientific certainty that he was profiled and targeted; and an attempt was made to recruit him to become an informant in his community. And with certainty, I can tell you that this all happened in a highly targeted environment, whose future has been mapped frequently from birth.

Related Story: Meet the actual, illegal, criminal, organized gangs that work in the Los Angeles policing,and tactical units.

The three Little Pigs and one Big, truly bad in a "good way" Wolf.

“Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.”-the Shirky-Masnik bureaucracy perpetuation principle.

A tale of two Doctors: Moss David Posner versus Lorraine Sheridan, and the author of the resoundingly debunked study on gang stalking.

The Good Doctor Posner
Dr. Moss David Posner was an M.D., and a former Viet Nam draft resistor– a man for whom involuntary conscription into the military forces was both unethical, and a necessary act of resistance, as he was charged with the care of his elderly parents. He made a reluctant decision to become a conscientious objector against the Viet Nam draft.
Like many men of his era,  and men of all era’s where men are seen as cheap dsiposable  labor and military cannon fodder, he was targeted and prosecuted with every niggling and quibbling detail under the laws that existed at the time- and those laws targeting men as potential victims of the sex-biased draft. The local draft board “expressly found that Posner was not a “genuine conscientious objector,” and like all laws that target male labor, male resistance, or male calls for ethical treatment-and that attempt to frame, or conscript men into violence one way or another, Posner lost his bid at resistance (the Domestic Violence Industry is the modern reaction formation from the MIC, and it’s dominists and zionists to men who resisted the draft).
Years later, after service to the state of California working with prisoners in some of the worlds most inhumane prisons, he was fired for treating prisoners humanely. He died in 2011, and was buried in Beth Israel cemetery, just as gang stalking had started to become a main stream topic.
For many decades after his act of civil disobedience, and throughout his prison advocacy efforts, where he quite nefariously advocated for the humane treatment of elderly prisoners-Dr. Posner endured organized gang stalking for decades, and he counseled others who also have been targets of this military-police-community policing-corporate stalking nightmare. He taught coping mechanisms and tactics on how to “fight back” using peaceful means of resistance, and and he is remembered as a man who fought “the good fight.”
Here are two of the several video’s that he and others put on Youtube to preserve his efforts, but there are many more, and you can find tidbits about him around the net:

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q30PZ4tB4jk?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent]
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PkSqg57W_kQ?version=3&rel=1&fs=1&autohide=2&showsearch=0&showinfo=1&iv_load_policy=1&wmode=transparent]

 
In order to understand the exact nature of how the discrediting and disinformation smear campaigns work in regards to gang stalking, here is a screen capture of a Google search for Dr. Posner’s video’s, with Google autocomplete utilizing “suggestions,” which any hypnotist, propagandist, or other influence operator will recognize by its colloquial name, which is “mind control:

 
Also keep in mind that Google, which  keeps a “back door” open on all Google searches, routing everything you search directly to the NSA and the CIA, but also to the FBI and some 14 other intelligence agencies-and which have notoriously co-opted the communication channels via back door searches in real time of all Google data. And, Google is basically a CIA creation to begin with. Wait a minute: did the CIA create Google, or did Google create the CIA?  In a word of smoke and mirrors, sometimes the cut outs look identical.
There literally is no difference between them now, except for the black bag jobs, and the assassinations and high level targeting of…consumers, of course. OH-and the physical as opposed to mental torture. Oh and the budgets- Google makes WAAAAAAY more money. Oh wait…..
Related Story: How the CIA built Google
“They” see gangs of deep state parrots, crisis PR professionals, and psychologists who are complicit with the Military Industrial Complex and the Carceral State.
Those Other doctors
In the summer of 2016, as the American election was in full swing, and the partisan MSM as revealed as a mere tool of deep state propaganda dissemination rather than anything even remotely close to being the heralded “fourth estate” that championed the will of the people, a string of mass shootings took place across America, and across the world. Lie most staged terror events that are eventually traced to deep state interests, Israel, or one of many international banking cartels, the summer of 2016 was unique in that the collusion between deep state narrative and actual homicides was linked irrevocably.
The issue of “targeted individuals” who are victims of organized gang stalking was linked as well. because some of these mass shooters had contacted online resource and support groups to attempt to get the help that modern psychiatry will not, and cannot provide to TI’s, chiefly because psychiatry is in bed with the Domestic Violence Industrial Complex (DVIC), the Military Industrial Complex (MIC), and the Prison Industrial Complex (PIC), all of which are also involved heavily with the drug companies and the mega-pharmaceutical interests.
What a difference a few decades make. In the era of Dr Posner resisting the draft and today, deep state involved mass shootings have swelled, as has the PIC and endless war. And one important detail that cannot be missed is how deeply in bed all of the above named interests are with both psychiatry and Big Pharma, but also with main stream media(MSM), which is little more than a propaganda dispensary.
It is here where the internet became for some an outlet of alternative news, and hard hitting social critique that filled a gap where the left-which once spoke for prison refrm and humane treatment-slid to the right, and now spoke for endless war and incarceration rates that are at record levels.
Through fear inducement and morality panics, the old left had become the neo-con new right, and they began to craft very misanthropic rationalizations and trans-humanist messages in Kantian “greater good” packages.  And all of this with “official sources” backing deep state social engineering schemes, one of which was gun control through the memetic that “targeted individuals” are dangerous.
It was at this un-American juncture where the New York Times met the Canadian “journalist” Mike McPhate, and his cohabitants in deep state propaganda factories, Australian psychologist and speech pathologist Dr. Loraine Sheridan, both of whom willingly and not-naively played along with disinformation and discrediting of TI’s and other vulnerable individuals-but also broad brushed all of those who experience abuse buy hidden surveillance state players into the category of mentally ill.
Like much of the NYT’s recent propaganda work, Sheridan was the perfect fit for their “official source,” and no doubt she has been handsomely rewarded since she forever juxtaposed junk science with mental health in a way that foreshadowed the death of the reputability of both journalism and psychiatry .
The infamous article was ominously billed as

United States of Paranoia: They See Gangs of Stalkers

Here, below, is the clown prince of information mediation about gang stalking via the discrediting narrative His name is Mike McPhate, and this picture is from his Twitter account (which was curiously silent just after the backlash from this dubious piece). I suggest you contact him-frequently-and ask him about gang stalking. And-contact him from an anonymous email on “the internet,” because the study that he supports believes in anonymous input.
 

mike mcphate
Mike McPhate of the NYT wrote the piece that quoted Sheridan: Deep State Stooge, or just another Mockingbird in the flock? Either way, @mcphate is the poster child for the question: is the MSM just another MIC tool of social control and fake news?

And here below, once again  is the “official source” and “only person to ever do a study on gang stalking that was quoted all over the internet as an authority on organized gang stalking- his handmaiden in propaganda dispensing, Dr. Lorraine Sheridan (not including Posner, Dietrich, or dozens of others who have done studes on this EXACT toic, and several related topics-which McPhate did not. Such is the nature of journalism today-who needs a fact checker-or facts for that matter, when the deep state is running propaganda into your mouth and out your ass?)
Without irony, these two concocted a narrative of “what is organized gang stalking” by consulting an arguably mentally ill person, Timothy Trespas*, and then, adding to their “sources” the results of Sheridan’s study where she literally, and without irony, interviewed “the internet” for her data, without speaking to any real person, in person. Let that sink in a bit, and get back to me. I thou, Ich Du and all that, right Dr. Wood?
But one of the main themes from all these “official sources” seems to be that shutting down un-mediated, un-infiltrated, and un-fileted discussion by victims of OGS is a necessary step to understanding the dialogue-and that by isolating individuals who have been gang staked, problem solved!
Even and especially, one of the few others who have attempted to muddy the dialectic of OGS, Elizabeth E. Dietrich, also recommends “isolation” of “these” individuals, because conversation-words- are somehow dangerous. Not without irony or coincidence, she is widely quoted by those in the gay community, and those who believe that every Twitter post have a “trigger warning.” Speech, it seems, is a threat to some people-especially those who have harmed others with junk science.
But these people are not simply attempting to stifle free expression, they are also trying to control a narrative, which has historically been the work of the CIA itself, and even the New York Times as a propaganda outlet for the CIA to take a leak.
As one example of how tightly controlled and diabolical all of this narrative control is, one must look at Sheridan’s partner in crime that co-authored the study, David V. James, who studies stalking, and authors pieces that indicate words are a threat to him as well, and all of their work, one notices almost immediately, is tailored to the current terrorism and “threat assessment” funding sources, and then, threat assessments of critical opinions of their ‘work.’ And all of that without a blink of irony, as these two perpetrated a major hoax where words became threats, and actual victims discredited.
To whit, here is some titles of his work:

The Fixated Threat Assessment Centre: preventing harm and facilitating care

http://www.tandfonline.com/author/James%2C+David+V
 
And this one below, a classic form of pre-emptive CYA when one of his botched ‘patients’ gets wise to operand conditioning, or other forms of the classic Martha Mitchell type official pinion gas-lighting that is prevalent in creationist communities, or police states and third world dictatorships, as well as neo-con artists that finance navel gazing junk science:

Which brings me back to Dr. Lorraine Sheridan, and the difference between Dr. Moss David Posner, activist, prisoners rights advocate, and Viet Nam War era draft resistor: the main targets of MIC stalking are always peace activists, dissidents, and others who challenge the lockup on “narrative.” Or who use “bad words,” that challenge these other coward directly.
While victims of OGS range from whistle blowers like decorated intelligence officer William Binney, to common victims of real estate developers and the llocal police such as Timothy Trespas, what any and all ‘studies’ of gang stalking indicate is that the pro’s want to keep a lid on it in the least, and to stop discussion about it entirely without their “divine intervention”. Cuz, bad words hurt waaaay more than bombs on babies heads in Syria, or Gaza; and certainly woods hertz way more to the sensitives in the trigger warning crowd.
Here is Dr. Sheridan’s work, co-authored by James:
Then, adding to the “BDS is Hitler!!” echo chamber that these academics are trapped in, there is Elizabeth E. Dietrich, who comes to similar conclusions-that OGS claimants are dangerous, and should be isolated. Without doubt, all these ‘official sources’ agree-isolation, and then, defamation via diagnoses is the key to containing the narrative, and that these ‘crazies’ must be silenced.
Where have we heard THAT before? Why, nowhere other than the famous case of Martha Mitchell, who helped break the Nixon Watergate scandal, when her psychologist called her delusional. This is called “the Martha Mitchell effect” which is a close cousin of “the Streisand Effect.”
Here is Dietrich’s easily discredited work-maybe you can help her, and  make her ‘internet famous’ and maybe, explain her flawed, kind of dangerous reasoning about isolating individuals (which has NEVER been shown to be a positive therapy):Gang stalking : internet connectivity as an emerging mental health concern Elizabeth E. Dietrich
(UPDATE 11-20-2019: I have removed the link to Elizabeth “Liz ” Dietrichs paper because some unscrupulous POS had used an automated likn -bot to cluck the link to her paper once per day, and I suspect that the unscrupulous cunt that did that was none other than….well, you know who it was. )
Is it just me, or are all these Nazi sounding names on these psychologists a coincidence? Maybe I am losing my mind, with a bit of help, because no psychologist I have ever known would or ethically could agree that silencing victims-or isolating actually mentally ill people- is EVER a good idea.
These names: David V. James, and Lorraine Sheridan, and Elizabeth Dietrich, should forever exist next to names like the Nazi Joseph Mengele, and the CIA’s LSD doctor, Sidney Gottlieb, and the CIA torture psychologists James Mitchell and Bruce Jesssen who made 81 million pushing junk science, phony psychology, and human rights abuses.
These diabolical MIC people and those who tailor their opinions for maximum police state dollars are really are practicing what has historically been called “punitive psychology” in many cases.  Not that some claimants aren’t possibly “ill,” but also, many certainly are not, such as the cases where whistle blowers and reporters  like Jessica Miles, and many others describe the same exact things as victims of OGS; or where low level politicians like Bob Deis in Stockton CA are stalked and harassed by the police union.
And, the practices that are described by victims are certainly the kind of thing that can cause stress, and PTSD, as well as what appear to be delusions because the “good guys” are in fact one and the same as those who harass them. And when you add official source gas-lighting from the ‘healing professions’, certainly that can’t help.
So if anything in the data is clear, it is that psychologists are obsessed with narrative control, and discrediting those who claim they have been gang stalked.
SO, any legitimate researcher, civil or criminal defense lawyer or other advocate that seeks to understand a targeted individuals complaint for a lawsuit about organized gang stalking, one must factor in the ‘suppression mechanism” that some psychologists are using.
But Timothy Trespas, who was featured prominently on the cover of the story, and who looks like a guy who has spent one two many nights on skid row, coincidentally lives in one of New York’s gentrifying communities, where there is a high correlation between the likelihood of low income people being harassed and targeted with gang stalking, and property developers who hire teams of armed thugs to push the homeless out of these areas-as their is a connection between OGS and real estate.

While the most famous case of real estate related gang stalking could well be the case of Bob Deis in Stockton Ca, happened in Stockton CA, where  the police and fire unions bought the house next to him and waged a war of attrition after Deis suggested cuts to pension funds, there are many others.
I could go on, but for any genuine researcher of organized gang stalking, the tale of two doctors should be instructive. One man with ethics, a conscience, and a cause; a bunch of others like the many heads of a Hydra, or Medusa herself, squawking  lies and disinformation like panhandlers and hucksters with their paws so deep in the deep state that it is nearly impossible to refute them properly.
But if we put on our thinking caps, and disconnect the wires from these ‘offical sources’ I am sure there’s hope for TI’s-once we locate the source of their gas-lighting (which comes from official sources) and their “electronic harassment” (which is what we know today as the total surveillance state and its constant wiretapping of ALL citizens, hooked in with community policing that has so far existed in hidden form.) Then, we can clealy see that the only “implants” involved are these people, planted like a CIA leak in mainstream media.